|Page 1 of 46:||          |
|Index||454 reviews in total|
For any forty-something pseudo-Boomer like myself, who grew up and
learned how to read with the Seuss books, well, this film is an insult.
There is NO way I'd let my kids watch this crude, stupid garbage. My
jaw dropped scene, after scene, after scene. What Hollywood "suit" OK'd
this thing? It is mean-spirited, raunchy and ugly. My little nephew
started CRYING about thirty minutes into the film. Characters burp,
curse, urinate, pick their nose, expose their posterior, etc.
I realize that young viewers don't understand the significance of Dr. Seuss, and the change his many children's books brought to the world of publishing.
This film is the antithesis of what he had in mind, and I am furious with his family for allowing this Hollywood monster to be unleashed.
PARENTS - don't let your kids think that this is what the Seuss universe is all about.....buy them the books, and skip these LAME films. Or, show them the "Horton Hears a Who" animated classic from the 70s.
Universal & Dreamworks, you have a really ANGRY viewer. Stop allowing inexperienced PRODUCTION DESIGNERS to direct your big-budget films. You could have had a classic on your hands, but instead you have the honor of having spent millions on one of IMDb's "Bottom 100 Films."
One of the worst films I have ever seen.
This movie isn't entertaining. It's that simple. The jokes aren't funny,
acting by the main character is terrible. Dr. Seuss is spinning in his
grave. The makers of this movie took a childrens book, threw in
sexual innuendo, and stuck it on a screen near you.
The movie plays itself out with joke-a-minute style. Unfortunately, none of the jokes are funny. Both the children's humor and the adult humor fails to please. Which brings up another point. Adult humor has no place in this movie. I have no problem with adult humor, but it shouldn't be in a Dr. Seuss movie. Not only was the adult humor unfunny, it did nothing more than cause confusion for the kids in the audience. Not to mention the explanations parents have to come up with when kids question the jokes.
Mike Myers is just bad in this movie. I had to go home and watch my collection of his movies and a few old Saturday Night Live episodes to reassure myself of his comedic ability. He completely failed to give the Cat a unique personality. If you're looking to see Myers perform half of his different SNL and movie characters in the period of an hour and a half, all while wearing a hideous cat suit, then watch this movie.
If you do get stuck seeing this atrocity, there are some redeeming points that will make it bearable for you. The sets are beautiful, almost a perfect rendition of what most people think a three-dimensional version of the Seuss universe would look like. Also, the performances of Dakota Fanning and Spencer Breslin are applaudable. Had they not been required to share the spotlight with that ungodly cat, the movie could've passed for good. Oh, and there's a scene where Myers is abused by a group of children, which provides some comic relief. Unfortunately, the Cat survives this incident to abuse the audience for another twenty minutes.
Avoid this movie if you can. Some parents will have to be dragged to it because their kids are more concerned with watching the Cat bounce around for 90 minutes than they are with seeing a good movie. Oh, to be young and naive again...
There is no way to avoid a comparison between The Cat in the Hat and
The Grinch Who Stole Christmas, so let's get that part out of the way.
First of all, let me start by saying that I think Grinch was an
underrated and unappreciated film. Cat was... well, just awful.
Jim Carey was cast because he is a brilliant physical comedian, and fearlessly commits to over the top, outrageous characters. Mike Myers fell back on his old bag of tricks.
Why, why, why Mike Myers?? The kids could care less, and the Austin Powers demographic isn't going to spy this film. So, what was the studio thinking?
The Cat was also apparently related to Linda Richmond. Can we talk? Why a New York Accent? Not entirely consistent with anything Dr. Seuss has ever written. Myers was even allowed to sneak in his Scottish shtick. I wonder how many different voices the director and the studio tried to edit out of before they just gave in and said "as long as you don't say fahklempt', you can keep the accents." Meyers never seemed to find any sort of comfort, either with the costume, make-up, or dialogue.
The jokes, what few there were, were crude and age inappropriate. When Myers picks up a garden hoe and delivers to the camera: "dirty ho", everything but the rim shot was missing, and even that wouldn't have helped.
The same folks who created 'Whoville', clearly had a hand in the creation of the town and the houses in 'Cat'. The sets and props were very appealing, giving the viewer a much needed distraction from the bad writing, direction, and Myers.
There was some fun to be had with Alec Baldwin and Kelly Preston. Dakota Fanning was the only actor who seemed to be aware she was in a movie based on a Dr. Seuss classic, and stayed true to the genre.
Call the SPCA. This Cat should be neutered and never be allowed to reproduce again. Please, please, no sequel.
Film critics of the world, I apologize. It is your job to give advice to
the moviegoing public so that they can wisely choose what to spend money
But I ignored your advice and I have been deeply hurt. However, my
decision to see "The Cat in the Hat" wasn't made haphazardly. You see,
three years ago all of you critics said that we should all avoid the
"calamity" known as "How the Grinch Stole Christmas". Then some friends
mine took me to see it and it turned out to be a colorful, funny and
hypnotic yuletide treat. So when the critics unleashed their fury against
"The Cat in the Hat", another big budget Seuss update with a big name star
in the title role, I thought that it must be the same old song. How wrong
For five whole minutes I thought I was in the clear. The opening credits are clever, the kids are charming and the production values are top notch. Then the cat showed up. There are many problems from this point on, but the biggest one was the woeful miscasting of Mike Myers. Where "The Grinch" was saved by the inspired casting of Jim Carrey, "The Cat" was destroyed by Myers. He can be very funny when his energies are applied where they belong, comic sketches. Every movie he's made that was truly funny was really just a feature length comedy sketch, from "Wayne's World" to "Austin Powers". So he tries to do the same thing here, it's just that these comedy sketches are more like the stuff that they stick at the end of SNL, not funny, just painful. Not that the writers helped him out any. After the charming prologue the movie turns into an hour of repulsive bodily humor gags, poorly timed pratfalls and insultingly stunted attempts at hip humor. This movie was the most disheartening cinematic experience I have ever had. Period. So much talent and work went into something so vile. I know that the adult stars of this movie will be relatively unscathed by this mess, I just hope that the wonderful Spencer Breslin and Dakota Fanning will get more chances to show their charms in far better movies. If you are a parent, please avoid this like the plague. With movies like "Elf" and "Brother Bear" currently in theaters, you have far better choices.
Don't get me wrong, I assumed this movie would be stupid, I honestly
did, I gave it an incredibly low standard to meet. The only reason I
even saw it was because there were a bunch of girls going (different
story for a different time). As I began watching I noticed something,
this film was terrible. Now there are two types of terrible, there's
Freddy vs. Jason terrible, where you and your friends sit back and
laugh and joke about how terrible it is, and then there is a movie like
this. The Cat in The Hat failed to create even a momentary interest in
me. As I watched the first bit of it not only was I bored senseless,
but I felt as though I had in some way been violated by the
horrendousness of said movie. Mike Myers is usually brilliant, I love
the majority of his work, but something in this movie didn't click. One
of the things that the director/producers/writers/whatevers changed was
that they refused to use any of the colors of the original book (red,
black, white) on any character but the Cat. Coincidentally or not, they
also refused to capture any of the original (and i hate to use this
word, but it fits) zaniness of the original. The book was like an Ice
Cream Sunday, colorful and delicious, and the movie was about as bland
and hard to swallow as sawdust.
Avoid this like a leprous prostitute.
If you liked the Grinch movie... go watch that again, because this was no where near as good a Seussian movie translation. Mike Myers' Cat is probably the most annoying character to "grace" the screen in recent times. His voice/accent is terrible and he laughs at his own jokes with an awful weasing sound, which is about the only laughing I heard at the theater. Not even the kids liked this one folks, and kids laugh at anything now. Save your money and go see Looney Tunes: Back in Action if you're really looking for a fun holiday family movie.
This movie was physically painful to sit through, maybe because (like
many people my age, and younger) I grew up with Dr. Seuss and loved his
books - funny, clever, whimsical and subversive at the same time. "The
Cat in the Hat" sucks all of the interest and spark out of the story,
and Mike Myer's performance as the Cat is mostly bewildering. Why the
Borscht Belt accent, the unfunny patter, the inappropriate jokes, the
charmless costume? I had to go back and re-read the books to see the
real problem: the books are SIMPLE. This movie is OVERBLOWN and way,
way too long.
You don't expect every kids' movie to be Toy Story or The Iron Giant, but this one set a new low. How could Mike Myers need the money?
The only good thing about this unfunny dreck is that I didn't have to
pay for it. I saw it for free at college. And if a college student
can't find humor in something that was free, it's hopeless.
Stale acting and poor jokes cannot be masked by an excellent, yet bewildering set design (that goes out of its way to market Volkswagon Beetles). I don't know what Michaels Myers was doing in this movie, but I have never seen anything more depressing. This was nothing more than a blatant effort to capitalize on the previous success of the Grinch (which has its opponents, but I enjoyed it very much). It's difficult not to sit through this failure and wonder what better projects were passed over to fund it.
You want a funny Seuss adaptation? Go with the Grinch.
Audrey, I know you truly cherish your husband Ted's memory but PLEASE do his
legacy justice and heed his wishes. Dr. Seuss refused to license his
characters during his lifetime for a very good reason. We beg of you to
please stop cashing in on his stories, images, fantasies and characters.
They are getting disemboweled by the powers that be of Hollywood and
Broadway. The children of tomorrow will be stuck with these histrionic and
grotesque interpretations that will forever pollute the loving warmth and
innocence of his books.
It is indeed your property to do with as you wish. I just wish you would listen to the advice of others for a little while. Save what is left of Dr. Seuss. Thank you.
The Cat in the Hat is just a slap in the face film. Mike Myers as The
Cat in the Hat is downright not funny and Mike Myers could not have
been any worse. This is his worst film he has ever been in. The acting
and the story was just terrible. I mean how could they make the most
beloved stories by Dr. Seuss be made into film and being one of the
worst films of all-time and such a disappointment. I couldn't have seen
a more worst film than this besides, maybe Baby Geniuses. But this film
is just so bad I can't even describe how badly they made this film. Bo
Welch should be fired or the writer should.
Hedeen's outlook: 0/10 No Stars F
|Page 1 of 46:||          |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Awards||External reviews||Parents Guide|
|Official site||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|