Reviews & Ratings for
Final Destination 2 More at IMDbPro »

Filter:

Best Chronological Prolific Authors Loved It Hated It Hide Spoilers:

Page 1 of 46:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Index

455 reviews in total

---

34 out of 54 people found the following review useful:
Shock Value -- 7 (Good Flick), 18 July 2005

Author: jimboduck

You know that feeling you get when you're watching America's Funniest Home Videos and the oblivious son hits his hapless father in the crotch with an aluminum bat? It gets a quick reaction, like, ooh, I feel your pain man. FINAL DESTINATION 2 is a 90 minute or so string of those painful shots, as each character one by one meets an unfortunate death by household appliance. Bodies are slammed by trucks, heads are impaled, and limbs fly through the air. When one of the characters dies when her car's airbag explodes out of nowhere, I blurted "Yeah! Wow, did they do that??? Yeah, they DID do that. Right on!" Although the film has a very serious atmosphere about it, what with the creepy score and people sincerely freaking out and everything, it still retains a campy humor about it buried beneath its high-budget exterior. Many movies would shy away from smashing up plastic ketchup-filled dummies, opting instead to avoid the gore. Not FINAL DESTINATION 2! This movie is an honest approach to movie-making, hearkening back to the day when you got together with friends and said, "Okay, in this scene we cut to the dummy falling off the building, it's run over by a Mack truck, and it splatters chunks of blood all over that Oldsmobile over there." As for the premise behind FINAL DESTINATION 2, how do I put it into words? A.J. Cook has premonitions that people died in a nasty pileup on the highway. Thing is, this never happened. And ... she continues to have premonitions that those same people will die in due time. Those people eventually die. Did I get that right? The universal law of nature is that, well, Death sometimes misses its mark and has to fix its mistakes (which usually involves electrical equipment getting wet and other freak accidents of home improvement). If this all sounds convoluted, watch the movie. You'll see what I mean. The premise of FINAL DESTINATION 2, as much potential as it might have, doesn't make much sense and is pretty hokey, but if you medicate your inquisitive mind with heavy sedatives, you'll be able to look past the flimsy premise and enjoy the movie. I'm definitely looking forward to a Final Destination 3.

---

41 out of 68 people found the following review useful:
Creepier, gorier and better put together than the first, 31 January 2003

Author: Agent10 from Tucson, AZ

I was apprehensive when I didn't Devon Sawa in the credits or this movie, but then again, this film didn't really need him. This wasn't a sequel in the purest sense, but the film makers created methods to link all of the new characters to the old ones, creating a flow which wasn't too jarring. Unfortunately, the dialogue was the only real stinker in this film. The pretentiousness, the obviousness and the downright hokiness that came out of the mouths of the characters really detracted from the tension, turning their performances into a bunch of acting class rejects. But I digress. The only thing people are looking for is how Death will get the new set of escape artists. The sheer surprise and execution of the executions made me jump and crawl. In such a desensitized world we live in, being able to jump out of my seat means this film is a winner.

---

14 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
Poorly Written And Not Very Scary Teens-In-Peril Horror Yarn, 22 May 2005

Author: ShootingShark from Dundee, Scotland

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

A teenage girl has a premonition of a horrific traffic accident and blocks an entry road with her car. The accident happens, but all the people she prevented from entering the road, including herself, seem cursed to die to by violent freak accidents.

This is a very stupid movie whose only purpose is to set the characters up to get smooshed in bizarre and icky circumstances. We have people impaled in the head by ladders, beheaded by elevators, blown up at barbecues, sliced up by netting, and so on. Call me old-fashioned, but I like a movie to have a plot and characters I can get interested in. The cast of catalogue-models are uniformly wooden, except for the ever-reliable Todd, who provides a few minutes' sinister grace. The digital effects for the short-and-sudden deaths are quite imaginative but not really very interesting or plausible - people just liquefy into computer goo and they're over in about ten frames. I much prefer the good old prosthetic latex approach, which is gorier and more realistic (see Scanners, The Fury, Day Of The Dead, Robocop, etc). There is a nice score by Shirley Walker which creates some suspense, the opening highway pile-up has some great stuntwork and most of the characters have horror-film director names. However, this indicates the golden rule of film-making - if what's on the page is lame, the movie will always be a turkey.

---

7 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
More Deaths, Less Quality, 2 October 2006

Author: marcus_stokes2000 from Italy

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

*Final Destination SPOILERS*

When a young woman (A.J. Cook) has a premonition on her road trip that ended up killing her friends & the young woman was saved by a police officer (Micheal Landes). While some people have died in the huge car accident. The young woman managed to save the lives of other people (Jonathan Cherry, Terrence T.C. Carson, Keegan Connor Tracy, Lynda Boyd, James N. Kirk, Sarah Carter). But Death wants them back, and the only person who can help them try to survive is the last survivor from flight 180 (Ali Larter), but will her help be enough?

Final Destination 2 doesn't work; first, we get a heroine who does very little, secondly the story is quickly forgotten for the death scenes, thirdly the plot twist (the survivors from Flight 180 saved the new survivors from the deaths they were destined to) leaves quite the hole, as we'll never know if the survivors who died before this revelation were part of that or not, fourthly, if it's a sequel, where is the theme from the original?, and lastly, the ending is cheap and stupid.

As a horror movie, it deserves a 6/10 for effort, however, compared to the first and the third, gets a 2/10.

I'll guess I'll be fair...

Final Destination 2: 5/10.

---

31 out of 55 people found the following review useful:
Horror makes way for humour and gore, 30 July 2004

Author: stevieheuge from Glasgow, Scotland

Final Destination was a decent film. Original idea, pretty suspenseful directing, and some death scenes that while inventive, were creepy to boot.

This time around, with a new director and a new approach, we get a very different film. The first movie was a horror - this is'nt. In fact its not even a thriller, its basically a load of silly dialogue acted out badly by very silly actors, with some dead people in-between.

The thing is, that doesn't make the movie all that bad - The deaths and the gore are the pay-offs, and great care has been taken to ensure that all of them would get a great reaction from a packed cinema theatre.

The car pile up at the start is bone crunchingly violent, with buckets of blood being splattered everywhere - and its very entertaining stuff.

Various methods have been used here for the subsequent death scenes (CG, green screens, puppets, models) but it all cuts together very well, and most of the deaths would have your average cinema audience whooping with crimson tainted delight...

The impressive trickery used in killing off each character, intertwining supsense and surprise, is so effective, that many people will come away from this film forgetting that there wasn't actually anything else good about it - apart from the eye candy of course.

Worth a watch - you'll recoil in disgust and laugh more than you would watching most movies of this genre. try to catch it before you die.

---

36 out of 65 people found the following review useful:
Very entertaining and better than the original, 17 May 2005

Author: christian123

Final Destination 2 is a very entertaining sequel and while the story is weaker then the first, the deaths are better. Kimberly (A.J. Cook) is a normal teen who is taking a road trip to Daytona with her 3 friends. She has a vision of a horrific traffic accident and so she blocks some of the cars from entering the highway. Sure enough they vision comes true and they have all just escaped death. Kim visits Clear Rivers (Ali Larter), the only survivor of Flight 180 who is convinced to help out the survivors of Route 23. Alex, who died between films, had been hit in the head with a falling brick. Kim, Clear and other strangers that are left must try to stick together and cheat Death again. The plot may sound stupid but its actually not all that bad. The story may not make sense at some scenes and the story is filled with holes. Its hard though to write a good story for something like this and I think they gave a good effort. The first film was very good and a lot of fun to watch. The sequel is even more fun to watch, even if it does get silly at times. Its better to watch the original before watching this so it would be easier to follow the story. Most horror films today are to silly to take serious and that's why you shouldn't really approach this one expecting an Oscar quality film. The acting was decent with the best being Ali Larter. She and Tony Todd are the only stars returning from the original film. A.J. Cook plays Kimberly and she does an okay job. The rest of the cast are mostly unknowns and aren't worth mentioning. David R. Ellis directs and he does really good job. He also directed the fast paced and exciting Cellular. The film is very gory and also very fun. Final Destination 2 was very creative when it came to killing off the characters. A couple of the death scenes do go over the top though the film delivers the goods for the most part. The film is only 90 minutes long so it's a quick film to watch. The movie also never gets boring as its always entertaining. I wouldn't say the film is to scary but there are some moments that may leave with fear. In the end, this is a very good sequel, that's better then the original and worth checking out. I just hope Final Destination 3 is just as good or even better then this film. Rating 7.8/10, check this film out as its very entertaining.

---

10 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Freak accident, 4 February 2006

Author: Syngeror from Finland

Final Destination II is slightly better (and bigger) than the first one. And now there's already a third sequel ready, which is in fact quite OK. I'm one of those sickos who like the idea of people dying in a freakish ways and this is where Final Destination films deliver.

This flick contains the most over the top car crash scene in film history. The whole sequence got me gasping. The credits go to the special-effects crew! All of the 3 films contain lots of gore, inventive deaths and good effects.

Overall the film is about people dying one after another in a freakish accidents. Funny, entertaining and bloody. The comedic touch softens the gore a bit. And you just can't take it seriously, when "death" lures it's victims to bizarre and deadly situations.

Hopefully the third installment is the last, this isn't that good.

The third entailment contains 2 versions of the film on the DVD. On the bonus version you can decide who dies and it's quite fun. For the whole trilogy I give 7 and a 1/2 out of 10. If you gotta go, go with a style!

---

12 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
Excellent sequel a great thriller, 15 February 2004

Author: Tom Smith from New Hampshire

If you liked "Final Destination" you'll really like "Final Destination 2". I remember the commercials for this one and was afraid they were ruining the thrill of this sequel. So I didn't see it in the theaters. I was wrong. If anything the commercials used the film footage to mislead you, so that the surprises were even greater.

For what "Final Destination 2" is trying to do, they do it perfectly. From the script, to the acting to the directing. This was a tough score for me. While it doesn't rate up there with the the best films of all time. In every aspect, they perfectly accomplished what they set out to do. It's a Thriller, full of a lot of unpredictable turns and surprises, and with great action. They wasted no time, the movie starts, they get right into it, and it keeps on at pretty much full pace until it's done.

---

3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Bad sequel, 22 March 2006

Author: dickbogers from Netherlands

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

At first I was very positive about this movie. Since the first part was pretty good, I thought I could expect a nice movie from this one too. But, as I should have known, this was a bad sequel as well. Bad dialogs, a lot of errors in the story, and even more stupid gore. Come on, a barbed wired fence that just flies trough a guy's body? Are you serious :S After watching it for an hour and somewhat minutes they find the ultimate solution to get death of their back and be happy forever. Even I could have thought up a better story. The cast wasn't very good either, a lot of inexperienced actors who just didn't know how to act in a situation like this, it looked like a really low budget film (don't know if it actually is :P) I hope they did better in FD3, and did not just made a clone of the other parts (only worse :P) and linked it to Final Destination 1 a bit.

---

4 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
One of the worst sequels ever!, 19 January 2006
Author: Christopher Smith

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

It is common knowledge that sequels are almost never as good as their originals. However, few look as bad when compared to their originals as FINAL DESTINATION 2 does. The first FINAL DESTINATION was an intelligent and well done horror flick that had an interesting premise, clever death sequences, and good performances. None of that is to be found in this sequel. This one is all about horrible acting, atrocious writing (listening to the dialog is painful to the ears), and lazy directing. *SPOILER* But my biggest beef with the flick comes with the fact that Clear is killed off towards the finale. I have often said that it is a clear indication (no pun intended) that a series is in desperate need of retooling when all or most the main characters from the original are dead. Hopefully FINAL DESTINATION 3 won't be as stale. 3/10

---

---

Page 1 of 46:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Add another review

---

Related Links

Plot summary	Plot synopsis	Ratings
Awards	Newsgroup reviews	External reviews
Parents Guide	Official site	Plot keywords
Main details	Your user reviews	Your vote history