| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 14 reviews in total |
47 out of 48 people found the following review useful:
My Kid Set Me Up to Watch This Documentary, 16 March 2004
![]()
Author:
Ralph Michael Stein (riglltesobxs@mailinator.com) from New York, N.Y.
My fourteen-year-old boy is very much into computers (that's hardly
surprising). This summer he'll be back with the Johns Hopkins University
Center for Talented Youth program studying - I don't really know exactly
what. It's some kind of computer program, I just sign the
check.
He's very much both anti-Microsoft and anti-Bill Gates. He's also quite
pro-Linux, the emblem of the "Open Source" movement whose adherents regard
its underlying virtues with a devotion normally reserved by the religious
for the icons of their faiths.
So he wanted me to see "Revolution OS," a documentary about the Linux
operating system and the open source movement that spawned the increasingly
important competitor to both Microsoft and Apple.
This is a very interesting documentary which I, clueless as to the secrets
of operating systems, readily understood. I watched it with the barest
comprehension of Linux or the philosophy underlying the open source
concept.
Much credit to the filmmaker for not only explaining the seminal value of
open source - the commitment to free interchange of ideas with minimal
incorporation of legal protection for intellectual property - but for also
succinctly allowing contrasting values and competing personalities screen
time. This documentary is a very concise but excellent guide for the
uninitiated into a world usually the arcane preserve of specialists most
adept at talking to each other.
The Open Source movement is a work in progress threatened by the real risk
of those benefiting from openness legally protecting their own "added value"
and thus, in a sense, betraying their benefactors. Several of those
interviewed pursue their open source values almost as a creed, the
commitment to computers taking the place of more traditional
dogma.
Anyone interested in a major intellectual counterpoint to the dominance of
both Microsoft and the role of law in insuring proprietary benefits for
innovators should see "Revolution OS": no manual required.
8/10.
15 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
I know nothing about computers (and if you don't either, this film is very interesting), 24 November 2003
![]()
Author:
Sandcat2004 from Seattle
Given that I have no knowledge about computers nor how they operate, I found
this film very informative with some basic descriptions of the free software
and
open source movement (which have some ideological differences... not that I
had ever heard of either). The film recounts the historical evolution (and
subsequent "revolution") through a series of interviews of key players in
the
development of the Linux operating systems for computers. If you know
nothing
about computers, do not assume that you will find this film uninteresting.
In fact,
although dense with information, the narrative is straight forward and
almost all
the information is explained for the ignorant like myself.
There are some relatively small problems with the film, mainly near its
conclusion. The finale of the film does not address the disparity between
the
commercial aspects of open source in the 90's and the long-term growth of
the
philosophy and practical applications. I assume that the Linux OS and the
idea
of open source did not lose steam after the dot-com stock bubble burst.
Given I
don't work around computers, besides for internet research and writing, I
must
make that assumption. Yet the film implies, for those of us who are
ignorant, that
perhaps it was derailed by the economic problems. But given the stable
foundation of the idea that the film describes, I cannot imagine that
commercial
problems would have a long-term affect.
The film ultimately is a nicely constructed lesson for those of us out of
the loop. I
recommend it to anyone who is interested in watching documentaries or
learning interesting kernels about our world. In terms of emotional
involvement,
the way the director juxtaposes the interviewees creates interesting moments
of
humor (there seems to be a jockeying for credit happening within the
community
of programmers). Where the credit belongs and how people have used this
ideology (which it is according to one of the founders of GNU-- see the
movie, it
will all be explained) to launch practical business operations creates a
nice
tension. Of course, there are some mentions of Microsoft's relationship,
which is
adversarial, to the Linux OS that can help the laymen get emotionally
involved
in the story by means of creating a hero (the Open Source community) and a
villain (Microsoft). Of course the Microsoft way of business (proprietary
rights) is
never really given voice with the exception involving an over-dramatized
reading of argumentative letter written in the 70's by Bill Gates (given I
am
originally from Seattle and some of my friends work for the giant, it seems
a little
one-sided).
Again, if you have no knowledge of computers, do not avoid this film for
that
reason alone. If you are on this site, you have an interest in films. You
can at
least appreciate it as a nicely constructed documentary (although not
excellent)
that will illuminate a part of recent history.
A small note: although there are some mannerisms of the interviewees that
can
be regarded as stereotypical regarding computer enthusiasts, they are some
of
the more well-spoken interviewees I have seen in film in
awhile.
16 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
Great view into the early history of Linux and Open Source, 29 January 2005
![]()
Author:
mmoneta from United States
While this documentary only covers the early period of Linux and Open
Source history (up to about 2000), it provides great insights into how
the software industry got itself where it is today.
Of course, since 2000, Linux has made great strides into the server
market, the desktop market (even Walmart sells computers with Linux
now), and the embedded market. Cell phones, Palm PDAs, cameras,
camcorders, cars, networking, Tivo, cable boxes, etc. all run by Linux
now (or soon will, according to announcements from manufacturers).
The days when you needed to learn a dozen different operating systems
are gone. Learn Linux and you know how everything works. The best part
is that if you don't like the way something works, you can change it.
That, and it's free! Make copies for all your friends, legally. Tens of
thousands of high-quality free software products (office suites,
graphics packages, video processing, everything imaginable). Tech
support is provided by tens of thousands of volunteers.
It's hard to understand how this change from paying for software to
free software happened; for many people not involved in the process,
it's still news to them.
If you want to know how this all happened, Revolution OS will give you
the background you need to understand the way the software business
works now, and in the future.
16 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
Worth watching for anybody, 14 December 2003
![]()
Author:
Mark Krenz from Bloomington, IN
When I first saw this on the shelf at the store I thought that it had a
strong potential to just be a "feel-good" movie geared only towards those in
the open source movement.
But after watching it, I feel like this is a documentary that I could show
my parents so that they can better understand the Open Source Community that
I call myself a member of.
This movie provides a very good introduction to what drove software
programmers of the 70s into the idea of freely available source code. I
thought I new most of the history, but a lot of what Richard Stallman and
Bruce Perens talk about enlightened me. I feel like I know understand the
open source community better and get the big picture. Even though I thought
I knew the big picture before.
12 out of 18 people found the following review useful:
Informative, but I felt somewhat manipulated, 12 August 2005
![]()
Author:
Edwin T. Rywalt from East Stroudsburg, PA USA
I guess I expected Revolution OS to show not only the history of LINUX and OpenSource but also why these softwares are better than their commercial counterparts. I was pleased with the presentation of the history, as I had not been previously aware of it, but I was less than satisfied with the documentary's complete lack of any demonstration, however brief, of the software and an explanation of why it's better than Microsoft Windows. There's a scene where Bill Gate's is responding to the issue of free software. Some of his remarks make sense- but it was difficult to focus on the ideas because at that point there was absolutely atrocious and intrusive music 'pasted' into the background and I couldn't help feeling that I was being manipulated. I also did not get how some of these developers make their money. Someone has to create the software. This takes time. People have to eat and they need to pay for their food to eat. If they are giving their time away developing free software, where are they getting the money for food? I would have liked the documentary to address that issue. I would also like to say that I do use OpenSource software and find it to be quite good, and since it's free, remarkable. I think the OpenSource movement is revolutionary, but I'm not sure this film brings this across.
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Entertaining and educational, but with an odd focus on the crash of tech stocks, 29 March 2002
Author:
David Huebel from Austin, Texas, USA
"Revolution OS" starts off strong by allowing several important and
articulate people to explain how and why they became involved with free and
open source software. It uses these interviews very effectively to reveal
the ideas, personalities, and history behind free software, open source,
and
Linux. Unfortunately, after this broad and detailed introduction, it
ignores all implications of open source and free software except one: the
impact of Linux on the commercial software market, and more specifically,
the fate of "Linux companies" in the tech crash. Nevertheless, it is an
enjoyable and worthy film.
Complaints first. Unfortunately, "Revolution OS" is a short film, and it
devotes a disproportionate amount of time to the emergence of Linux-related
companies and the precipitous rise and then fall of their stock prices.
Although it may be hard now to imagine someone seeing this film without
already knowing that story, it's misleading for the film to present this
spectacle without making it clear that these stocks were only a few of
hundreds of computer stocks that shared the same fate. By devoting so much
time to the buildup of commercial excitement about Linux and then
concluding
the film with the collapse of Linux company share prices, "Revolution OS"
gives the impression that the recent history of Linux is contained in the
boom-bust story of Linux stocks, leaving the uninformed viewer to conclude
-- what? That the stock market has rendered final judgment on the value of
open source? That the apparent importance of Richard Stallman and Linus
Torvalds was just a delusion of tech-crazed investors?
This distorted presentation is apparently due to the filmmakers' lack of
understanding that the open source and free software phenomena have
significance beyond Linux's impact on the commercial software market. So
many other avenues could have been explored: the economic and social
impact
of the availability of free software in developing nations; perspectives
from the economic theory of information; the utility of the ongoing
creation
of useful software by open source development teams; the applicability of
licenses such as the GNU General Public License to everything that can be
seen as information, including musical compositions and other intellectual
creations; and last but certainly not least, the contributions of free
software and open source ideas (and their opponents' ideas) to debates over
intellectual property, perhaps the defining issue of this generation.
Simply mentioning some of these ways in which the free software and open
source movements have the potential to influence society would have paid
sufficient respect to the complexity of the subject, but after allotting
generous time to philosophical and historical exposition, the filmmakers
inexplicably revert to the simplistic public perception of Linux circa
2001:
a bunch of geeks who almost got rich. In fact, if you only saw the last
third of "Revolution OS", you would think it was a mock-affectionate eulogy
for Linux geeks' dot-com dreams.
On the up side, the stars of "Revolution OS" are treated fairly, and their
foibles generate plenty of humor, especially their ego clashes. When
Richard Stallman accepts an award named after Linus Torvalds, he unleashes
a
simile about Torvalds' role in the success of Linux that left me laughing
at
its cleverness, Stallman's baldness in demanding his share of credit, and
the (probably justified) assumption he makes of his audience's intimate
familiarity with "Star Wars."
"Revolution OS" also deserves credit for the care it takes to portray the
differences and disagreements between individuals, their common ground, and
their varying attitudes toward unfree software. Merely recognizing that
the
difference between free software and open source software is important
enough to present to a lay audience puts this movie in my good
graces.
Overall, "Revolution OS" will be better understood and appreciated by
people
who are already familiar with the subject matter. Non-geeks, however, will
find considerable enlightenment, especially if they follow up by reading
_The Cathedral and the Bazaar_ (which is available on the web) and the
articles by Richard Stallman and others on the "Philosophy of the GNU
Project" page at the GNU web site.
5 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Preachings for the already converted, 26 November 2006
![]()
Author:
Mikael from Sweden
If this really is a serious attempt for making a documentary it tries
to cover so many areas that it should have been made a series instead.
It fails to give a proper history of open source/free software. It
fails to recreate the role of open source/free software during the
period of focus, namely the dot com boom and crash of 1997-2001. It
fails to give any new insights, even for the year it was made. And it
fails miserably to have any kind of objectivity or dialogue.
The value of this movie are the interviews with the key persons of the
various open source and free software movements, though it becomes
quite tiresome to sit and wait for the goodies. What really brings the
credibility down is the overly hostile reading of the letter by Bill
Gates and the traditional Microsoft bashing through the entire
production, combined with the heroic soundtrack during the interviews
of the "good guys". It gives the over all impression of really being a
sales pitch for a church from a bunch of overly enthusiastic believers,
though without the visionary parts that can make it a document of its
context of production.
In conclusion, even though far between, there are some good bits in
this documentary that could make it worth watching if you have a
special interest in the open source movement. Just be aware that you
might also get some chills of embarrassment in between.
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
I thought it was Great!, 30 January 2003
![]()
Author:
cbeamer3 from Hamilton, Ontario
I've read 3 books related to the open source movement - "Just For Fun", "Rebel Code" and "Free As In Freedom". This documentary told much the same story as in the books. However, it was kind of neat to "meet" some of the key players and hear them personally give their observations and viewpoints. It was also neat seeing them "in person" because they portrayed a different image than I sensed from the books. They are real people dedicated to a great endeavour. For anyone interested in open source, this documentary is a "must see"!
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
A nice documentary about open source software, 12 December 2002
Author:
presto8 from Portland, Oregon
A nice documentary about the open source software revolution. None of the material presented here will come as a surprise to the computer techies out there, but the interview format of the film does give a feel for the personalities involved, including Linus Torvalds, Richard Stallman, Bruce Perens, and Eric Raymond. What is most intriguing is how each person is portrayed as feeling that their contribution to the open source community stands out as the most important part of the revolution: Torvalds' Linux, Stallman's GNU Project, Raymond's "The Cathedral and the Bazaar", Perens' "Open Source Definition", and Behlendorf's Apache. Whether these people truly feel this way or whether it is attributable to creative editing is an exercise left to the viewer.
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Even Bill Gates would have to admit this is a good film, 6 September 2002
![]()
Author:
juanm101 from Redwood City, California
I had been hearing about Revolution OS from some programmers
at my company for the past several months. I'm a
management-type so I didn't think the film would really be my type
of thing. I then heard a CNET radio segment on the film and
decided it might be kind of interesting after all.
As it ended up, I caught the last show at the Towne 3 in San Jose.
I was tired by the time I sat down in my seat, but I was surprised
that I actually stayed awake through the whole film. The director
really succeed in making the film a lot more entertaining and
involving than I would have thought possible. There were lots of
talking heads, but I not as much as I was expecting. The best
thing about the film was that it had a sense of humor about the
whole thing.
If you don't know anything about Linux or Open Source, but are
interested in the topics, then you will really like Revolution OS. If
you are looking for an intelligent documentary about something
pretty important, then you will definitely like Revolution OS. If you
are looking for some sort of super-technical film about how to write
software or how and why obscure software patches were created,
then this film is not for you.
Basically, the director, J.T.S. Moore, approached the film like he
was telling the story of a revolution with its own heroes, villains,
defeats and sly comebacks. That's why I liked it because it was
about people and some universal ideas.
One final note, I don't see a lot a documentaries in the theater, but
Revolution OS seemed really well made. The print I saw was
scratched up from a lot of screenings, but the cinematography,
editing, shot design, and music were totally top notch. A lot better
than the stuff on TLC or The History Channel. I think the whole
film was shot on 35mm and in cinemascope. Very neat.
I will definitely get the DVD when it comes out.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Ratings | Newsgroup reviews | External reviews |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |