Message Boards

This independent film which tackles a serious and controversial topic got raves reviews from sources such as Variety and Hollywood Reporter, it won jury and audience awards at some of the very top independent film festivals and in the IMDB comments the one viewer who wrote a review gave it a very positive one. And yet...somehow...in the Users' Ratings the film has a far lower number than "Joe Dirt."

41 users have voted and rated this film. To do so means they would have actually have had seen it. Since this film has probably been only shown a half dozen times in festivals its logical to assume that only a relatively small number of people have had an opportunity to view it. It reportedly played very well to thses crowds. However somehow that majority who seemed to love it haven't voted and only that smaller number who did not care for it have taken the time to give it a low rating. Yeah, right.

Obviously there are people voting who have not even see the film at all or perhaps there is some bored individual out there who didn't care for the movie and somehow managed to vote repeatedly. Here's an idea. Why don't all of those people who took time to catch this movie at a festival and hated it write a short or extensive review in the comments section? Tell us why the movie is so bad. Something tells me that isn't going to happen because the people voting more likely than not never saw a minute of footage.