MOVIEmeter
Top 5000
Up 353 this week

Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)

4.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 4.8/10 from 89,102 users   Metascore: 48/100
Reviews: 544 user | 157 critic | 39 from Metacritic.com

The Angels investigate a series of murders which occur after the theft of a witness protection profile database.

Director:

Writers:

(television series), (television series), 4 more credits »
Watch Trailer
0Check in
0Share...

Watch Now

From $2.99 on Amazon Instant Video

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 29 titles
created 19 Nov 2011
 
a list of 35 titles
created 14 May 2012
 
a list of 40 titles
created 21 Jul 2012
 
a list of 44 titles
created 12 Feb 2013
 
a list of 32 titles
created 5 months ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)

Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003) on IMDb 4.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle.

User Polls

8 wins & 14 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Action | Adventure | Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

Three women, detectives with a mysterious boss, retrieve stolen voice-ID software, using martial arts, tech skills, and sex appeal.

Director: McG
Stars: Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, Lucy Liu
Charlie's Angels (1976–1981)
Action | Adventure | Crime
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

The adventures of three sexy female private eyes.

Stars: Kate Jackson, Farrah Fawcett, Jaclyn Smith
Action | Adventure | Crime
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.3/10 X  

A cat burglar, a car thief, and a dirty cop get a chance to turn their lives around; fighting crime and working for the mysterious Charlie Townsend.

Stars: Annie Ilonzeh, Minka Kelly, Rachael Taylor
Comedy | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

A man and a woman are compelled, for legal reasons, to live life as a couple for a limited period of time. At stake is a large amount of money.

Director: Tom Vaughan
Stars: Cameron Diaz, Ashton Kutcher, Rob Corddry
Comedy | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5/10 X  

A girl finds she is forced to educate herself on the etiquette of wooing the opposite sex when she finally meets Mr. Right.

Director: Roger Kumble
Stars: Cameron Diaz, Thomas Jane, Christina Applegate
Action | Comedy | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

A young woman gets mixed up with a disgraced spy who is trying to clear his name.

Director: James Mangold
Stars: Tom Cruise, Cameron Diaz, Peter Sarsgaard
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Max
...
...
...
...
Cheung-Yan Yuen ...
Edit

Storyline

The Angels--Natalie, Dylan, and Alex are back again but this time they're preparing for a strike without even warning as they go undercover to retrieve two missing silver bands. These are no ordinary rings. They contain valuable encrypted information that reveal the new identities of every person in the Federal Witness Protection Program. When witnesses start turning up dead, only the Angels, using their expertise as masters of disguise, espionage and martial arts can stop the perpetrator, a mysterious "fallen" Angel. Aided by their trusty colleague, Jimmy Bosley, the Angels' adventure begins at a remote Mongolian outpost and ends only after Dylan is forced to face a dark secret from her past--a secret that puts the lives of her two best friends in danger. Written by Anthony Pereyra {hypersonic91@yahoo.com}

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

This summer the Angels are back.


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for action violence, sensuality and language/innuendo | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

| |

Release Date:

27 June 2003 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Charlie's Angels 2  »

Box Office

Budget:

$120,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$3,575,774 (France) (18 July 2003)

Gross:

$100,685,880 (USA) (12 September 2003)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (unrated)

Sound Mix:

| | (8 channels)

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Courtney Love was offered the role of Madison Lee, but turned it down. See more »

Goofs

The school crosswalk faces a cliff: the kids have, literally, nowhere to go after Bosely crosses them. See more »

Quotes

Natalie Cook: Killer, huh? I just got so excited. When it's big like that I just love to ride it hard and rough.
See more »

Crazy Credits

After the "Columbia Pictures" intro, the shot zooms in to the torch the woman is holding, starting the scene. See more »

Connections

Referenced in Jeopardy!: 2005 Back to School Week Game 3 (2005) See more »

Soundtracks

Danger! High Voltage
Written by Tyler Spencer, Anthony Selph, Joseph Frezza and Stephen Nawara
Performed by Electric Six
Courtesy of XL Recordings
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

"This film has the mediocrity of a horrible B-movie from the seventies, with a huge budget splattered on top."
29 July 2003 | by (UK) – See all my reviews

I liked "Charlie's Angels." It never took itself too seriously, and Bill Murray provided some comic relief, making the film more than just an hour and a half bikini advert. Something funny (or unfunny) happens in "Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle": It's terrible.

I mean, this movie isn't bad, it's just awful. The acting is even worse than the first, there's no Bill Murray, and what were all the stars making cameos in this film thinking? Bruce Willis, Owen Wilson, and others make brief appearences, but what about Demi Moore, Crispin Glover ("Back to the Future"), Robert Patrick (better remembered as the T-1000 in "T2"), John Cleese (or was that a cameo?), Luke Wilson, Bernie Mac (who now has his own very popular TV show--he didn't need this to hinder his career), Matt LeBlanc ("Friends"), and so on and so forth, who all took main roles? Okay, I understand LeBlanc taking part in the film, his career is going nowhere other than "Friends," but seriously, Luke Wilson?! Between this and "Legally Blonde 2," the man may never make a lead role again (like in "Old School," a much funnier and more fun film than this). And John Cleese! What's with him and small roles lately? "Harry Potter," "James Bond," all of his roles are supporting: Whatever happened to his acting career? And that's not to mention what in the %&#% Cameron Diaz is doing in this movie. Drew Barrymore...maybe. Lucy Liu...definately. Cameron Diaz...NO WAY! I really like Cameron Diaz, and she can act (see "There's Something About Mary"), but what in the name of H.G. Wells is she doing in this? And why does she act so bad in it? I understand playing homage to the show with bad acting and all like the first film, but this pushes the limit.

The direction style is worse, thanks to "McG," and Drew Barrymore manages to steal the show as the all-time worst actress in recent years. I know it's not all her--it's the script. Anyone who has to say the stuff these girls say in this film should know they're in trouble, and should mutter the lines with utter chaos, but it's unbearable how corny the things they say are. And just check out their acting in a dirt bike scene, when Liu and Barrymore are "worried" and "scared" that Diaz's character might be in trouble. Youch! Bad acting to a new extreme. This film has the mediocrity of a horrible B-movie from the seventies, with a huge budget splattered on top.

Originally titled "Charlie's Angels: Halo" (the name changed due to copyright on the video game "Halo"), "Full Throttle's" plot is one of the worst I've seen in a long time. It's horribly contrived. Where should I begin? In the beginning of the film, the three Angels, Natalie (Diaz), Alex (Liu) and Dylan (Barrymore) rescue a hostage (Patrick) from a bunch of Hungarians. Stupidity ensues when the Angels fall off a bridge, dodging a missile, and manage to grab onto a helicopter or something before the truck they were in blows up. When watching this scene, the first things that enters your brain is this: How in the world did this pass Columbia TriStar's eyes? I mean, that scene is the kind of stuff I used to think would be neat when I was about ten, only back then they didn't make feature films out of idiotic ideas. Anyway, on with the plot.

After rescuing Patrick, they find out he was carrying with him a ring on his finger that the Hungarians stole. This ring, when joined with another, reveals the entire database of those on the witness protection program and their real names. Good Lord, I didn't know that the Government kept the names of their protected witnesses on a super-duper ring gadget so easily stealable. I mean, didn't this pass the actors and actresses' minds--maybe the film might be a bit sore on the plot?

I suppose that's not why people go to see this movie. They go to see the girls in bikinis. That's not a bad idea, the first one was like that, but if you're going to have a plot at least make it non-laughable. Even the first film's plot was better than THIS!

One thing leads to another, pretty soon they find out Dylan (who entered the witness protection program years ago) is being targeted for assassination by the Creepy Thin Man (Crispin Glover). One thing I found funny is that Crispin Glover refused to return for "Back to the Future Part II," demanding what writer Bob Gale said was "unreasonable" perks, yet he returned for "Charlie's Angels 2" in a flash. Interesting, Crispin, I see you've learned from your mistakes--sadly, you've used your wisdom to return for a terrible film.

"Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle" isn't just miserable, it isn't just awful, it is just so mediocre it hurts. It's like on gargantuan mess, filled to the rim with bad acting, horrible "Matrix" rip-off fight scenes, and a God-awful script, all of which makes "Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle" one of the biggest cinematic disasters in recent years. I could spend hours wondering why the beautiful and talented Cameron Diaz chose to appear in this film, but in all honesty, it hurts my brain just thinking about it. What hurts my brain even more is the fact that this film has grossed close to 100 mil already, meaning more sequels. I weep for those that paid to see this movie expecting a treat.

I'll say once more to the fans of the films that I enjoyed the original as a guilty pleasure, but this is too much for me. Please, no more sequels.

1.5/5 stars -

John Ulmer


50 of 85 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Want Charlie's Angels 3? kjmdb
The most ridiculous movie ever? jon-385
Worst Movie in the History of Cinema granto1990
Bosley II and Charlie both gone... Blondfashionisto
Nun Scene FayeriePrincess
Did anyone else realize... Phantomgirl579
Discuss Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page