| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Index | 75 reviews in total |
14 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
IMDb says the budget was over 100 million..., 5 April 2005
![]()
Author:
MLDinTN from TN
where did it all go because it certainly wasn't spent on the animation.
It was just your regular Saturday morning cartoon animation. I guess
most of the money must have been spent on the stars who played the
voices. Since Rosanne's been out of work lately, she probably asked for
a pretty penny to do this.
It didn't have any fun songs that stand out in my mind. Plus, the plot
was very generic. And it needed more animals. The main animals were
cows, a rabbit, and a horse. There's also a goat, pigs, buffalo, and
chickens, but they weren't shown a lot. One of the reasons people liked
the story of Finding Nemo so much was all the different animals used to
tell the story.
FINAL VERDICT: I guess 5 year olds will like it, but I didn't think it
was too great.
8 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Nice visuals, otherwise unexceptional, 11 April 2004
Author:
florafairy from Los Angeles
While the film wasn't a total dud a la "Treasure Planet," it's certainly
no
"Little Mermaid," or even "Emperor's New Groove," which I consider the
best
of the latest crop of cartoons for its hip sensibility. "Home on the
Range"
suffers from an unoriginal and unfunny script, although it is not
tediously
poor or Saturday-morning-cartoon simple. To begin, there is an
overabundance of plastic-playset ready characters (literally a whole farm
full): the trio of bounty-hunting heifers played by Roseanne Barr, Judi
Dench, and Jennifer Tilly; the yodeling cattle rustler Alameda Slim (Randy
Quaid) and his three bumbling nephews; the wannabe-hero steed Buck (Cuba
Gooding Jr-- who ok'ed that name?); two lascivious bulls; a buffalo
bouncer;
a peg-legged jackrabbit; and a whole farmyard of pigs, chickens, a goose,
and a surly goat. Oh, and Steve Buscemi shows up too, as a caricature of
himself in a purple suit and a pencil moustache. Estelle Harris and
Patrick
Warburton (so memorable in "Toy Story 2" and "Groove," respectively), had
brief cameos as well. There's no time for any kind of character
development
(not even with a sacred Disney "I Want" song), and the thinnest of
premises
has the cows hunting for Slim in time to get the reward money to save
their
farm. I was surprised not by the simplicity but by the unnecessary,
unfunny
bawdiness of the script (the movie opens with a shot of the Barr cow's
ample
udders, with her voiceover dryly remarking "Yep, they're real. Quit
staring." Crossdressing, pee, and fat man jokes follow.) Alan Menken
wrote
a few snappy but unmemorable tunes (none of which are sung by the
characters, but by the likes of Bonnie Raitt and k.d. lang) and a
Coplandesque score.
The film redeems itself in its art direction, which bursts with Disney
color
and retro UPA-style angularity. Especially in the opening scenes, a
multiplane effect is used to further flatten, rather than deepen, this
storybook world. It's an interesting and visually engaging concept that
works well for the story. Backgrounds are intricately detailed with
drybrush effects that call to mind "Sleeping Beauty;" if that film's art
director, Eyvind Earle, had been called upon to paint the rocks and buttes
of the American desert, it would have looked very much like this. It's
quite stunning, actually, and the best art direction since 1996's "The
Hunchback of Notre Dame."
I especially appreciated a background detail in the town scene: one of
the
buildings was actually only a facade, held up by supports like on a
backlot
Western set. Similarly, sooner or later, not just critics but parents too
will demand the Disney animated features to show that they have something
behind that venerable name. "Home on the Range" will tide us over for
now,
but a renaissance of Disney is getting to be overdue. The Disney animation
department (what's left of it), like it or not, needs to take a cue from
Pixar and strive for family-friendly originality if they hope to maintain
the integrity of the brand. ***
11 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
An enjoyable Disney movie, 11 January 2005
![]()
Author:
George Mussman (GEM-20) from Washington State
I really took a chance when I bought the DVD of "Home On The Range"
because I had not seen it. It is not my normal practice to buy
something that I am totally unfamiliar with. However, I was happily
surprised. This movie was wonderful! My kids and I thoroughly enjoyed
it.
Roseanne provided a funny voice to one of the cows. Love her or hate
her, the casting was perfect, like Ellen DeGeneres was for "Finding
Nemo".
I read here on IMDb that "Home On The Range" is the last Disney film to
be done with traditional animation. Maybe there are faster or cheaper
ways of making these movies, but a great history is coming to an end.
Kind of sad
I recommend this movie. While it may not be a masterpiece,
it is a delight that is better than most Don Bluth or Dreamworks films.
I would give it *** out of four. Fun and funny stuff!
6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
well..., 31 August 2008
![]()
Author:
jackster12 from France
I'm typing this as the movie is playing on DVD. And the kids seem to
like watching it. But then, they're young and animation appeals in
general.
Still, we try to watch with them... and I happen to love animation
myself, having some background in cartoon-drawing. Everything Pixar?
Fantastic. Old Disney? Sure, serve it up. Along with the Looney Tunes,
old Tom & Jerry, etc.
This, though, is a sleepwalk of a feature in so many ways. Not in the
animation, which isn't bad (though not much special, in context of
what's out there). Nor in the music, which is decent enough.
The writing, however, is horrible. I can't imagine anyone
characterizing this dialogue as "funny"... it's an endless stream of
clichés. And the story line, while thin at the core, is unnecessarily
complicated at the fringes. The twists don't feel like twists. They
feel like fumbling shortcuts used to navigate a nest of tangled
details.
I find myself astounded at how (a) such a venerable studio as Disney
gets behind this kind of project (b) how they manage to attract so much
high-profile voice talent and (c) how those actors stomach saying these
lines, given that every one of them has acted in much better stuff than
this pap. I guess a paycheck helps.
But still, ultimately this is a movie that shouldn't have been made.
P.S. One other thing... one can't help but feel like this is one of
those animation movies meant to appeal to a demographic. Like, say, the
vast swath of middle America that loves country music. It's worth
noting that the other failed animated movies of recent years have all
attempted to do the same kind of feel-good, blatant targeting.
Brother Bear... Fox and the Hound 2... there are others I can't think
of at the moment. Why does it fail? First, because the movies by nature
end up offering stereotypes of the demographic they're targeting.
Second, because they end up being style over substance. The plot is
just a vehicle to deliver the caricature. And last, because it's
ridiculous to assume that great story lines don't transcend the
cultural distinctions.
Do the studio marketers really think, for instance, that the Nascar set
and Manhattan kids alike can't "get" Monsters Inc or Toy Story on a
shared level? The only movie of recent years that seemed to beat that
rap was "Cars." And that was because it was a good story, not stuck in
being pedantic or playing to any one crowd.
11 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
Surprisingly good..., 20 January 2006
![]()
Author:
Theshapeshifter from United States
I don't see just why it is that people don't like this film. It has good music, good animation, and funny dialogue, but it is fairly sappy. I thought that it was fairly good, even though the plot is just a wee bit weak. Fortunately, the plot is peppered with many humorous events and turns which clear any and all flaws up. The plot is that of a small farm out in the Old West, which is set to be foreclosed. All seems lost until two cows who live there, and one who just moved in, decide to do the only thing that can be done to save their home, catch a notorious criminal, who is known for stealing cows. With some massively amusing high-jinks and many plot twists, this film, while redundant at times, is not to be missed. Take it from someone who knows animation, this movie, while having received a multitude of bad comments and scorns is good, but watch it yourself and YOU be the judge. YOU must decide whether or not it is good, but I found it enjoyable.
9 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Not prime grade beef, but still a nice selection of ground chuck, 24 April 2004
![]()
Author:
filmbuff-36 from Houston, TX
With Disney fazing out their hand-drawn animation studios in favor of the
computer animation brand, one must accept the quiet passing of their
traditional style with a mix of both admiration and frustration. A nod of
respect for 44 motion pictures of varying degrees of quality followed by a
note of sadness at the demand for bottom-line economics over artistic
dedication.
As a swan song, "Home on the Range" is not the best send-off from the Mouse
House. If "Lilo and Stitch" or "Brother Bear" had ended up as the final 2-D
animated piece from the studio, it might have finished the tradition on a
slightly higher note. Not that this latest one isn't entertaining, but it
lacks the drama to bring about the end of an era on a high
note.
The time is the 1800s. The place -- the Old West. Cattle drovers roam the
land with their livestock, thieves and other miscreants terrorize the
countryside and homesteaders try to eek out an existence in the middle of
the wilderness. It is here that local farmer Pearl has set up her own his
little paradise appropriately titled "Patch of Heaven."
Among the animals on the farm, the cows clearly command the most respect.
They include prim and proper Ms. Caloway (voice of Judi Dench) who does not
tolerate recklessness, the air-headed Grace (voice of Jennifer Tilly) who
spouts kooky Zen tidbits at inappropriate moments, and cocky Maggie (voice
of Roseanne Barr), a headstrong show cow and the latest addition to the farm
following misfortune at her old home.
Times are not good for Pearl, with the bank threatening to foreclose on her
farm if she doesn't come up with $750 within three days. Not wishing to lose
another home, Maggie convinces Ms. Caloway and Grace to aid her in hunting
down cattle thief Alameda Slim (voice of Randy Quaid). The three heifers
find competition in a conceited and ambitious stallion named Buck (voice of
Cuba Gooding Jr.) who is anxious to make a name for himself by being the
mount of legendary bounty hunter Rico (voice of Charles
Dennis).
The various parties continually cross paths in energetic vignettes, with
Western clichés both adhered to and skewered as only a cartoon could do. The
cows want Slim to collect the reward, Slim wants the cows to raise money to
buy land cheap at auction, and Buck wants to impress Rico with his abilities
to track and fight crime. Traps are set, alliances are forged and action
ensues.
"Home on the Range" is certainly lively, and is often times quite humorous,
but it suffers from a lack of creativity given the potential of the premise.
For a cartoon about cows hunting down cattle rustlers, everything seems so
formulaic. There are very few surprises and the characters seem to just go
through the motions of the typical Disney animated fare.
Where it does succeed though is in the performances. Barr is delightfully
acid-tongued as a cow with a tendency for showing off. Her timing is great
and comments pointed, which only makes one wonder where she has been for the
last few years.
Dench brings Mrs. Caloway a Victorian-era sense of composure and
sophistication that is amusingly out of place in the Old West. Never mind
how she got that British accent out there in the first place, Dench's
ability to bring dignity to the role is a welcome plus.
Tilly is a strange choice for Grace but acquits herself admirably. She's
both empty-headed and idiot savant, often at the same times, though her
character is typically pushed to the background in favor of Maggie and
Caloway's bickering.
The rest of the cast is likable as well, with Gooding Jr. lively as the
horse full of himself but with his heart more or less in the right place.
Quaid can be amusing at times as the yodeling villain, and even Steve
Buscemi shows up in a small but memorable role as a slimy fence for Alameda
Slim's stolen property named Wesley, whom Slim appropriately mispronounces
as "weasely."
But despite the good performances and lively action, there's not much else
at which the movie excels. The characters are all generic and based on
archetypes. Who is Pearl and why should we care about her? Just because she
dances around with her animals and they live in peaceful harmony with each
other, we're supposed to just automatically sympathize with her
plight?
Also, what does Alameda plan to do with the land when he gets it? The answer
to these and other questions -- we don't know. The filmmakers just want us
to accept the plot as is, which may present a problem to the older members
of the audience.
But the kids will probably love it. It's simple and fun, and loaded with
some lively country music performed by the likes of k.d. lang and Tim McGraw
that is sure to bring a smile.
Compared to some of the lesser Disney offerings, "Home on the Range" is
certainly a step up due to it's glib approach to Western convention, but as
the coda to an animated legacy dating back to "Snow White and the Seven
Dwarfs," one wishes that the studio had chosen a beefier prize before
putting their dynasty out to pasture.
Six out of ten stars. Not a bad cartoon, but as Disney's animated swan song,
it's a bit of a disappointment.
5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
An absolute disgrace, 7 August 2007
![]()
Author:
Atreyu_II from The world of artists
The 44th animated Disney "classic" is just one among other good
examples of how Disney went downhill during these last years.
It's sad to see how Disney (which made so many timeless classics)
declined that much. What happened to the traditional hand-drawn
classics? All this CGI stuff only ruined Disney! "Home On The Range"
isn't the worst Disney movie ever, but it is side by side with their
worst movies.
This movie has lots of irritating moments, but the worst of all is a
scene in a bar - one of the most ridiculous scenes in a movie! The
"humor" of this movie isn't the classic humor which is really funny.
What we see here is nothing but annoying, unconventional and pointless
modern humor.
This movie has some nice backgrounds of the Old West, but only a few.
The characters are very ugly in general and so terribly designed that
it's impossible not to feel annoyed by them.
Stupid situations, terrible designs, very low picture quality, awful
animation and boring songs are more weak points of this disgrace.
The characters in general are annoying. The only characters I liked
were the little yellow birds, the little pigs and Rusty the Dog. But
even these characters can't be compared with the beloved and legendary
Disney characters of the great classics from the past.
6 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
2D Films Can Compete, 25 May 2004
![]()
Author:
Gene Crokus from United States
To say Home On The Range is a little dated looking is not entirely fair.
We just are not used to seeing two-dimensional cartoon characters. So to
some this film may run to tastes remindful of Saturday morning cartoons in
years past. But there is a little more here than just how anthropomorphism
is projected on the big screen.
Where Home On The Range does not measure up is in the laughs department.
There are some awfully funny scenes in the more recent Shrek II, and one of
those (involving an arrest scene) is of the two funniest I have ever seen in
an animated film (the other is in Finding Nemo, when Ellen Degeneres speaks
whale). And in that regard Home doesn't quite hit the
mark.
The plot revolves around saving the farm. The animals living thereon
(humans cannot save farms very often) contrive to do this through the usual
convoluted methods. And it is somewhat interesting how this is developed.
Interesting enough for your children, that is there is not much here for
the more adult crowds.
Cuba Gooding is the show stealer in the voice department. But the
yodeling we hear by the cattle rustler early on is a close second.
There are some surprisingly neat looking scenes, and not many cartoons of
yesteryear had characters drawn as sharply. Two dimensional film is not
done by any means.
All in all this is a C+ effort. There are some sharp moments (watch Buck
the horse run around the barn, check out the Rico (a decidedly un-Western
sounding name) character, and listen to everything Jeb the goat says. They
are the scene stealers.
7 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
Disney disappointment., 16 April 2008
![]()
Author:
Hawk Wing from Denmark
The story line is too thin, the dialog is boring and there are no jokes
or great moments in it. I never laughed once. The target audience must
be lower than 8 years old, this is a baby-sitter with no character.
It's even worse than Chicken Little, and it doesn't even try to be
funny. Normally, it would be an enjoyable animation, but coming from
Disney Studios, I'd say this is very disappointing.
If I have to be positive, I can say that my eyes didn't start bleeding.
Judy Dench saved the day. She earns this movie 2 points / 10. It's
difficult to find 10 lines to say about this movie even if they're all
negative.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Ineffective, almost humourless, and not so well written Disney fare, 7 January 2009
![]()
Author:
Electrified_Voltage from Guelph, Ontario, Canada
It has been nearly five years since the release of this recent
traditionally animated Disney flick, made in a CGI-dominated time, and
I definitely didn't even hear about it at the time of its release. It
clearly didn't turn out to be a box office smash, which is probably why
I never heard about it (unlike "The Incredibles", the hugely successful
CGI-animated feature released the same year), and I don't think I knew
about it until I saw it mentioned in a book about animated films a
couple years ago. After seeing "Home on the Range", I can definitely
see why it tanked.
In the old west, Maggie, Mrs. Calloway, and Grace are three cows, all
with very different traits, who live on a dairy farm in Nebraska called
Patch of Heaven, owned by an elderly widow named Pearl Gesner. Pearl
owes a lot of money, which she unfortunately can't pay, so it appears
she will soon lose her farm, and it will be auctioned off! So, the
three cows decide to set out to try and save their home. They must
track down an outlaw, a cattle rustler named Alameda Slim, who uses a
false identity to claim many properties in the state, and hypnotizes
cows with his yodeling! On their adventure, they meet others on the
same mission, to try and stop Alameda Slim, and due to the different
traits of the three cows, they don't always get along, with conflict
between Maggie and Mrs. Calloway, which obviously won't make it easier!
Others have already mentioned the lacklustre plot of this film, and I'm
going to have to agree wholeheartedly. The plot pretty much completely
failed to interest me, since it's very simple and forgettable, and the
real lack of humour doesn't help. I only rarely found amusing moments,
and kept a straight face for almost the entire thing. For example,
there's some weak slapstick, which may appeal to kids, but probably not
many others. I found that the funniest parts involved Alameda Slim's
dimwitted nephews, parts such as them not being able to recognise their
uncle after they've seen him put his simple disguise on, but they are
very minor characters. Not only is the plot forgettable, so are the
gags and most of the characters. Basically, the film was put together
fairly simply, and probably could have been more focused. I found
myself indifferent to pretty much everything about it, and I'm sure I'm
not alone.
It looks like this film marked the end of a very long era, the era of
traditionally animated theatrical Disney movies, which began in 1937
with "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" and went on with the company
long after Walt Disney's death in 1966. Through those decades, so many
classics were made in the franchise, so it's unfortunate that they
couldn't finish with a much more noteworthy picture. Instead, they
finished with a dull one, one which is probably much more appealing to
kids than adults, unlike probably most of them, which can be fun for
all ages. "Home on the Range" reminds me a lot of "Rock-A-Doodle", a
1991 animated film from Don Bluth, and not one of his more popular
efforts. Both are lacklustre animated films with anthropomorphic
animals, ones which are basically for the kids, and I've personally
found to be very unmemorable.
| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | Newsgroup reviews | External reviews |
| Parents Guide | Official site | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |