3 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- Anthropocentric Spin, 14 August 2005
Author:
dunmore_ego from Los Angeles, California
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
I want to hurt this movie. Like it hurt me.
But first, I need to hurt the puerile-minded fans of this schlock: Any
ratiocinating fools who entreat those of us with a modicum of
intelligence to "sit back, relax and enjoy this entertainment" do not
realize that we who rail against bogus "science" in movies of this ilk,
do so NOT because of bogus science per se, but because of the
INCONSISTENT bogus science. We may not boast Geophysics degrees, nor do
we aspire to atom-splitting scientific accuracy we just want
CONSISTENCY!
Example 1: If your movie maintains that pigeons use the earth's
electromagnetic field for "long-distance navigation", why show pigeons
disoriented whilst tooling around the few hundred feet of Trafalgar
Square?
Example 2: If your movie cites Real Science to explain the
impossibility of generating enough energy to start the planet's core
re-spinning, why not establish that it takes that same impossible
amount of energy to STOP the core in the first place? More on this
later.
This movie has less "science" in it than Star Wars and Star Wars has
NO science in it.
Furthermore, note that "implausible" = fiction; "impossible" = fantasy.
A laser disintegrating rock to nothingness: implausible. Humans
sustaining diamond-crushing pressure in the earth's mantle - no matter
WHAT they're wearing, let alone wafer-thin spacesuits: impossible.
Throughout the film, Impossibility outweighing Implausibility means
this is Science FANTASY, not Science "Fiction", so cease associating it
with a once-legitimate term.
When physics knowledge was at a groundling stage, scientifically-inept
tales like "Journey to the Center of the Earth" were acceptable, but
these days, even the common rabble are well-versed in general physics,
so it is INEXCUSABLE that knowledge be so denigrated, ignored and
subjugated to the inadequacies of feeble-minded technicians with big
budgets, who promulgate ANTI-knowledge with their idiotic product
Movie opens with a guy who looks like Peter Gallagher sans Eyebrows
dropping dead at a board meeting so begins a series of events that
establish that the earth's core has inexplicably stopped spinning,
causing electromagnetic anomalies. So scientists must drill down and
re-start the spin with The Universal Solvent nukes.
But the spin begins long before they take the plunge
At a militia symposium, geophysicist Aaron Eckhart (your average
"biscuit-thrower" college professor: disheveled hair, attire and
lifestyle; upon arriving home, throws biscuit to dog which has no name
Hollywood stereotype created by Mel Gibson in "Lethal Weapon"), cites
Physics 101, yet none of the generals seem to have even a sixth-grade
education, as they stare dismayed at his demo of burning a peach with a
spray-can, to illustrate get this! how the Sun would burn the earth
were it to lose its electromagnetic covering. The stupidity meter could
go no lower at that point.
Movies of this ilk are constructed around one or two thrilling
sequences upon which the burden of the storyline is draped
uncomfortably such a scene was the introduction to grotesquely
gorgeous Hilary Swank, as her crew emergency-land Shuttle Endeavour in
the LA Aqueduct. The movie's pitch was ALL ABOUT sonic-booming over
Dodger Stadium and navigating through overpass bridges like technofied
T-Birds from Grease. Magnificently-staged, the thrill meter hit climax
consequently, it was all downhill from there.
Stanley Tucci's suavely turtle-necked character is simply to insult
Carl Sagan. Ironic that we meet Tucci exiting his Einstein seminars,
even whilst this movie flings caca in the face of Einstein's most
rigorous theorem (E=mc squared).
Tchéky Karyo, as Frenchman Serge, is the only likable character. Of the
admittedly talented cast, his performance alone is so poignant that
we're truly saddened to see him die. (His end was pre-ordained; he was,
after all, French.)
Let's play Meet The Stereotype: gorgeously grotesque D.J. Qualls as
computer-hacker, Rat. Isn't his "unlikely hero" character one of those
rootless, amoral beings who make our modern online lives unbearable
with viruses and identity theft and their wholly unnecessary existence?
The sooner they are eradicated, rather than pedestalled, the better.
There's the Square-Jawed American Pilot (least-known of the principals
ergo, first to die); Delroy Lindo, Token Black Dude; That Guy from
Six Feet Under and Alfre Woodward as the preposterously miscast Flight
Director. One keeps expecting F. Murray Abraham in a movie this bad.
(The actors did their best, but the blathering catastrophe of the
script gave them no quarter.)
Lindo constructs their drilling craft with a substance called
Unobtainium (stop that laughing in back!), which, he tells us, converts
heat and pressure to energy, so the deeper it gets, the stronger it
gets .er, I think the misinformed "scientist" MEANT to say that energy
in the form of heat and pressure is converted to MASS by the
Unobtainium. (Remember that "E=mc2" thingy?) Was the "science
consultant" a G.E.D.? and more importantly, may I book some time to
slap him uncontrollably?
The SCRIPT was made of Unobtainium. The deeper it got, the more energy
it expended in keeping us from frying in outrage.
In an Act II sequence, where everyone takes turns saying something
scientifically illiterate, Tucci reveals that a man-made device,
"Destiny", is responsible for the stalled core. I'll say this once:
NOTHING MAN-MADE can output the amount of energy needed to stall a
PLANET'S core. What part of "NOTHING MAN-MADE" don't the film-makers
understand? Arrogant, anthropocentric, bacterial mites!
Conceited humans refuse to acknowledge One True Fact: THE PLANET will
be fine whether or not the core spins at all; *whether or not humans
EXIST at all*. You're only "saving" it for your OWN selfish ends
As the two surviving Attractive People are rescued, Rat cries, "The
earth is healing itself!" - It was never sick, dimwit!
Watch it at Amazon
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Core (2003) More at IMDbPro »
3 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

Anthropocentric Spin, 14 August 2005
Author: dunmore_ego from Los Angeles, California
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
I want to hurt this movie. Like it hurt me.
But first, I need to hurt the puerile-minded fans of this schlock: Any ratiocinating fools who entreat those of us with a modicum of intelligence to "sit back, relax and enjoy this entertainment" do not realize that we who rail against bogus "science" in movies of this ilk, do so NOT because of bogus science per se, but because of the INCONSISTENT bogus science. We may not boast Geophysics degrees, nor do we aspire to atom-splitting scientific accuracy we just want CONSISTENCY!
Example 1: If your movie maintains that pigeons use the earth's electromagnetic field for "long-distance navigation", why show pigeons disoriented whilst tooling around the few hundred feet of Trafalgar Square?
Example 2: If your movie cites Real Science to explain the impossibility of generating enough energy to start the planet's core re-spinning, why not establish that it takes that same impossible amount of energy to STOP the core in the first place? More on this later.
This movie has less "science" in it than Star Wars and Star Wars has NO science in it.
Furthermore, note that "implausible" = fiction; "impossible" = fantasy. A laser disintegrating rock to nothingness: implausible. Humans sustaining diamond-crushing pressure in the earth's mantle - no matter WHAT they're wearing, let alone wafer-thin spacesuits: impossible. Throughout the film, Impossibility outweighing Implausibility means this is Science FANTASY, not Science "Fiction", so cease associating it with a once-legitimate term.
When physics knowledge was at a groundling stage, scientifically-inept tales like "Journey to the Center of the Earth" were acceptable, but these days, even the common rabble are well-versed in general physics, so it is INEXCUSABLE that knowledge be so denigrated, ignored and subjugated to the inadequacies of feeble-minded technicians with big budgets, who promulgate ANTI-knowledge with their idiotic product
Movie opens with a guy who looks like Peter Gallagher sans Eyebrows dropping dead at a board meeting so begins a series of events that establish that the earth's core has inexplicably stopped spinning, causing electromagnetic anomalies. So scientists must drill down and re-start the spin with The Universal Solvent nukes.
But the spin begins long before they take the plunge
At a militia symposium, geophysicist Aaron Eckhart (your average "biscuit-thrower" college professor: disheveled hair, attire and lifestyle; upon arriving home, throws biscuit to dog which has no name Hollywood stereotype created by Mel Gibson in "Lethal Weapon"), cites Physics 101, yet none of the generals seem to have even a sixth-grade education, as they stare dismayed at his demo of burning a peach with a spray-can, to illustrate get this! how the Sun would burn the earth were it to lose its electromagnetic covering. The stupidity meter could go no lower at that point.
Movies of this ilk are constructed around one or two thrilling sequences upon which the burden of the storyline is draped uncomfortably such a scene was the introduction to grotesquely gorgeous Hilary Swank, as her crew emergency-land Shuttle Endeavour in the LA Aqueduct. The movie's pitch was ALL ABOUT sonic-booming over Dodger Stadium and navigating through overpass bridges like technofied T-Birds from Grease. Magnificently-staged, the thrill meter hit climax consequently, it was all downhill from there.
Stanley Tucci's suavely turtle-necked character is simply to insult Carl Sagan. Ironic that we meet Tucci exiting his Einstein seminars, even whilst this movie flings caca in the face of Einstein's most rigorous theorem (E=mc squared).
Tchéky Karyo, as Frenchman Serge, is the only likable character. Of the admittedly talented cast, his performance alone is so poignant that we're truly saddened to see him die. (His end was pre-ordained; he was, after all, French.)
Let's play Meet The Stereotype: gorgeously grotesque D.J. Qualls as computer-hacker, Rat. Isn't his "unlikely hero" character one of those rootless, amoral beings who make our modern online lives unbearable with viruses and identity theft and their wholly unnecessary existence? The sooner they are eradicated, rather than pedestalled, the better.
There's the Square-Jawed American Pilot (least-known of the principals ergo, first to die); Delroy Lindo, Token Black Dude; That Guy from Six Feet Under and Alfre Woodward as the preposterously miscast Flight Director. One keeps expecting F. Murray Abraham in a movie this bad. (The actors did their best, but the blathering catastrophe of the script gave them no quarter.)
Lindo constructs their drilling craft with a substance called Unobtainium (stop that laughing in back!), which, he tells us, converts heat and pressure to energy, so the deeper it gets, the stronger it gets .er, I think the misinformed "scientist" MEANT to say that energy in the form of heat and pressure is converted to MASS by the Unobtainium. (Remember that "E=mc2" thingy?) Was the "science consultant" a G.E.D.? and more importantly, may I book some time to slap him uncontrollably?
The SCRIPT was made of Unobtainium. The deeper it got, the more energy it expended in keeping us from frying in outrage.
In an Act II sequence, where everyone takes turns saying something scientifically illiterate, Tucci reveals that a man-made device, "Destiny", is responsible for the stalled core. I'll say this once: NOTHING MAN-MADE can output the amount of energy needed to stall a PLANET'S core. What part of "NOTHING MAN-MADE" don't the film-makers understand? Arrogant, anthropocentric, bacterial mites!
Conceited humans refuse to acknowledge One True Fact: THE PLANET will be fine whether or not the core spins at all; *whether or not humans EXIST at all*. You're only "saving" it for your OWN selfish ends
As the two surviving Attractive People are rescued, Rat cries, "The earth is healing itself!" - It was never sick, dimwit!
But I think I'M going to be
(Movie Maniacs, visit: www.poffysmoviemania.com)
423 comments in total
Add another comment
Related Links