8.1/10
42
2 user

Inherit the Wind (1965)

In 1925, a Tennessee science teacher is arrested for teaching Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, and a mighty courtroom battle ensues.

Director:

Writers:

(adaptation), (play) | 1 more credit »
Reviews
Won 1 Primetime Emmy. Another 7 nominations. See more awards »

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
Henry Drummond
...
Matthew Harrison Brady
Norman Wright ...
Townsman
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
...
Rachel Brown
Robert Breen ...
Elijah
Burt Brinckerhoff ...
Bert Cates
Fred Burrell ...
Davenport
Doug Chapin ...
Howard
George Ebeling ...
Sillers
...
Dunlap
Wally Engelhardt ...
Corkin (as Wallace Englehardt)
Beulah Garrick ...
Mrs. McClain
...
E. K. Hornbeck
John Irving ...
Reporter (as John D. Irving)
...
Melinda
Edit

Storyline

In 1925, a Tennessee science teacher is arrested for teaching Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, and a mighty courtroom battle ensues.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

18 November 1965 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Hallmark Hall of Fame: Inherit the Wind (#15.2)  »

Company Credits

Show more on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Melvyn Douglas had also taken over the role of "Henry Drummond" from Paul Muni in the original Broadway production of this famous play. See more »

Connections

Version of Inherit the Wind (1999) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Stupidity highlighted in this great film.
19 June 2012 | by See all my reviews

Institutionalised stupidity was perfectly highlighted in this superb film. All the remakes and TV adaptations did the storyline justice but fell short of the originals impact. It reached a global audience, seriously damaging the image of religion in the USA.

A landmark cinematographic gem that quickly reached cult film status. It was responsible for fans coining the phrase Creatard, as in creationist retard. The storyline highlighted the blind faith thoughtlessness of evangelical, extremely commercial Christian fundamentalism. Demonstrating how it had corrupted both the education and legal systems.

When watching the film it is best to know before hand that Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge. This is significantly different from the word "theory" in common usage, which implies that something is unproven or speculative.

The defining characteristic of all scientific knowledge, including theories, is the ability to make falsifiable or testable predictions. In the same way as evolutionary theory predicted genetics and the shared genome.

The relevance and specificity of those predictions determine how potentially useful the theory is. A would-be theory that makes no observable predictions is not a useful theory. Predictions not sufficiently specific to be tested are similarly not useful. In both cases, the term "theory" is hardly applicable.

A body of descriptions of knowledge is usually only called a theory if it has fulfilled these criteria -It makes falsifiable predictions with consistent accuracy across a broad area of scientific inquiry (such as mechanics. -It is well-supported by many independent strands of evidence, rather than a single foundation. This ensures that it is probably a good approximation, if not completely correct. -It is consistent with pre-existing theories and other experimental results. (Its predictions may differ slightly from pre-existing theories in cases where they are more accurate than before.) -It can be adapted and modified to account for new evidence as it is discovered, thus increasing its predictive capability over time. -It is among the most parsimonious explanations, sparing in proposed entities or explanations. (See Occam's razor. Since there is no generally accepted objective definition of parsimony, this is not a strict criterion, but some theories are much less economical than others.) The first three criteria are the most important. Theories considered scientific meet at least most of the criteria, but ideally all of them. This is true of such established theories as special and general relativity, quantum mechanics, plate tectonics, evolution, etc.

Now enjoy a cracking film!


0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 2 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page