Chrono-Perambulator (1999) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Clever and funny – don't let the title put you off or mislead you
bob the moo8 October 2002
We open with stock footage of many failed attempts by Professor Teddy Knox to work his time machine before the discovery of a relic in Ireland surrounded by three Neolithic skeletons and metal artefacts – many years before metal was first used anywhere on record. Knox enlists James Douglas and his colleague to go back and meet the alien craft that he suspects first brought the artefacts to earth.

This short is very short and sweet but very professionally made. The opening montage is very funny, with Knox resorting to guns to take revenge on his experiments. The actual scientific find is interesting and is presented well as a period. The mystery is good but the humour remains – witness Knox draw a gun to kill the farmer demanding his field back only to be gently discouraged by Douglas. The twist isn't too shocking but is very neat and, because it's short, by the time you see it coming – it's happening.

Dance is well cast and is relaxed and works well as the sceptical bemused voice of reason in the piece. Paterson is excellent – he plays his role a little like a Scottish Dr Strangelove and is clearly wonderfully unhinged. I would have liked to see is character given a little more free reign for comedy though. However all told these two men make this very watchable.

Overall I wouldn't call it the best short I've ever seen but it is concise, funny and quite clever as an idea. The twist is good and well worth the 10 minutes – in a longer film I would have worked it out long before the end but here it works. The period is well set out and it does feel like the film `The Time Machine' (the original) in terms of characters, accents etc. Fun and better than I expected.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Beautifully atmospheric
raygirvan7 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
MAJOR SPOILER WARNING

I can't add much to Bob's earlier comment: this is a little gem of film: plus points are the strong atmosphere (helped along by classical mood music) and comic characterisation (Bill Paterson's mad scientist and Charles Dance's pompous publicity-seeking scientist). There are nice pastiches of silent movie footage and high-class costume drama (the latter reminiscent of the archaeological dig in A Month in the Country). However, fans of time travel stories may feel cheated by the plot. Three men get into the time machine to go back to the Stone Age investigate the finding of three skeletons in and around an anomalous metal structure. See what's coming? The supposed twist, then, is so blindingly obvious that the film's characters would have to be stupid not to anticipate it - maybe the excruciating inevitability is the point?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Meh
Stephan_fr23 August 2020
Watched it because it's a movie with a causal loop (predestination paradox) and I'm on time travel bender.

The issue here is that you have a movie build around a 'what if' as usual, instead of a thematic build around a story. Granted in 10m it can be hard to do exposition but "i love sarah jane' has shown it's in fact possible.

The result is a predictable ending, which is a real shame, because clearly here they had the budget and the actors (including the amazing Charles Dance).
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great twist
lynchboy200116 April 2002
This is a funny little film from Damien O'Donnell, director of the classic short film 35 a Side. Dance is called over from London to investigate an archaelogical dig that discovers turn of the century materials in a Stone-Age site. An eccentric inventor then offers the use of his time machine (The Chrono-Perambulator) to discover what happened. The result (a very clever twist) is extremely clever. O'Donnell truly has a knack with short films, hopefully he'll come back to them!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed