Scent of Danger (TV 2002)

FBI agent Carol Blue was unwilling to take local help in the case of the kidnapping of little Zoe Hendricks, but ex-cop Chris Milos' private investigation bureau proves just too good. His ... See full summary »

Director:

Peter Svatek

Writer:

Dan Levine

Stars:

Sherilyn Fenn, Costas Mandylor, Emma Campbell

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Sherilyn Fenn	...	Brenna Shaw
Costas Mandylor	...	Chris Milos
Emma Campbell	...	Carol Blue
James McGowan	...	Gideon
Ellen David	...	Connie
Steve Adams	...	Rob Garrett
Cary Lawrence	...	Lori Hendricks
Bruce Dinsmore	...	Tom Hendricks
Alicia Ducasse	...	Zoe Hendricks
Vlasta Vrana	...	Dr. York
Victoria Van Ryswyk	...	Denise Johansen
Genevieve Cocke	...	Denise's Mother (as Geneviève Cocke)
Kody McWilliams	...	Nick
Vincent Leclerc	...	Agent Pearson

Storyline

FBI agent Carol Blue was unwilling to take local help in the case of the kidnapping of little Zoe Hendricks, but ex-cop Chris Milos' private investigation bureau proves just too good. His dog handler, Brenna Shaw, and her Alsatian, Brie, find the kidnapper holding Zoe and dropping the kid in the water on purpose so he can escape. They soon conclude it's not a ransom case but more personal, are contacted under the Biblical name Gideon 'judge', and get caught up in his macabre, vindictive games and gruesome logic...

---

Plot Keywords:

dog | kidnapping | fbi agent | ex cop | private investigator | 

---

Genres:

Drama | Mystery | Thriller

---

Details

Country:

Canada

Language:

English

Release Date:

23 October 2002 (USA)

Also Known As:

Sur la piste du danger

Company Credits

Production Co:

Muse Entertainment Enterprises

Technical Specs

Runtime:

88 min

Sound Mix:

Stereo

Color:

Color

User Reviews

To TC-4 ([e-mail]): too technical but no real opinion !

I'm referring to «This movie is an insult to real handlers and their dogs., 22 October 2002 -- Author: TC-4 ([e-mail])» I might candidly agree to all the «technical» arguments regarding dogs training. To a layman like me, they seem founded. But aren't they a bit too «limited», precisely by the dog training experience ? I mean, isn't that movie judged ONLY through that prism ? I would have wanted a personal opinion about the other aspects of that movie. There must be some... even if it's by no means the «greatest movie for TV ever made»! Personally, I found it «original» BECAUSE of the roles played by the dogs. Also, who but other «dog experts» could or would agree with the flaws denounced -- however accurate they are...? And I would tend to think that they really ARE! As a layman, of course. Cheers!