| Index | 6 reviews in total |
5 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Interesting plays with your senses, 9 July 2006
![]()
Author:
archaicangel7 from United States
This film is very interesting, the characters may not be developed to a
certain depth but thats the point of this film, the director is
obviously trying to leave us with certain questions and we must find an
answer to. However, the film does not leave you wanting to know more
but its rather an experience. A sensory experience, I should say.
The film has bright colors that cannot help but to captivate your eye
and if you listen closely the use of sound by the director is
impressive, he plays with color and sound through out the film, so it
feels like an experience with your senses rather than just watching a
film with an obvious plot. This movie is great for anyone looking for
something different and new.
However Chan's more plot developed films are The longest summer and
Made in Hong Kong, the cinematography in these films is not great but
the stories are incredible. Hope this helps.
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Most misunderstood film about Hong Kong's future, 18 January 2011
Author:
Gau Keung
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This is one of the most misunderstood Hong Kong films. Some of the
reviewers here got part of it right. The film does borrow heavily from
the Monkey King Legend. The young pimp, for example, is referred to as
the Monkey King several times within the film, and the Chu family
members are a visual reference to the Pig King. At one point, the elder
son of the Chu family was also called the Pig King. What is
conspicuously absent here is the Tong Dynasty Monk. Therefore this
movie is not a modern version of Journey to the West, but it is in fact
an attempt to deal with the fate of the Hong Kong economy after the
handover from Britain to China, using the well known characters of the
familiar novel as metaphors.
The Monkey King is well known for his ability to morph into just about
any being on earth. He represents the adaptable Hong Kong economy. One
version of the Monkey King is the young pimp, who calls himself the
little tiger, as in the tiger economies of Asia. Unfortunately for the
tiger, who tried to succeed with his computer, he ended up smashing it
instead. This is Fruit Chan's disdainful reference to Hong Kong's
failed attempt in the 90's to base its economy on the computer
industry. He calls that attempt "tiger head and snake tail," or a
roaring start and a whimpering finish. The Monkey King nevertheless is
not limited to one morph. As one scene shows, the phone book is full of
people who have the same name as the young pimp, whose name can be
translated as "strong will." The Monkey King can indeed change again if
necessary. IOW, despite the failed attempt to turn Hong Kong into a
high tech based economy, the Monkey King lives on.
However, the Monkey King does have a nemesis, and it is the five-finger
mountain. The Monkey King was in fact imprisoned under the five-finger
mountain for hundreds of years before he was freed to accompany the
Tong Dynasty Monk on his journey to the West. In this movie, the
five-finger mountain comes in the form of the 5 high rise buildings in
Hollywood Plaza that tower over the shanty town. These 5 buildings also
represent the building boom in Shanghai and this point is driven home
when we found that the mainland prostitute Tung Tung (also known as
Fong Fong and Hung Hung), who claims to be from Shanghai, resides in
one of the units in the five-finger mountain. This is a snide reference
to the National Anthem of China, Tung Fong Hung, or the "East is Red."
The mainland prostitute therefore is here representing Shanghai and
China, and she is seducing Hong Kong (and pretty soon the USA) with her
cheap prices. In this film, Fruit Chan is really asking whether the
fast growing Shanghai economy is going to be the nemesis to the Hong
Kong economy. In fact, at one point, members of the Chu family were
waving a white flag at the five fingered mountain. Is Hong Kong ready
to surrender to Shanghai? And how is Hong Kong's economy actually doing
after the handover? This is depicted in the film by the family pet of
the Chu family. Her name is Queenie, and at one point she was lost.
When she came back, she had writings on her body which resemble those
made by the King of Kowloon, a well known delusional graffiti writing
character in Hong Kong society. Fruit Chan therefore claims that the
Hong Kong economy had lost direction after the handover, and it was as
delusional as the King of Kowloon. In fact, Hong Kong did go through a
mild recession since the handover. So, far from being an
incomprehensible dark comedy, as some people called this, this movie is
actually an attempt to examine Hong Kong's economic future.
The ending, despite its gruesome nature, does contain a note of
optimism. It shows the Chu Family moving into a resettlement estate and
it shows that one of those people who were victimized by the gangsters
had adapted to life with his mismatched hands. After all, as Fruit Chan
pointed out, the Monkey King is adaptable, and so is Hong Kong's
economy. It will do fine even when fate deals it the wrong hand,
figuratively and literally. The key to Hong Kong's future actually lies
in its past. Hong Kong's people succeeded in their past when they
relied on their professional and entrepreneurial skills, such as
roasting pigs, and these skills may be the key to success in the Hong
Kong economy of the future. As the film shows, the head of the Chu
family is the only blackmail victim who had the money to pay.
2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Fruit Chan talks about H.K. again., 22 August 2009
![]()
Author:
aliver86 from Taiwan
Before 1997 people in Mainland China think H.K. is a dream place. So after 1997 they go to H.K. to make money. As times go by when they can go to H.K. easily ,than they think about America dream. That's what Fruit Chan want to talk about. Tiger head snack tail in Chinese means beginning strong but finish weak,also symbolize the attitude of Chinese government take over H.K. after 1997. And left hand should not in right hand's place. Hollywood should not in H.K. Is H.K. should under Chinese government control?And the story is adapted the ancient Chinese novel Journey to the West.Sūn Wùkōng & Zhū Bājiè should have more magic power than the fairy.But in this movie they all played by the fairy and also show there weakness.
1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Weird, surrealistic and often more than a little wonderful, 22 December 2009
![]()
Author:
ky_chong
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Fruit Chan is a kind of one-man show: he writes, directs and produces
his own movies, and he has little regard for what the rest of Hong Kong
cinema is churning out. His films can't be more different than those
commercial comedies populated by cutesy pop-stars or the habitual genre
movies that Hong Kong filmmakers excel in. "Hollywood Hong Kong" is
something firmly in the line of Fruit Chan's filmography, meaning you
get the kind of strange narrative twists you generally don't expect.
But in this Fruit Chan universe everything is rich, weird, surrealistic
and often more than a little wonderful. The closest equivalent I have
for him is Wes Anderson in the US, but even Wes does not come near the
odd narrative surprises that "Hollywood Hong Kong" serves up for the
audience.
"Hollywood Hong Kong" is set in an old shanty town in Hong Kong where a
rotund barbecue pork seller/butcher and his two equally over-sized
children make barbecued pork for wet market buyers. Zhou Xun plays a
pretty hooker from Shanghai, China, who encounters the younger brother
and seduces the elder one. A neighboring young pimp who is equally
infatuated with the hooker gets hooked too with the girl who has been
advertising her services on the web. Even the older father, Mr Chu,
becomes somewhat obsessed with the attractive, at first seemingly
harmless, girl.
True to Fruit Chan tradition, another subplot is laced with black
humor: a female, middle-aged doctor from mainland China wants to help
Mr Chu's sow have babies, but not of piglets - she wants the sow to
bear human fetuses, and she persuades the butcher to let her implant
fetuses into the pig. Three-thirds into the movie, someone's arm gets
chopped off, and the doctor sewn a wrong one back. Humor of this sort
is riotous throughout "Hollywood Hong Kong", but it is of a very
decidedly black kind, and makes the narrative more interesting for
that.
Perhaps some people will question the meaning of the film. I'd like
agree to some extent to one of the IMDb reviewers that this movie seems
like an inverted "Journey to the West" where the evil spider spirit
(Zhou Xun) appear to triumph over the other two characters, Monkey and
Pigsy. But this reading may be too simplistic. Fruit Chan has imbued
enough sympathy even for the Zhou Xun character, not to mention the
pimp, the butcher and the butcher's sons. Another way to read it is to
see it as Chan's commentary on the intrusion of mainland Chinese
culture into Hong Kong. Fruit Chan is documenting something quite real
(a large number of prostitutes working in HK now are from the mainland,
and some are working quite unscrupulously). The copious amount of
corpulent flesh is surely metaphoric for sex in a film where sex is
very frankly addressed. I find it a little strange that some reviewers
are actually finding this a "typical art-house movie". If they do their
homework, they will realize Fruit Chan is an independent filmmaker but
rarely "art-house" the way Tsai Ming-liang, Kieslowski or Fellini are.
8 out of 32 people found the following review useful:
Oscar-winning Hollywood it isn't, 12 February 2003
![]()
Author:
Lester Mak (leekandham) from London, UK
Hollywood Hong Kong may have won several awards, but the question that
lingers in my mind is why? It's a typical art-house movie, but there
really
isn't much that is outstanding at all.
The plot centres around a 'shanty-town' in the shadows of 'Hollywood', a
housing estate in Hong Kong. A prostitute arrives in the town with desires
to travel to America. Meanwhile, a barbecue pork seller struggles to make
ends meet, and things get worse when the girl arrives, as she turns the
lives of the him, his family and other residents upside
down.
The plot is fairly simple and there's really not much to say about it.
However, the film allows the viewer an insight into the lives of about
half
a dozen characters and does this well. But otherwise there is very little
to
shout about it.
Hollywood Hong Kong probably is a little special as not many art-house
films
originate there. But nonetheless, I feel this is one film that may be
overrated.
One to watch if you're bored or looking for insight.
5 out of 31 people found the following review useful:
Blackmail and Roast Pork, 6 November 2005
![]()
Author:
Bill-1035 from United Kingdom
The story concerns a family of extremely fat Hong Kong pork butchers,
father and two sons, a young pimp who is trying to set up an internet
call girl service and a beautiful young prostitute who blackmails the
first two for a rich man we never meet. Along the way we are treated to
escaped pigs being chased through narrow alleys, people being chased
through narrow alleys, pigs being chopped up, people's hands being
chopped off (and stitched back on to the wrong arms, sex, blackmail and
general confusion.
This is not an art house movie. There is no pretence at art. The film
is not character driven because none of the characters are on screen
long enough for their personalities to be developed and consequently we
can feel no sympathy for their plight. The social commentary is crude
and obvious, the poor people do over the pigs while the rich people do
over the poor people and take their money to boot and just to emphasise
the point there are lots of shots contrasting the corrugated iron
hovels of shanty town with posh apartment buildings soaring towards the
sky.
This is the first Fruit Chan movie I've seen and it will almost
certainly be the last. Unfortunately it is not quite bad enough to be
one of those movies like 'Plan 9 from Outer Space' that keep you
watching in awed fascination just to see what new depths it can plumb,
this movie is just common or garden bad; bad with no distinguishing
features.
| Ratings | Awards | External reviews |
| Official site | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |