1 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :- X-traordinary, 4 December 2004
Author:
dunmore_ego from Los Angeles, California
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
X-SPOILERS.
Unfortunate that X1 and X2 are now associated with these mutant movies,
instead of their original references Bell's X1 aircraft, piloted by
Chuck Yeager, was the first documented to break the sound barrier in
1947 never forget that, young-uns! Successive X-numbers denoted
successive prototypes.
Has there ever been a more perfectly-cast movie than X2? So many
characters fitting our preconceptions so absolutely er - except for
Cyclops, whose role is disconcertingly minimal, as it was in X-Men.
Comicbook Cyclops Scott Summers was always the undisputed Leader of the
group, exuding a patriarchal air amongst the very first x-youngsters to
the present. Movie Cyclops James Marsden exudes all the presence of a
day-player, or some guy in a bar in Miami in an episode of Girls Gone
Wild.
Jean Grey's character is also abused somewhat. Firstly that hair
not working, honey! Gone are comicbook Jean's cascading, volcanic-red,
lava-locks (too 80s for this modern film? - but no worse than the Anime
cartoon hairstyle she now sports); will it have to come down to an
episode of VH1's 50 Awesomely Badder Hairdos to acknowledge this soccer
mom abomination? And before we know it, Jean is gone. In a dramatic
high-point, sexily holding back a wall of water while simultaneously
powering up the X-Jet, she is sacrificed; a device which had to occur
for Jean Grey's overwhelming Phoenix force to achieve illimitable
psionic freedom (Hep me! Hep me! I'm sliding into geekery!...) In
essence, in just two movies her character traverses an arc which took
decades of comics to develop. Movies, unfortunately, do not have the
luxury of comicbook shelf-life; plots that were developed over
thousands of inter-connected comics must necessarily be composited into
a few films, before the franchise goes to pot with new directors,
unfamiliar and unlikeable cast and widened demographic mundanity. i.e.
it ALWAYS ends up G-rated, with scenes of soldiers crawling out of
exploded military vehicles to prove that they are still alive.
The film unflinchingly supplies each major character with an
interesting arc; an almost insurmountable undertaking, considering the
plethora of varied roles and interlocking story lines. Director Singer
and writers have done an incredible job, full tilt boogie even the
day-player Cyclops gets his moment to kick butt and take names - but is
ultimately taken down by a chick girly-man style!
Before I go on, I must clarify: this is an excellent movie,
well-filmed, well-written, well-acted and hey! Wolverine! 'nuff said!
- but it is not without its illogicities.
An example: Rogue is sucked out of the disabled X-Jet and Nightcrawler
bamfs out and retrieves her, bringing her back onboard safely
excellently illustrating his power's utility - BUT - well, he's back in
the out-of-control X-Jet! - why not bamf to the GROUND INSTEAD,
EINSTEIN? Matter of fact, why not individually bamf EVERYONE down to
the ground? This is the quandary that writers of superhero films must
face: all these beings put together make up a formidable force and if
they logically reasoned through any predicament, NOTHING could
ultimately harm them. When Wolverine barks, 'Don't we have any weapons
in this heap?', the full portent of his question hits us when Storm's
eyes go white they're ALL Walking Weapons. Yet here is another
mis-use of 'power' from that same scene: Couldn't Storm (who has just
conjured more twisters than there were in the movie Twister) conjure a
mighty updraft to float the X-Jet safely to earth?; couldn't Jean (who
has just utilized her telekinesis to explode a missile) also float the
jet down safely?; couldn't Iceman create a slide of ice?; the potential
list of 'saves' goes on yet, it's Airport '75 up in that converted
Blackbird and Our Man Charlton ain't nowhere in sight. Instances like
these really make you wonder whether you ARE on the Right Side, rooting
for these insensate clowns, when the ostensible Bad Guy Magneto is
the only one with any brains, balls or mutant clout to actually SAVE
the jet.
Admittedly, even in the comics, utilization of super-powers are
oft-times foregone in favor of plot development.
The DVD commentaries *infuriate* with their naivete: cast and crew
misuse and completely misunderstand the word 'evolution', continually
saying 'evolve' where they simply should say 'develop', illustrating an
utter ignorance of this world-shaping concept. 'Evolution' is a process
by which mutated genes, if they enable an organism to better adapt to
its environment, are 'selected' and passed on. Less-adaptable organisms
are leached out of the pathway of Life vis a vis 'natural selection'.
Not being an essay on 'evolution' per se, this skeletal description
will have to suffice to illustrate the ingenuousness of terms like
'character evolution'.
The DVD also bludgeons viewers with the unsubtle 'message' of
tolerance. As if the raison d'etre of this movie IS to promote
tolerance and NOT to make sinful amounts of exploitative cash. By
exploiting a 'minority' existing in fantasy, they audaciously attach
this analogy to world problems, and then pretend they CARE. The fact
that this movie issues from one of the most insular, IN-tolerant places
on earth Hollywood makes that 'message' all the more hypocritical
and straight-up shameless prevarication.
The X-Men's 'message' has nothing to do with why this film was made -
the current rash of superhero movies is not being voraciously consumed
faster than they can be made because audiences wish to imbue themselves
with spiritual elevation; no, superhero-mania is the latest fad in a
long line of film fads remember all those 'war' movies after WWII?;
all the 'westerns' of the forties through sixties; the 'cop' films of
the seventies; 'slasher' films of the eighties; the genres of
'baseball', 'family', 'romantic comedies', et al. 'Superhero' films now
join the carousel of bankable corporate products because the
generation who grew up enamored with comics is now at an age where THEY
are making the major business decisions in the world. So please spare
us the faux-philanthropy and get on with entertaining us for our cash.
Watch it at Amazon
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
X2 (2003) More at IMDbPro »
1 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-

X-traordinary, 4 December 2004
Author: dunmore_ego from Los Angeles, California
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
X-SPOILERS.
Unfortunate that X1 and X2 are now associated with these mutant movies, instead of their original references Bell's X1 aircraft, piloted by Chuck Yeager, was the first documented to break the sound barrier in 1947 never forget that, young-uns! Successive X-numbers denoted successive prototypes.
Has there ever been a more perfectly-cast movie than X2? So many characters fitting our preconceptions so absolutely er - except for Cyclops, whose role is disconcertingly minimal, as it was in X-Men. Comicbook Cyclops Scott Summers was always the undisputed Leader of the group, exuding a patriarchal air amongst the very first x-youngsters to the present. Movie Cyclops James Marsden exudes all the presence of a day-player, or some guy in a bar in Miami in an episode of Girls Gone Wild.
Jean Grey's character is also abused somewhat. Firstly that hair not working, honey! Gone are comicbook Jean's cascading, volcanic-red, lava-locks (too 80s for this modern film? - but no worse than the Anime cartoon hairstyle she now sports); will it have to come down to an episode of VH1's 50 Awesomely Badder Hairdos to acknowledge this soccer mom abomination? And before we know it, Jean is gone. In a dramatic high-point, sexily holding back a wall of water while simultaneously powering up the X-Jet, she is sacrificed; a device which had to occur for Jean Grey's overwhelming Phoenix force to achieve illimitable psionic freedom (Hep me! Hep me! I'm sliding into geekery!...) In essence, in just two movies her character traverses an arc which took decades of comics to develop. Movies, unfortunately, do not have the luxury of comicbook shelf-life; plots that were developed over thousands of inter-connected comics must necessarily be composited into a few films, before the franchise goes to pot with new directors, unfamiliar and unlikeable cast and widened demographic mundanity. i.e. it ALWAYS ends up G-rated, with scenes of soldiers crawling out of exploded military vehicles to prove that they are still alive.
The film unflinchingly supplies each major character with an interesting arc; an almost insurmountable undertaking, considering the plethora of varied roles and interlocking story lines. Director Singer and writers have done an incredible job, full tilt boogie even the day-player Cyclops gets his moment to kick butt and take names - but is ultimately taken down by a chick girly-man style!
Before I go on, I must clarify: this is an excellent movie, well-filmed, well-written, well-acted and hey! Wolverine! 'nuff said! - but it is not without its illogicities.
An example: Rogue is sucked out of the disabled X-Jet and Nightcrawler bamfs out and retrieves her, bringing her back onboard safely excellently illustrating his power's utility - BUT - well, he's back in the out-of-control X-Jet! - why not bamf to the GROUND INSTEAD, EINSTEIN? Matter of fact, why not individually bamf EVERYONE down to the ground? This is the quandary that writers of superhero films must face: all these beings put together make up a formidable force and if they logically reasoned through any predicament, NOTHING could ultimately harm them. When Wolverine barks, 'Don't we have any weapons in this heap?', the full portent of his question hits us when Storm's eyes go white they're ALL Walking Weapons. Yet here is another mis-use of 'power' from that same scene: Couldn't Storm (who has just conjured more twisters than there were in the movie Twister) conjure a mighty updraft to float the X-Jet safely to earth?; couldn't Jean (who has just utilized her telekinesis to explode a missile) also float the jet down safely?; couldn't Iceman create a slide of ice?; the potential list of 'saves' goes on yet, it's Airport '75 up in that converted Blackbird and Our Man Charlton ain't nowhere in sight. Instances like these really make you wonder whether you ARE on the Right Side, rooting for these insensate clowns, when the ostensible Bad Guy Magneto is the only one with any brains, balls or mutant clout to actually SAVE the jet.
Admittedly, even in the comics, utilization of super-powers are oft-times foregone in favor of plot development.
The DVD commentaries *infuriate* with their naivete: cast and crew misuse and completely misunderstand the word 'evolution', continually saying 'evolve' where they simply should say 'develop', illustrating an utter ignorance of this world-shaping concept. 'Evolution' is a process by which mutated genes, if they enable an organism to better adapt to its environment, are 'selected' and passed on. Less-adaptable organisms are leached out of the pathway of Life vis a vis 'natural selection'. Not being an essay on 'evolution' per se, this skeletal description will have to suffice to illustrate the ingenuousness of terms like 'character evolution'.
The DVD also bludgeons viewers with the unsubtle 'message' of tolerance. As if the raison d'etre of this movie IS to promote tolerance and NOT to make sinful amounts of exploitative cash. By exploiting a 'minority' existing in fantasy, they audaciously attach this analogy to world problems, and then pretend they CARE. The fact that this movie issues from one of the most insular, IN-tolerant places on earth Hollywood makes that 'message' all the more hypocritical and straight-up shameless prevarication.
The X-Men's 'message' has nothing to do with why this film was made - the current rash of superhero movies is not being voraciously consumed faster than they can be made because audiences wish to imbue themselves with spiritual elevation; no, superhero-mania is the latest fad in a long line of film fads remember all those 'war' movies after WWII?; all the 'westerns' of the forties through sixties; the 'cop' films of the seventies; 'slasher' films of the eighties; the genres of 'baseball', 'family', 'romantic comedies', et al. 'Superhero' films now join the carousel of bankable corporate products because the generation who grew up enamored with comics is now at an age where THEY are making the major business decisions in the world. So please spare us the faux-philanthropy and get on with entertaining us for our cash.
994 comments in total
Add another comment
Related Links