155 out of 235 people found the following comment useful :- Star Power Overcomes Some Comic Weaknesses, 18 December 2004
Author:
realangst from United States
There are many movies where the performances are so good that the
weaknesses of the movie itself are almost oblivious.
The casting in this film, bringing together the stars of the original
with Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand as Greg aka Gaylord Focker's
parents, is sensational.
While I admit that I believed I would read comments and reviews about
the crudeness of the material, I believe the reason this is not a
typically tragic Hollywood farce is due to the strength of the
performances and the interaction of the characters.
As you know, the premise of the movie is very simple. Prior to the
wedding of Greg and Pam, the two families will meet. In typical
Hollywood sequel fashion, we already know that the Byrnses are somewhat
reserved, set in their ways. So it is no surprise that the Fockers are
almost the complete opposite.
Hilarity ensures, some crude, some overtly sexual. But the cast is
skillful and it plays more like a comic version of "Closer". You will
believe that Bernie and Roz (amazing performances by Dustin Hoffman and
Barbra Streisand) are Greg Focker's parents. Not only is their
interaction genuine, their love for their child is as well. Part of
Greg's embarrassment is the knowledge of his parents' "quirks" and how
different they are from the Byrnses. Ben Stiller aptly conveys this
while not backing down from his love for his parents.
Meanwhile, stern Jack Byrnes scans the Fockers for clues to prove why
he should not like them, therefore not allowing his daughter to be
married into that family. His design of the RV is classic Jack Byrnes.
What is an improvement in this film, is that Jack discovers some things
about himself and his relationship with his wife and daughter that
change him. This may be the funniest performance in Robert DeNiro's
career.
Throughout the film, there are themes that everyone has experienced but
most of all, how important love is. The love of another and the love of
family and friends. There is a very good example of this in a scene
between Teri Polo and Ben Stiller, after some new information is
exposed that could possibly tear them apart once again.
All in all, when you know the cast is having a good time, the audience
does too. I will be seeing this one more than once.
141 out of 210 people found the following comment useful :- We've Been "Focker-ized"!, 20 December 2004
Author:
Radio_Lady from Portland, Oregon
"Meet the Fockers" sounds like "Meet the f-u-u- ". Oops! Can't say that
because of FCC guidelines. Just the same, the title pretty much
describes the level of the humor in this Ben Stiller comedy. But that's
redundant because it IS a Ben Stiller movie. Clearly my expectations
for this movie were not high and, maybe because of that, I found "Meet
the Fockers" quite funny.
Don't get me wrong. This is not a movie for everyone. First off, the
writers did not miss a single opportunity to play off of the name
"Focker". It's silly and gets a little old but it somehow works with
the other repetitious low-down gags.
Focker is the family name for Greg (Focker), Ben Stiller. The funniest
Fockers, however, (now I'm doing it) are Greg's parents Bernie and Roz,
a loose and liberal Florida hippy couple still living in the last
century and enjoying every minute of it. Dustin Hoffman, as Bernie
displays a previously unrevealed talent for over the top comedy.
Fitting perfectly with Hoffman's Bernie, is Barbra Streisand as Roz
Focker, reminiscent of the "zaftig" Lainie Kazan. Bernie is a
yesteryear lawyer who has not practiced since who knows when. Roz is
the main breadwinner from her business as a sex therapist to the
elderly.
Greg is not too eager to reveal his parents' true nature to his
fiancée's parents as they all come to visit to get to know one another
better. Teri Polo nicely plays Greg's fiancée Pam. Robert DeNiro and
Blythe Danner play her stiff and straight parents, Jack and Dina
Byrnes. Oh also add in some baby low-brow by Spencer and Bradley
Pickeren, two adorable twins playing Little Jack.
So, go low, go loose -- or don't go at all -- but if you like Ben
Stiller, go see "Meet the Fockers". Dustin's antics will crack you up
and you'll enjoy Barbra back on the big screen after so long. Rated a
B+.
89 out of 140 people found the following comment useful :- Not as good as the original, but its' still a satisfying sequel!, 19 December 2004
Author:
max-217 from Chicago
MEET THE FOCKERS made me laugh a lot. It probably has more laughs than
the original, but the laughs aren't as big or as fresh or as subtle.
And as sequels go, it contains many scenes that are mere variations of
the original: the dinner gone wrong, the sports competition gone wrong,
the pet gone wrong, the Owen Wilson cameo, the "focker" puns, etc. But
many of the variations are quite inspired. Thanks to the terrific cast.
De Niro, Stiller, Hoffman and Streisand all look like they're having a
great time. Each is given a scene or two to really shine; De Niro and
Hoffman fare the best. A child actor's also been added to the cast, and
he's a scene-stealer. I just wish Blythe Danner (Mrs. Byrnes) and Teri
Polo (Pam Focker) were given more to do. But, as entertaining as I
thought the movie was, expect many critics to be turned off or pretend
to be turned off by the numerous toilet jokes. I say, flock 'em!
119 out of 205 people found the following comment useful :- The critics are wrong, this movie is funny, 22 December 2004
Author:
christian123
After convincing his fiancée's parents to allow them to marry, Greg
Focker (Ben Stiller) now has to deal with what happens when her ex-CIA
father Jack Byrnes (Robert De Niro) meets his own wacky ex-hippy
parents, played by Dustin Hoffman and Barbara Streisand.
I really wanted to see this film when it was first announced. The
original was very funny and it had a great repeat value. However, the
reviews started coming in and they were all negative so I was a little
discouraged. I still went to see it and it turned out to be very funny.
The critics really need to lighten up since they turned away a fine
comedy. Sure, some of the gags are old and tired but they still work.
They use a lot of "Focker" jokes and of male nurse jokes sob that kind
of got annoying but it wasn't an overload either. The story is pretty
much the same as the first one except now Greg's parents are thrown
into the mix and nothing ever goes right. The writers came up with a
bunch of different, funny situations and some of them were recycled
while others were new.
The cast is great and they help move the film along nicely. The best
was clearly Dustin Hoffman as Greg's dad. He was hilarious and fun to
watch on screen. Ben Stiller was okay but his uptight character role is
kind of getting annoying. Robert De Niro also gives a funny performance
and he is now forgiven for appearing in Godsend. Barbara Streisand was
surprisingly funny and bearable. I usually cannot stand her but she was
alright in the movie. Blythe Danner gives a decent performance, nothing
really special. Teri Polo was the only miscast in the movie. She just
didn't fit or look well next to Hoffman, Stiller and De Niro. Owen
Wilson makes a cameo and it was decent, a little unnecessary though.
Jay Roach directs and he does a good job with the movie though it was a
little too long. 115 minutes is kind of long for a comedy and because
of the long running time, the film starts to bore around the end. They
should have taken some things out to keep the film shorter and
interesting. I also didn't like the character little Jack. He was the
grandson of Jack (De Niro) and he was very annoying. The addition of
the baby character was unnecessary and it kind of brought the film
down. Compared to the original, the first one is funnier and more
enjoyable. The second one is still pretty funny but it doesn't have a
good repeat value. However, the film is still worth checking out in
theaters. In the end, please ignore the critics and check this film out
in theaters. Rating 7/10
43 out of 61 people found the following comment useful :- Stay away from this movie in droves, 14 January 2005
Author:
baikauskas from Chicago
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Despite the reviews being lukewarm, I went to see this movie on a
recent afternoon because I had a couple of hours between holiday visits
to friends. It was the only film that fit my schedule. It was not my
first, second or third choice and if I had absolutely anything else to
do and if the weather had been any more cooperative, I would have run -
not walked out of the theater. I decided that since it remained at the
top of the box office for another week, maybe, just maybe there was
something redeeming about it. There isn't. Nothing. And the audience
agreed. There were probably 20 of us and not one person - not one -
laughed at any point in this movie. It is one of the most pathetic
wastes of talent since - since - since I don't know what. Shame on
everyone associated with this horribly unfunny movie.
25 out of 36 people found the following comment useful :- A different kind of comedy than Meet the Parents, 30 April 2005
Author:
Brandt Sponseller from New York City
Series note: As this is a direct continuation of Meet the Parents
(2000), it is recommended that you watch that film first. It gives
necessary background exposition and characterization for this film.
Gaylord "Greg" Focker (Ben Stiller) and fiancée Pam Byrnes' (Teri Polo)
wedding is fast approaching, and their parents still have not met each
other. So Greg and Pam fly from Chicago to New York to meet her
parents, Jack (Robert De Niro) and Dina (Blythe Danner), before heading
off with them to Miami to meet his parents, Bernie (Dustin Hoffman) and
Mother Focker Roz (Barbara Streisand). The problem is that the Byrnes
are staid, conservative (though slightly crazy) types who would never
think of showing public affection, while the Fockers are still
hippies--she is a sex therapist for elderly couples and he's a lawyer
who became Mr. Mom once Gaylord was born. Can Gaylord keep his parents
reined in enough to not cause Jack blow his lid and try to stop the
wedding? Although I didn't think Meet the Fockers was quite as funny or
successful as Meet the Parents, it's still funny and successful, with a
bit less of an emphasis on nonstop outrageous humor and a bit more of
an emphasis on the often amusing complexities of extended family
relationships.
If you've seen Meet the Parents first--and you should--some of the
material, such as Gaylord's job, jokes based on the "Focker" name, and
even Jack's background and disposition will have less of an impact,
which initially partially depends on novelty and surprise.
Additionally, director Jay Roach and the writing team of James
Herzfeld, Marc Hyman and John Hamburg telegraph quite a few of the
punch lines. For just one example, it's obvious that something is going
to happen to Gaylord's rental car in New York as soon as we hear him
opt out of purchasing insurance, blowing it off as a "scam" to make
money.
On the other hand, Roach and crew make it clear from the start that
they're not exactly shooting for the same style of film as Meet the
Parents. This is evident from the beginning, which cleverly pokes fun
at Meet the Parents' "gradually going to hell in a handbasket" style by
having everything go exactly right.
Roach aims for classic scenarios of families colliding that have
surprisingly serious subtexts (and in the real world, these kinds of
situations do have an attendant humor, at least when we're not right in
the midst of them). Every family tends to have its own customs and
norms, its own take on ethics, etiquette, politics, religion and so on.
Naturally, when we try to merge families through marriages,
uncomfortable, often embarrassing, and frequently tense situations
abound. Aside from the humor, this is the crux of Meet the Fockers.
Another important subtext that occurs in various guises through the
film (and for which the potential was there in Meet the Parents even if
it wasn't capitalized on in quite the same way) is opening up to
"free", honest expression of one's thoughts, feelings and desires
versus showing a "proper" public face. This is particularly amusing and
poignant in the case of Jack, whose job involved obtaining honest
expression, but who is the strongest case of putting on a false public
face--to an extent that he's bought into the persona himself. In a way,
Roach and crew are suggesting that if we can really reach that ideal
self-expression, maybe those family mergers, and even other kinds of
cultural encounters (such as the Fockers' run-in with the police) could
proceed more smoothly.
So it's not so important whether Meet the Fockers is as funny as Meet
the Parents. Roach isn't just trying to make you laugh, even though he
does so frequently. Despite all the comments in others' reviews about
sex-oriented humor (how could you not expect that in a film with a
title like this?), or general "low-brow" humor, the comic situations
here are more sophisticated in many ways than a typical "outrageous"
comedy. That means that you're not going to laugh out loud, with tears
streaming down your face, as often as you're going to be sitting there
with a big smile on your face watching scenarios such as Bernie trying,
and mostly succeeding, to hold on to his hippie ideals no matter what
the short term costs. This is more a humor of slightly exaggerated but
realistic folly, played fabulously by a stellar cast.
23 out of 33 people found the following comment useful :- ahhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!! humbug, 28 February 2005
Author:
wee_scottish_lassie from Paris, France
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
You could hardly call this film a comedy. Just a bunch of people making
absolute fools of themselves. When I went to see this I just about died
of boredom. It is simply not funny! There was absolutely nothing
hilarious about the guy's mum being a sex therapist.. There was nothing
funny about a kid saying ass hole. Come to think of it, there was
nothing funny about it full stop. I am fed up of seeing films which are
not only trash as far as film making is concerned but destroy the
purpose of going to the cinema. "Now what is the purpose?" I hear you
ask.. That, my dears is something that if you do not know now, will
find out in the future years to come. In my mind the purpose is to be
entertained but Hollywood doesn't seem to think like that. I sincerely
hope that no more people will go and see this sad excuse for a film.
18 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :- Focking Awful, 19 February 2005
Author:
warnerclassic from Sunny Sunny Cornwall
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Meeting the Parents of your girlfriend can be stressful enough. But
having her parents meet yours can sometimes be a recipe for disaster,
something Greg Focker finds to his peril; when both sets of parents
meet on the eve of his wedding. Made after the success of Meet the
Parents, Meet the Fockers carries on where the last film left off, with
Greg delivering babies while his stuffy future father in laws delivers
ultimatums, both with memorable results. Of course Greg is now finally
in "The Circle of Trust" a circle that is headed by Jack, Greg's
uptight future father in law, retired from the CIA, yet still firmly
attached to his former profession. Meanwhile Greg's own parents are
laid back and free with their emotions, his mother being a sex
therapist and his father a house husband. Knowing Jack's conservative
ways Greg is delighted but terrified at his fiancés news that they are
going to have a baby. Worried of Jacks reaction, things get worse when
Greg's old teenage crush reappears, along with a 15 year old son who is
a dead ringer for Greg and, as far as Jack's concerned, a prime
contender for a DNA test . Meet the Fockers is based purely in the
realm of a one joke movie (i.e. the family's name) and so has the
longevity of one (i.e. very short) The main problems with the film is
the heartbreaking (from a film fans point of view) sight of Robert De
Niro, Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand all participating in a film
that Benny Hill would have passed at. Streisand, the powerhouse all
singing and acting legend, is here reduced to teaching senior citizens
how to have better sex, something I could have lived without seeing.
Hoffman is clearly having fun, although quite unaware that the audience
isn't. His scenes with De Niro have a chemistry, but the scenes
themselves do little to their reputations. One scene with Hoffman
sitting on a toilet and De Niro in the shower waiting for him to
"finish" really felt like an all time low, and when Hoffman flushed I
hoped their careers wasn't going down with it. One high point is the
appearance of Owen Wilson (Stiller's Hutch to his Starsky) who shows up
at the end, but by that time I was too busy sawing through my wrists.
Meet the Fockers has an incredible waste of exceptional talent, and
that my friends is no laughing matter.
23 out of 35 people found the following comment useful :- Overrated, vulgar and NOT FUNNY!, 12 February 2005
Author:
moviemasterdebater from Western Sahara
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Believe the critics because this one is just a rehash of the first and
I don't remember laughing even once during the entire film.
Unfortunately, this sequel continues in the same vein as the original.
Making fun of Greg's profession as a male nurse and using his last name
in virtually every way possible to replace the sexual expletive, this
film appears doomed from the start for family viewing.
Along with heavy innuendo based on the family moniker, much of the
script's humor relies on overt sexual themes for the punch lines.
Working as a seniors' sex therapist, Roz promotes erotic exercise moves
and candidly discusses options for an amorously repressed couple. A
paternity case, a busload of buxom cheerleaders who start to remove
their tops and an incident of mooning are also played for laughs. As
well, a toddler learns to swear repeatedly and gets his hands on some
hard liquor when a flustered caregiver is distracted by an incoming
call. The results are supposed to be funny, but the farce often comes
up short in good taste.
46 out of 82 people found the following comment useful :- Re-used material presented in a way that makes it seem brand new, 23 December 2004
Author:
MasterDebator5 from New Jersey, USA
Meet The Fockers Starring: Robert DeNiro, Ben Stiller, Teri Polo,
Blythe Danner, Barbra Streisand, and Dustin Hoffman.
Meet The Fockers (The sequel to the successful comedy, Meet The
Parents) is about male nurse Gaylord Focker (Ben Stiller) and his
fiancée Pam Byrnes (Teri Polo). They fly out to meet Pam's parents
(DeNiro and Blythe) along with Pam's sister's young baby to meet
Gaylord's parents (Hoffman and Streisand) for the first time. As
expected DeNiro's old fashioned ideals on families and the Fockers'
easy going, hippie style clash in various hilarious ways.
If you're a fan of the first film and are looking for new styles of
jokes, this may not be the film for you. Although Meet The Fockers is a
funny film (this is of course my opinion) it is not all that original.
Many jokes from the first film are recycled in new ways in the second.
When I say 'recycled' I mean that the same kind of joke is used, but in
a different setting and a different situation. This should be expected
from many sequels, and yet the thing that makes Meet The Fockers
different from other sequels to comedies is that it may use the same
jokes, but it keeps the jokes fresh and they are always different
enough from the first time the joke was used to still be funny. For
example, Jack spying on his family via secret cameras, that bit is used
again, but it is kept original and doesn't seem that lame. Another
example of a sequel like this is Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me.
It did the same bits and still kept them fresh.
A complaint of mine about the movie is that at times there are too many
things going on. In other words, the story isn't as simple as the
original film. I won't give away any of the plot lines because I don't
want to ruin the film for you, but at times you may find yourself
thinking: "Oh yeah, I forgot that that happened before." Barbra and
Dustin were great additions to the cast. They did a good job of being
Greg's wacky, hippie parents. Especially because neither of them
usually do comedy.
All in all Meet The Fockers is a good film and is definitely worthy of
the $8.50 (or whatever) that you would have to spend.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsnews articlesPromotional
taglinestrailers and videospostersphoto galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Meet the Fockers (2004)
155 out of 235 people found the following comment useful :-

Star Power Overcomes Some Comic Weaknesses, 18 December 2004
Author: realangst from United States
There are many movies where the performances are so good that the weaknesses of the movie itself are almost oblivious.
The casting in this film, bringing together the stars of the original with Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand as Greg aka Gaylord Focker's parents, is sensational.
While I admit that I believed I would read comments and reviews about the crudeness of the material, I believe the reason this is not a typically tragic Hollywood farce is due to the strength of the performances and the interaction of the characters.
As you know, the premise of the movie is very simple. Prior to the wedding of Greg and Pam, the two families will meet. In typical Hollywood sequel fashion, we already know that the Byrnses are somewhat reserved, set in their ways. So it is no surprise that the Fockers are almost the complete opposite.
Hilarity ensures, some crude, some overtly sexual. But the cast is skillful and it plays more like a comic version of "Closer". You will believe that Bernie and Roz (amazing performances by Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand) are Greg Focker's parents. Not only is their interaction genuine, their love for their child is as well. Part of Greg's embarrassment is the knowledge of his parents' "quirks" and how different they are from the Byrnses. Ben Stiller aptly conveys this while not backing down from his love for his parents.
Meanwhile, stern Jack Byrnes scans the Fockers for clues to prove why he should not like them, therefore not allowing his daughter to be married into that family. His design of the RV is classic Jack Byrnes. What is an improvement in this film, is that Jack discovers some things about himself and his relationship with his wife and daughter that change him. This may be the funniest performance in Robert DeNiro's career.
Throughout the film, there are themes that everyone has experienced but most of all, how important love is. The love of another and the love of family and friends. There is a very good example of this in a scene between Teri Polo and Ben Stiller, after some new information is exposed that could possibly tear them apart once again.
All in all, when you know the cast is having a good time, the audience does too. I will be seeing this one more than once.
141 out of 210 people found the following comment useful :-

We've Been "Focker-ized"!, 20 December 2004
Author: Radio_Lady from Portland, Oregon
"Meet the Fockers" sounds like "Meet the f-u-u- ". Oops! Can't say that because of FCC guidelines. Just the same, the title pretty much describes the level of the humor in this Ben Stiller comedy. But that's redundant because it IS a Ben Stiller movie. Clearly my expectations for this movie were not high and, maybe because of that, I found "Meet the Fockers" quite funny.
Don't get me wrong. This is not a movie for everyone. First off, the writers did not miss a single opportunity to play off of the name "Focker". It's silly and gets a little old but it somehow works with the other repetitious low-down gags.
Focker is the family name for Greg (Focker), Ben Stiller. The funniest Fockers, however, (now I'm doing it) are Greg's parents Bernie and Roz, a loose and liberal Florida hippy couple still living in the last century and enjoying every minute of it. Dustin Hoffman, as Bernie displays a previously unrevealed talent for over the top comedy. Fitting perfectly with Hoffman's Bernie, is Barbra Streisand as Roz Focker, reminiscent of the "zaftig" Lainie Kazan. Bernie is a yesteryear lawyer who has not practiced since who knows when. Roz is the main breadwinner from her business as a sex therapist to the elderly.
Greg is not too eager to reveal his parents' true nature to his fiancée's parents as they all come to visit to get to know one another better. Teri Polo nicely plays Greg's fiancée Pam. Robert DeNiro and Blythe Danner play her stiff and straight parents, Jack and Dina Byrnes. Oh also add in some baby low-brow by Spencer and Bradley Pickeren, two adorable twins playing Little Jack.
So, go low, go loose -- or don't go at all -- but if you like Ben Stiller, go see "Meet the Fockers". Dustin's antics will crack you up and you'll enjoy Barbra back on the big screen after so long. Rated a B+.
89 out of 140 people found the following comment useful :-

Not as good as the original, but its' still a satisfying sequel!, 19 December 2004
Author: max-217 from Chicago
MEET THE FOCKERS made me laugh a lot. It probably has more laughs than the original, but the laughs aren't as big or as fresh or as subtle. And as sequels go, it contains many scenes that are mere variations of the original: the dinner gone wrong, the sports competition gone wrong, the pet gone wrong, the Owen Wilson cameo, the "focker" puns, etc. But many of the variations are quite inspired. Thanks to the terrific cast. De Niro, Stiller, Hoffman and Streisand all look like they're having a great time. Each is given a scene or two to really shine; De Niro and Hoffman fare the best. A child actor's also been added to the cast, and he's a scene-stealer. I just wish Blythe Danner (Mrs. Byrnes) and Teri Polo (Pam Focker) were given more to do. But, as entertaining as I thought the movie was, expect many critics to be turned off or pretend to be turned off by the numerous toilet jokes. I say, flock 'em!
119 out of 205 people found the following comment useful :-

The critics are wrong, this movie is funny, 22 December 2004
Author: christian123
After convincing his fiancée's parents to allow them to marry, Greg Focker (Ben Stiller) now has to deal with what happens when her ex-CIA father Jack Byrnes (Robert De Niro) meets his own wacky ex-hippy parents, played by Dustin Hoffman and Barbara Streisand.
I really wanted to see this film when it was first announced. The original was very funny and it had a great repeat value. However, the reviews started coming in and they were all negative so I was a little discouraged. I still went to see it and it turned out to be very funny. The critics really need to lighten up since they turned away a fine comedy. Sure, some of the gags are old and tired but they still work. They use a lot of "Focker" jokes and of male nurse jokes sob that kind of got annoying but it wasn't an overload either. The story is pretty much the same as the first one except now Greg's parents are thrown into the mix and nothing ever goes right. The writers came up with a bunch of different, funny situations and some of them were recycled while others were new.
The cast is great and they help move the film along nicely. The best was clearly Dustin Hoffman as Greg's dad. He was hilarious and fun to watch on screen. Ben Stiller was okay but his uptight character role is kind of getting annoying. Robert De Niro also gives a funny performance and he is now forgiven for appearing in Godsend. Barbara Streisand was surprisingly funny and bearable. I usually cannot stand her but she was alright in the movie. Blythe Danner gives a decent performance, nothing really special. Teri Polo was the only miscast in the movie. She just didn't fit or look well next to Hoffman, Stiller and De Niro. Owen Wilson makes a cameo and it was decent, a little unnecessary though.
Jay Roach directs and he does a good job with the movie though it was a little too long. 115 minutes is kind of long for a comedy and because of the long running time, the film starts to bore around the end. They should have taken some things out to keep the film shorter and interesting. I also didn't like the character little Jack. He was the grandson of Jack (De Niro) and he was very annoying. The addition of the baby character was unnecessary and it kind of brought the film down. Compared to the original, the first one is funnier and more enjoyable. The second one is still pretty funny but it doesn't have a good repeat value. However, the film is still worth checking out in theaters. In the end, please ignore the critics and check this film out in theaters. Rating 7/10
43 out of 61 people found the following comment useful :-

Stay away from this movie in droves, 14 January 2005
Author: baikauskas from Chicago
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Despite the reviews being lukewarm, I went to see this movie on a recent afternoon because I had a couple of hours between holiday visits to friends. It was the only film that fit my schedule. It was not my first, second or third choice and if I had absolutely anything else to do and if the weather had been any more cooperative, I would have run - not walked out of the theater. I decided that since it remained at the top of the box office for another week, maybe, just maybe there was something redeeming about it. There isn't. Nothing. And the audience agreed. There were probably 20 of us and not one person - not one - laughed at any point in this movie. It is one of the most pathetic wastes of talent since - since - since I don't know what. Shame on everyone associated with this horribly unfunny movie.
25 out of 36 people found the following comment useful :-

A different kind of comedy than Meet the Parents, 30 April 2005
Author: Brandt Sponseller from New York City
Series note: As this is a direct continuation of Meet the Parents (2000), it is recommended that you watch that film first. It gives necessary background exposition and characterization for this film.
Gaylord "Greg" Focker (Ben Stiller) and fiancée Pam Byrnes' (Teri Polo) wedding is fast approaching, and their parents still have not met each other. So Greg and Pam fly from Chicago to New York to meet her parents, Jack (Robert De Niro) and Dina (Blythe Danner), before heading off with them to Miami to meet his parents, Bernie (Dustin Hoffman) and Mother Focker Roz (Barbara Streisand). The problem is that the Byrnes are staid, conservative (though slightly crazy) types who would never think of showing public affection, while the Fockers are still hippies--she is a sex therapist for elderly couples and he's a lawyer who became Mr. Mom once Gaylord was born. Can Gaylord keep his parents reined in enough to not cause Jack blow his lid and try to stop the wedding? Although I didn't think Meet the Fockers was quite as funny or successful as Meet the Parents, it's still funny and successful, with a bit less of an emphasis on nonstop outrageous humor and a bit more of an emphasis on the often amusing complexities of extended family relationships.
If you've seen Meet the Parents first--and you should--some of the material, such as Gaylord's job, jokes based on the "Focker" name, and even Jack's background and disposition will have less of an impact, which initially partially depends on novelty and surprise. Additionally, director Jay Roach and the writing team of James Herzfeld, Marc Hyman and John Hamburg telegraph quite a few of the punch lines. For just one example, it's obvious that something is going to happen to Gaylord's rental car in New York as soon as we hear him opt out of purchasing insurance, blowing it off as a "scam" to make money.
On the other hand, Roach and crew make it clear from the start that they're not exactly shooting for the same style of film as Meet the Parents. This is evident from the beginning, which cleverly pokes fun at Meet the Parents' "gradually going to hell in a handbasket" style by having everything go exactly right.
Roach aims for classic scenarios of families colliding that have surprisingly serious subtexts (and in the real world, these kinds of situations do have an attendant humor, at least when we're not right in the midst of them). Every family tends to have its own customs and norms, its own take on ethics, etiquette, politics, religion and so on. Naturally, when we try to merge families through marriages, uncomfortable, often embarrassing, and frequently tense situations abound. Aside from the humor, this is the crux of Meet the Fockers.
Another important subtext that occurs in various guises through the film (and for which the potential was there in Meet the Parents even if it wasn't capitalized on in quite the same way) is opening up to "free", honest expression of one's thoughts, feelings and desires versus showing a "proper" public face. This is particularly amusing and poignant in the case of Jack, whose job involved obtaining honest expression, but who is the strongest case of putting on a false public face--to an extent that he's bought into the persona himself. In a way, Roach and crew are suggesting that if we can really reach that ideal self-expression, maybe those family mergers, and even other kinds of cultural encounters (such as the Fockers' run-in with the police) could proceed more smoothly.
So it's not so important whether Meet the Fockers is as funny as Meet the Parents. Roach isn't just trying to make you laugh, even though he does so frequently. Despite all the comments in others' reviews about sex-oriented humor (how could you not expect that in a film with a title like this?), or general "low-brow" humor, the comic situations here are more sophisticated in many ways than a typical "outrageous" comedy. That means that you're not going to laugh out loud, with tears streaming down your face, as often as you're going to be sitting there with a big smile on your face watching scenarios such as Bernie trying, and mostly succeeding, to hold on to his hippie ideals no matter what the short term costs. This is more a humor of slightly exaggerated but realistic folly, played fabulously by a stellar cast.
23 out of 33 people found the following comment useful :-

ahhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!! humbug, 28 February 2005
Author: wee_scottish_lassie from Paris, France
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
You could hardly call this film a comedy. Just a bunch of people making absolute fools of themselves. When I went to see this I just about died of boredom. It is simply not funny! There was absolutely nothing hilarious about the guy's mum being a sex therapist.. There was nothing funny about a kid saying ass hole. Come to think of it, there was nothing funny about it full stop. I am fed up of seeing films which are not only trash as far as film making is concerned but destroy the purpose of going to the cinema. "Now what is the purpose?" I hear you ask.. That, my dears is something that if you do not know now, will find out in the future years to come. In my mind the purpose is to be entertained but Hollywood doesn't seem to think like that. I sincerely hope that no more people will go and see this sad excuse for a film.
18 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :-

Focking Awful, 19 February 2005
Author: warnerclassic from Sunny Sunny Cornwall
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Meeting the Parents of your girlfriend can be stressful enough. But having her parents meet yours can sometimes be a recipe for disaster, something Greg Focker finds to his peril; when both sets of parents meet on the eve of his wedding. Made after the success of Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers carries on where the last film left off, with Greg delivering babies while his stuffy future father in laws delivers ultimatums, both with memorable results. Of course Greg is now finally in "The Circle of Trust" a circle that is headed by Jack, Greg's uptight future father in law, retired from the CIA, yet still firmly attached to his former profession. Meanwhile Greg's own parents are laid back and free with their emotions, his mother being a sex therapist and his father a house husband. Knowing Jack's conservative ways Greg is delighted but terrified at his fiancés news that they are going to have a baby. Worried of Jacks reaction, things get worse when Greg's old teenage crush reappears, along with a 15 year old son who is a dead ringer for Greg and, as far as Jack's concerned, a prime contender for a DNA test . Meet the Fockers is based purely in the realm of a one joke movie (i.e. the family's name) and so has the longevity of one (i.e. very short) The main problems with the film is the heartbreaking (from a film fans point of view) sight of Robert De Niro, Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand all participating in a film that Benny Hill would have passed at. Streisand, the powerhouse all singing and acting legend, is here reduced to teaching senior citizens how to have better sex, something I could have lived without seeing. Hoffman is clearly having fun, although quite unaware that the audience isn't. His scenes with De Niro have a chemistry, but the scenes themselves do little to their reputations. One scene with Hoffman sitting on a toilet and De Niro in the shower waiting for him to "finish" really felt like an all time low, and when Hoffman flushed I hoped their careers wasn't going down with it. One high point is the appearance of Owen Wilson (Stiller's Hutch to his Starsky) who shows up at the end, but by that time I was too busy sawing through my wrists. Meet the Fockers has an incredible waste of exceptional talent, and that my friends is no laughing matter.
23 out of 35 people found the following comment useful :-

Overrated, vulgar and NOT FUNNY!, 12 February 2005
Author: moviemasterdebater from Western Sahara
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Believe the critics because this one is just a rehash of the first and I don't remember laughing even once during the entire film. Unfortunately, this sequel continues in the same vein as the original. Making fun of Greg's profession as a male nurse and using his last name in virtually every way possible to replace the sexual expletive, this film appears doomed from the start for family viewing.
Along with heavy innuendo based on the family moniker, much of the script's humor relies on overt sexual themes for the punch lines. Working as a seniors' sex therapist, Roz promotes erotic exercise moves and candidly discusses options for an amorously repressed couple. A paternity case, a busload of buxom cheerleaders who start to remove their tops and an incident of mooning are also played for laughs. As well, a toddler learns to swear repeatedly and gets his hands on some hard liquor when a flustered caregiver is distracted by an incoming call. The results are supposed to be funny, but the farce often comes up short in good taste.
46 out of 82 people found the following comment useful :-

Re-used material presented in a way that makes it seem brand new, 23 December 2004
Author: MasterDebator5 from New Jersey, USA
Meet The Fockers Starring: Robert DeNiro, Ben Stiller, Teri Polo, Blythe Danner, Barbra Streisand, and Dustin Hoffman.
Meet The Fockers (The sequel to the successful comedy, Meet The Parents) is about male nurse Gaylord Focker (Ben Stiller) and his fiancée Pam Byrnes (Teri Polo). They fly out to meet Pam's parents (DeNiro and Blythe) along with Pam's sister's young baby to meet Gaylord's parents (Hoffman and Streisand) for the first time. As expected DeNiro's old fashioned ideals on families and the Fockers' easy going, hippie style clash in various hilarious ways.
If you're a fan of the first film and are looking for new styles of jokes, this may not be the film for you. Although Meet The Fockers is a funny film (this is of course my opinion) it is not all that original. Many jokes from the first film are recycled in new ways in the second. When I say 'recycled' I mean that the same kind of joke is used, but in a different setting and a different situation. This should be expected from many sequels, and yet the thing that makes Meet The Fockers different from other sequels to comedies is that it may use the same jokes, but it keeps the jokes fresh and they are always different enough from the first time the joke was used to still be funny. For example, Jack spying on his family via secret cameras, that bit is used again, but it is kept original and doesn't seem that lame. Another example of a sequel like this is Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me. It did the same bits and still kept them fresh.
A complaint of mine about the movie is that at times there are too many things going on. In other words, the story isn't as simple as the original film. I won't give away any of the plot lines because I don't want to ruin the film for you, but at times you may find yourself thinking: "Oh yeah, I forgot that that happened before." Barbra and Dustin were great additions to the cast. They did a good job of being Greg's wacky, hippie parents. Especially because neither of them usually do comedy.
All in all Meet The Fockers is a good film and is definitely worthy of the $8.50 (or whatever) that you would have to spend.
8.8/10 B+
Add another comment
Related Links