When his wife is killed in a seemingly random incident Harry (Turturro), prompted by mysterious visions, journeys to discover the true circumstances surrounding her murder.
Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends.
If your account is linked with Facebook and you have turned on sharing, this will show up in your activity feed. If not, you can turn on sharing
here
.
A woman is kidnapped by a stranger on a routine flight. Threatened by the potential murder of her father, she is pulled into a plot to assist her captor in offing a politician.
Based on true events, 16 year-old Jamie falls in with his mother's new boyfriend and his crowd of self-appointed neighborhood watchmen, a relationship that leads to a spree of torture and murder.
Director:
Justin Kurzel
Stars:
Lucas Pittaway,
Bob Adriaens,
Louise Harris
When his wife is killed in a seemingly random incident Harry (Turturro), prompted by mysterious visions, journeys to discover the true circumstances surrounding her murder.
Nicolas Winding Refn's film company (Jang Go Star) went bankrupt after the box office failure of this film. See more »
Quotes
[first lines]
Harry:
Unit 14 here. I got a white, middle-aged male, he just took a cardigan and slipped it into his bag. Area A-91, over.
Control Room Guard:
Copy. Got the suspect on camera. Over.
Harry:
Stay on him, here I go...
See more »
Crazy Credits
The closing credits appear on footage from CCTV security tapes. See more »
I've often been extremely critical of PG-13 horror and thriller films. Here's one that adds fuel to that fire, I'm afraid.
The core of this film revolves around John Turturro working as a security guard for a mall. For some reason he sits alone at home watching the security tapes over and over, pauses them occasionally to take pictures of people in them and then he hangs the picture on his wall with a few notes. Presumably, it's because he's hunting for the man who killed his wife. However, he doesn't see a picture of said man or the mystery security tape which shows her murder until after we see him whiling away in front of his television with his digital camera. Eventually, he thinks he's on the right track, and tries to track down old Mr. Wife-Killer.
Here's the breakdown:
The Good:
--The film's set-up is rather slow and weird enough to hold interestbut not for very long.
--The acting is alrightJohn Turturro is pretty creepy.
Didn't Hurt It, Didn't Help:
--There's barely any music.
--Slow pace may build tension for some, but is more likely to bore most people viewing the movie.
--Seemingly linear film.
--OK atmosphere.
The Bad:
--The sets constantly reminded me of Kubrick's "The Shining." You know, because they were bland, yet coated heavy with designs from the seventies. Perhaps I thought that way because of the bland hotel that John Turturro stays in which was designed in the early seventies, and never changedever.
--We see an image of a face pressed through a red plasticy-sheet occasionallybut it's never explained what the face represents. It's either tension, anger, or fear. Who knows?
--Occasional "nightmare-like" cinematography which also contains no explanation. Sure, it looks pretty good, but what the hell does it mean?
--Bland characters.
The Ugly:
--***POSSIBLE SPOILER*** This film meanders for about 100 minutes without going anywhere, getting to know anyone, or explaining anything. Husband hunts for wife's killer and gets revenge. That should've been a very simple movieand very linear. But several points are made to a sub-plot that seemed like it would have been pretty important to the storybut it's never explained!!
--A sub-plot about a cop and his fragile relationship with his wife is also never explainedor properly developed--but it is needlessly touched upon.
Memorable Scene:
--There really wasn't anything very memorable about this movie. An hour and a half of yawn.
Acting: 7/10 Story: 4/10 Atmosphere: 6/10 Cinematography: 6/10 Character Development: 4/10 Special Effects/Make-up: 0/10 (Nothing to note) Nudity/Sexuality: 0/10 Violence/Gore: 2/10 (very little violence, only slow tension) Dialogue: 7/10 Music: 6/10 Direction: 5/10
Cheesiness: 0/10 Crappiness: 5/10
Overall: 4/10
This film offers almost nothing for the viewer to enjoy. It's a terribly slow thriller that goes nowhere and explains nothing. Very bland. Certain movies and directors can get away with doing and showing things that they never explain. But this movie can't. Only for people who are bland or people who really like dull, uninteresting films that explain little or nothing.
www.ResidentHazard.com
12 of 24 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
I've often been extremely critical of PG-13 horror and thriller films. Here's one that adds fuel to that fire, I'm afraid.
The core of this film revolves around John Turturro working as a security guard for a mall. For some reason he sits alone at home watching the security tapes over and over, pauses them occasionally to take pictures of people in them and then he hangs the picture on his wall with a few notes. Presumably, it's because he's hunting for the man who killed his wife. However, he doesn't see a picture of said man or the mystery security tape which shows her murder until after we see him whiling away in front of his television with his digital camera. Eventually, he thinks he's on the right track, and tries to track down old Mr. Wife-Killer.
Here's the breakdown:
The Good:
--The film's set-up is rather slow and weird enough to hold interestbut not for very long.
--The acting is alrightJohn Turturro is pretty creepy.
Didn't Hurt It, Didn't Help:
--There's barely any music.
--Slow pace may build tension for some, but is more likely to bore most people viewing the movie.
--Seemingly linear film.
--OK atmosphere.
The Bad:
--The sets constantly reminded me of Kubrick's "The Shining." You know, because they were bland, yet coated heavy with designs from the seventies. Perhaps I thought that way because of the bland hotel that John Turturro stays in which was designed in the early seventies, and never changedever.
--We see an image of a face pressed through a red plasticy-sheet occasionallybut it's never explained what the face represents. It's either tension, anger, or fear. Who knows?
--Occasional "nightmare-like" cinematography which also contains no explanation. Sure, it looks pretty good, but what the hell does it mean?
--Bland characters.
The Ugly:
--***POSSIBLE SPOILER*** This film meanders for about 100 minutes without going anywhere, getting to know anyone, or explaining anything. Husband hunts for wife's killer and gets revenge. That should've been a very simple movieand very linear. But several points are made to a sub-plot that seemed like it would have been pretty important to the storybut it's never explained!!
--A sub-plot about a cop and his fragile relationship with his wife is also never explainedor properly developed--but it is needlessly touched upon.
Memorable Scene:
--There really wasn't anything very memorable about this movie. An hour and a half of yawn.
Acting: 7/10 Story: 4/10 Atmosphere: 6/10 Cinematography: 6/10 Character Development: 4/10 Special Effects/Make-up: 0/10 (Nothing to note) Nudity/Sexuality: 0/10 Violence/Gore: 2/10 (very little violence, only slow tension) Dialogue: 7/10 Music: 6/10 Direction: 5/10
Cheesiness: 0/10 Crappiness: 5/10
Overall: 4/10
This film offers almost nothing for the viewer to enjoy. It's a terribly slow thriller that goes nowhere and explains nothing. Very bland. Certain movies and directors can get away with doing and showing things that they never explain. But this movie can't. Only for people who are bland or people who really like dull, uninteresting films that explain little or nothing.
www.ResidentHazard.com