| Index | 7 reviews in total |
4 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
sexy, chinese charlie's angels (as if the title didn't already give that away., 19 May 2004
Author:
winkie_69 from Milwaukee, WI
If you are a fan of beautiful women, this is definitely something to
rent. If you cannot stand (at times) really crappy special effects,
don't check this one out unless you've seen everything already. I'm a
big fan of Shu Qi as well as a chinese student, so for me this was a no
brainer. I'm also someone who can just rear back and laugh at either
bad acting or bad effects.
At times this movie was really engaging. The story was interesting
enough - although nothing too special for Hong Kong cinema. The fight
sequences were interesting. The characters to watch in this movie are
however worth it. The interaction between Bone and Spider (god i love
names in chinese movies) is unforgettable. That and Shu Qi is lovely
and a damn fine actress like always. out of 10, eh, i'd have to say the
movie was about a 5.5 - 6.5, depending on who you're watching it with,
like an utter intellectual, 1.0 or if it's a good friend who likes to
laugh as much as you at cheesy things, 8.0
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Charlie's Angels on estrogen (Martial Angels), 1 June 2009
![]()
Author:
ebiros2 from United States
The movie is another Wong Jing's classic style that makes no apologies
about its intent to just entertain. If you read the subtitles, the
story isn't so bad. Shu Qi's old boy friend returns after 2 years, but
he gets kidnapped. Now Shu Qi and six other girls goes out to get him
back.
The movie is bit like Charlies Angels in that all girls team performs
action. But the girls are much better looking than the real Charlie's
Angels (US movie version that is), although their skin exposure remains
low.
The movie is bit comical because of the outrageous plot of six women
working together to perform theft as their profession, and all other
plot being outlandish as well, but it sticks to it's purpose to
entertain. I found this movie to be pretty good entertainment, and the
chemistry of members of the team interesting. Not a bad movie to be
part of the mix of other light hearted entertainment that are not only
made in Hong Kong, but also from Hollywood.
4 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Awful, 25 June 2003
![]()
Author:
Lester Mak (leekandham) from London, UK
Sometimes you need to see a bad movie just to appreciate the good ones.
Well, that's my opinion anyway. This one will always be in the bad movie
category, simply because all but Shu Qi's performance was
terrible.
Martial Angel tells of Cat (Shu Qi), a professional thief turned straight
after leaving her lover, Chi Lam (Julian Cheung), two years before. But
her
past returns to haunt her as Chi Lam is kidnapped for the ransom of
security
software belonging to the company Cat works for. In order to rescue him,
she
calls on her old friends from her orphanage days, six other feisty women,
to
save the day...
I may have told the synopsis cheesily, but this is a cheesy story. In
fact,
the whole script and direction lacked any quality at all. Much of the
dialogue was meaningless and coupled with a plot that was as thin as
rice-paper in water. If I could sum it up, take a bad Jackie Chan movie,
remove the comedy, remove the choreography, throw away the budget, and
you
have Martial Angels: a formulaic piece of work with no imagination at
all.
Mind you, I do have to give credit where credit's due, and Shu Qi was
probably the only person to emerge unscathed from the terrible action, as
it
was her performance that shone through. Okay, you can't say she was
excellent - after all she had absolutely nothing to work with - but she
did
manage to dig some character out from her role. Other than that, only
Sandra
Ng and Kelly Lin made any other impression - although these were mostly
glimmers and very brief.
Elsewhere, the film just fell to pieces. Scenes and dialogue were
completely
unnatural and unbelievable, special effects were obviously done on the
cheap
with no attempt to clean up edges between persons and the mask of the
blue
screen, poor editing involving numerous discontinuities in fight scenes,
camera angles that were elementary and unflattering, and direction I've
seen
better from a lost dog.
I guess this film was a too many cooks affair. Most probably, the budget
was
blown away on the over-enthusiasm to have seven babes on the same silver
screen. That didn't leave much else.
Frankly, the way this film was made was like a cheap porn movie without
the
porn. Charlie's Angels, it ain't. In fact, while sisters can do it for
themselves, none of that was really that apparent here.
Definitely one to forget.
It's pretty good- besides some really tacky things, 21 November 2004
Author:
arnieparnie from Australia
The movie was alright overall- the movie itself was a bit of a cliché, but if acting and effects were enhanced it would have been better. Amanda Strang's performance probably stood out the most, compared to the other typical 'angels'. The special effects were particularly bad and the ending was rather abrupt. It was a bit hard to remember all the chicks at first but the second time around I recognised all of them by their weird animal nicknames. Some of the lines were a bit cheesy and predictable, and the sudden chain of deaths really put me off. Also, I felt that some bits of the movie were a bit graphic and disturbing, but I guess for a good cause. I think it's safe to say that most people would think this movie is a load of crap, but if all these flaws were fixed then maybe the movie would score a bit higher.
1 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Gorgeous ladies - dreadful film, 21 February 2006
![]()
Author:
BA_Harrison from Hampshire, England
Despite pretty bad reviews, I just had to give this film a go it
does, after all, star HK super-babe Shu Qi plus 6 other oriental
lovelies as a team of all-action cat-burglars. Surely that's worth
checking out? Well, as babe-fests go, Martial Angels is hard to beat.
The eye candy is top quality. Shu Qi looks as fantastic as always, and
of the rest of the girls, Rosemary Vandebrouck and Amanda Strang caught
my roving eye in particular.
Unfortunately, if one is to judge this movie by any other possible
merits, it is an absolute stinker! The story is weak, the action shoddy
and the special effects downright pathetic. Director Clarence Fok and
Producer Wong Jing have given us a photogenic cast and little else.
If Shu Qi is the only reason you're contemplating seeing this one, you
would be better off watching Sex and Zen 2 again!
1 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Not very good, 22 July 2001
![]()
Author:
SoulxSide from Arizona
Reasons to avoid this film: bad script, bad action, bad effects, low budget, and just generally stupid. Reasons to see this film: Shu Qi, Kelly Lam Hei-Lui, Teresa Mak Ga Kei, Sophie Ngan Wing Sze, Sandra Ng Kwun-Yu, Rosemary, and Amanda Strang. This is basically Charlie's Angels meets Mission Impossible 2 on a shoestring budget (but they can afford to blow a few small things up and rent a helicoptor). Perhaps good for a rental or if you're obsessed with Shu Qi (in which case you would do better renting "Sex and Zen 2" or "Shu Qi - Body Show".
1 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Wonderful women, worse writing, 24 April 2004
Author:
Pro Jury
With such an amazingly wonderfully attractive cast, any six year-old kid
could think up some silly plot and still allow for a fairly pleasurable
viewing experience. So, the only explanation for MARTIAL ANGELS is that the
writer intentionally wanted to create an unwatchable movie. Indeed, this is
what we have here -- an unwatchable movie. It is really too bad because the
first part of the movie has style, the music is fun, and the actresses are
worthy of worship. The writing in MARTIAL ANGELS stinks rotten eggs.
Any Hong Kong movie producers wanting better writing, hey, contact me.
MARTIAL ANGLES is proof that you movie producers could do worse than
me.
| Ratings | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |