"Walking with Beasts"
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditsepisode listepisodes castepisode ratings... by rating... by votes
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsmessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summaryplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

FAQ for
"Walking with Prehistoric Beasts" (2001) More at IMDbPro »"Walking with Beasts" (original title)

The content of this page was created directly by users and has not been screened or verified by IMDb staff.
Visit our FAQ Help to learn more

In short, partially. Walking with Beasts is a prehistory-related television documentary that's over a decade old, and this much time has the unfortunate effect of rendering the CGI and animatronic reconstructions of its dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures highly obsolete and unscientific. The field of paleontology advances in a staggering speed, meaning that even documentaries that are merely a year or two old tend to get quickly dated. Another problem that factored in was that in a lot of cases, the production crew purposely decided to make their creatures unscientific (or at least scientifically implausible) due to budgetary reasons, or for sheer sensationalism. At the very least, the production is far more accurate than its predecessor Walking with Dinosaurs

As for a less than exhaustive list of the more prominent errors:

* Gastornis is depicted as a fearsome predator that terrorized smaller animals. Modern research suggests that this interpretation has no basis, instead, the animal was almost certainly fully herbivorous.

* Eurotamandua is live-acted by a modern-day tamandua. It probably belonged to afrotherians (like aardvarks or elephant shrews) rather than xenarthrans (like anteaters), although it could be argued that it still looked somewhat like a tamandua.

* Leptictidium moving around by hopping has been called into question.

* Although pointed out by the narration, Ambulocetus isn't known from Europe. It also had an upright gait and it is doubtful that it hunted like crocodiles.

* Propalaeotherium, although related, was probably not ancestral to modern horses.

* Both sexes of Embolotherium (called brontotheres in the episode) probably had a heart-shaped crest, not just the males.

* Andrewsarchus is no longer believed to have been a relative of whales, being instead similar to the entelodonts from episode 3.

* Hyaenodon's teeth were more suitable for shearing than crushing.

* Deinotherium's anatomy has been criticized by some people, mostly because its trunk seems too short.

* The series' depiction of Phorusrhacos is more in line with a similar bird, Titanis. Phorusrhacos was smaller and has been extinct for almost 20 million years before the time of the episode it's featured in.

* Although plausible, given that almost every animal, even herbivores, eat meat to supplement their diet, the meat-eating Megatherium is speculation.

* Neanderthal wasn't the only species of human living alongside the Cro-Magnons in episode 6. There was also Homo floresiensis.

* The coloration on certain Ice Age mammals is probably incorrect, if cave paintings depicting these are to be believed.

Page last updated by Vihktor-24, 20 hours ago
Top Contributors: Vihktor-24

r73731


Related Links

Plot summary Trivia Quotes
Goofs Crazy credits Alternate versions
Movie connections User reviews Main details