Visually interesting but worthless story, 18 April 2004
Author:
bob the moo from Birmingham, UK
Stuck in a traffic jam, a young boy fidgets restlessly beside his mother,
pulling faces and rocking back and forward. To placate him, his mother
allows him to open up a carefully wrapped present in the back seat - a
plastic toy ray gun. When they arrive home, he continues to play with his
new ray gun - to the detriment of some of the other things in his
room.
As a fan of all things short I was happy to give this film ten minutes of
my
time - if it is great then fantastic, if it is rubbish then I have only
wasted ten minutes so no great loss! The film opens in a sort of strange
1950's world that has been crossed with toned-down characters from Dr
Seuss,
with a visual style that is quite otherworldly. Visually the film is
never
really dull - it is full of bright colours and held my interest from the
very start until the strange ending.
The problem with the short is that there is almost no substance to go
along
with this style. Things happen for sure but it is difficult to really
follow what is going on or, more importantly, to make sense of understand
them to the point where you are intellectually involved in the film. The
acting doesn't really help as it isn't great. The boy and the mother both
look really fitting but neither has much to work with. The little boy is
too much of a `doer' rather than an `actor', it seems an unfair criticism
but there are times where you can almost hear the director saying `ok, sit
up now, wide eyes, that's it, now be excited and run to the door' - the
boy
just does these actions and that's a wrap. The mother only has a few
seconds onscreen but the presence of her hands washing dishes was another
element I didn't see the point of.
With it's fun title and strange look, I wanted this film to be enjoyable
and
fun. Sadly it may look interesting but the total lack of engaging
substance
was a problem for me - even if it had been off the wall I could still have
gotten into it if I could even have followed what was going on but this
doesn't really have a story of even the most basic definition and the
visuals are not clever or inventive enough to fill the void left by that.
Maybe worth a look once for the visual design side of it but certainly no
more than that.
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Ray Gun Fun (1998) More at IMDbPro »
Visually interesting but worthless story, 18 April 2004
Author: bob the moo from Birmingham, UK
Stuck in a traffic jam, a young boy fidgets restlessly beside his mother, pulling faces and rocking back and forward. To placate him, his mother allows him to open up a carefully wrapped present in the back seat - a plastic toy ray gun. When they arrive home, he continues to play with his new ray gun - to the detriment of some of the other things in his room.
As a fan of all things short I was happy to give this film ten minutes of my time - if it is great then fantastic, if it is rubbish then I have only wasted ten minutes so no great loss! The film opens in a sort of strange 1950's world that has been crossed with toned-down characters from Dr Seuss, with a visual style that is quite otherworldly. Visually the film is never really dull - it is full of bright colours and held my interest from the very start until the strange ending.
The problem with the short is that there is almost no substance to go along with this style. Things happen for sure but it is difficult to really follow what is going on or, more importantly, to make sense of understand them to the point where you are intellectually involved in the film. The acting doesn't really help as it isn't great. The boy and the mother both look really fitting but neither has much to work with. The little boy is too much of a `doer' rather than an `actor', it seems an unfair criticism but there are times where you can almost hear the director saying `ok, sit up now, wide eyes, that's it, now be excited and run to the door' - the boy just does these actions and that's a wrap. The mother only has a few seconds onscreen but the presence of her hands washing dishes was another element I didn't see the point of.
With it's fun title and strange look, I wanted this film to be enjoyable and fun. Sadly it may look interesting but the total lack of engaging substance was a problem for me - even if it had been off the wall I could still have gotten into it if I could even have followed what was going on but this doesn't really have a story of even the most basic definition and the visuals are not clever or inventive enough to fill the void left by that. Maybe worth a look once for the visual design side of it but certainly no more than that.
Add another comment
Related Links