|Index||3 reviews in total|
Just saw this on Film Four tonight (UK TV chanel)... very interesting, but
50 minutes isn't even near long enough if you've read Paul Sammon's
excellent "Future Noir: the Making of Blade Runner". Interviews with
everybody involved except Harrison Ford and Sean Young of course, who hated
each other's guts during the making of the film. We even see Philip K. Dick
before he died - what a paranoid bloke he was! And even, for the first time
ever, a look at the deleted scene where Deckard visits Holden in hospital.
If you look you'll see the set for that scene was from
It's amazing visiting the buildings Ridley Scott used to make his future vision of Los Angeles. In the daytime they look NOTHING like Scott's sets, particularly the Bradbury Building in L.A., used for the final battle... when you see the before and after shots it really brings home what a genius of visual style Scott is.
Most shocking is that whilst all of the people have obviously aged in the last 20 years, Joe Turkel (Eldon Tyrell) hasn't aged a day! Hmmmm...
For anyone that hasn't read Paul Sammon's book, you'll be amazed at the problems encountered making this film, a true up-hill struggle. But Blade Runner still remains one of the best American movies of all time.
Ridley Scott admits this is one of his best films, and millions of cult fans worldwide agree. A true original...
Having read Paul Sammon's laboriously-researched novel "Future Noir" from cover to cover, I didn't find a lot of fresh insight in this semi-modern rumination on Ridley Scott's rainy portrait of a gloomy future culture. Having said that, it's nice to hear the various words and stories straight from each horse's mouth, rather than coldly reprinted, oral history style, on a long page. Having shunned the project since almost the moment it was released, it's no surprise to see Harrison Ford and Sean Young conspicuously absent from the list of interviewees, though an appearance from either would have made this a much more interesting piece. The few concept sketches and effect demos the doc's producers manage to dig up are extremely interesting, but they're too few and far between for this to hold the interest of non-hardcores.
I'm not a big fan of "Blade Runner" (great visuals+no plot= bad movie),
but I thought this documentary would make me revise my original
opinion. It didn't.
In fact, this documentary was very uninspired. I was really shocked when producers started bashing Ridley's work.
Not much technical information either. Just a lot of talking. Although it was funny to find out they actually used outtakes from Kubrick's "Shining".
No matter how "hard" it tries, it won't make you feel "Blade Runner" is something great... unless you're convinced this way around.
|Plot summary||Ratings||Plot keywords|
|Main details||Your user reviews||Your vote history|