| Page 1 of 4: | [1] [2] [3] [4] |
| Index | 38 reviews in total |
13 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Cute, funny, laugh at life's situations movie..., 14 March 2005
![]()
Author:
JoeyJoey908 from United States
I thought this movie reminded me of a lot of young women I know who are
insecure about love, men, their bodies, their minds, even though they
may be bright and attractive. It is a breath of fresh air to see a
young woman poke fun of the way that we tend to over analyze things
such as sex, the long awaited "phone call the day after," over thinking
everything, and who or what holds the right answers to all of our
questions about love, life, and relationships.
I am sure if you polled intelligent, 20 something female college grads
with good heads on their shoulders, they would find this movie amusing.
Nice to see a movie that is not about the perfect in every-way girl
finding the perfect in every-way prince charming.
8 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
perfectly explains my girlfriends neuroses, 24 January 2004
![]()
Author:
Charles Herold (cherold) from United States
Cute, slightly offbeat romantic comedy is funny and I recognize some of the lead's attitudes and actions from girls I've known, so it kind of helps me figure out why they do some of the things they do, and I liked the way they would move from what was happening to what she was hearing and imagining, as when a guy's comments about having stayed with an ex for the good sex translating in her mind to a diatribe about her being fat. Movie has a rather cynical view towards self-help pop psychology books, which I think is justified. The big speech near the end of pretty stupid, the sort of unrealistic thing you see in Hollywood movies all the time. Not successful on all levels, and if I felt like it I could pick apart this or that, but overall it just works and is quite entertaining.
6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
My recommendations, 24 March 2003
Author:
David (rollerblade) from Syracuse, NY
I really liked this film. As a man, I am sure that this was driven by the
fact that Julie Davis is a hottie who wore very sexy clothing. I also
enjoyed the several hot sex scenes. (Face it. Isn't this one reason that
Sex and The City is so popular.)
This really was the kind of movie that a man a woman watch right before
they
have sex. This isn't a bad thing.
This movie was supposed to be wierd in the first place. The confessions
to
a horny priest, the shooting, the voices yammering in her head where
designed to be quirky. Rather than analyse the heck out of the movie, I
just let it be what it was.
I have heard that this is an ultra low budget film. Yet, the quality of
the
shooting seems very good.
I also liked the fact that Julie David didn't go for some super smooth
skinned beauty to play the part. She looked like a real woman and
therefore, was irresistable.
Romantic comedies of today tend to be mindless and cute and sappy anyways.
So the ending of the film was status quo.
I recommend it.
8 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
Best of Class, 21 December 2002
Author:
twoxmilton from los angeles
For me, what "Amelie" was to Paris, "Amy" is to Los Angeles. Amy"s O is a witty, well conceived and acted presentation and resolution (the cop-out ending!) of a feminist argument, alive with larger than life characters, each contributing a perspective on the argument, which is of course, maintaining female self esteem in a traditional relationship. The best of this genre - funny and intellectually satisfying - 9/10
9 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
Julie Davis takes on at least one role too many, 4 June 2004
Author:
herbqedi from New York, NY
There are many engaging and titillating sequences in this low-budget
production that is written, stars, is directed by, and co-produced by Julie
Davis. But, it is as uneven and ultimately frustrating as any comedy you've
ever rooted for to succeed.
Since many other reviewers have done a thorough job of identifying and
critiquing the maddeningly confusing inconsistencies of this subversively
anti-feminist treatise masquerading as a stereotyped pro-feminist
fictionalized autobiography that rails against society's stereotypes only to
find that some stereotypes are stereotypes because they are true, I will
merely add that I heard deafening echoes of past sellouts such as ABC's
debacle called "The Great American Beauty Contest" and Jane Fonda's
character "admitting" that all women only go to college to find husbands in
the movie "Tall Story." [That was all just one sentence,
folks!]
What makes the above one-sentence summary such a shame is that writer Davis
did seem to have some interesting ideas to convey and actor Davis conveyed
some of them quite engagingly. More frustrating still is that Director
Davis did an excellent job of pacing the movie and adding cute visual ideas
on a low budget, and did a SUPER job of making satiric statements through
wardrobe choices. Yet, Director Davis hadn't a clue how to direct actor
Davis who, in turn, threw away some of the best lines written by writer
Davis. It is unknown to what extent co-Producer Davis played in the
ultimate cop-out decisions alluded to by the others in arriving at the
unsatisfying ending that left so many of us feeling betrayed or cheated.
But, at the same time, it is clear that Julie Davis is a woman of great wit,
intelligence, and talent that is worthy of harnessing.
Overall, this is fast-moving and enjoyable enough to spend 100 minutes
watching. So, why not watch it on Showtime-on-demand, then arrive at your
own conclusions?
8 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
I think she was faking..., 23 September 2004
Author:
tomgrunick from Australia
This movie is nothing but a tease...offering all sorts of insights into
the way women and men inter-act but in the end offering only shallow
platitudes.
The use of the confessional as the way of hearing Amy's inner thoughts
was nothing but a glib gimmick...completely unbelievable.
The acting was wooden and unimpressive, and I couldn't recognise any of
the stars. Nor will I be looking for them in another movie any time
soon.
This is a poor imitation of Sex And The City, and comparisons with
Woody Allen are hopeful at best, and laughable at worst. It all seemed
like a stand-up routine taken too far.
And what is it with movies about women who write books about how they
don't need men, and then fall in love? Change the formula!
5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
interesting perspectives on sex and relationships, 16 August 2001
![]()
Author:
BronxvilleFilmFan from Bronxville, NY
"Amy's Orgasm" certainly isn't the first film to consider sex and
relationships from a woman's, or from women's, perspective(s), but it does
feel unique in giving frequently visited material a fresh, sassy, and
daring
treatment not frequently seen.
Julie Davis has crafted a script that, for the most part, is crisp and pops
with great dialogue. The narrative/plot is strained in some parts, but I'm
a sappy romantic and fell for the film overall nonetheless.
Nick Chinlund is the male lead, starring here as a sleaze-baggy radio shock
jock who also happens to be quite sexy. I recognized Chinlund from a great
spot he did on The X-Files; it was nice to see him in an entirely different
role and working the script and his scenes with Davis, the co-star *and*
writer/director, very, very well.
Caroline Aaron is terrific in her supporting role, too. She gives the kind
of scene-stealing performance that should attract attention from critics.
Overall, "Amy's Orgasm" is a well-acted romantic comedy that takes some
pretty interesting risks. As a writer and director, Davis still manages to
say something about sex and relationships and is able to do so in a manner
slightly different than what we're used to seeing from most other
films.
6 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Would be 3 or 4 if not for eye candy, 31 May 2003
![]()
Author:
initiate from CA
Story about writing a book for all women just because one had some unhappiness and feels righteous enough to advise all women to avoid the mistake she herself made. Then about hypocrisy of doing what she advises others to NOT do. Then the obvious Howard Stern reference (maybe she in real life is a fan???) and the goody-goody exaggerations of this character. Then the sellout to the "happy ending". All in all a very bad story. But nicely shot.
8 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
Let's hope Amy doesn't have multiples., 24 February 2003
![]()
Author:
George Parker from Orange County, CA USA
In the context of grand cinema, "Amy's Orgasm" is a zit. However, in the context of romcom fare, this flick is somewhere around the middle of a very large heap. A naive but lively Niagara of prattling about the usual stock love vs sex stuff we've all seen before, "Amy's O" does little to distinguish itself and will probably play best with teen females at sleep-overs because of the in-your-face vulgarities, sexual emphasis, and obvious girl power bent. Passable stuff for the public at large, "Amy's O" is a marginal though worthy effort for a relatively young auteur who apparently put this flick together almost single handedly. (C)
5 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
HILARIOUS!! I Loved it. See it if you have the chance., 15 August 2002
![]()
Author:
jonnieblak from New York
Exactly what an independent movie should be. Smartly written with a unique point of veiw. A little Sex in the City-ish, but with real characters and loads of funny, classic dialogue about relationships and sex. The lead actress is adorable!
| Page 1 of 4: | [1] [2] [3] [4] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |