|Page 1 of 8:||       |
|Index||79 reviews in total|
Take this review with a grain of salt, because I am a massive fan of
Peter Pan and all things properly based on the James Barrie classic.
This sequel, however, made me cringe. I've enjoyed liberal
interpretations before - Hook and Finding Neverland, for example - but
this movie completely trashed whatever character Peter Pan is supposed
to have. Peter Pan is not a hero - he is a mischievous and often
forgetful boy. He is entirely selfish and entirely charming, and these
are his two flaws. However, in "Return to Neverland," this character of
"Peter Pan" is a mere ghost of the complex Barrie creation. Whatever
beautiful messages Peter Pan has about nostalgia and childhood, "Return
to Neverland" turns them upside down at worst, and simply ignores them
The animation wasn't bad, though.
One thing I've noticed about most Disney sequels is that the storyline tends
to be the opposite of the original. It's not different here. In the original
"Peter Pan", Wendy has no intention of growing up too soon and instead goes
to Never Land for a while, where she'll never grow up. But in "Return to
Never Land", Wendy has grown up, gotten married and had kids of her own. Her
son, Danny, who's still very young, is always intrigued by his mother's
stories of Peter, but her older daughter Jane, who feels as though now her
father's gone to war, she must protect her family, it means no more silly
stories. And then the movie develops from there, when Jane is thought to be
Wendy and is kidnapped by Captain Hook. Then, of course, Peter Pan meets her
and then the story continues from there. Jane thinks she's really mature,
and it's up to Peter and the Lost Boys to bring out her childish side
I think "Return to Never Land" is one of the better Disney sequels, as heaps of others have turned out to rip-offs of the original. If they thought this was going to be like the others, they would've released it straight to video. So, if you have to see a Disney sequel, then this is a pretty good one.
All you need is faith, trust and pixie dust! This is a surprisingly
pleasant sequel. The C.G. Tinkerbelle is not as ...delicate as I remember
from the first, but she is still made well and is just as spunky! I think
they did a very good job on this movie...so good of a job that I would not
classify it with normal sequels. I think it will be on the shelf with the
other classics. They still have the Tink that turns red when she's mad,
the lost boys haven't changed a bit. Peter is just as I remember him, and
in all this they did a great job. And overall, I love this movie. The
credits did surprise me. They reminded me of the last page in the Little
Golden Books I read as a child. Very similar artistry...very similar lay
Also, I'd like to add that the music was actually not torture for me to listen to...which counts for a lot for my opinion of cartoons.
I would not miss taking my children to this movie. It's even a sweet date movie.
I think you will like it.
"Peter Pan In Return To Never Land" is Disneys animated sequel to their
truly classic 1953 adaptation of J.M. Barries beloved childrens story.
Times moved on since the first movie and although Peter Pan never grew up,
Wendy did. Its now World War Two and an adult Wendy is living in London,
still telling tales of Peter Pan, Captain Hook, Tinkerbell and all the other
inhabitants of Never Land to her two children; Danny, an awe struck little
boy and Jane, a more cynical, pragmatic older girl who has no time for
fairytales. However when Hook flies his sailing ship to London, kidnaps Jane
and takes her to Never Land, she soon wishes she has paid more attention to
her mothers stories.
With a budget of a mere $20M the film was produced by Disneys TV animation department (who have previously toiled over straight to video/DVD sequels for other Disney movies including "Cinderella," "The Lady And The Tramp," "The Lion King" and "The Little Mermaid"), but this was apparently always planned as a cinematic release. The film succeeds in combining the traditional feel of the original 50s animation with a more contemporary look, particularly for the intrepid young heroine Jane (whose modern looking bobbed haircut was actually highly fashionable during World War Two!). The use of computer generated animation does successfully enhance certain scenes, sometimes so subtly you dont even notice, and sometimes in the case of Tinkerbells magical pixie dust to spectacular effect. However Hooks computer generated ship, while certainly impressive, unfortunately stands out uncomfortably from the traditionally animated environments that surround it. Overall though "Peter Pan In Return To Never Land" only the second sequel to a Disney feature to be released on the big screen more than deserves a cinematic outing, and will no doubt go down well with the latest generation of Disney fans, who have grown up with a VHS copy of the original at home.
My friend and I went and saw this movie and felt like we were little again. It made us laugh and it was great to see some of our favorite characters come alive again. I hate to read about critics when they dissect the movie, all you need to know is that it's a wonderful sequel, that personally, I plan to see again. No matter what age you are you'll leave after with a smile on your face. Jane is the perfect portrayal of kids these days and what they're missing. So do yourself a huge favor and just go see it.
I am a 13 year old kid and I saw the movie and when I saw the war parts I was shocked and sort of felt sorry for wendy because she was in the war area but when the movie got to the where the ship is entering the second star to the right I heard sounds in that scene like: I'll get you for this pan if it's the last thing I do,ticking,and Peter famous line from "Peter Pan": Once you're grown up you can never back. I liked the lost boys, though in number one they used to fight alot.And pan wasn't mean to Jane he was just upset because tink's light was fading and the ending was almost sad because peter sort of felt that he didn't give a darn about wendy but she cared for him.my favorite lost boy is Slightly he rocks. Plus the songs were great I liked "So to be one of us" and "now that you're one of us" but My favorite song is the new version of "Do you believe in magic" it's a new version of the song then the oringal.the reason why disney wanted to do a sequal to peter pan is because they thought that we kids and adults might to see peter pan again and take us back to neverland and have us forget what's going in the world like the Terrorism war.The movie was a huge hit at my Regal cinemas in lincoln city,oregon everyone clapped and I yelled "GIVE US MORE PAN". Rumor has it that disney is thinking about doing a thrid Peter pan movie called: Peter Pan 3, the plot: it is going to be about peter's past,how tink came in his life,how hook and the pirates got to neverland,and how the lost boys got there too.
Sequel to classic history with an enjoyable Peter Pan , adventures ,
imagination ,astounding as well as gorgeous sets and brilliant images ,
though it was originally planned as a direct-to-video release in which
the protagonist of the story results to be Wendy's daughter and is set
in London during World War II . The picture mingles action , feats ,
humor , tongue-in-cheek , fantasy and a lot of entertainment . The film
centers about Peter Pan (voice by Blayne Weaver) , a nice adolescent
who doesn't want grow up , Wendy , her daughter Jane and brothers . As
Jane is kidnapped by Captain Hook from parents' home and they are going
to Neverland . As main starring is abducted by Captain Hook and Peter
Pan must come to the rescue in order to challenge his old enemy . Peter
Pan , Tink and Lost Boys (they were boys who fell out of their prams
while the nurses weren't looking , whereas Peter Pan is a permanent
resident of Never Neverland, the lost boys are only temporary lodgers ,
if they seem to grow up, Peter Pan sends them home) will take on
captain Hook , Smee and pirates henchmen . As Peter Pan's quest to go
back Jane safely home is jeopardized until she can start to believe in
the magic of imagination .
The film contains emotion , humor , fantasy , songs and a lot of fun . The plot is similar to Walt Disney's classic replacing Wendy with her daughter Jane who along with Peter undertake several adventures in Neverland ; as Pan with the help of her and the Lost Boys must save his friends by battling with Captain Hook and Smee once again . From the beginning to the end the amusement and entertainment is interminable . An entertaining movie , a little tiring when the characters are singing , but is still shines . The highlights film are the marvelous images when Peter Pan and Jane are flying throughout Neverland , it turns out to be colorful and delightful . Due to controversy over their appearance in original movie , as Disney attracted negative comments for their stereotypical depiction of Indians, as indeed did J.M. Barrie with his original play , it's probably for that very reason that the Indians do not appear in this 2002 sequel , though Peter and Jane briefly visit their places , however ; as they fly over Tipis , Indian tribes and skull monument . The giant octopus was created as a new nemesis for Captain Hook because it was felt that the Disney animators had exhausted all the comic possibilities of "Hook vs. the Crocodile" in the original Peter Pan (1953). The octopus's tentacles make a "Pock! Pock!" sound that is similar to the "Tick Tock!" sound heard from the crocodile in the previous film . Although original author J.M. Barrie is credited, this sequel and its original were the only major films versions of "Peter Pan" and both of them use little of his original dialogue . Because most of the original voice cast of the movie had died, including Hans Conried (Hook) and Bobby Driscoll (Peter Pan), an entirely new cast of actors had to be used to film this sequel such as Corey Burton as Hook , Jeff Bennett as Smee , Kath Soucie as Wendy , Roger Rees as Edward , Spencer Breslin as Cubby , Bradley Pierce as Nibs and Clive Revill . Many Peter Pan purists were very upset by the characterization of Tinker Bell as a petulant and voluptuous young woman as old film ¨Peter Pan¨ as its sequel the ¨Return to Never Land¨ . The fable will appeal to adventure and classic tale fan . Rating : 6,5/10 above average . It's a terrific familiar amusement that will appeal to vintage tale fans .
Other films and stage productions dealing with this classic personage are the followings : The original Broadway production of "Peter Pan", or "The Boy Who Wouldn't Grow Up" by J.M. Barrie opened at the Empire Theater on November 6, 1905 , it ran for 223 performances, closed on May 20, 1906, and starred nineteenth-century stage actress Maude Adams, who never made any films ; silent film ¨Peter Pan¨ (1924) starred by Virginia Brown Faire as Tinker Bell , it uses much of Barrie's original dialogue ; Peter Pan (1953) with voice by Bobby Driscoll, Kathryn Beaumont, Hans Conried ; ¨Hook¨(2001) with Steven Spielberg with Dustin Hoffman as Captain Hook , Robin Williams , Freddie Highmore , Julia Roberts , Bob Hoskins as Smee , Maggie Smith and Caroline Goodall ; ¨Finding Neverland¨ (2004) by Marc Foster with Johnny Depp as James M Barry , Kate Winslet , Kelly McDonald as Peter Pan , Julie Christie , Radha Mitchell , and recent version ¨Peter Pan¨ by JP Hogan with Jeremy Sumpter , Raquel Wood and Jason Isaac .
Return To Neverland isn't terrible, but it does fail on many levels, so
can't be classed as a good sequel. The animation and the story were the
redeeming qualities, but unfortunately the songs and the characters
The animation is mostly bright and colourful, but falls flat in the dark backgrounds. The story wasn't bad either, trying to keep Hook from getting the treasure and everything. I also liked the war scene, because that was quite interesting on an animation perspective, and brought some intrigue on a contextual level. I was unimpressed by the trailer, but the film itself wasn't bad, but loses the charm about 15 minutes in. I will say it has a great message about cherishing your childhood.
The first problem was that the kidnapping scene took far too long, despite the breathtaking animation of Hook's ship, and I hated the change to Hook. In the original and the criminally underrated TV series Peter Pan and the Pirates, which are both classics, he is complex and vindictive, but here he was manipulative in a negative way, and lacked menace. The best character was Jane, but that isn't saying much, and Peter's new voice was horrible, too bolshy. The songs were terrible and forgettable immediately after you've finished watching the movie, likewise with the dialogue. The main problem was that it isn't a true sequel at all, compared to the first film and the book. And the octopus, why replace the crocodile may I ask?
I'm sorry that this is mostly negative, but Return To Neverland was very disappointing. Though better than the trailer suggested, it is still a pretty charmless film, with a 3/10(Adequate) Bethany Cox
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
***NOTE: my review contains spoilers, but none so spoiled as my
Some will say that Disney has sold out in recent years. But MY gripe is not with marketing strategies, nor with flooding us with sequels to all these classics within a couple year's timespan. I can learn to accept that.
My gripe is with this character development of Peter Pan. It's kind of like the comic book that saw Luke Skywalker join the dark side, but without as good an excuse.
Another user commented that Peter Pan always bordered on violence. I just don't remember him being mean, though.
This movie has Peter Pan & the Lost Boys pulling a little girl's hair, destroying her journal to shreds, and getting ANGRY at her and calling her a traitor (at a time when she was innocent)! (Where is the magic of Neverland???)
Peter Pan lies to her also...in a plot to save Tinkerbell, he tells her he's sorry and wants to make it up to her...but he is just using her and has already explained why and how, to the Lost Boys!
I guess this film was made for little girls during a time of war. I guess by showing her have a change of heart, SHE is the real hero, and Peter Pan is irrelevant.
But I came to see Peter Pan! Do we really really have to have good guys do bad things and not know any better...and did the sequel really have to be a big fat trailer for the original classic?
Instead of endlessly discussing faith and believing, GIVE US THE OLD MAGIC...THE PURE FANTASY back. I still don't know WHAT to believe about this effort.
This is a perfect example of why Walt Disney said very clearly "Don't let them make sequels to my movies." He didn't want Peter Pan 2, Snow White 2 and so on. The studio has made some great movies (Lion King, Little Mermaid), but has the creative well run dry? Aren't there thousands of wonderful fairy tales from around the world that could be done? This movie (short, like Tarzan and Jane short) felt more like an exploitation of a classic than a tribute to a timeless and charming film.
|Page 1 of 8:||       |
|External reviews||Parents Guide||Official site|
|Plot keywords||Main details||Your user reviews|
|Your vote history|