| Index | 6 reviews in total |
20 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
My #1 Japanese film of all time, 9 August 2003
![]()
Author:
calvinlynn
Perhaps "Kiga kaikyo" (Tomu Uchida, 1963), also known as "Fugitive from
the
Past" or "Strait of Hunger" (the original japanese title), is the most
underrated japanese film in western audience. It's incredible to find that
it has only 5 votes on IMDb (including mine).
"Strait of Hunger" is a dark, twisted crime drama, yet remains subtle
emotion and social criticism themes inside. The characters are complex and
intriguing, and the view angle of 1950s Japanese society is wide and
enlightened with an epical story telling. The black and white
cinematography
is astoundingly fabulous, especially the billowy ocean under the
hurricane,
which gives the audience indelible impression. Tomu Uchida is one of the
greatest film makers (if not the greatest) living in Japan and this film
is
a timeless masterpiece. It is my all time #1 japanese film and I strongly
recommend this to everyone.
6 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
One of the great narratives of bad karma, hell, of cinema, 19 March 2011
![]()
Author:
chaos-rampant from Greece
We're beating a dead horse if we begin to lament another lost treasure,
another overlooked Japanese director who's yet to receive his dues.
Uchida will have to queue up in a humongous line. The film canon, as we
know it, as it's being taught to college kids in film classes, is
written from a Western perspective and is so incomplete as to be near
useless. It's safe to say we're living in the Dark Ages of cinema, in
the negative time of ignorance, and that 100 years from now Straits of
Hunger will feature prominently in lists of the epochal narrative films
of the previous century. We may choose to keep honoring the Colombuses
and pretend we invented paper or gunpowder, but film history will
invariably reveal the pioneers.
But that's a matter of concern for the historian, the librarian of
cinema who will undertake the thankless task of restoring in the
ledgers some measure of order. What do we get from the discovery of
such a film now, as mortals with a remote? On one hand it's the perfect
illustration of a narrative cinema en route to modernism, from Kurosawa
to Imamura, how it's concurrent with New Wave expression, aware of it
but not ready for it. The illustration is transparent when the image
turns negative in crucial scenes, it feels like we're standing on a
brink of expression (one of many in this film).
This is mere technicality though, dry academic discourse. If we're so
inclined, we can find measures of this in Uchida's previous films. The
man was of Mizoguchi's generation but he had an eye for abstraction. We
can play back to back the finale of Killing in Yoshiwara and Sword of
Doom and see what we get, how the point of view shifts to within, how
the external turmoil becomes a lucid image of a state of mind.
What really matters to me here though is, as Donald Richie describes
it, the "working out of karma". It's become a tortured term over the
years but we need to understand what karma is not. It's not fate,
though it speaks of fatalism. It doesn't emanate from above, we are the
agents. Translated from sanskrit (or pali) it means "action". Our past
actions have brought us here, our present actions determine our future.
Good or bad, karma sets in motion the cycle of suffering that binds all
beings to this earthly prison.
This is a spiritual film then, but how does it pertain to some primal
principle of the soul? The story of bad karma is common in Japanese
lore, a man finds himself haunted by guilt demons of the mind for the
misdeeds of the past. Usually in this type of film we're brought to the
brink of an abyss, from there we can gaze below to the existential
void. Most films daren't go further (that is, if we accept there is
somewhere to go from there) but it's enough for me to experience this,
it's a first awareness. Our reward is that view.
Straits of Hunger presents a complexity that opens up a yawning chasm
when we come to stand at that brink.
Our man is unaware of wrongdoing until it's too late. Because no one
would believe his story of how he didn't murder anyone to get ahold of
so much money, he keeps it. The dawn of his bad karma comes from a
punishing moral conundrum, from circumstances outside his control. Our
protagonist gets to choose, a life in prison or a life of guilt. I like
that we're watching the hapless fallguy dance to the cosmic tune of an
indifferent god (more precisely, no god), but we should keep in mind
this is not a noir text.
What's of essence here, is the acceptance of suffering. Our protagonist
needs to atone for something he didn't want to be born into, a
murderous scheme with two ex-convicts of which he was unaware. As we
all do. Suffering then, like the first cry of the newborn, is a
natural, inate, response to existence. Brilliant! I love how Uchida
makes cinema out of that bad karma.
In a similar text, the Daibosatsu Toge, famously adapted by Kihachi
Okamoto in '66 and Uchida himself in '71, the setting of the visitation
is, of course, The Great Boddhisatva Pass (that is, from where the
boddhisatvas pass or cross into this world, enlightened beings who
choose to remain in the cycle of life and suffering to assist others in
their path). Here it's a furious storm, a cataclysm.
For the first apparition of guilt, Uchida summons into the stage the
portents of doom, rain and lightnings rolling down Mt. Fear, and a
prostitute, the harbringer almost ceremonially covered in a blanket,
mockingly bellows "there's no path out of hell". In a later scene he
repeats the setup, to make a connection, but this time there is murder.
What exists in the mind, will find its way out.
Inbetween, Uchida gives us one of the most vivid chronicles of life in
postwar Japan to this day. The poverty and moral desperation of life in
the slums and the black market, the Yankee resentment and political
upheaval, but also a kind of hopeful anticipation for change. The
contrast is subtle, and in the next segment we see our raggedy
protagonist is now a successful businessman.
Two instances in the film fascinate me a lot, when the cop recites the
sutra for the dead. The first time is nondescript, but when we hear it
again in the finale we know. It foreshadows. And more, the cop knows
the sutras better than a monk (as a monk tells him), the teachings, but
he's not liberated. Ultimately no one is in the film, and the cycle of
suffering goes on. This is one of the great Buddhist films for me.
8 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
all that and a bag of chips, 19 January 2006
![]()
Author:
dailies
This just ran at MoMA's extraordinary survey of films from the Japan Film Institute, and it was one of the best in the series. A real eye opener--previous commenters nailed it. Definitely makes you want to explore the director's other work. Fits in that uniquely Japanese genre of the whodunnit where the process of detection requires travel throughout the country and specifics of local cultures and habits--so the travelogue is half the fascination. Getting a young Ken Takakura plus Rentaro Mikuni in the same picture is extra added bonus. If you like later films of this type such as *Castle of Sand* or *Vengeance Is Mine*, you'll like this one.
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Blend of Kurosawa and Teshigahara, 17 September 2008
![]()
Author:
jkierste-1 from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
"Kiga Kaikyo" is a perfect blend of Kurosawa's crime films ("The Bad Sleep Well" and "High and Low") with Teshigahara's hypnotism ("Pitfall," "Woman in the Dunes," and "The Face of Another"). Characteristic of the best films of 1960's Japanese cinema, Kudo blends a complex tale of deceit and moral dilemma with elegantly weaved chiaroscuro cinematography. The film unfolds over three acts with deliberate pacing; over these three acts the protagonist shifts into an antagonist and Kudo examines the primal nature of man. The film is not perfect -- it lacks the poignance of Kurosawa and the visual mastery of Teshigahara. Nevertheless, it blends both together seamlessly, tapping the best of both director's and delivery a tightly wound suspense curio that fails to disappoint.
3 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Simpley Good, 9 February 2005
![]()
Author:
shaid from Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
*MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS* *MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS* *MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS*
This film is not to be missed. It has all the ingredients of a great
movie. A story based on characters. Characters we care about what
happened to them. A development both in characters and story. And a
social commentary on Japan after The Second World War. Supported by an
excellent cast & story telling.
Filmed in black & white and at 182 minutes long, the film is never
boring. One can only wish that such films will be made today.
Unfortunately in the day of special effects such films have no place
and that is a shame.
I can only recommend this film. It worth every money you pay for it and
any time you will dedicate to see it.
0 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Tedious, 19 July 2009
![]()
Author:
timlin-4 from United States
This film is long, predictable, and boring. There is no suspense, the
plot is stale, and the police procedure is completely uninteresting.
The acting and cinematography are good, but there are some primitive
effects whose strangeness is sort of unsettling as intended, but have
mostly a comic effect for modern Western viewers (the sex scene with a
fingernail is perhaps the highlight of the film). As in most Japanese
movies, the characters are ridiculously awkward at times, but
apparently this is how Japanese behave in reality.
While the depiction of post-war Japan was interesting, it wasn't
enlightening, and as with German accounts of WWII you get the feeling
that what little suffering is depicted is exaggerated.
Fans of Japanese cinema might like this film, but I recommend you watch
Pitfall (again) if you are short on time, because Kiga kaikyo won't be
adding much to your life.
| Ratings | Awards | External reviews |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |