MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 79 this week

Gods and Generals (2003)

 -  Drama | History | War  -  21 February 2003 (USA)
6.3
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.3/10 from 11,958 users   Metascore: 30/100
Reviews: 490 user | 83 critic | 29 from Metacritic.com

The rise and fall of legendary war hero Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson as he leads the Confederacy to great success against the Union from 1861 to 1863. Prequel to the 1993 classic "Gettysburg".

Director:

Writers:

(book), (screenplay)
Watch Trailer
0Check in
0Share...

Watch Now

From $2.99 on Amazon Instant Video

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb: What to Watch - The One I Love

Interview with Charlie McDowell and Mark Duplass


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 43 titles
created 31 Mar 2011
 
a list of 21 titles
created 11 Dec 2011
 
a list of 26 titles
created 16 Apr 2012
 
a list of 45 titles
created 02 May 2013
 
a list of 30 titles
created 11 May 2013
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Gods and Generals (2003)

Gods and Generals (2003) on IMDb 6.3/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Gods and Generals.
1 win & 2 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Gettysburg (1993)
Drama | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

In 1863, the Northern and Southern forces fight at Gettysburg in the decisive battle of the American Civil War.

Director: Ronald F. Maxwell
Stars: Tom Berenger, Martin Sheen, Stephen Lang
Gettysburg (TV Movie 2011)
Documentary | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

An examination of the Battle of Gettysberg on both the personal and strategic level.

Director: Adrian Moat
Stars: Sam Rockwell, Josh Artis, Greg Berg
Glory (1989)
Drama | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

Robert Gould Shaw leads the US Civil War's first all-black volunteer company, fighting prejudices of both his own Union army and the Confederates.

Director: Edward Zwick
Stars: Matthew Broderick, Denzel Washington, Cary Elwes
Copperhead (2013)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.4/10 X  

An Upstate New York family is torn apart during the American Civil War.

Director: Ronald F. Maxwell
Stars: François Arnaud, Lucy Boynton, Casey Thomas Brown
Waterloo I (1970)
Action | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

Facing the decline of everything he has worked to obtain, conqueror Napoleon Bonaparte and his army confront the British at the Battle of Waterloo.

Director: Sergey Bondarchuk
Stars: Rod Steiger, Christopher Plummer, Orson Welles
Midway (1976)
Action | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.7/10 X  

A dramatization of the battle that turned out to be the turning point of the Pacific Theatre of World War II.

Director: Jack Smight
Stars: Charlton Heston, Henry Fonda, James Coburn
Action | Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.3/10 X  

Gettysburg Three days of Destiny is the compelling story of the commanders, decisions and pivotal moments of the battle that turned the tide of the American Civil War

Director: Robert Child
Stars: Steve Schlosser, Bob Bosler, Benjamin Bidlack
Drama | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  

A historical telling of the failed attempt to capture several bridges on a road to Germany in World War II, in a campaign called Operation Market-Garden.

Director: Richard Attenborough
Stars: Sean Connery, Ryan O'Neal, Michael Caine
Attitude (2003)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  
Director: Rob Nilsson
Stars: Michael Disend, Marion Christian, Vernon Medearis
Action | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

In 1940, the British Royal Air Force fights a desperate battle vs. the Nazi Germany Air Force for control of British air space to prevent a Nazi invasion of Britain.

Director: Guy Hamilton
Stars: Michael Caine, Trevor Howard, Harry Andrews
Action | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

The events of D-Day, told on a grand scale from both the Allied and German points of view.

Directors: Ken Annakin, Andrew Marton, and 3 more credits »
Stars: John Wayne, Robert Ryan, Richard Burton
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  
Director: Ronald F. Maxwell
Stars: Donzaleigh Abernathy, Kevin Conway, Jeff Daniels
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Martha
Mark Aldrich ...
Adjutant
George Allen ...
Confederate Officer
...
Capt. James J. White
...
Brig. Gen. James Kemper (as Royce Applegate)
...
...
Maj. Walter Taylor
Mac Butler ...
Robert Byrd ...
Confederate General (as Robert C. Byrd)
...
Bowdoin Student
...
...
Rev. Beverly Tucker Lacy
...
Old Penn
Jim Choate ...
Brig. Gen. Bernard Bee
...
Dr. George Junkin
Edit

Storyline

The rise and fall of legendary war hero Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson as he leads the Confederacy to great success against the Union from 1861 to 1863. Prequel to the 1993 classic "Gettysburg".

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

The nations heart was touched by.... See more »

Genres:

Drama | History | War

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for sustained battle sequences | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

21 February 2003 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Dioses y generales  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Budget:

$56,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$4,675,246 (USA) (21 February 2003)

Gross:

$12,870,569 (USA) (25 April 2003)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (director's cut)

Sound Mix:

| |

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Martin Sheen was asked to reprise his role of Robert E. Lee from Gettysburg (1993), but could not due to commitment to The West Wing (1999). The role was given to Robert Duvall, who is actually a descendant of Lee. See more »

Goofs

As the 20th Maine is storming Marye's Heights, the flag bearer is seen being shot down, with the flag pole breaking in half. He has a green fig leaf tucked under his hat, right above his ear. This indicates that this is a shot taken from footage of the Irish Brigade's attack, since only the Irish soldiers wore these figs (and can be seen putting them on in a deleted scene on the soundtrack's extra features.) See more »

Quotes

[first lines]
Title Card: A human life, I think, should be well rooted in some spot of a native land, where it may get the love of tender kinship for the face of the earth, for the labors men go forth to, for the sounds and accents that haunt it, for whatever will give that early home a familiar unmistakable difference amidst the future widening of knowledge. The best introduction to astronomy is to think of the nightly heavens as a little lot of stars belonging to one's own homestead. - George Eliot
See more »

Crazy Credits

The movie was dedicated to the memory of John F. Maxwell and Royce D. Applegate. See more »

Connections

Follows Gettysburg (1993) See more »

Soundtracks

Going Home
Music and Lyrics by Mary Fahl, Byron Isaacs and Glenn H. Patscha
Performed by Mary Fahl
Violin solo by Mark O'Connor
Courtesy of Sony Classical/Odyssey Records
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Good movie overall but Gettysburg was better.
26 February 2003 | by (Glade Spring, VA) – See all my reviews

My View in Summary: Overall, I enjoyed the movie (despite some of its apparent flaws), and I plan to see it again in the theater, as well as purchase the extended version when it comes out on DVD. I liked Gettysburg and the novel "Gods and Generals" better. I am fairly confident that the majority of Americans will not like nor support this film due to its overall pro-southern emphasis.

What I liked about the movie: I thought Lang did an excellent job portraying Jackson. I was deeply moved by his final scene in the film.

The attention to detail was good; overall it was historically accurate--with some exceptions.

The costumes looked good.

I appreciated the show of how Christianity influenced many in the Civil War, such as Jackson and Lee.

I liked the fact that many from Gettysburg reprised their roles in this film, although there were some who couldn't, which was a little disappointing.



What I didn't like or wished was better about the movie: The fake beards were more than obvious in this film, with the exception of Jackson's and Lee's, but this is relatively minor to the overall film.

I thought, with maybe the exception of the Fredericksburg battle, the depiction of the battle scenes were not nearly as well done as in Gettysburg; but to be fair, there were more battles to cover in this film. Gettysburg only had one, meaning more time could be given to the details of the battle.

The battle of Antietam was not in the movie at all, not even mentioned, which is very disappointing given its significance and effects.

Some of the CGI is poorly done (i.e., very obvious), but, again, this is a small part of the movie and in my opinion neither makes nor breaks it.

Some of the speeches were a bit stiff and seemed contrived, particularly Chamberlain's speech before the battle of Fredricksburg.

Not enough time was given to developing the characters of Lee, Chamberlain, and Hancock, all of whom are important in the novel. In fact, in contrast to the film, the novel gives most time to Lee, not Jackson. To be fair, however, novels usually are better than their film counterparts given the constraints of time.



My thoughts on some of the common complaints about the movie: Some complain there wasn't enough realism as to the carnage of war. To that I say there was enough to get the point across, and for myself, it is refreshing from time to time to see a movie that doesn't rely too heavily on blood and guts. This is not meant to be a blood and guts movie. The novel is even less bloody. Anyone who wants to see a blood and guts war movie should buy or rent Saving Private Ryan, Full Metal Jacket, Hamburger Hill, the Patriot, Braveheart, etc.

Others complain that there were too many poetic speeches. Indeed there were many speeches, but that was also true of Gettysburg, which most view as a good movie. I didn't mind the speeches so much other than they sometimes truncated the character in such a way that the audience fails to see their visceral humanity. As stated above, the only speech I thought was a bit over the top was Chamberlain's before the battle of Fredricksburg. It seemed forced, showy, and odd that the whole regiment would stand motionless and quiet for so long to hear him go on and on. Clearly it was intended to be a poignant moment showing historical parallels between the American Civil War and Roman history. But the whole scene ends up feeling staged and apathetic.

Others complain about the strong emphasis on religion. As stated above, I found this emphasis refreshing, for certainly Jackson and Lee were very devout Christian men. Christianity was a part of the ethos of this country at that time and affected many in both north and south.

Still others complain about the pro-southern perspective being so strong. While I admit there is an imbalance between the northern and southern perspectives, which clearly favors the southern view, I also think this only stands to reason, since the overall focus of the film is clearly on Jackson, a southerner. And given the fact that many other movies often underplay the southern perspective (i.e., it was fought over State's rights) or ignore it altogether, some will find this movie's emphasis a refreshing change. On the other hand, the clear downplay of the role and effect of slavery in this film will no doubt trouble many Americans.

Finally, others complain that the movie is too long. But I find this to be a misnomer. What most really mean by this is that the movie is not entertaining enough to justify such a length. This is not the first long film in cinematic history. Other films were very long and yet praised as wonderful (Terms of Endearment, Dances With Wolves, Gone with the Wind, Braveheart, Lord of the Rings, etc.). The real issue here, I believe, is that this movie for many is too "slow" or "mundane" in their estimation. This, I think, is a result of our becoming so accustomed to roller coaster rides at the movies. If it isn't constantly exciting or humorous or action-packed, it needs to be short. I suppose that in a TV age wherein we are accustom to pure entertainment compacted into ten-minute blocks of time separated by pithy, entertaining commercials, this complaint ought not surprise us, given the historical orientation of this film. But I think such a complaint is evidence of a deeper cultural problem, which should concern us all.

My opinion who will like this movie: many Historians, Teachers, and Homeschooling parents; most southerners; Civil War reenactors; many Christians.

My opinion who will not like this movie: Most northerners, most African Americans, many Liberals, most in Hollywood.

My opinion on how the movie will fare: It will likely not last long in the theaters. Most critics will hate it. It will come out on DVD/Home video sooner than most movies. It will likely not rake in as much money as it cost to make. However, I hope to be proven wrong here. Though not without flaws, I believe it is worth seeing and discussing.


54 of 70 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
The Irish at the defensive wall. whenim64
Movie Review: The Extended Director’s Cut of “Gods and Generals”!!! Crazyhorse30
Director's Cut Showing at Manassas - July 2011 jtf87
Always wondered why it didn't follow the book trob226
Jackson's Alleged Eccentricities tallkennj
Part of a trilogy? ZeroSwede
Discuss Gods and Generals (2003) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?