MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 380 this week

Gods and Generals (2003)

 -  Drama | History | War  -  21 February 2003 (USA)
6.3
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.3/10 from 12,151 users   Metascore: 30/100
Reviews: 490 user | 84 critic | 29 from Metacritic.com

The rise and fall of legendary war hero Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson as he leads the Confederacy to great success against the Union from 1861 to 1863. Prequel to the 1993 classic "Gettysburg".

Director:

Writers:

(book), (screenplay)
Watch Trailer
0Check in
0Share...

Watch Now

From $2.99 on Amazon Instant Video

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 43 titles
created 31 Mar 2011
 
a list of 35 titles
created 20 Oct 2011
 
a list of 34 titles
created 08 Jul 2012
 
a list of 42 titles
created 27 Jun 2013
 
a list of 36 titles
created 1 week ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Gods and Generals (2003)

Gods and Generals (2003) on IMDb 6.3/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Gods and Generals.

User Polls

1 win & 2 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Gettysburg (TV Movie 2011)
Documentary | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

An examination of the Battle of Gettysberg on both the personal and strategic level.

Director: Adrian Moat
Stars: Sam Rockwell, Josh Artis, Greg Berg
Gettysburg (1993)
Drama | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

In 1863, the Northern and Southern forces fight at Gettysburg in the decisive battle of the American Civil War.

Director: Ronald F. Maxwell
Stars: Tom Berenger, Martin Sheen, Stephen Lang
Copperhead (2013)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.4/10 X  

An Upstate New York family is torn apart during the American Civil War.

Director: Ronald F. Maxwell
Stars: François Arnaud, Lucy Boynton, Casey Thomas Brown
Action | Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.3/10 X  

Gettysburg Three days of Destiny is the compelling story of the commanders, decisions and pivotal moments of the battle that turned the tide of the American Civil War

Director: Robert Child
Stars: Steve Schlosser, Bob Bosler, Benjamin Bidlack
Glory (1989)
Drama | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

Robert Gould Shaw leads the US Civil War's first all-black volunteer company, fighting prejudices of both his own Union army and the Confederates.

Director: Edward Zwick
Stars: Matthew Broderick, Denzel Washington, Cary Elwes
Crime | Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

An aging hitman gets a contract to kill a general in Buenos Aires. But when his mark becomes unavailable, he becomes involved in Argentinian tango culture.

Director: Robert Duvall
Stars: Robert Duvall, Luciana Pedraza, Rubén Blades
Wicked Spring (2002)
Drama | War | Western
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

During the 1864 battle of the Wilderness, three Union soldiers and three Confederate Soldiers get seperated from their units as twilight engulfs the ravaged battlefield. The men wander ... See full summary »

Director: Kevin R. Hershberger
Stars: Brian Merrick, DJ Perry, Terry Jernigan
Andersonville (TV Movie 1996)
Drama | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

The story of the most notorious Confederate prisoner of war camp in the American Civil War.

Director: John Frankenheimer
Stars: Jarrod Emick, Frederic Forrest, Ted Marcoux
Drama | Sport
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

Gordon McLeod is the manager of a second tier Scottish football team. Faced with pressure from his American owner, he is forced to bring on a marquee player to improve the fortunes of the ... See full summary »

Director: Michael Corrente
Stars: Robert Duvall, Michael Keaton, Andy Gray
The Crossing (TV Movie 2000)
Biography | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

A dramatization of George Washington's perilous gamble of crossing the Delaware River and attacking the British forces at Trenton.

Director: Robert Harmon
Stars: Jeff Daniels, Roger Rees, Sebastian Roché
Open Range (2003)
Action | Romance | Western
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

A former gunslinger is forced to take up arms again when he and his cattle crew are threatened by a corrupt lawman.

Director: Kevin Costner
Stars: Kevin Costner, Robert Duvall, Diego Luna
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  
Director: Ronald F. Maxwell
Stars: Donzaleigh Abernathy, Kevin Conway, Jeff Daniels
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Martha
...
Adjutant
George Allen ...
Confederate Officer
...
Capt. James J. White
...
Brig. Gen. James Kemper (as Royce Applegate)
...
...
Maj. Walter Taylor
Mac Butler ...
Robert Byrd ...
Confederate General (as Robert C. Byrd)
...
Bowdoin Student
...
...
Rev. Beverly Tucker Lacy
...
Old Penn
Jim Choate ...
Brig. Gen. Bernard Bee
...
Dr. George Junkin
Edit

Storyline

The rise and fall of legendary war hero Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson as he leads the Confederacy to great success against the Union from 1861 to 1863. Prequel to the 1993 classic "Gettysburg".

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

The nations heart was touched by.... See more »

Genres:

Drama | History | War

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for sustained battle sequences | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

21 February 2003 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Dioses y generales  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Budget:

$56,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$4,675,246 (USA) (21 February 2003)

Gross:

$12,870,569 (USA) (25 April 2003)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (director's cut)

Sound Mix:

| |

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The views of the town of Fredericksburg, Virginia are really of the unincorporated town Great Cacapon, West Virginia, filmed from the Panorama Overlook near Berkeley Springs. See more »

Goofs

Before the Battle of Fredricksburg the the Irish Brigades famous green flags were in the process of being replaced, the only regiment to have the green flag was the 28th Massachusetts. Days after the battle Gen. T.F. Meagher, commander of the Irish Brigade, had the new emerald flags presented at what is known as the "Deaths Dinner" while the deaths of their comrades were still fresh on their minds. See more »

Quotes

[first lines]
Title Card: A human life, I think, should be well rooted in some spot of a native land, where it may get the love of tender kinship for the face of the earth, for the labors men go forth to, for the sounds and accents that haunt it, for whatever will give that early home a familiar unmistakable difference amidst the future widening of knowledge. The best introduction to astronomy is to think of the nightly heavens as a little lot of stars belonging to one's own homestead. - George Eliot
See more »

Crazy Credits

The movie was dedicated to the memory of John F. Maxwell and Royce D. Applegate. See more »

Connections

Spin-off Gods and Generals (2003) See more »

Soundtracks

Silent Night
Music by Franz Gruber (as Franz X. Gruber)
Lyrics by Joseph Mohr
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Good movie overall but Gettysburg was better.
26 February 2003 | by (Glade Spring, VA) – See all my reviews

My View in Summary: Overall, I enjoyed the movie (despite some of its apparent flaws), and I plan to see it again in the theater, as well as purchase the extended version when it comes out on DVD. I liked Gettysburg and the novel "Gods and Generals" better. I am fairly confident that the majority of Americans will not like nor support this film due to its overall pro-southern emphasis.

What I liked about the movie: I thought Lang did an excellent job portraying Jackson. I was deeply moved by his final scene in the film.

The attention to detail was good; overall it was historically accurate--with some exceptions.

The costumes looked good.

I appreciated the show of how Christianity influenced many in the Civil War, such as Jackson and Lee.

I liked the fact that many from Gettysburg reprised their roles in this film, although there were some who couldn't, which was a little disappointing.



What I didn't like or wished was better about the movie: The fake beards were more than obvious in this film, with the exception of Jackson's and Lee's, but this is relatively minor to the overall film.

I thought, with maybe the exception of the Fredericksburg battle, the depiction of the battle scenes were not nearly as well done as in Gettysburg; but to be fair, there were more battles to cover in this film. Gettysburg only had one, meaning more time could be given to the details of the battle.

The battle of Antietam was not in the movie at all, not even mentioned, which is very disappointing given its significance and effects.

Some of the CGI is poorly done (i.e., very obvious), but, again, this is a small part of the movie and in my opinion neither makes nor breaks it.

Some of the speeches were a bit stiff and seemed contrived, particularly Chamberlain's speech before the battle of Fredricksburg.

Not enough time was given to developing the characters of Lee, Chamberlain, and Hancock, all of whom are important in the novel. In fact, in contrast to the film, the novel gives most time to Lee, not Jackson. To be fair, however, novels usually are better than their film counterparts given the constraints of time.



My thoughts on some of the common complaints about the movie: Some complain there wasn't enough realism as to the carnage of war. To that I say there was enough to get the point across, and for myself, it is refreshing from time to time to see a movie that doesn't rely too heavily on blood and guts. This is not meant to be a blood and guts movie. The novel is even less bloody. Anyone who wants to see a blood and guts war movie should buy or rent Saving Private Ryan, Full Metal Jacket, Hamburger Hill, the Patriot, Braveheart, etc.

Others complain that there were too many poetic speeches. Indeed there were many speeches, but that was also true of Gettysburg, which most view as a good movie. I didn't mind the speeches so much other than they sometimes truncated the character in such a way that the audience fails to see their visceral humanity. As stated above, the only speech I thought was a bit over the top was Chamberlain's before the battle of Fredricksburg. It seemed forced, showy, and odd that the whole regiment would stand motionless and quiet for so long to hear him go on and on. Clearly it was intended to be a poignant moment showing historical parallels between the American Civil War and Roman history. But the whole scene ends up feeling staged and apathetic.

Others complain about the strong emphasis on religion. As stated above, I found this emphasis refreshing, for certainly Jackson and Lee were very devout Christian men. Christianity was a part of the ethos of this country at that time and affected many in both north and south.

Still others complain about the pro-southern perspective being so strong. While I admit there is an imbalance between the northern and southern perspectives, which clearly favors the southern view, I also think this only stands to reason, since the overall focus of the film is clearly on Jackson, a southerner. And given the fact that many other movies often underplay the southern perspective (i.e., it was fought over State's rights) or ignore it altogether, some will find this movie's emphasis a refreshing change. On the other hand, the clear downplay of the role and effect of slavery in this film will no doubt trouble many Americans.

Finally, others complain that the movie is too long. But I find this to be a misnomer. What most really mean by this is that the movie is not entertaining enough to justify such a length. This is not the first long film in cinematic history. Other films were very long and yet praised as wonderful (Terms of Endearment, Dances With Wolves, Gone with the Wind, Braveheart, Lord of the Rings, etc.). The real issue here, I believe, is that this movie for many is too "slow" or "mundane" in their estimation. This, I think, is a result of our becoming so accustomed to roller coaster rides at the movies. If it isn't constantly exciting or humorous or action-packed, it needs to be short. I suppose that in a TV age wherein we are accustom to pure entertainment compacted into ten-minute blocks of time separated by pithy, entertaining commercials, this complaint ought not surprise us, given the historical orientation of this film. But I think such a complaint is evidence of a deeper cultural problem, which should concern us all.

My opinion who will like this movie: many Historians, Teachers, and Homeschooling parents; most southerners; Civil War reenactors; many Christians.

My opinion who will not like this movie: Most northerners, most African Americans, many Liberals, most in Hollywood.

My opinion on how the movie will fare: It will likely not last long in the theaters. Most critics will hate it. It will come out on DVD/Home video sooner than most movies. It will likely not rake in as much money as it cost to make. However, I hope to be proven wrong here. Though not without flaws, I believe it is worth seeing and discussing.


57 of 73 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
The Irish at the defensive wall. whenim64
Uniforms stwadsworth
Movie Review: The Extended Director’s Cut of “Gods and Generals”!!! Crazyhorse30
Director's Cut Showing at Manassas - July 2011 jtf87
Always wondered why it didn't follow the book trob226
Jackson's Alleged Eccentricities tallkennj
Discuss Gods and Generals (2003) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?