Dating back to the time of Jesus Christ, an ancient relic known as the Loculus has been fought over by the forces of light and darkness down the centuries. Created in 50 AD, the wood panels... See full summary »
Dating back to the time of Jesus Christ, an ancient relic known as the Loculus has been fought over by the forces of light and darkness down the centuries. Created in 50 AD, the wood panels of the Loculus are emblazoned with two images: the Ankh symbol - a looped crucifix - and the Caduceus - a rod entwined with two serpents. On its perilous journey through history, the Loculus was further adorned with more arcane mystical imagery including pentagrams, hexagrams, a crucified serpent, the naked human form divine and a hermaphrodite. And many have tried to unlock the secret of the sacred artefact - a secret only a chosen few know contains profound and overwhelming ramifications for mankind. In 1299 a Jewish alchemist's attempts to unravel the enigma ended in disaster. And in 1710 Sir Isaac Newton, discoverer of the laws of gravity and a foremost member of the Masonic Order of the Knights Templar, also strove to answer the riddle. But with the art of science in its infancy, Newton ... Written by
One is used to lending one's unstinting support to the brave efforts of our film industry. This however should never be extended to support for crimes against taste and judgement.Where is the plot? Who approved the script? What happened to story structure, respect for the audience's intelligence and simple awareness of characterisation? In the immortal words of Mr G Harrison
"My Dear Lord!" - surely someone could have done better than
This diabolical travesty has already been condemned on this site for obvious failings perceived by all who have been stupid enough to pay to see it. That the photography and design are adequate does not raise it above contention for 'worst film in living memory'.
I do not wish to repeat what others have said, to carp about the lack of direction, or indeed to carp about the woeful dialogue or even to carp about the cringeful acting (who is guilty of telling that wooden girl she could act?), but the public have a right to be protected from this.
Be warned this film is a load of old carp.
21 of 35 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?