"The Name of the Game" LA 2017 (TV Episode 1971) Poster

(TV Series)

(1971)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Looking forward to 2017
AlsExGal28 January 2023
Episode of the series The Name of the Game directed by Steven Spielberg, later re-shown as a standalone TV movie. Series star Gene Barry is on his way to a conference on the environment - ecology is what they called it then - when he has a car accident that renders him unconscious. He's awakened in the year 2017 in a dystopian future-Los Angeles that has relocated underground following an ecological disaster that has left much of the planet uninhabitable. Barry tries to learn what exactly led to this nightmare scenario, and is disturbed by the fascist government led by Barry Sullivan. Also featuring Sharon Farrell, Paul Stewart, Severn Darden, Edmond O'Brien, Louise Latham, Michael C. Gwynne, and Geoffrey Lewis.

This "glimpse into the future" gets much of it wrong, as usual, such as a primitive question answering computer, but it's still amusing to see the worries of the day, most of which are still present. Some noteworthy touches: the cops are also degree-holding psychiatrists that spout psycho-babble; milk is a luxury and status symbol; a visit to a nightclub features an elderly acid rock band performing for a bunch of geriatric hippies; and a discussion about a "supposed sighting of a real Negro in Cleveland", which hasn't been seen since "the riots of '86".

Over 50 years later I have to admire this episode's cheek, especially given the banality of current TV fare. Recommended, though it is usually found only in truncated versions.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not The Greatest...but Excellent stuff !
biffot5 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler Alert !

A 'Gene Barry' Segment Episode

Some presumably Sci Fi fans now claim this story to be the GREATEST ever episode of the entire series...But I can't agree.

First 'The Name of The Game' was NEVER ever a Sci Fi series - For this story could far more easily be a 'Twilight Zone' episode (similarly you might just as easily have had one of the three 'Name of The Game' Lead characters featured in Dennis Weaver's famous role having the scary 'cat & mouse' freeway experience in the Spielberg TV movie 'Duel' which was at least set in the same time period - yes ?)

Thus it's perhaps uneasily 'shoehorned' into the Seventies contemporary series by the 'to be expected' means of a groan inducing (and in truth quite predictable) explanation ending in order to then get 'back to series Reality'...

Second, In my view, it's not only NOT the best 'Name of The Game' story ever...but also not really the best of the 'Gene Barry' segment tales either...being relatively untypical of his normal style shows, (bar a handful of 'offbeat' styled episodes), in which he excelled.

That said I'm certainly NOT belittling it either I hasten to add...for it IS a very powerful thought provoking episode asking: 'what if...?' and 'Where are we going as a Society ?' ....chillingly it IS more relevant now than way back in 1971, so it Does carry a punch, tho' the colourful late sixties/early seventies Production style rather dates it now....

It's a bit OTT but the points it makes re a bleak future pollution ruined Earth, underground society...most amusingly 'Dinosaur Rock Bands' etc...are all valid and quite possibly very accurate predictions of things that do indeed lay up ahead...

It's one of the small but very memorable group of more 'offbeat' Gene Barry segment stories (like: 'Love-in At Ground Zero', 'Tarot', 'One of the Girls in Research', 'The Showdown',etc) and it stands out as the show at it's most artistic, arty, and ambitious...

....but then again perhaps is not Gene Barry at his strongest or most comfortable - his more conventional battle of wits 'chess games' with powerful business or political opponents probably see his finest acting performances ( - for example anyone could have been the young scientist guy in 'War of The Worlds'...but Gene Barry deftly made 'Bat Masterson', 'Capt.Amos Burke', and here Publisher 'Glenn Howard' totally his own)

The tale shows an uneasy and weary Glenn Howard driving back from a conference to discuss growing World pollution problems...very topical for 1971...Howard's car swerves and crashes (guess the ending ?)...

...He 'awakens' to find himself suddenly now in 2017 A.D. - in a crazy world gone all wrong....society driven underground due to world pollution..with overpopulation problems (clear shades of 'H.G.Wells' nightmarish visions of the future...)

A good support cast make this a fascinating and indeed memorable 'one off' futuristic Sci Fi flavoured episode of a contemporary set TV show that is really well directed by the young Steven Spielberg, with a most compelling musical score.

Now perhaps it's become a little over rated by Sci Fi fans somewhat (?)

...but it's nevertheless a great offbeat memorable if perhaps uncharacteristic 'The Name of the Game' episode !
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bat and Pat in the 21st Century
GaryPeterson677 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
As a Western fan, I see Gene Barry and Barry Sullivan and think of BAT MASTERSON and THE TALL MAN, in which Sullivan played Pat Garrett. It was great seeing these men teamed up and surviving in a claustrophobic dystopian future far from the wide-open ranges of the Old West.

Thinking of Sullivan as Pat Garrett also gave greater oomph to his wife's breaking the news that "Billy's dead."

This is the first and only episode of THE NAME OF THE GAME I've seen, so I can only judge it as a standalone TV movie.

THE GOOD. Several iconic 1970's science-fiction films are presaged here. The ambulance drive back to LA with shots of skeletons in rusted-out cars brought to mind the title sequence of THE OMEGA MAN, which would be released later in 1971. When Sandrelle offered herself to Glenn I thought of the "furniture" that came with the apartments in SOYLENT GREEN (set in 2022). Same for the scarcity of commonplace staples like milk or meat. The underground cities evoked the domed cities of LOGAN'S RUN, coupled with the population problem and whispered promise of people living safely and freely on the surface. All three of those films had as their base some disaster that upended society as we know it.

Another seventies movie that sprang to mind was Woody Allen's SLEEPER. And that film perhaps more than the others parallels LA 2017. Miles Monroe from 1973 wakes up in 2173 and has experiences similar to Glenn, adjusting to a similar yet utterly strange culture. The country is totalitarian, ruled by a shadowy figure who is never clearly seen. Eventually Miles like Glenn is recruited by a resistance movement. Glenn has Sandrelle as his kooky guide just as Woody had the kookier Diane Keaton as Luna leading him through a brave new world.

I loved the "Discard" club for old folks to jam out to ancient rock n' rollers; one of the film's prophecies that actually came true. We've actually lived long enough to see septuagenarian singers on tour as standard operating procedure, which robbed this scene of the satirical humor audiences in '71 would have enjoyed.

A highlight was the stellar cast assembled for this film. Gene Barry stars and is ably assisted by Barry Sullivan, a standout with a meaty part. Sharon Farrell won me over as the tragic pawn Sandrelle. Severn Darden and Paul Stewart were squandered, however, especially Darden. He gave flashes of his eccentric bombast (evident in films like THE PRESIDENT'S ANALYST), but mostly played it straight and restrained. (He would soon show up in another dystopian film, BATTLE FOR THE PLANET OF THE APES).

But the biggest disappointment was Edmond O'Brien as mad scientist Bergman. He has one scene, sitting straitjacketed in a chair, reading his lines off a cue card, maniacally flashing his eyes through the magnified lenses of his chunky glasses. Let's face it, O'Brien just phoned it in. He was probably done shooting by noon, picked up his check, and was on the putting green by one. And worse, all O'Brien gave us was a long, tedious info dump.

THE BAD. That info dump headlines what was wrong with this picture. So much exposition! Everyone Glenn spoke with was like a faucet gushing forth gallons of data on the ecological, societal, and governmental calamities that befell the planet since the 1970s.

I thought of a 22-year-old Al Gore, clutching well-thumbed copies of Carson's "Silent Spring" and Reich's "Greening of America," riveted to this movie as if it were a PBS documentary. If anything, the fact the ecological alarmism pictured here never came to pass should give pause to Greta and her legion of sycophantic climate hysterics. The film does demonstrate that those who fail to learn from history will rinse and repeat it (and find gullible suckers to believe it). Maybe that's why this series or this standalone episode have never been released on DVD? It's an embarrassment, at least on the environmental front.

More compelling when watching in the 2020s is its prediction of big business eventually taking over government. And not only business overstepping, but psychiatry, as headshrinkers serve as police and can deem any nonconformist a dangerous criminal (and eliminate them with impunity).

This film aired two years before Roe v. Wade opened the floodgates to abortion in 1973. Paul Stewart's character discusses "negating" the "rejects" and sterilizing the undesirable strains of humanity, describing a future where Margaret Sanger's eugenicist dreams were made manifest. That reminds me of a similarly themed dystopian sci-fi TV movie from later this same year: THE LAST CHILD starring Ed Asner, Michael Cole, and Janet Margolin.

Orwell rightly predicted the surveillance state seen here. But there's a welcome twist with the watchmen being a bunch of goldbrickers who aren't especially invested or concerned when a camera goes out. One guard is lamenting his fool kid brother getting shot down over Liverpool in our ongoing war with England. Little things like that add flavor and fun to the film, like the PA announcement promoting a rich and colorful career as a police informant.

Is nothing sacred? Even religion has been subsumed by the state. The networked churches broadcasting nationwide has become a reality, especially post-Covid. What I'd like to know is how the sabbath day got bumped back to Saturday!

I don't cast stones at the outdated technology. Who in 1971 could have envisioned smartphones or digital media? Seeing reel projectors, primitive computers, and 1970's fashions, haircuts, and vehicles didn't bother or distract me. With a little suspension of disbelief, it's easy to believe this was 2017.

So how does Glenn escape the matrix? Not a dream! Not an imaginary story! Okay, okay, it was a dream and an imaginary story. I did for a moment hope that when Glenn ran over the crest of that hill (policemen in hot pursuit) that he would stumble into the tear in the space-time continuum and return home to 1971, but that would open up all those pesky time travel questions (not to mention shouts of ripoff from those of us who love the "100 Yards Over the Rim" episode of TWILIGHT ZONE!). The story resolved just fine (and nice touch having Geoffrey Lewis bridge the 46-year span), though I thought Spielberg gilded the lily with the closeups on the exhaust puffs and the dead bird. If you didn't get the message by that point in the picture...

I enjoyed LA 2017 primarily for the performances and winning rapport between Western vets Gene Barry and Barry Sullivan going Buck Rogers instead of Roy Rogers. The story was enjoyable albeit overly ambitious; its reach exceeding its grasp. But I applaud all involved for making that reach.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Eco-Sci Fi
DTVTEMP10 March 2002
Although dated by any standards, this episode of the popular NBC show "The Name of the Game" still stands up relatively well. It is my hope that Universal will repurpose this content and release it to DVD.

LA 2017 differed from the other episodes of Name of the Game, in that it was a science fiction episode. The episode represents the first screenplay written by Sci Fi Author Phillip Wylie. Steven Spielberg directed the episode.

Publisher Glenn Howard is returning in his car from the Sierra Pines Conference on world ecological issues. It is a smoggy day in Los Angeles, and exhaust backs up in his car, knocking him out. His car drives off the side of the road into a dirt bank.

When he awakes, he discovers that a time warp has transported him from 1971 to the year 2017. An ecological disaster which occurred in the 1980s and 1990s has wiped out all life on the surface of the earth, interfering with the oxygen cycle and rendering the atmosphere deadly to even breathe.

Los Angeles is now an underground city of some 10,000 people. It has survived along with similar cities in perhaps a dozen locations around the world. The government has been replaced by a shareholder's democracy established by the wealthy businessmen who funded building of the original underground cities.

The shareholder's democracy is structured to favor the corporate elite. It is extremely heavy handed and is more or less a totalitarian state. Psychologists are now the police, and they are oriented towards thought control and mind control. Privacy does not exist.

This is an excellent episode. I last saw it aired on television in 1981.
29 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worth seeing...but VERY flawed.
planktonrules5 April 2023
"LA 2017" is an episode of the anthology series "The Name of the Game". Why I watched this particular episode is that it was directed by a very young Steven Spielberg. I've seen a few of his early TV directorial efforts...such as "Night Gallery" and "Duel" and I was curious to see what the rest of his early stuff was like. Well, in this case it was rough...though I think most of the blame for this is the budget and run time. If it were longer and higher budgeted, it might have been a terrific episode.

Glenn Howard (Gene Barry) is driving when he suddenly has an accident. When he awakens, he's taken by folks in hazmat suits to some underground lair. When he awakens, he learns that it's no longer 1971...but 2017 and no one knows how this happened. But what Glenn does know is that this future world really sucks! Most of the people on Earth have died as a result of an ecological disaster...and the remaining ones live underground and are ruled by a fascist corporation. He's not thrilled by these folks and soon gravitates to the underground...a movement pushing to change society.

While I like the general style of the story, I was annoyed by two things. First, instead of showing what happened in the future, the story spends a lot of time TALKING about what happened...a cheap way to make a shorter story. Second, the ending, while it did make sense, also was VERY disappointing...much like the end of "The Wizard of Oz". While it worked in the 1939 film, here the ending seemed like a cop-out...a way to try to wrap everything together neatly at the end...even if it isn't satisfying. I really think the story would have worked as a pilot for a series...and the story clearly needed series length.

Overall, the acting isn't bad and the story has some very interesting elements. But it's badly in need of a reworking...and could have been a lot better.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Spielberg in the far future thirty years before A.I.
virek2132 August 2001
Contrary to what some may be led to believe, the masterful A.I.: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE isn't exactly the first time Spielberg has gone into the far future. In fact, his actual first trip that way began while he was still a TV director. L.A. 2017, an episode he shot for the NBC-TV show "The Name Of The Game", was that trip.

Though "Name Of The Game" was usually standard TV melodrama, Spielberg's episode took on a distinct science fiction theme. Gene Barry, as series regular Glenn Howard, is driving to a conference on ecology and tape-recording an essay for his magazine "People" (not the one we all know), when he falls asleep at the wheel and crashes. When he wakes up, it is to a nightmarishly yellow-orange skyline; and he is found by men in gas masks. He is taken to an underground complex, where he is met by the new "mayor" of Los Angeles (Barry Sullivan). Sullivan's explanation for the state of L.A.'s problems is that a toxic algae spread across the world and mixed with L.A.'s smog, creating a deadly mix that killed all life above ground. Barry learns that he has somehow travelled nearly half a century into an ecological nightmare of the future.

Anticipating certain aspects of Ridley Scott's 1982 epic BLADE RUNNER, L.A. 2017 posits a cynical assessment of Mankind's abuse of the environment. Spielberg interestingly shot the scenes of the underground complex at the Hyperion treatment plant in El Segundo; and the scenes of a pollution-ridden world were shot, and enhanced with orange-yellow camera filters, in the fall of 1970 in areas of the western San Fernando Valley that had recently been devastated by a violent wind-driven firestorm. Spielberg also manages to get solid performances from his cast all around, which is astounding, given the fact that he had only twelve days and $375,000 to use.

Topped off by an eerie futuristic score by Robert Prince and Billy Goldenberg, L.A. 2017 is an excellent and very early glimpse into Spielberg's professional movie-making talents. Universal, I believe, owns the rights to this superb TV flick, which aired on NBC on January 15, 1971; it should do the right thing and release this piece on video.
39 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Best show of the series
mike-ryan4554 March 2008
I haven't seen the episode since I was a child, but I remember the imagination and power of it. It was extremely good. It was easily the best show of the entire series. The other comments are dead on about the content and how economically effective it was. It was a mixture of quiet menace and solid science with fond dashes of humour. The "senior citizen's bar" with octogenarian Hippies playing electric guitars was quite memorable.

Someone needs to make a TV series of these Sci Fi gems from the 60's. Episodes like those golden ten episodes of the Outer Limits and Twilight Zone. This would stand right up there with them. It surely would beat the rehashes like the new American Gladiators.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Scary as a kid back then.....
otisarea8 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
My Dad used to watch this show, when it was in its original run. For some reason, I managed to convince both parents that I wanted to watch this episode, as it was 'all about a long time in the future,' or so I thought back then, with Gene Barry's character being the one mainly in this episode. I had no idea of what a dystopian future was, back then, but I was into watching Lost In Space (Jupiter 2 launched in 1997), Journey to the Center of The Earth, as well as Capt. Nemo, with James Mason. Watergate hadn't happened yet, we were still involved in fighting the Vietnam War, as I recall, and I hadn't really gotten into Star Trek reruns yet.

Steven Spielberg was some guy I'd never heard of, let alone understand was a Director or Producer was.

Back in March of 2020, or so, I remembered the show and episode, as being about the future, pollution, and essentially everybody living underground in a police state, or Martial Law type of situation. By the end of the episode, it was revealed that 'it had all been a dream,' due to being rendered unconscious due to a car's malfunctioning exhaust system, and carbon monoxide entering the passenger compartment. Strangely ironic in terms of the date in the future chosen, and the outbreak of COVID-19, worldwide. At that point, life was changed, in terms of what had been considered normal, up until then, and the future looked uncertain in too many ways to mention.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed