Reviews & Ratings for
Mi in More at IMDbPro »

9 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
A tragic story of love, or is it?, 7 December 2005

Author: Ann Murray (hagfish) from United States

Unlike many viewers of this movie, I found far greater depth than it is credited with.

Let us go past the obvious, which is that the film is assuredly erotic.

Examine instead, the fact that in this, it is also beautiful and intense. Mi in is a bath of sensuality we are submerged in by the director.

The point that is missed regarding this film is that it is surreal. I assume it was intended to be so. When viewed as surrealism, it reaches an entirely different level.

We do not know at any point if the story is a figment of the vivid imagination of the male character, a writer, or if it is really happening. We might hope it is imagination at work, because the final scene before the closing of the film is so heart wrenchingly tragic.

In this scene, he has set himself free from one demon, only to inherit another. Released from the physical body of the woman over whom he obsesses, and who has tormented him in every moment of his days, he must then live with interminable guilt and grief.

It was impossible for me to disengage myself from the film once it had grasped me, which it did in a very subtle way. By the final few scenes I was emotionally involved with the characters. The woman, while also pitying and understanding her, put me off. In the end she did not have my sympathy as deeply as the writer, who was impaled on this fruitless love, and held prisoner by obsession, whereas she was deliberately using him in a cold hearted way, while she was as obsessed and impaled as he, on an abusive relationship, and self-destructive course of her own. Many times she expresses the wish to die. To be dead. To be set free from her pain.

She is at times obviously mentally unbalanced, drunk, or hysterical, and yet deliberate in her actions. She lies with equanimity, flirts and seduces without conscience.

It must be stated here that the subtitles were moronic, ghastly, and unforgivable. This factor leads to unnecessary confusion. If one were able to understand Korean, the original language of the film, our experience of this tale would have been entirely different.

When viewed through the intellect first, without expectation, but with an open mind to the surreal, this becomes a little gem in it's own right. It goes without saying that it is a most beautiful film physically. The players are both exceptionally good-looking people. Both have very beautiful bodies. They are agile and graceful, and totally believable in the love scenes.

Since this story is presented as narrative frequently, using the voice-over technique, it must be remarked that Mr. Oh has a very pleasant mature speaking voice that brings enjoyment to the ear, while giving us a fine clue regarding the nature of the character.

The director did certain things with the sound track, other than supplying us with a remarkable musical background that incidentally stands high on my list of favored film scores. It is exquisite.

The very sound of the film otherwise--the clattering departures of the woman, her slamming of the door, her frequent shrillness, her noisy occupation of another's space, is jarring. All this, opposed to the introspective silence of the writer, is calculated and clever, simply because it works on the subconscious, and tells us so much about the characters, without saying a word.

If we look at the visual aspects without the sensuality, without the sex, we see a man with beautiful gentle hands tenderly nurturing a plant. A subtle, sensitive, poignant view into the inner heart, as well as the physical self. He lives in serene simplicity.

For a movie that was not well received by the Korean public when it was released in theatres there, it has certainly enjoyed longevity as a DVD. It is still in print, and sells for a hefty twenty plus US dollars on the Asian market.

I've seen comments elsewhere regarding the performance of Oh Ji Ho, in that it is not top rate. I would therefore like to point out that this film is his debut effort, having come from a career as a successful model.He was also quite young when he made the film. He was born in 1976.

Were this film to be made now, as he approaches the age of thirty, I feel the role would have been handled far better. He would have been more credible. The character he plays is older, mature, a professional writer of some standing. The interior struggle of the man needed clarification, which would have come from clear translation (good subtitles). We did not have that. Therefore we can't judge Mr. Oh's interpretation of the role very fairly.

If it were not for the subtitles, I would have rated it as a 10, simply because it is a daring plunge into a convoluted tale by a master director who was willing it seems, to take a chance, to present a puzzle that requires the thought process. A little much to ask of the average viewer going to see a film presented as erotic, and perceived as soft-core pornography.

There is a great difference between the utter stupidity of soft-core/hard-core pornography, which relies on the display of sexual behavior in greater or lesser degree, sans art, sans viable plot, sans any modicum of sensitivity, and any trace of the difficulty presented to the human race in the course of an agonizingly debilitating relationship based on sexual obsession and unrequited love, that can only end bitterly, leaving the dust of shattered, pulverized souls behind it.

It's a fine art film that happens also to be an elegant piece of erotica.

8 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Lengthy, 4 July 2004
Author: shu-fen from Hong Kong, China

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I picked up the VCD pack and before I put it down, my friend told me to have a go and not to be bothered by the Category III. She's 60% correct. The actress has done a good job (it would be even better if they take someone more beautiful) while the man doesn't show much of acting. Modern interior setting, beautiful cinematography, great bodies and perfect "estrangement" ambience, all these come together to bring in distressful feeling. What mars the film is the length, it's too long.

The two persons don't know each other well but they have intimate physical association. It's a very strange spatial setting that it appears that they don't have any connection with the outside world. The sex scenes though explicit but not decadent, their private parts are not shown. The same crew can come together to create something more of story-telling but not solely on displaying shooting techniques or cinematographic talent. (I especially like the very last shot on the beach. Two naked bodies lie with the man on top horizontally under the sun. The blue sky, the marine blue sea and the golden sand are put into three layers as the background, well, it's a painting. The title can be "Fusion of Man and Nature", wondrous.)

Some psychologists say that men are easily intrigued or trapped by sex if the women they encounter take the lead to capture their heart, soul and even life if they are pushed to their limit. The movie has translated the saying into visible form with tragic ending.

1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Mi in, Me out (SPOILERS), 20 August 2010
Author: vb10 from world

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I have just wasted two hours of my precious time... There is no love. No passion. There is a girl (nude model) who is so erratic in her behavior, it is really hard to sympathize with her. When the guy (MAJOR SPOILER AHEAD) finally strangles her (for whatever reason) the only thing I could think about was - why he did not do it in the beginning? Just because he enjoyed having sex with her every single minute of his day?

What is really disturbing about this movie is that (AGAIN) the woman is portrayed as dumb, illogical, emotionally disturbed and inconsistent. On top of all that, she is used for sex, physically abused and finally killed. How much violence toward women can Korean movie industry tolerate? Apparently, a lot.

The only thing I loved about this movie was interior design. It is beautiful. I would love to hire the person from this movie to decorate my house.

VERDICT: do not watch.

3 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Sensous and requires highly developed sense of emotional longing, 1 October 2008

Author: darkmax from Singapore

I find this interesting film to be quite sensuous and emotional. Unfortunately for many guys out there, it may be too much, especially if one is not in tune with their emotions.

The sex scenes were realistic but not profane. To call it pornography would be over the top. It is artsy.

The way the male character handles the unpredictable female lead is at best strenuous. He tries his best to make sense of their relationship, trying hard to settle her down by his side. His longing for her occupies his entire day's thoughts.

If one has fallen deeply in love before, one will understand much of the emotions of the guy. The female is at best surreal and ethereal to him. This frustrates him.

Overall, this is a nice movie to watch if you have the patience and the emotional capacity to comprehend the subtleties in the acting.

1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
minimal in every way, 10 June 2007

Author: summoner131 from Viet Nam

This movie is a pure example of minimalist cinema. Everything in it is minimal,the present of minimalism is in the script,in the number of characters, in the characters' relation and in the set decor. By an eye-candy cinematography, a beautiful ,simple and someways surreal story was told: An young and lonely writer accidentally had a gorgeous lover - another struggling soul - and began a mental adventure in sex and love , to understand the irregular rhythm of heart, to find out the meaning, purpose or even the dark side of love. Highly recommend for those who're into minimalism and for them only , you may find this film so boring with pointless sex scenes if you're not one of them .

3 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
very pretty deep hurting, 19 June 2002

Author: ETCmodel02 (e@ianchristy.com) from vancouver, BC

On the positive, I'll say it's pretty enough to be watchable. On the negative, it's insipid enough to cause regret for another 2 hours of life wasted in front of the screen. Long, whiny and pointless. And I'm not saying this to be mean, I really wanted to like this film, it seemed to have everything going for it, had the so called "buzz", and was a hassle to track down besides. Had a little more effort gone into it on the story side, I believe this would've been amazing. And I expect the team behind it will produce wonderful work in the future, they clearly have the ability. But I recommend waiting for their future efforts, let this one go.

3 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Not bad two-hander, 15 December 2001

Author: sharptongue from Sydney, Australia

A film which spends 95% of the footage on just two people. Could be dull, right ? Well, the result is less dull than it could have been. The main reason is the incredibly varied and confident performance of the girl.

The film is told, narrated indeed, by a young man, a writer, recalling an insane rollercoaster affair with a disturbed and pretty young woman. She shows up and moves in one day, for no stated reason. She appears to adore the man, spending much time enjoying his company and body. But her mobile phone rings at odd times and every time it does, she has a short conversation then rushes off.

Her story is that she works as a nude model, but he's never sure whether to believe her. It is made clear that, despite her sometimes-earnest words of love, she is still very connected with a cruel ex-lover, who is the one on the other end of the phone.

This reviewer is inclined to not read this film as fiction, as more than one of my ex-girlfriends was at least as crazy as this girl. I pity the passive narrator, who is never in control of events, whether or not this attractive psychobitch is around.

In case anyone is misled by the HK Category III rating, I'll spell out that this is a Korean film and, therefore, does not show full frontal nudity. The Cat III rating is earned for a couple of explicit sex scenes, with plenty of exposed flesh but not including private parts. Pity. Both these actors have very attractive bodies.

The only film I can relate this one to is one whose title I cannot remember. It was a Japanese film which I saw a few years ago, featuring two young actors in a single room. It was a cheapie which paid homage to Oshima's masterpiece IN THE REALM OF THE SENSES. Perhaps La Belle is a Korean remake of this film of the unknown title.

Despite the slow pace, this film holds attention. Though far from compelling, it is watchable.

Add another review

Related Links