6 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- What for?, 9 August 2004
Author:
talber from Krakow, Poland
Why would anyone waste perfectly good film for something this bad is
beyond me. The only reason I watched this movie through is that I was
unable to leave my bed at the time. The acting's horrible, but that's
not the problem. The music's lousy, but that is also not the problem.
The problem is this: there isn't one original scene, one original idea,
one comprehensible line of dialogue or one believable character in the
whole messy 90 minutes of it. To quote my beloved "Singin' in the rain"
- DID SOMEBODY ACTUALLY GET PAID FOR WRITING THIS? The movie is an
incomprehensible mess, a hastily stuck together bunch of clichés. Don't
bother. In fact, discourage others from watching. You'll be doing them
a favour.
6 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- Wow!(and not in a good way), 27 November 2004
Author:
mirandadawn31 from Anchorage Alaska
This movie had me laughing the whole time. Unfortunately, it's not
suppose to be a comedy. Craig Parker did a wonderful job as the
overeager Deputy Henley but the rest of the movie isn't worth seeing. I
would compare it to a bad "Lifetime" movie, but worse. I don't know why
it's considered a thriller because I would not be thrilled to have to
see this movie again. It takes every cheesy cliché from every other
thriller movie and uses them over and over again. None of the actors
were American so I don't see why it needed to be set in America just so
they could all murder the accent. Sometimes they even forgot which side
of the road to drive on. It's just... the list of bad things about this
movie could go on forever.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- Oh, man . . ., 7 November 2003
Author:
Aislinn_Malmeril
This movie was pretty bad, but not as bad as "Motel Hell" or "Teen Alien".
I
think this movie's saving grace was Craig Parker. He manages to pull off a
decent American accent (for the most part, anyway), which is better than
his
other Kiwi costars. Bit of trivia: the director is one of the producers on
"Mercy Peak".
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :- Would You Want Your Daughter To Marry A Slasher?, 8 November 2007
Author:
bkoganbing from Buffalo, New York
First one family is murdered than another and both have a teen beauty
queen in each family. Sheriff Barry Corbin is looking towards the young
male population of his town as potential killers. However radio news
reporter Kelly McGillis has her own ideas. She recalls a very similar
slasher case in a neighboring town several years ago and tries to
interest Corbin. Of course he's rather obtuse. Guess who's right on the
subject.
She's got reason for concern as her daughter Kate Elliott was good
friends with the other two murdered girls. We're given an interesting
trio of suspects. Backpacker Kieran Hutchison, the James Dean wannabe
Daniel Gillies, and somewhat nerdy kid Tom Huntington. There's also a
really dumb deputy in the mix in Craig Parker.
I never as a rule expect much from these films and I'm not
disappointed. The cast goes through the motions and collects their
paychecks.
Hey Elliott could have wound up married to the wrong one.
4 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- One of the worst slasher movies ever., 17 April 2003
Author:
Fei_Lo from Los Angeles
The acting of the the two female victims and the main lead are
excruciatingly bad, Are they even American?! Mixed in with some blatant
overacting and a bland script this movie is a real turkey.
Avoid.
1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- Amazing feat!, 22 April 2006
Author:
Carlos Martinez Escalona from Mexico
Maybe one of the worst things ever done! If you could read the script
just once, you'd realise it's absolutely nonsense. But, as far a movie
can go, I now use it with my students to show them ALL the things you
shouldn't do! And that's pretty difficult. So, just let me add this:
camera angles, lighting, plot, music, acting and directorial skills are
nonexistent. What about that? It's a class in itself and I doubt anyone
will ever make anything as bad... ever!
Think about TV and film production. How much money did they spend in
lighting this film... a lot! just because they wanted it to happen at
night. But... night? It just comes and goes no matter the time of day!
It's amazing how much money you can spend and how badly your product
will come out. What I can't believe is that it made it to a DVD
release. Who paid for this? If I was the writer or director or
producer, I'd never dare to risk my neck!
1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- Great entertainment value, 4 July 2002
Author:
funkylad from Antwerpen, Belgium
Although the movie has some over the top performances, plot holes and
inconsistencies, it still manages to keep you entertained for 90
minutes.
The story is sometimes a bit of a cliche, but that doesn't mean you
can't
still enjoy the story.
1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- Thriller with suspense and good acting, 27 June 2002
Author:
Peter Derkx from Culemborg, Netherlands
I would have given this movie a 7, but for the last minute.
For 90 minutes it is an average good thriller with good acting and moments
of suspense. Good to watch. The last minute spoils the thought of this
movie
for me. Now it is barely a 6.
Watch it at Amazon
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
No One Can Hear You (2001) More at IMDbPro »
6 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-

What for?, 9 August 2004
Author: talber from Krakow, Poland
Why would anyone waste perfectly good film for something this bad is beyond me. The only reason I watched this movie through is that I was unable to leave my bed at the time. The acting's horrible, but that's not the problem. The music's lousy, but that is also not the problem. The problem is this: there isn't one original scene, one original idea, one comprehensible line of dialogue or one believable character in the whole messy 90 minutes of it. To quote my beloved "Singin' in the rain" - DID SOMEBODY ACTUALLY GET PAID FOR WRITING THIS? The movie is an incomprehensible mess, a hastily stuck together bunch of clichés. Don't bother. In fact, discourage others from watching. You'll be doing them a favour.
6 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-
Wow!(and not in a good way), 27 November 2004
Author: mirandadawn31 from Anchorage Alaska
This movie had me laughing the whole time. Unfortunately, it's not suppose to be a comedy. Craig Parker did a wonderful job as the overeager Deputy Henley but the rest of the movie isn't worth seeing. I would compare it to a bad "Lifetime" movie, but worse. I don't know why it's considered a thriller because I would not be thrilled to have to see this movie again. It takes every cheesy cliché from every other thriller movie and uses them over and over again. None of the actors were American so I don't see why it needed to be set in America just so they could all murder the accent. Sometimes they even forgot which side of the road to drive on. It's just... the list of bad things about this movie could go on forever.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-
Oh, man . . ., 7 November 2003
Author: Aislinn_Malmeril
This movie was pretty bad, but not as bad as "Motel Hell" or "Teen Alien". I think this movie's saving grace was Craig Parker. He manages to pull off a decent American accent (for the most part, anyway), which is better than his other Kiwi costars. Bit of trivia: the director is one of the producers on "Mercy Peak".
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-

Would You Want Your Daughter To Marry A Slasher?, 8 November 2007
Author: bkoganbing from Buffalo, New York
First one family is murdered than another and both have a teen beauty queen in each family. Sheriff Barry Corbin is looking towards the young male population of his town as potential killers. However radio news reporter Kelly McGillis has her own ideas. She recalls a very similar slasher case in a neighboring town several years ago and tries to interest Corbin. Of course he's rather obtuse. Guess who's right on the subject.
She's got reason for concern as her daughter Kate Elliott was good friends with the other two murdered girls. We're given an interesting trio of suspects. Backpacker Kieran Hutchison, the James Dean wannabe Daniel Gillies, and somewhat nerdy kid Tom Huntington. There's also a really dumb deputy in the mix in Craig Parker.
I never as a rule expect much from these films and I'm not disappointed. The cast goes through the motions and collects their paychecks.
Hey Elliott could have wound up married to the wrong one.
4 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-
One of the worst slasher movies ever., 17 April 2003
Author: Fei_Lo from Los Angeles
The acting of the the two female victims and the main lead are excruciatingly bad, Are they even American?! Mixed in with some blatant overacting and a bland script this movie is a real turkey. Avoid.
1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

Amazing feat!, 22 April 2006
Author: Carlos Martinez Escalona from Mexico
Maybe one of the worst things ever done! If you could read the script just once, you'd realise it's absolutely nonsense. But, as far a movie can go, I now use it with my students to show them ALL the things you shouldn't do! And that's pretty difficult. So, just let me add this: camera angles, lighting, plot, music, acting and directorial skills are nonexistent. What about that? It's a class in itself and I doubt anyone will ever make anything as bad... ever!
Think about TV and film production. How much money did they spend in lighting this film... a lot! just because they wanted it to happen at night. But... night? It just comes and goes no matter the time of day!
It's amazing how much money you can spend and how badly your product will come out. What I can't believe is that it made it to a DVD release. Who paid for this? If I was the writer or director or producer, I'd never dare to risk my neck!
1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

Great entertainment value, 4 July 2002
Author: funkylad from Antwerpen, Belgium
Although the movie has some over the top performances, plot holes and inconsistencies, it still manages to keep you entertained for 90 minutes. The story is sometimes a bit of a cliche, but that doesn't mean you can't still enjoy the story.
1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

Thriller with suspense and good acting, 27 June 2002
Author: Peter Derkx from Culemborg, Netherlands
I would have given this movie a 7, but for the last minute. For 90 minutes it is an average good thriller with good acting and moments of suspense. Good to watch. The last minute spoils the thought of this movie for me. Now it is barely a 6.
Add another comment
Related Links