(2003)

Critic Reviews

45

Metascore

Based on 35 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
70
While the movie is stupid, it is -- hooray, and let's put this in all the national ads! -- not appallingly stupid.
70
Offers up the kind of pleasures that only a summer movie can...The cast is good-looking, the soundtrack is loud, the plot is stupid.
63
New York Daily News
The standout in the cast is James Todd Smith, whose acting talent may soon persuade him to shed his adolescent stage name of LL Cool J and concentrate on mainstream film roles.
50
Actor-turned-director Clark Johnson uses the flashy, up-to-the-minute editing and camera stunts action fans expect, but keeps the mayhem on a recognizably human scale — it's big, but not insanely overblown.
50
It's just one more competent but routine, midlevel ($70 million) late-summer action movie filled with the usual explosions, shootouts and male bonding.
50
New York Magazine (Vulture)
There is something sneakily gratifying about all this: Not since the days of "Earthquake" have Hollywood producers so indulged their fantasies of trashing the town.
50
Boston Globe
Those who love police overkill, guns, jingoistic race-baiting, guns, macho smugness, and guns will be well served.
38
Baltimore Sun
S.W.A.T. may be an acronym for Special Weapons and Tactics, but by the end of this routine melodrama, it might as well stand for Standard Whacking and Trashing.
30
Austin Chronicle
Surely something more original than this could have been mined from the history of North America’s largest and most professional police force. As it is, though, Johnson’s film is just firing blanks.
10
Village Voice
A prototypical new-millennium summer movie, S.W.A.T. is no more than an extended trailer for itself.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for S.W.A.T. (2003) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews