Julianes Sturz in den Dschungel (TV Movie 1999) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Just see the film and don't let my words spoil a great story
dbborroughs30 April 2008
Christmas 1971. A plane full of people crashes into the Amazon Jungle. A massive search is started and the wreckage is found. Despite the best efforts of rescuers no one is found alive and the search is called off. 16 Days later Juliane Koepcke, aged 17 stumbles out of the jungle, the only survivor.

Leave it to Werner Herzog to talk Juliane to go back into the jungle and show us what it was like. Amazing, hypnotic film who's subject haunted Herzog for decades-he was in the airport at the time the plane took off during his time making Aguirre. Clearly Herzog's obsession is our gain since this is a film that you fall into and watch in a state of wondrous disbelief. the thought of what this young girl went through is mind blowing, even if you take into account that she was raised in the jungle at a scientific station. No matter how you slice it she was ten ways to Sunday lucky. Julianne tells us what happened in a weird detached manner of fact manner that is strangely inviting and yet eerily unemotional. As she says she has wall up that will keep her safe. Its a wild film of an amazing story, a sibling of Herzog's Little Dieter Needs to Fly and Aguirre. I kept thinking that someone should turn it into a movie---and then Herzog shows clips from the movie that was made of the story complete with catty commentary by Juliane Koepcke who is standing in the jungle laughing at the silliness of it. I was very amused.

See this film. It will amaze you. Better it will entertain and inform you.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wings of Hope
MartinTeller10 January 2012
Another remarkable Herzog doc, about Juliane Koepcke, the 17 year-old sole survivor of a 1971 plane crash in the Peruvian jungle. 27 years later, Herzog takes her to visit the crash site and retrace her nine-day journey to rescue. The tale has many fascinating elements, not the least of which is the fact that Herzog himself was almost on that flight, on his way to film AGUIRRE. Then there's the man with a special role in the story, and who almost lost his life helping with the documentary. The film contains the usual enigmatic Herzogian touches like his poetic narration and strange detours. One of my favorite moments was actually one of the least relevant: a minute is taken to film a young girl delighted with the camera. An upbeat glimmer of innocence in this story of someone facing the abyss and emerging through the other side, haunted forever but still alive.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Herzog at his most Haunting
mr-jack-calvert4 September 2013
I've been an unrepentant fan of Werner Herzog ever since I saw him ranting in his German accent about the vileness and fornication of the jungle in "Burden of Dreams," Les Blank's 1982 documentary about the making of "Fitzcarraldo." Since then, I've seen most all of Herzog's films. There is something sublime, perverse, and almost autistically innocent about Herzog; even when he fudges things--which he frequently does--there is still a kind of oblique honesty about it, because he knows that we know what he's up to, yet he never doubts that we'll understand. I think it's okay for a documentary to have a point of view, and with "Wings of Hope," Herzog, as usual, exercises the prerogative to its fullest. But that's alright, he's Herzog. There will never be another.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A tenacious lady and the man who gave her wings (or hope)
Sinnerman14 November 2004
To understand the genius of Werner Herzog, one need look no further than this quirky documentary.

By sheer stroke of luck, I attended a talk by Beat Presser (a photographer collaborator of Herzog's in the seminal Fitzcarraldo). The talk was entitled, "Werner At Work", where we'd see Beat's exclusive footage of Herzog during his filming sessions of Cobra Verde, Invincible and yes, Wings of Hope.

During one presentation, we saw the footage Beat shot of Herzog filming the "Wings of hope" woman. She was seen wandering around the Zoology Museum where she worked. The woman merely she strolled along the shelves of animal specimens. She's also trying her earnest best to follow the subtle nudges from the man behind the camera. In Beat's footage, those shots were actually very matter of fact. Its just the woman, trailed by Herzog, a camera man and a sound guy. But Herzog's midas touch (read: embellishment) transformed those shot footage into a re-enactment of the woman's "dream sequence' in the final take of Wings of Hope. Wow. I couldn't stop laughing.

Herzog is such a zany genius. I love the guy. Love him!!!
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Haunting, metaphysical documentary about a modern Lazarus.(possible spoiler in last paragraph)
the red duchess6 February 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Herzog's idiosyncratic documentaries may not be to all tastes. Anyone raised on the spurious objectivity of the British documentary tradition - still pervasive today, with its illusion of enquiry, even-handedness and recourse to eye-witness and expert - may balk at the aggressive subjectivity of Herzog's films, which often tightropes the abyss of egotism. For instance, his intrusive commentary, often breaking in on the ostensible subject's account; the concomitant imposing of his own concerns onto another's experience; his stylising 'realistic' subject matter as he tries to create dream-like effects or utter mystical prognostications.

These are all valid complaints, and there are times when Herzog exasperates even the most fervent admirer. But 'Wings of Hope' isn't really a documentary if we accept the definition of that form as the recording and shaping of reality. The film's subject is Juliane Koepcke, a German biologist who, in 1971, was the only survivor of a plane crash in the Peruvian jungles. Herzog invites her over a quarter of a century on to retrace her steps as she walked, eventually in a starved trance, for over ten days to rescue.

The film is 'documentary' in the sense that we sift through the rubble of the crash, now so entangled in verdure that it has become part of the forest; we hear Juliane's eye-witness testimony; we catch a glimpse of horrendous socio-economic realities that persist in the region, such as the fisherman who rescued her being refused entry on a boat after he is bitten by a stingray because he can't afford the fare, or the murderous short-cuts taken by businesses that result in plane crashes.

But filmmakers are attracted to a particular subject for subjective reasons, because it interests them. Juliane is a typical Herzog protagonist (although, rarely, a woman), someone who leaves the realm of civilisation (she had just attended her graduation ball after completing her secondary education) and is plunged into the unknowable world of nature, where reason is as much a hindrance as a help, where the mind is eventually worn out, and the protagonist becomes a near-zombie, buffeted, aided, or destroyed by nature. The fact that this is a 'true' story seems to give credence to the seemingly wilder fancies of Herzog's fiction; a clip from his masterpiece, 'Aguirre, Wrath of God' is shown here.

This is where the film's real meat is. Herzog himself was due to take the fatal plane on his way to shoot 'Aguirre'. The film is as much haunted with Herzog's own brush with mortality, his own sense of reprieve, as it is with the survival and second chance of Juliane. This knowledge excuses, even engenders, the dream sense that intrudes, and finally engulfs the film.

But even without this knowledge, this documentary could only have gone in this direction. This isn't a film about a crash and its aftermath, but the journey of a woman through her own memories, and the viewer's empathy with, or recreation of them. Thus a concrete genre used to record reality becomes an abstract means of intimating what cannot be shown, time, memory, history, dream. This is not all Herzog's doing - Juliane's descriptions of the crash, for instance, have a startling poetic beauty that transcends or transforms a horrific reality into something Other.

This domain is usually that of Chris Marker (with more politics, of course), and there is an extraordinary sequence in Juliane's biological museum, with its dead, classified, even extinct species being explained by a woman who herself literally rose from the dead, and accompanied by Herzog's speculative narration, that approximates the effect of Marker's 'La Jetee'. Hence the chilling beauty of the final images, the admission that the documentary is inadequate to record certain realities, that people have to be left to their own memories and recreations of the past, a doomed project.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful
DeadDapperDan23 January 2021
Although google categorised this film under the genre of adventure, it doesn't really fit in it. It's common for a documentary to show some real footages or images to make the film more impactful, but herzog does none of that.

Firstly, there weren't enough picture of videos to depict the crash. Werner instead takes us on a journey that Julianne has been through by revisiting the same crash sites. I personally found this way of storytelling in a documentary to be more impactful and gripping than merely showing images and elaborate narrations of the events.

The documentary isn't just about how and when the events spanned out, rather it's more about survival and the gruelling journey Julianne went through.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brilliant
Michael_Elliott2 March 2008
Wings of Hope (2000)

**** (out of 4)

A rather amazing, harrowing and inspirational documentary from Werner Herzog about a 1971 plane crash in a South American jungle. A plane loaded with 92 passengers crashed in this jungle and only a seventeen-year-old woman survived. This woman, Juliane Koepcke, had to fight her way through the jungle before being found twelve days after the crash. Herzog takes this woman back to the scene of the crash and they hike through the jungle showing us the paths she took to live. This is a brilliant documentary that has a claustrophobic feel because it's simply amazing that this woman would survive the crash and it's even more amazing that she'd be able to find her way out of this jungle. Another curious note is that Herzog himself was getting ready to film Aguirre, the Wrath of God and was going to take this same flight but it was sold out. Seeing the woman going through the wreck site was also fascinating but depressing considering all the things we see.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The girl who fell from the sky
tieman647 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
1971. Christmas Eve. Lansa Flight 508 leaves Lima airport bound for Pucallpa, a town in the Amazon rain-forest. While attempting to avoid a storm, a bolt of lightning hits one of the aircraft's fuel tanks and shears off a wing. The plane tumbles toward the Peruvian forest, eventually crashing and killing 92 passengers and crew.

As the plane disintegrates, Juliane Koepcke, seventeen years old, is thrown from its fuselage. She plunges tens of thousands of feet, her chair spiralling wildly, inadvertently acting like a propeller and so creating up-thrust. Cushioned further by a thick jungle canopy, Juliane, incredulously, lands gently to the ground. She is the incident's only survivor.

Hours earlier filmmaker Werner Herzog, attempting to get into the jungles to shoot scenes for a film ("Aguirre, Wrath of God"), tries and fails to book a seat on the same flight. Had he been allowed on Lansa 508, he too would have died.

Decades later Herzog contacts Juliane and offers to take her back to her crash site as part of his documentary, "Wings of Hope". She agrees. "He helped me towards working through my past," Juliane would say of Herzog. "His empathetic questions and his ability to truly listen, as well as the chance to return to the site of my terror, were the best therapy."

"Wings of Hope" wastes no time introducing us to Juliane. Though now in her late 40s, the scars of her ordeal are still evident. She's an introverted, perpetually shell-shocked woman, her eyes glazed over, her body tense and always on edge. Herzog takes her on a recreation of her journey, covering everything from Flight 508's crash to Juliane's miraculous, ten day trek through the Amazonian bush. Because Juliane's parents – her mother died in the crash - were biologists, the girl was somewhat able to cope with her jungle ordeal. She may have suffered a concussion, broken collarbone and sported maggot infected gashes on the arms and legs, but Juliane was nevertheless smart enough to follow a river downstream with the hope of finding civilisation. And so for ten days she walked and waded, using her jungle-smarts to avoid sting-rays, piranhas, alligators, jaguars, snakes and spiders. Still, the jungle took a toll. Hundreds of bugs burrowed into her body, cold rains invoked pneumonia and her thin mini-skirt offered neither warmth nor protection. Days later Juliane stumbles upon hunters. They describe the half-dead, starving girl as a ghost, her body swollen, bloodied and battered.

Herzog's films typically deal with a wild and lawless Nature either engulfing men or driving them to insanity. Here the man/Nature battle swings wildly back and forth. It is human arrogance that leads to the little girl falling out of the skies, and it is the leafy arms of trees which cushion her fall and ensure her survival. But the forest that saves then quickly turns into Juliane's prisoner. She battles it for ten days, before, on the verge of death, she emerges. Ironically, Juliane would become a biologist and return to the Peruvian jungles to study insects, birds and bats. Her parents were similarly biologists, dedicating their lives to learn, conserve and care for that which tore their family apart.

Herzog constructs haunting little moments throughout the film. Early scenes focus on battered mannequins in clothing stores, images which conjure up the mutilated victims of Flight 508. Later we step into Juliane's biological museum, with its preserved, dead and embalmed bodies and carcasses. Juliane – a woman who's seemingly risen from a tomb – too seems to be in a preserved state, her body calcified; she's your typical Herzog protagonist, both survivor and mad man. One great shot focuses on a found piece of wreckage: the aircraft's twin wheels, quietly resting in the jungle and overrun with moss and bush. A traumatized Juliane can barely look at the object. Other scenes highlight a different form of horror: the socioeconomic reality of life in Peru, the tale of a fisherman who sells his gun because he can't afford boat fare, and stories of an airline that relentlessly cuts costs (and safety measures) to make a buck.

The film's last passage approaches the sublime. Here we're introduced to the fisherman who saved Juliane's life. She calls him her angel. A God. A tool of divine intervention. But he limps pathetically, having recently been lanced by a string-ray. But Herzog always finds the spiritual in the pathetic. Final scenes consist of a dream sequence scored by Wagner's "Das Rheingold", in which Juliane's thankful narration is ironically juxtaposed with shots of Juliane's saviour, who hops on one leg and struggles to climb a small hill, even when assisted by three villagers. "Nothing can be reversed," Herzog says, as his camera retraces Juliane's "fall" through the door of Flight 508. "But all of the sudden she beholds an angel engulfed in light. All fear departs from her..."

The scene, of course, sums up the last four decades of Herzog: here's mankind crippled in the face of a malevolent jungle, and so relying, always relying, on a little help from his fellowman. Man's angels limp? Then send more. Or choose a less steep hill.

"Wings of Hope" is typically classified as a "documentary", but of course Herzog's "documentaries" and "feature films" often smudge fiction and documentation. Herzog himself spends much of "Hope" engaging in his now customary metaphysical musings. While his later work invites parody because of this, "Hope" remains sad and affecting, with a healthy respect for a horrible event which both Juliane and Herzog know they can not even begin to communicate.

Incidentally, Terrence Malick's "The New World" shamelessly "borrows" Herzog's "Das Rheingold" sequences. "Malick called me and apologised," Werner Herzog says.

8.5/10 - Worth one viewing.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Theirs was the worst reputation imaginable"
sorryevil16 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This film is more affecting for me than Little Dieter Needs to Fly, Herzog's other jungle crash and escape documentary, with which it has many parallels in style and substance. More people need to see it. It was on Google Video for a short time, and is included on a short documentary DVD set. As with a lot of the director's work, he inserts himself shamelessly into the action. He takes the crash survivor Juliane on a plane, and his face is on the edge of the frame, asking, "How do you feel?" But she does not bite. For the first half of the movie, she is stoic and without emotion, the perfect foil for Werner. He has her stand and make monologues awkwardly, and her quiet voice is dubbed in English, making her even more remote. But as it progresses, as she goes to the crash site and each piece of wreckage is methodically shown to her, she eventually gets a little more animated, and it breaks my heart every time, the slow process by which a survivor of trauma allows themselves to feel the things which happened to them. She dismisses the TV movie-of-the-week about her (a bad actress runs from things, befriends monkeys), and we see a clip of it, and she contrasts it with how she spend her actual time in the jungle. She talks about a type of a bird (in a glass cage, in a (her?) museum) that was her "savior." Most importantly, her intellect, not her heart, saves her: she follows small rivers to large ones, and large rivers to civilization.

Werner's wonderful shamelessness about breaking documentary nonfictional piety has two amazing payoffs here. One, showing her a new piece of wreckage far-off from the crash site, he speaks in dubbed English about the horrible history of the airline, how it used motorcycle mechanics, and overpacked its airliners so more people died than necessary. He stands there, demanding emotion from her, in front of the camera, and she says, "Yes, theirs was the worst reputation imaginable." I wrote this on the marker board in my cubicle. If you're surviving, you keep the emotions tight. You move, you think, you don't dwell. Julianne is still doing this, decades later.

And second, the ending. (SPOILER of sorts) I interpret the beautiful ending as cynical on the part of our director. It contradicts the movie in front of it, full of the romantic idea of being rescued, implying death, and showing instead, her rescuer, himself today an injured man being helped up an embankment by his family. I love it, I watch it over and over. (SPOILER)
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed