| Page 1 of 5: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] |
| Index | 42 reviews in total |
61 out of 70 people found the following review useful:
A challenging masterwork, 23 November 2004
Author:
John Simpson (jandesimpson@btinternet.com) from Hastings, U.K.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
SPOILERS
It is only after a third viewing that I dare venture some comments on
this awesome film. That I was fascinated from the start was beyond
doubt but its funereal tempo caused me to nod to the extent that even
on a second viewing there were whole sequences I had missed. By the
third attempt I feel ready."Werckmeister Harmonies" is one of the great
artistic challenges of our age. I cannot begin to admit that I
understand it fully but I do know that it carries those haunting
resonances remaining long after the final shot, that I recently found
in the Japanese "Eureka" and nearly half a century ago in Antonioni's
"L'Avventura". As there is very little evidence that even the
professionals have got to grips with the film's meaning - most are
clearly as mesmerised as me but talk mainly about style, in other words
how the director looks at his world, I will venture a few ideas even if
they are erroneous. Bela Tarr's masterwork can only be understood as an
allegory. In the 17th century the German musician, Andreas
Werckmeister, conceived the idea of equal temperament thus enabling
music to be written and played in any key. In doing so, according to
the philosopher musicologist of the film, the purity of the natural
cosmic language and inevitability of ordered sound became tainted. As a
metaphor for this concept we are shown a small Hungarian town in
mid-winter under the threat of civil chaos, The catalyst that brings
this about is the arrival in the main square of a circus consisting of
only one giant lorry containing a stuffed whale and a mysterious figure
billed as the Prince who occasionally speaks but is never seen except
as a shadow on a wall. The circus is a challenge to man's understanding
of his safe familiar world and when, as here, there is a failure of
comprehension the result is a crescendo into anarchy. A mob go on the
rampage and, in a sequence of extreme barbarity, attack the local
hospital beating up the defenceless patients. That the film works as an
intensely human document is due to the fact that the director has given
us a character with whom we can identify in the form of Janos, a young
postman, whose odyssey throughout the wintry town we follow every step.
As each scene takes place in real time generally in a single shot, a
walk down a street is the length it takes to achieve. Thus Tarr builds
into his structure that element of reflective time for the audience
that is a hallmark of the cinema of Angelopoulos and Aoyami. We
assimilate Janos's impressions for the time it takes him to experience
them. As much has already been written about Tarr's use of the long
take I will just add that the attack on the hospital is every bit as
powerful an action sequence as the massacre on the Odessa Steps in
"Battleship Potemkin". What however is so extraordinary about Tarr's
great set-piece is the way it generates a similar power not by
Eisenstein-like montage but by long tracking shots. Equally
extraordinary is the use of silence. Not one of the victims cries out
in distress, there is just the sound of furniture and fixtures being
smashed. Whereas Eisenstein homes in on characters and faces, Tarr
views his as a dark almost faceless collective. There is just one face
recollected from a previous crowd scene to relate this terrible event
to the casually familiar. The sequence reaches its climax when a
curtain is pulled down from a bath to reveal in longshot the naked
standing body of an old man, just flesh devoid of personality. This has
the astonishing effect of taming the mob so that they gradually slink
away in shame. There is a strange parallel here with our final glimpse
of Janos sitting on a hospital bed, traumatised after his unsuccessful
attempt at escape from the town. The only sounds he makes are quietly
sung unrelated notes. His uncle, the musicologist is with him. He
admits to the by now uncomprehending Janos that he has finally
compromised by tuning his piano to equal temperament as the only way of
perhaps selling the instrument. For the rest all is silence. The
musician visits the square by now deserted to see for himself the whale
abandoned outside its wrecked carrier. It is Tarr's haunting resolution
of a nightmare vision of a world gone mad.
36 out of 45 people found the following review useful:
A Work-of-art, 5 February 2003
Author:
thecygnet from Budapest, Hungary
Put it simply, "Werckmeister harmóniák" is one of the most beautiful and
haunting European film of the recent years, and maybe the best Hungarian
film in decades.
After the breakthrough of the acclaimed 7 hours long epic "Sátántangó" in
1994 it took 3 years to complete this masterpiece for Tarr Béla.
"Sátántangó" and 'Werckmeister harmóniák" made Tarr one of the most
acclaimed and adored directors of the contemporary film making. This
mind-blowing story is told in only 37 shots (I counted it myself) some of
them lasts for 5 or 6 minutes. Despite the small number of the shots, this
film has one of the most effective editing of all time. Every edit is
perfectly timed and has a meaning of its own. Kudos to the editor.
The stark black-and-white camerawork is by Medvigy Gábor, and the
melancholic music is composed by Víg Mihály.
The most harrowing scene is the raid on the town hospital, the longest scene
of the film, shot in complete silence. Frightening and senses-staggering,
the picture of the naked old man burns into the soul.
Highly recommended, a must-see for anyone who is interested in the recent
history of Central-Eastern Europe and wants to understand it.
35 out of 46 people found the following review useful:
Demanding, but rewarding, 21 August 2000
![]()
Author:
ian.lavery
Imagine it. You spend four years on a project, with big funding hassles
and
changes in crew; and then, finally, after your film is very
enthusiastically
received at Cannes, the lab goes and destroys the only English-subtitled
print before it's shown at the Edinburgh festival. Obviously Bela Tarr
doesn't have his sorrows to seek.
Some might accuse the film--which centres on a rural town riven by the
arrival of a "circus" consisting only of a dead white whale in a
corrugated
iron trailer and a character called "The Prince" whose nihilistic and
inflammatory remarks incite riots--of veering very close to a parody of
miserabilist cinema. Okay, so it's in black and white; there's a lot of
mud,
rubbish, smoke and wetness; there's not much dialogue between not very
attractive people; every take lasts between five and ten minutes; and
there
are many scenes of people trudging through cold and bleak landscapes.
(You'll never see so much trudging in a film.) Lars Rudolph, as the hero
Janos, looks like a cross between a young Klaus Kinski and Frasier's
brother, Niles, and spends most of the film wild-eyed and harried.
However, Tarr's distinctive style--exceptionally fluid and intricate
tracking shots rendered in beautifully sharp monochrome--perfectly matches
the grim story, which, as the director pointed out, explores the
"boundaries
between civilisation and barbarism". Any seemingly parodic moments are far
outweighed by extremely powerful ones, notably the opening scene in a pub
where the hero explains what an eclipse is using the sozzled bar
clientele;
the hero's deeply unsettling encounter with the "Prince"; and the mob's
attack on a hospital.
Although the narrative falls apart a bit in its closing scenes, the film's
images stay with the viewer in ways unmatched much recent cinema. This
film
demands your time and concentration, but rewards them; it has a unique and
mesmerising rhythm. And the music, by Mihaly Vig, is simply beautiful.
28 out of 37 people found the following review useful:
Contemplative Film, 28 October 2002
![]()
Author:
Janazz from Phoenix, AZ
made entirely of longshots of 2-4 minutes in duration. Layers of symbolism in poetic images. It's not a movie, it's not entertainment. It's film, and you have to engage and ask questions about what you are seeing. Why did only 2 people saw the whale? What was the significance of that? How did the riots get started? Who were the insiders and who were the outsiders? How could you tell? Why the hospital? Why do humans always need a causation? Why was the Prince's speech in a different language? What did the Prince represent? What did the Whale? A viewer may not want to be taxed with these questions but given the way the world is, these questions are worth thinking about. I've only seen one other "contemplative film" which is Angelopoulos' Ulyssey's Gaze, which I deeply cherish. This didn't get to me as deeply as it's images weren't as evocative to me. This is probably due to my being able access the cultural symbols of Angelopoulos more easily (though that film isn't "easy" either,it's just that I have more background in modern Greek poetry, etc.). Recommend this film as a unique chance to think of an alternative use of celloid, don't be intimidated.
24 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
Mesmerising..., 25 February 2003
![]()
Author:
meyerhold from paris, France
A wonderfully balletic and poetic film, built on long, long tracking and steadycam shots (thirty-eight for 2hrs 25mins). A study in pervasive yet neutral melancholia; the main character, who accompanies us through the whole film, is a simple, dreamy yet quietly optimistic postman, if one were to interpret his wide-eyed stare and unquestioning attitudes in such a way. One is drawn in from the very beginning, via the evocative music and camerawork. It is rare these days to see European films that take so much time and care as they progress. Watching it I was reminded of Aleksei German's Khrustalyov, My Car! - 1998, Roy Andersson's Songs from the Second Floor - 2000, Fellini and of course Tarkovski. I don't think that all cinema should be 'easy' or well wrapped up. Indeed, I often feel that I am simply not in the mood for seeing a particular film, or experiencing a particular atmopshere. After all it is fairly easy to tell from even short descriptions or reviews the kind of thing that is in store. So I was somewhat surprised to see one previous reviewer here describe this film as "dreary drek". Well, perhaps, but if they wanted to go and see a comedy or redemptive drama, why didn't they go see one already?! I may have had the odd moment of wishing certain shots were a tad shorter, but all in all I was mesmerised, from beginning to end.
19 out of 24 people found the following review useful:
Slow paced, beautiful descent into madness!, 27 February 2006
![]()
Author:
NateManD from Bloomsburg PA
There's one film that sends shivers up my spine just with it's mere title and that's Bela Tarr's "the Werckmeister Harmonies". It's one of those films that may infuriate some viewers meanwhile leaving others awestruck. The story concerns a very cold winter in a small Hungarian town. The camera follows a man Janos in his various everyday events. We know that this is no ordinary film during the poetic intro in the bar, where the various customers act out different parts of the solar system in rotation. The peaceful order of the village is disturbed, when a traveling circus comes to town. The circus has a stuffed whale carcass on display and abnormalities in jars. A man known as the prince who runs the circus remains in hiding. The stuffed whale seems to have a mystical power. These and other small events which are not fully explained lead the town's people to go crazy and eventually turn violent. This film is very slow, at some times unbearable. Certain events are filmed in real time. Similar film's that come to mind are Antonioni's "Avventura,L" and Heneke's "Code Unknown" Although this film is super slow at times, I loved it. There is something that is gripping about it. It is very surreal and emotional. The scene where the villagers go crazy and raid a nursing home almost brought me to tears. The films musical score is so haunting, it will stay in your mind forever. Also director Gus Van Sant is highly influenced by the films of Bela Tarr and it's apparent in his more recent work like "Gerry" and "Elephant". "The Werckmeister Harmonies" is a masterpiece that's not for everyone. I recommend it for viewers who are extremely patient and are looking for something different.
25 out of 36 people found the following review useful:
A nightmarish vision of a town going mad, 19 May 2003
Author:
Howard Schumann from Vancouver, B.C.
It is closing time in a bar somewhere in Eastern Europe. Someone says, "Show
us, Janos". A blank faced young man, Janos Valuska (Lars Rudolph), begins to
organize a ballet of inebriated patrons playing the Sun and the Moon turning
in their orbits. Valuska pleads, "All I ask is that you step with me into
the bottomlessness." As the dance continues, the men are spun. They stop
suddenly as the orchestrater tells us that "in this awful, incomprehensible
dusk, everything that lives is still
" Then, with a push, the dancers carry
on until the Earth emerges from the Moon's shadow. The eternal conflict
between darkness and light begins again.
Containing shots that last up to fifteen minutes at a time, Werckmeister
Harmonies, the latest film by Bela Tarr (Satantango, Damnation), is a
nightmarish vision of a society duped by political demagogues and distracted
by circuses, being led into a cycle of violence and despair. Based on a
novel by László Krasznahorkai, it is a powerful and disturbing film that, in
its surreal depiction of growing madness in an unnamed town, is reminiscent
of Roy Andersson's Songs From the Second Floor. The film takes its name from
the theories of Janos' "uncle" Gyorgy Eszter (Peter Fitz), a musicologist
who tells him of his obsession with the legacy of Andreas Werckmeister, a
17th century German musician who created the twelve-tone scale. Eszter
believes that perfect order does injustice to the holiness of music, and
says that the heavens move to their own music.
As Janos leaves the bar and walks through the cold and half-deserted
streets, streets that in T.S. Eliot's phrase "follow like a tedious argument
of insidious intent", an enormous van drives up the main street and comes to
rest in a great empty square in the town center. A circus is in town. The
exhibit contains the world's largest whale, dead and stuffed with tiny
staring eyes, and The Prince, a shadowy figure that we never see. The town
is full of rumors of impending violence. Janos sees the whale and watches a
growing group of seemingly unemployed middle aged men gather silently around
fires in the square. He seems to know everyone in the town. To further her
political agenda of "town cleansing" (read ethnic cleansing), Eszter's
estranged wife, Tunde (Hanna Schygulla), sends the compliant Janos on
errands. He is told to put the children of the police chief to bed but, as
if presaging the coming violence, they stomp on their beds to a cacophony of
noise while one shouts at Janos over and over again. "It will be hard for
you". "It will be hard for you." He is also asked to listen to conversations
in the square and report back to her, but he only hears the Prince saying,
`What they build and what they will build is illusion and lies. What they
think and what they will think is ridiculous'.
When the signal is given, the men in the square come together and march
towards us with growing anger in a hypnotic parade lasting five terrifying
minutes. They go on a rampage, setting fires and ransacking a hospital,
beating the sick in an unbroken orgy of violence. Patients huddle by their
beds in silent fear. Suddenly a door is opened. Confronted by the menacing
faces, an emaciated old man stands naked in a shower bathed in an amorphous
light. Transfixed by what they have seen, the men abandon their task and
retreat silently into the street. On the morning after, order is restored.
The van is broken down and the whale is exposed as little more than an
overstuffed balloon. The Sun emerges from behind the Moon to the swell of
ineffably beautiful music. We have reached the end of the cycle only to
begin dancing again when the next Prince calls the tune.
23 out of 36 people found the following review useful:
Amazingly beautiful, 18 November 2002
![]()
Author:
swampcow from USA
Don't let warnings of length turn you away from this movie. If you are incapable of sitting still for 2.5 hours and realizing the beauty of lengthy shots, don't see it. But if not, don't let reviews by those with short attention-spans keep you from seeing this film. It is one of the most beautifully and dramatically shot movies, with each shot lasting about 10 minutes. This allows for breathtaking camera movement that mixes perfectly with the sound track. Take a break from typical movies broken up by excessive shots and see this movie. It will blow you away.
14 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
Bleak and gripping, a great European film, 26 September 2005
![]()
Author:
gray4 from Somerset, England
This is as bleak a film as I have since for a long time. Seen mainly
through the eyes of a 'holy fool', played by German Lars Rudolph, it
may be allegorical, it may be a horror story or it might even be a
distinctively Hungarian very black comedy.
Bela Tarr's direction is stunning. The lighting is brilliant
throughout, but none more so than when the circus comes to town in the
middle of the night. The care and patience with which scenes are built
greatly enhances the intensity of the most violent moments. The scene,
for example, when a mob march down a long street before attacking a
hospital matches the greatest moments of black-&-white silent cinema.
The film retains a disturbing ambiguity throughout, right up to its
powerful ending. What is the significance of the whale and its owners?
And is Valuska (Lars Rudolph) as innocent as it seems on the surface?
The result is a long (140 minutes), gripping and exciting film that
leaves more questions than answers at the end.
8 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Rhythmical Harmonies, 22 January 2007
![]()
Author:
atyson from UK
- A portrait of a small town in Hungary descending gradually into civil
disorder -
An extraordinarily brilliant movie. But this is not for everyone.
Beautifully shot in black and white, the director bravely specialises
in spectacularly lengthy shots which the viewer's brain will either
become absorbed by or reject for tedium. An interesting dimension which
can heighten involvement in these long shots (or annoy the hell out the
unconvinced) is rhythmical sound - be it cranky machinery (reminiscent
of Sergio Leone),walking, or an amazing scene where two kids are
jumping up and down and banging on drums on the eve before a riot
ensues. There is a detachment to the camera-work which reminded me of
Kubrick. Again this is a technique which will alienate many viewers.
But it works disturbingly well in particular during the penultimate
riot scene at the hospital.
I watched this followed by The Damnation on the current double-disc DVD
edition available in the UK which is a superb issue and has an
interview with the Director as a bonus feature. Interesting to note
that he states quite categorically that he intends no
allegorical/symbolic element to his work.
| Page 1 of 5: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |