In 17th century Paris, a dashing swordsman named D'Artagnan finds himself at odds with the powerful forces taking over France. He sets out to avenge the murder of his parents and finds his country cleaved by chaos and civil unrest. His heart softens only for Francesca, a fiery peasant girl who claims D'Artagnan's heart on sight. Written by
Sujit R. Varma
D'Artagnan did really exist. His name was Charles de Batz and was called D'Artagnan when he arrived in Paris probably because he was coming from the south-west of France (where the movie was partly shot) and where is the little city of Artagnan. See more »
In the first swordfight, when D'Artagnan leaps and flies across the room to face the other swordsmen, the harness holding the actor in the air can be seen. See more »
This is a movie that really doesn't know what it is. For one thing, it
seems to try and hang on to some parts of the story by Dumas, and yet
it also is an entirely different story. Seemingly, the only real
similarities are the names of the characters. This movie would be much
more effective if it was entirely its own story, and not using the
names of the famous characters. The reason? This movie totally dashes
the names of those characters.
The most unsettling part for me was the fact that the Three Musketeers
are nothing like themselves. Porthos is not the least bit arrogant or
over-the-top. Aramis isn't religious at all. And Athos does not even
remotely resemble the character in the book. Sadly, Justin Chambers
makes a better d'Artagnan than Chris O' Donnell, but only because he
doesn't do any acting at all, which is better than the profuse
overacting of O' Donnell. And Stephen Rea is a good actor, but his
character isn't remotely as menacing as Richelieu should be.
With all of that said, if you just view it as a movie, and try to block
the actual story out of your mind, it can be entertaining. The fight
scenes are very well done, and the pacing keeps the viewer interested.
Perhaps this movie could have been really good if it was about the
story of a musketeer NOT named d'Artagnan, and his unique adventure.
But since it tries to be an interpretation of Dumas, it falls miserably
short. As a movie, it is so-so, but as far as an interpretation of the
famous story, it is absolutely terrible.
7 of 8 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?