MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 12,196 this week

Anak (2000)

7.4
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.4/10 from 167 users  
Reviews: 6 user

The main character is a Filipina Overseas Contract Worker, one of the many residents of the archipelago who is forced to leave her family and take a higher paying job in a more prosperous ... See full summary »

Director:

Writers:

(story), (story)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 20 titles
created 22 Jun 2011
 
list image
a list of 20 titles
created 12 Aug 2011
 
a list of 1225 titles
created 14 May 2012
 
a list of 82 titles
created 03 Jan 2013
 
a list of 1585 titles
created 11 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Anak (2000)

Anak (2000) on IMDb 7.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Anak.
3 wins & 9 nominations. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Vilma Santos ...
Josie
Claudine Barretto ...
Carla
...
Rudy
Baron Geisler ...
Michael
Sheila Mae Alvero ...
Daday (as Sheila Mae)
Amy Austria ...
Lyn
Cherry Pie Picache ...
Mercy
Leandro Muñoz ...
Brian
Tess Dumpit ...
Norma
Cris Michelena ...
Arnel
Hazel Ann Mendoza ...
Young Carla
Daniel Morial ...
Young Michael
Gino Paul Guzman ...
Don Don
Jodi Sta. Maria ...
Bernadette
Odette Khan ...
Mrs. Madrid
Edit

Storyline

The main character is a Filipina Overseas Contract Worker, one of the many residents of the archipelago who is forced to leave her family and take a higher paying job in a more prosperous Asian country. While she is working her employer refuses to let her take a vacation, nor does he deliver her mail to her. She is unaware, therefore, that her husband has died. When she finally returns to the Philippines she is met with resentment and hatred by her children. The movie studies how she overcomes these feelings and rebuilds the relationship with her family. Written by Tim_the_Bald

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

|

Release Date:

10 May 2000 (Philippines)  »

Also Known As:

Anak  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

|

Sound Mix:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Gabby Concepcion was initially tapped to play the role of Rudy. See more »

Connections

Referenced in Game K N B: Episode dated 12 October 2006 (2006) See more »

Soundtracks

Anak
Composed and Written by Freddie Aguilar
Used with permission from Bayanihan Music Philippines, Inc.
Master Recording from Vicor Music Corporation
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
just meant to prey on the emotions of ofws..forgetting the essential elements in movie making
3 August 2008 | by (Philippines) – See all my reviews

i have watched this film several years back and when i finally landed in a place where there are millions of ofws, i felt compelled to write a review of it even though i believe no one would even bother reading it.

i have to be frank to say that the producers of this movie tried to beat the emotional punch of ofws, some 7 million of them in 2000, to make sure that they had a fan base that would solidly usher this movie to box office revenues and critical acclaims. but one could clearly see right through the motives of the producers that they intend on getting money even if it meant preying on the emotional vulnerability of ofws.

they have stuck on such an idea that they have discarded the essential points in movie making.

first, the dialogs and conversation flows were downright ridiculous.they were talking so fast as if they were in a hurry.

even if the movie casted very good actors, vilma santos, cherry pie picache, to mention a few, it just really cannot make up for a bad set of dialogs; it even made them appear laughable. just bad, shallow and unlife-like dialogs. the untalented writers even attempted to make the movie appear intense by drenching the dialogs with offensive and obscene expletives even in scenes that did not really need them. this shallow style of scriptwriting made this movie a lot more unbearable as there were unnecessary remarks in a lot of wrong places.

the character of the protagonist was poorly conceived, clichéd, just plain and vividly shallow. why would you despise your mother, who, from previous countless accounts of domestic helpers, had been enduring unimaginable working conditions in other country, just because she missed or unintentionally failed to reply to your letters. how shallow does that plot goes? if this description needed a metaphorical comparison, it should be that this story must have been written by a 4th grader for his short story requirement. i don't understand why such shallow (pardon the over-usage) concoctions pass out as a plot for a movie. maybe the producers also think of the audience as shallow and there was no need to go deeper. honestly in my opinion, they may be quite right. but it was not right to follow the audience's lead. the movie makers should always be the one raising the bar.

second, some angles were terrible. some perspectives were so focused on capturing the intense emotional portrayals of the actors that the important elements in the background were obliterated. again, bad directing. the director just doesn't know what he or she was doing or is it even correct to call her/him a director.

third, many scenes were superfluous and unrealistic. in a certain scene, the mother was grabbing the daughter and wouldn't let go of her for no reason even if the daughter had no plans of going anywhere. this bad situation was so forcefully implemented so that it would appear that they were wrestling. on top of it, the people cheered as if they were watching a wrestling derby. how shallow and mindless of a plot is that that it just made me cringe. we know that when people argue, especially if it involves someone who is a senior, spectators would tend to keep their mouth shut and retreat to the sides. the people involved in the writing of this script obviously do not know what the realities of human psychology and sociology are. they just wrote it so that they had something to write. truly, they obviously lacked the necessary education and talent. they did not even bother to do a little research. they just had the stupid idea in order to have something to call a story.

i still have yet to see a movie that doesn't capitalize so much on the manipulation of emotions for the purpose of amassing revenues. while it is true that movie making is also dictated by economic tides, it is also important not to leave out the essential and artistic aspects of making it. the Philippine cinema is not actually young but it seems to be doting and becoming more and more immature while many watchers have become more and more intelligent.


1 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Good film lilcherub24
Comment on: '...forgetting the essential elements in movie making'' rosethenia
Discuss Anak (2000) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?