| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Index | 51 reviews in total |
40 out of 44 people found the following review useful:
Not quite enough to be enough, 18 February 2003
![]()
Author:
Kevin J. Cunningham (brutesentiment) from SF Bay Area, California
The Sleeping Dictionary should be noted mostly for being the biggest
missed
opportunity of shooting star Jessica Alba. This film was her only film
project
between the first and second seasons of "Dark Angel,' the show that turned
her
into a sensation, but quickly died a network death at the end of season 2,
and
thus ending the heat index on the lovely Miss Alba. The tragedy is this
film, a
good showcase of her and her abilities (rather than just her), was
inexplicably
delayed, pushed off and kept from theater screens, only to be released
direct-to
video far too long after her star dimmed.
As with any product here, you can get the synopsis elsewhere, so don't
look
for
it here. I'll try not to spoil anything, but take note if you read this,
then watch the
movie, you may get tipped off as to what I'm vaguely referencing. If that
bothers
you, come back after you watch!
This is a film that had a good idea, and good execution of what the idea
turned
into. Unfortunately, a little bit more planning would have helped. At 109
minutes,
this film won't bore you, but it could have been rightfully intriguing
with
20-30
minutes of good plot added.
The film is carried on the sound filmmaking and charm of it's actors. In
particular,
Alba is enchanting. She plays the part with the seriousness it was
intended,
and
never lets her intentionally accented English fall into 'stupid foreigner'
stereotype, a tough job for many young actors and actresses who have
attempted the same. Her partner, Hugh Dancy, is good enough. He channels
a
little bit like a scrawny Heath Ledger, but never quite gets rugged
enough.
The other joy of the cast is the ever-underrated Bob Hoskins. By
coincidence, I
saw 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit' just hours before watching 'Sleeping
Dictionary,' and am never let down by his appearances in films. He plays
a
character who isn't written subtly enough; still, he acts it. The endless
looks of
"Damn bloody fool. Good for him, the w***er" scattered through the film
isn't
enough for a man of his caliber, but we'll take what we can
get.
Their performances are weaved together well by Writer/Director Guy Jenkin,
who is making his big screen debut as a director, though his writing
career
goes
back to the late '70's without much acclaim. Directing-wise, he knows what
he is
doing. The camera work is graceful and beautiful, and he compliments the
fantastic elements of the story well. As a writer, well, there are things
left to be
desired.
Most of all, this film seems too short. The story is predictable, but it
never drags.
The love scenes are contrived, as is the underdeveloped climax, but that's
not
where the film is weak. The characters are cleverly set up to be mirrors,
and the
overlapping triangles are so complex they rival those brainteasers that
ask
'how
many triangles are in this picture?' The problem is, the most important
one
is
never realized, because of the lack of development between Dancy and his
best
friend within the tribe. Without much difficulty, and a little more time,
that
relationship alone would have lifted this film from not quite enough to a
good, if
not better, movie.
As a result, you're left with a film that doesn't challenge anything
because
it just
challenges the same old things. But it is romantic, and has much more
spark
than many other movies you may see of this type. For that, and a young
actress
who has way too much fire to just disappear at this point of her career,
this film is
worth seeing.
37 out of 40 people found the following review useful:
Wonderful Romance Better and Better than Webster's and American Heritage Dictionaries, 27 August 2005
![]()
Author:
Claudio Carvalho from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
In 1936, the expatriated young and naive just-graduated British John
Truscott (Hugh Dancy) arrives to the Sarawak, a British colony, to work
in the Iban society. The beautiful Selima (Jessica Alba) is assigned to
be his "sleeping dictionary", to live and sleep with him and teach him
the language and habits of the locals. The reluctant John and Selima
fall in love for each other in a forbidden romance.
What a magnificent surprise "The Sleeping Dictionary" was for me,
indeed a wonderful romance, with action and drama and an adorable story
of difference of cultures, seduction and secrets. Jessica Alba and Hugh
Dancy have stunning performances, showing a delightful chemistry.
Brenda Blethyn and Bob Hoskins are excellent, as usual, and Noah
Taylor, as the nasty Neville, Emily Mortimer, as the sweet Cecil and
Eugene Salleh, as Belansai, are also fantastic. Certainly, Jessica Alba
is better and better than Webster's and American Heritage Dictionaries.
Definitely, "The Sleeping Dictionary" is a must-see movie for any
sensitive audience. My vote is ten.
Title (Brazil): "Dicionário de Cama" ("Dictionary of Bed")
20 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
A Classic Love vs Tradition Story, 29 June 2004
![]()
Author:
adrianbu from United Kingdom
I watched this film after reading the reviews made by others here and i
have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed it even if I am, outwardly, the
perfect example of emotionally repressed male.
Firstly, it isn't going to win Oscars for anything really but that
really isn't the point at all and nor should it be. It's a gentle,
almost passive, love story that focuses in on the characters but uses
their respective backgrounds and the limitations of their society's
expectations as a character in its own right. All set in a time and
place sufficiently remote to suspend disbelief, but close enough, to
enable the viewer to relate.
It's well written, directed, filmed and acted with the actors
delivering more than adequate performances that are sufficient to
actually care what happens to them.
For the repressed male, like me, who is considering watching this film
out of duty to his girlfriend, don't be disheartened you will most
likely enjoy it if you allow yourself to. If nothing else the lovely
Jessica Alba continues to enchant the male audience with nothing but
her screen presence and in some scenes her lack of clothes.
For the female and non-repressed males, I recommend this film to you,
not as classic but a sweet, enchanting and humorous love story. You
will no doubt only watch the film once but then repeated viewings will
add little.
It is what it is and nothing more but for a film of this type that's
all it should be and that's all it tries to be.
For this reason and this reason only I gave this film 9/10 for they
achieved what they set out to achieve
29 out of 40 people found the following review useful:
Beautiful social history, 13 July 2003
![]()
Author:
Tim Johnson from Fremantle, Australia
My wife and I watched this film not knowing anything about it except a two
sentence introduction on a movie-card. We were impressed by all aspects of
it-particularly the substance of the script-it was a brave script-a script
that should have made people uncomfortable because of the swipes taken at
British colonialism and what that evil did on a personal level to everybody
concerned. Living as I do in Western Australia, the dark legacy of European
colonialism is just below the surface and I have seen firsthand the outlines
of the story presented in "The Sleeping Dictionary"-not of course the same
geography or the same details but once colonialism left its tread on the
floor of world history it matters little the particulars.
The enormity of the personal tragedy of that period is something not to be
derisively dismissed as one commentator remarked-as a film fit for screening
at the old folks home on a Saturday afternoon. Unfortunately the world is
still dealing with that evil period of recent history.
I was moved by all the decisions that the characters faced throughout the
film. Brenda Blethyn's character as the wife of Hoskin's colonial official
was as much a victim as anybody in the film. Although she emerges as the
"baddie" she must try, with little background, to stitch together a
semblance of what she feels is an acceptable canvas in order to paint her
English life-such of it as there is in Sarawak. And what of Hoskin's torn
character-a man who can only fall back on "duty" to country in order to find
reason for the completion of duties that he recognizes as damaging to all
involved.
A brave film-look for it!
20 out of 25 people found the following review useful:
Engaging romance, beautiful scenery, 9 March 2004
Author:
Elmer Saunders from Plano, TX USA
While overseas, I had heard the concept of the movie and the fact the
appealing Jessica Alba was featured but had little chance to check on the
actual film. When I returned to the USA late last year, I found the film
had gone directly to video with limited availability (couldn't get it at
Blockbuster, for instance). I am glad that I wound up buying a copy
(although I found a 'used' DVD for half the new asking
price).
It is a shame the film never appeared in theaters as the visuals of
Sarawak
would have been great on the large screen and the audio and music are well
done and would have benefited from a theatrical environment.
BELOW IS DISCUSSION OF PLOT ELEMENTS WHICH MIGHT SPOIL IT FOR THOSE WHO
HAVEN'T SEEN THE FILM.
While overall the plot line was reasonable and avoided cliche, there were
a
number of disconnects as far as I was concerned.
Truscott's dilemma with Bullard after the miners' slaughter arrives too
abruptly and presumes some sort of offscreen confession. Since it is a
central conflict in the drama, it really deserves more
explanation.
Similarly, the "one year later" leap to Truscott's marrying Cecil Bullard
lacked sincerity. Why would Truscutt marry the daughter of those who
wedged
him away from his true love? While one can imagine various possibilities,
the lack of on screen justification left me unfulfilled.
Finally, even after conversion by Sarawak and its people, Truscutt is
still
too much of a proper Englishman to credibly leave a pregnant wife. Some
of
the sympathy I'd built up for the forbidden lovers was undercut by the way
this was handled. It would have been far better for Cecil to push a
reluctant Truscutt away.
Still, these plot issues are relatively small in comparison to a film,
cast
and cinematography that rose well above the small budget and unheralded
distribution. I rarely buy videos or DVDs because I find I seldom go back
to play them, but this one I will enjoy owning.
30 out of 45 people found the following review useful:
A puzzling film, 22 February 2003
Author:
tprofumo from Los Angeles
The puzzle is, why did this film go directly to video and why isn't it a
better film?
Fineline apparently relegated this to the video bins because of a crowded
release schedule, but more likely because it had just one American star
in
it, Jessica Alba, and her TV series, "Dark Angel," had been canceled,
meaning she no longer brought any "heat" to the project.
That's a shame, because this film is light years better than most direct
to
video releases.
While the plot is quite complicated, it is basically about a young
Englishman, played by Hugh Dancey, who goes out to Sawawak (Borneo) in
the
mid-thirties to follow in his father's footsteps and bring the benefits
of a
good English education to the natives and headhunters of the
region.
He needs to pick up the language, though, and thus is assigned a
"sleeping
dictionary" a fetching young local woman who will teach him the native
lingo, while giving him an education in bed at the same
time.
While that may sound as contrived a plot as you could find, it is
probably
grounded in fact, and certainly grounded in solid, British upper class
hypocrisy of that day, which, taking into account the fact that he'll be
there for three years, sees no reason why he can't avail himself of the
local talent to satisfy his sexual needs. In fact, when he initially
rejects the beautiful Jessica Alba, they offer him a young man, he being
the
product of British boys schools and all that.
After a very brief period of conflict, Dancey and Alba fall head over
heels
for each other, decide they want to marry, and find themselves in hot
water
from that point on. The film goes on to rightfully bash British upper
class
racial prejudice, but never quite deals with the key issue facing
Dancey's
character. Does he ever catch on that the education he wanted to bring
to
the natives is the same education that says, one Englishman is worth a
thousand natives?
Anyway, the film, written and directed by Guy Jenkin, is fairly well
scripted, well directed and absolutely beautifully shot. Word is, it
cost
just $15 million, but it has the look of a much more expensive picture,
definitely not some cut rate direct to video thriller. This is not some
prison women in cages film shot in the Philippines.
There are some good characterizations here. Bob Hoskins starts out very
strong as the cynical governor of this province, but then is very under
utilized. Brenda Blethyn is fantasic as Hoskins wife, a manipulative
upper
class snob who is the real villain of the story.
But there are script problems here. Dancey and Alba fall in love far too
quickly, skipping over a lot of character build up which would have made
us
care for them a lot more than we wind up doing. There is sympathy for
them,
though, because of the obvious class and racial biases in the British
empire. But you get the feeling there are a lot of missed opportunities
here.
Perhaps the biggest flaw the film has are its two stars, though.
Dancey,pretty much unknown in America, seems only adequate to me. He
brings
no real passion to the role of the young idealist.
The real enigma, of course, is Jessica Alba. Although as beautiful as
any
young actress in Hollywood today, she has yet to prove that she can
actually
act, and with every successive missed opportunity, she is building up a
body
of work that says maybe she can't. Her first feature staring role was in
a
flic called "Paranoid," in which she was frankly just plain dreadful.
She
has had supporting roles in a couple of other films, but the pictures
were
so dreadful you couldn't hang much of the blame on her, except maybe in
her
choice of roles. Her big break came in the James Cameron produced TV
series
"Dark Angel," which got its wings clipped after two seasons. In it, Abla
was forced to play a rather depressing character in a depressing show and
she could not get deep enough into it to make it the kind of hit that
Jennifer Garner became in "Alias."
In Sleeping Dictionary, Alba definitely looks like someone any man would
want to sleep with, but other than that seems in many ways miscast
completely. I read one review here that mistakenly places this movie in
South America. I wonder if the producers made the same mistake. The
days
when any dark skinned actress can play any dark skinned character, from
Latino to Asian to Arabic, appear to be over to me. Alba didn't seem
like a
resident of Borneo. She in many ways seemed like a wise ass girl from
East
Los Angeles.
Then there's the main problem, her delivery of lines. Alba is excellent
when she keeps her mouth shut. No, really, she does reaction shots
extremely well. Her emotions play out beautifully on her face. It's
when
she has to talk that she often finds herself in trouble. In this film,
much
of her delivery of her lines was just short of bad.
More importantly, it wasn't good and that makes this film another big
missed
chance for Jessica Alba. It's too bad, because she was in part hampered
by
an under developed character, which may have been hampered by a
restricted
budget. Ten more minutes showing us who the main characters really were
might have made all the difference in this film. But Alba still would
have
had to be good enough to handle the added material and I still don't know
if
she is.
She supposedly has another film in the works in which she plays some kind
of
hiphop dancer. Hopefully, at least playing the right race, she'll shine.
But she just misses the mark for me in "Sleeping Dictionary" as she has
missed it in everything she's done since "Flipper."
21 out of 28 people found the following review useful:
One of the Best Films of 2002, 18 July 2003
![]()
Author:
xyler from United States
Although THE SLEEPING DICTIONARY is not that well known and never had a
theatrical release, it is by far one of the best movies of 2002. My
sister
had to pursuade me to first rent, then watch this movie because the idea
of
a British colonial officer who falls in love with what is known as a
Sleeping Dictionary...that is a native woman who sleeps with a man while
teaching him the native language. Jessica Alba, who is most well known
for
her stint on "DARK ANGEL", deftly portrays Selima, the native sleeping
dictionary for John Truscott. Hugh Dancy, who portrays John Truscott, is
a
young british actor who is on his way up. Dancy and Alba have chemistry,
and you can hardly take your eyes off of them. The supporting cast is
also
excellent. Brenda Blethyn, Bob Hoskins, Emily Mortimer, Noah Taylor,
Junix
Inocian, and Eugene Salleh each portray their parts perfectly and add a
unique flavor to the movie.
On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being lowest, 10 highest), I rate THE SLEEPING
DICTIONARY a 10.
12 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
love-across-the-tracks, remixed......, 21 January 2004
![]()
Author:
Jimmy_fingers from Cheltenham, England
Liked this film a lot. A rework of the classic Romeo and Juliet
impossible-love scenario, it managed to stand out from the crowd, not
least
because of the impressive cinematography (helped in no small part by the
wonderful locales and the beautiful tribes people (The Iban). While never
being earth-shattering, for a film to watch with a loved one (without
being
too girly) this is hard to top IMO. It shows the moral struggle of a man
who
has to choose between 'duty' and love. The arrogance and conditioning of
British colonialism is dealt with well, as we struggled to impose our
European values and God on peoples in far flung corners, and indeed it
shows
the irony that we struggled to retain it ourselves as the beauty of the
place and people intoxicated our men (a few cads apart)
Watch it with wifey/girlfriend/prospective mate
14 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
a beautiful film, 30 July 2006
![]()
Author:
Willow V from Spain
This was an excellent film and brought back a lot of memories of my
time with the Iban people in Sarawak. The costumes, the people, the
scenery...these would all be worth watching the movie even without a
good plot. There are some priceless moments in it including a
conversation with the cook about drunkenness and wages and the
relationship between the young Englishman and the Iban people he is
supposed to be governing. The Iban have a well developed sense of
humor. Overall the plot is enjoyable. I'm not a fan of romances, but
this was well done and gave a unique glimpse into a people who are
still very much the same to this day (minus the actual head hunting).
If you have ever dreamed of an adventure in Borneo, watch this
first...it will convince you of the beauty and the need to go.
12 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
A nice idea badly executed, 15 January 2004
![]()
Author:
astronic from Dortmund, Germany
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
SPOILERS AHEAD:
First of all, I really liked the general concept of this film. The idea of a
young Englishmen falling in love with a native girl from a British colony
surely isn't that original, but it hasn't been overused either.
Furthermore I hoped to get a glimpse of the life in British colonies at that
time (especially the social interacting between the British colonial rulers
and the native people) and, of course, Jessica Alba.
Well, for those primarily interested in the latter one: Yes, her character
has nude scenes, but no, they obviously aren't performed by Jessica Alba.
Speaking of that: In my opinion the body double did not even fit Jessica's
"size"; they could have done a lot better at this point.
As I stated initially, I really liked this films premise, but the execution
comes close to the worst you could have made out of it.
First of all: The movie is fractioned. While this doesn't has to be
necessarily bad, each fraction gets it's own little climax, whilst there's
nowhere a main climax on sight. Even that could work, if those little
climax' would do their job, unfortunately they don't. That's mainly because
the film doesn't spend the time to develop them, instead it rushes to get a
climax done in order to start another one.
For example: John's "I don't want to have sex unmarried"-dance at the very
beginning (lasted maybe 5 minutes and was resolved by pure horniness), their
trip to the dying jungle people ("oh look, it's because of the poison, let's
tell them and go home"), the matter of John's first departure from Sarawak,
his relation to his wife, the attempted murder and death trial afterwards,
Henry's relation to Selima, (and so on, and so on). Everything seemed flat,
rushed and undeveloped.
For no obvious they made a plot-driven film out of a people-story. That
can't work out. The ending concludes this greatly, you virtually could hear
the director's thoughts: "Oh, well, we've 2 minutes and some budget left.
Let's bring in the bad guy with a gun".
On the pro-side the native/Englishmen relations are done quiet nicely, and
not every character is stereotypical; I especially enjoyed the role of Cecil
for that matter. The cinematography could've been worse but never reached
the potential it doubtlessly had. I'd rank Simon Boswell's score slightly
but definitely above average. Speaking of Jessica Alba's performance, well:
Her role consists mainly of walking around and looking pretty, she did that
without getting injured and if you've seen her in "Idle Hands", that's worth
something.
At the end I saw a movie whose creators couldn't fill the (very solid) plot
with life. That's particularly sad, since I'd could've been a great
film.
| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| External reviews | Parents Guide | Official site |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |