|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|Index||15 reviews in total|
I think it's really sad when someone watches a movie, and when it's not all Hollywood bells and whistles totally smashes it to pieces in a review! I purchased this movie used, mainly because some of the actors (Maggie) and the name of the movie - and of course, interest - what could have happened to this guy to ruin his life over losing some photographs?!?!? Eventually, you realize the underlying message of the movie....Your vision is already within you...It's a good message, even though parts of the movie might seem far fetched, I liked the odd-balls all ending up befriending one another, I liked the visuals of the NY street scenes. Not all movies that are indie suck, you just have to LOOK to see what is really there. And by the way, I have done a gallery showing with only 8 X 10's.......
From acting to visuals this film is a gem - a diamond in the rough. I was blown away by the performances headed up by the star, Reg Rogers, a master of his craft. This is Maggie G's first big role and it is a wonderful start to a now star studded career. Rob Campbell and Chris Bauer are fantastic. The writer/director, Jeremy Stein, has created a remarkable movie that not only is about something but is also vastly entertaining. It's films like this that make you believe that there is still hope for modern cinema. I can't wait to see the next film from this gifted filmmaker.
This movie is a dream-like parable of a pretentious N.Y. photographer who has learned that art must come deep from the heart and be authentic. He has lost his native ability in the glamour of the artistic "in-crowd" and finds his way with the help of underclass mentors. The importance of his pictures pale in comparision to the image of life he derives in his journey.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
If you have *any* bit of a photographer's eye, you'll love this film. It
manages to perfectly capture how it feels to recognize the "decisive
when a photo should be taken. The supporting actors are all wonderful in
their quirky characters, and the lead actor helps you feel what it's like
have lost your creative enthusiasm. (There's more, but I don't want to
include any spoilers!)
It's not a great film but it's got a lot of fine moments. The best performance of that whole movie is easily, Maggie Gyllenhaal. She plays this kooky, fortune teller-wannabe who is a neatfreak and likes to broadcast the news while using her feather duster as a microphone. Every scene she's in is worth watching. I recommend to the thousands (and thousands) of Gyllenhaalics.
This film is definitely an indie, but it was really quite good.
The story starts with Max (Reg Rogers), who was the big thing in the NYC photography world a year ago, but has lost his talent. He needs to somehow produce 10 brilliant shots in one day, or else he risks losing everything. Max manages to procure these 10 masterpieces after a mysterious man leaves them in a bar. Unfortunately, someone steals them from Max, too.
The majority of the movie follows Max on his quest to recover the 10 photos, which have been inexplicably scattered throughout the city. He meets up with several interesting characters, including Maggie Gyllenhaal and Rob Campbell. Gyllenhaal's character is especially good. She plays an aspiring newscaster, obsessive-compulsive daughter of a clairvoyant (sounds confusing, but it's pretty funny).
This movie is nothing huge, but I really liked it. The shots of the city at night are pretty, and all of the quirky characters are likeable.
Occasionally, surfing through the late night flicks, you run across a
gemstone that grabs you by the pajama lapels and shakes you awake until
you've finished reading the credits: such was my reaction to The
Photographer a few nights ago. Jeremy Stein made an absolutely
film: ignore comments here to the contrary.
The theme is that one can never anticipate how unexpected turns in our lives will contribute to our personal growth. In this case, Max overcomes a form of creative paralysis and re-discovers himself and his art through chance encounters with complete strangers. Shot in New York City's seedy back streets (lower East Side?) the collective odyssey of Max and his new-found pals (the supporting cast are very good) laces in bar scenes that, for me at least, are archetypal moments when we have chance encounters with people who turn out to have so much in common with us in hidden ways that it makes us reflect on who we really are most comfortable with, why we made the choices we've made, and what the hell we're doing with our lives.
There's a kind of magic in this film (the search for Violet) that isn't overplayed but that's important to tying everything up into a neat little package. Terrific score (Andrew Hollander) and beautiful cinematography (Vanja Cernjul) sustain the mood throughout. If you don't come away feeling better about life after seeing this film, you've missed it.
Jeremy Stein, who wrote and directed, is very talented indeed, and I hope this one is available on DVD: it's one you want in the library.
I hope this movie is coming out in the theater because I want to see it again. It is worth it for the scene in the bar alone. The characters and setting are so real, which is weird because the story is kind of a fantasy. I really felt like I knew them. If I had to describe this movie I would say that it is "The Wizard of Oz" plus "After Hours". Does this team have any more movies coming out?
I saw this movie at its New York premiere, and walked out saying "wow".
story is simple but interesting, which lets the actors really shine.
some magic involved, but it isn't the wizards-and-special-effects kind:
a more subtle, grownup variety that's propelled by the story, rather than
Speaking of magic, the director and cinematographer have performed an amazing trick: they've made grubby downtown Manhattan look beautiful and enticing. You can still smell the urine, but it seems glamorous somehow. I don't want to give anything away, but the final scene of the movie is one of the best shots of the city that I've ever seen.
There's a lot to look at in this movie, and that includes the cast. The new guys are great, and there are lots of familiar faces too. Anthony Michael Hall, Tom Noonan and John Heard all make appearances, and you've never had more fun watching them.
Watch "The Photographer" now, so you can say "I knew all about this before it was popular" in a few years. I can't wait for the DVD.
2/3 way through this film I was bored and did not get it. But at some
point something being said clicked and I was glued to the last third.
Then I watched it all over again and took notes this time. I take notes
with books and movies I see or read.
I read Mr. Stein said it was loosely based on The Wizard of Oz. Maybe or was that quote taken out of context? I will have to watch it again with that in mind. Before, I say anything on the story line. I thought the quality of the film was excellent for acting, sound, lighting and quality of color. "Normal" neon sign echoing "camel" in the bar was a lovely detail.Especially for a first film and presumed low budget? Or does this guy have a sugar Daddy somewhere? 2nd, I thought the writing verged on David Mamet.
Finally regarding the story, I found a different route, a Biblical one. Did Max= Moses, Mira=Miriam, Romeo= Aaron, Marcello= Pharroh (on his throne in toilet?). Or is Marcello= Jethro? What represents Mitzriam, the dessert, the red/reed sea? Are the 10 photo's representive of the 10 commandments? If so how does each photo visualize each commandment? What does the curtain blowing at Violet's house represent? the girl in white on a bike? Why does Max step back at end?Who is the guy in the pilot hat? lots of questions.
I took some classes with Stan Brackage (who was honored im memmorium at the Oscars last year) an Independent film maker. I used to fall asleep a lot and when I woke up and found out what a film was really about- I knew I had missed something. But there is nothing more pleasant and peace than a nap in a movie seat. Your safe and someone will yell if there is a fire.
A great film will leave you with more questions not answers. And maybe all theories are right. As with another comment that said this was about an artist search to find himself- or refind. Indeed there was a lot of talk about "creativity. A great work has many levels.
Mr. Stein what is in your Riya Tzadi?
|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|External reviews||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|