Timequest (2000)

A story about a man who travels back in time to Fort Worth, Texas on November 22, 1963 and prevents the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Director:

Robert Dyke

Writer:

Robert Dyke

Stars:

Victor Slezak, Caprice Benedetti, Vince Grant

1 nomination.

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Victor Slezak	...	John F. Kennedy
Caprice Benedetti	...	Jacqueline Kennedy
Vince Grant	...	Robert F. Kennedy
Bruce Campbell	...	William Roberts
Barry Corbin	...	Lyndon Johnson
Larry Drake	...	J. Edgar Hoover
Ralph Waite	...	The Time Traveler
Joseph Murphy	...	Raymond Mead
Rick Gianasi	...	James Robert Kennedy
David Haig	...	Clint Hill
Debra Port	...	Janice Kennedy
Amanda Bernacchi	...	Cheryl Stein
Dawn Lafferty	...	Magic Bullit
Shelly Marks	...	Norma Jeane
Richard Jewell	...	Agent Richards

Storyline

A story about a man who travels back in time to Fort Worth, Texas on November 22, 1963 and prevents the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

---

Plot Keywords:

convenience store robbery | television | security camera | kennedy assassination | broken glass | 

---

Taglines:

Would you believe it, if......

---

Genres:

Sci-Fi

---

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for language and some sexuality/nudity

Details

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

19 November 2000 (USA)

Also Known As:

Nobody Knows

Filming Locations:

Dallas, Texas, USA

Company Credits

Production Co:

Destination Earth LLC

Technical Specs

Runtime:

92 min

Sound Mix:

Dolby SR

Color:

Color

Did You Know?

Trivia

During post production, Nobody Knows was screened as a "work in progress" at the 2000 Dallas Deep Ellum Film Festival, 5 miles from the site of the JFK assassination. It won first place in its category.

---

Quotes

[first lines]
Jacqueline Kennedy: Did today really happen?

---

Crazy Credits

Set Pet ... Scout (the Wonder Dog)

User Reviews

Cheese on a stick -- with mold.

A writer should never direct his own movie................................................ Unless the script is actually good........This one is not.

I won't give you an overview of the storyline, since that's been covered in this database entry.

I'll start by saying that I know all too well that writing a good time travel story is not an easy task. "Time Quest: What if JFK had lived?" which also goes by the name "Second Chance" is a blend of melodrama, mixed with cliché and a touch of the occasional "HUH?!". My first reaction to the dual title was that this writer is so self absorbed that he couldn't decide on ONE movie title, because he simply admires every idea he has, so he simply *had* to call it both! If you see this, you'll know what I mean. A lot of story elements were put into this movie that I'm sure the writer thought would be "heart warming", but ended up being a moment to sit back and groan. Without spoiling anything, look for these wishy-washy moments in the movie if you decide to watch it:

1) The time traveler dancing with Jacqueline. Uhm..... was this really necessary? As this unfolds, JFK looks as baffled as we viewers ARE.

2) Robert Kennedy finding the fingerprint on the glass. Would there even BE a fingerprint if time had been altered and the traveler had `never been there'? hmmmm... Granted this movie is about as scientifically accurate as the anatomy of a Barbie doll....but come on!

3) The nifty "elementary school artwork" scene. Wow! The government really DOES keep track of everything! Including those lousy pictures you colored in grade 3!! Wow! How powerful! How deep! How STUPID!

And how about that line "Oh my sweet Jesus, we are at a crossroads here!" as he looks at the newly discovered picture! UGH! Cornball!!

Ok, perhaps I'm being a bit harsh. But the fact remains that this movie was often comical in places that the writer never intended it to be -- taking away from any dramatic drive that even existed in this insipid flick. See this movie ONLY if you are like me, have a love of corny sci-fi and a maniacal need to pick them apart as you watch. Oh, and BELIEVE me, there is so much to pick apart in this movie that it would take me about 10 pages.

My take on this movie is like this: It could have been better if the director would have taken more outside criticism and opinions from other people. Any person (other than the director I would think) could have pointed out the hokey moments, therefore allowing them to be removed and avoiding an embarrassment of a film such as this one.

Maybe I'm wrong, but the sad fact is that this movie had potential --had it been done properly.

2 of out 10 stars.