MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 63,200 this week

David Copperfield (1911)

7.1
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.1/10 from 9 users  
Reviews: 1 user | 1 critic

Add a Plot

Director:

Writer:

(novel)
0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

Live Chat with Keanu Reeves

We conducted a Live Chat with Keanu about his upcoming film John Wick.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 16 titles
created 5 months ago
 
list image
a list of 9996 titles
created 3 months ago
 
a list of 101 titles
created 2 days ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: David Copperfield (1911)

David Copperfield (1911) on IMDb 7.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of David Copperfield.

User Polls

Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
Flora Foster ...
Marie Eline ...
Em'ly as a Child
Anna Seer ...
Ed Genung ...
Florence La Badie ...
Em'ly as a Woman
Frank Hall Crane
Alphonse Ethier
Maude Fealy
Mignon Anderson ...
William Garwood
Harry Benham
Viola Alberti ...
Justus D. Barnes ...
William Russell ...
James Cruze ...
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama | Short

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

17 October 1911 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Little Em'ly and David Copperfield  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Version of David Copperfield (1993) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Too Short
26 September 2012 | by (New York City) – See all my reviews

Charles Dickens wrote big novels: big novels that were serialized for up to a year at a time in magazines, then published on their own in editions that ran hundreds and hundreds of pages. They were full of large themes and eccentrically rendered characters drawn from life -- indeed, Dickens modeled David Copperfield in no small part, on himself.

Any attempt, then, to reduce one of Dickens' sprawling works into a three-reel movie -- no matter how absurdly long three reels might seem in 1913 -- must inevitably fail. That's what this version of David COPPERFIELD tries to do and it fails. It offers us none of the details of character and reduces the plot to a series of incidents. Micawber is reduced to half a minute of pantomime.

Clearly, this is a type of film that has fallen out of fashion -- it is a visualization of a novel for those already familiar with the novel. It's not a type of movie I favor, so instead we must consider the technical issues of the movie instead.

On that basis, this is a very good film -- for 1911. The camera-work, although static, is composed very well. The seaside sequences are quite beautiful. The sets are wonderfully designed for the era, the costuming exquisite and the actors know their business. The Thanhouser Company, based in New Rochelle, had access to New York's actors to fill out its own house players. So, how to rate a film like this? I give it a score blended from its value on its own and its place in the history and evolution of movies. It's a movie I'm very glad to have seen and if you care, as do I, strongly about such things, you will enjoy it too. For those with a more casual interest in such matters it is, alas, largely a waste of time. Ignore this one. Instead, look at the following year's production of NICHOLAS NICKLEBY which solves most of these problems by ignoring them.


0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss David Copperfield (1911) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?