Strong Language (2000)

User Rating:

6.5/10   

Director:

Simon Rumley

Writer:

Simon Rumley (writer)

Release Date:

28 January 2000 (UK)

Genre:

Comedy | Crime

Tagline:

From the coolest city on the planet, the hippest movie of the year.

Plot:

While a narrator tells the story of a night of terror that changes his life forever, 16 young people chat about their lives in London...

Plot Keywords:

London | Drugs | Police | Alcohol | 1990s

Awards:

2 nominations

Cast

Ricci Harnett	...	Nathan
Kelly Marcel	...	Phillipa
Tania Emery	...	Zoe
Julie Rice	...	Tatty
Thomas Dyton	...	Boy Racer Triton
Robyn Lewis	...	Corrine
Stuart Laing	...	Mark
Shireen Abdel-Moneim	...	Hayley
Al Nedjari	...	Peter
Paul Tonkinson	...	Danny
Ruth Purser	...	Jane
Charles De'Ath	...	Stuart (as Charlie De'Ath)
Elaine Britten	...	Jo
Chris Pavlo	...	Tony
Kate Allenby	...	Lydia

Runtime:

76 min

Country:

UK

Language:

English

Color:

Black and White | Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1

Certification:

UK:18

Filming Locations:

London, England, UK

Trivia:

The movie was originally titled "'Thon" as in "talkathon."

Movie Connections:

Followed by The Truth Game (2001)

A brave experiment that works brilliantly

Strong Language is one of those films that sounds like an awful idea on paper: a little-known, independent British film, made on a tiny budget with a virtually unknown cast. On top of that, there is no real plot (although there is a continuous story - more about that in a moment) and the actors are, for the most part, working from a script that they themselves helped to write in extensive improvisation sessions. The film is also perhaps unique in having seventeen cast members, none of whom ever meet up on screen.

The basic principle is simple: the characters, all young Londoners from a variety of backgrounds, speak to the audience, Talking Heads-style, about issues that affect them: music, alcohol, drugs, sex, and even some politics. Some of the comments are funny, some absolutely hilarious, and a few are even quite profound.

As in real life, there is a broad cross-section of society represented, and if sometimes the characters seem a little stereotyped, then this is not necessarily a bad thing; it helps the audience identify with - or laugh at - some of their more outrageous suggestions. There is a supermarket shelf stacker, a fetish model, a teacher, and a young lady who is "far too busy to work". The audience finds itself alternately roaring with laughter at some of the unbelievable points of view put forward, or nodding in sympathy. Some of the characters are racist, some are sexist, some are fascist. Strong Language means exactly that: it has not done its job if it does not shock as much as it amuses.

As the film progresses, we discover that there is order to this apparently random collection of anecdotes. A single central story starts to emerge from the most mysterious of the characters, around which the others continue to discuss their various issues. And in the last three minutes of the film we discover something else about all of the characters, which I won't spoil for you here.

Writer/producer/director Simon Rumley clearly has a gift for words on a par with, say, Quentin Tarantino; and in a sense, there is a distinct similarity in directorial style as well. But Tarantino is equally happy letting hard action tell the story, while Rumley, possibly because of budget constraints, has had to rely on words alone. Fortunately, it works brilliantly, although it is a lot more effective watching it in a cinema or with a group of friends than on your own.

Overall, I rate this film highly, and would not hesitate to recommend it. Here is proof, as if it were needed, that it is not always the worst films that fail to find a decent distribution deal.