IMDb > One Day in September (1999) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
One Day in September
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guide
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

Reviews & Ratings for
One Day in September More at IMDbPro »

Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 3 of 7: [Prev][1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [Next]
Index 62 reviews in total 

1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:

Excellent telling of a harrowing story

Author: paudie from Ireland
3 December 2009

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

This is a top class documentary, telling the story of the events surrounding the murder of Israeli athletes and coaches in Munich in 1972. There is an interview with the last surviving Palestinian who took part in the attack. He describes being picked for the mission and the specific training undertaken. He is not remorseful in any way for the deaths that took place. There are also touching interviews with family members of the Israelis. Most damningly from the German point of view local police and politicians describe honestly how confused they were in trying to settle the crisis.

The film sets the scene of the Munich Olympics, describing how anxious the organisers were for the games to be as carefree as possible leading to minimal security in the athletes village. Using remarkable news footage the film gradually builds up the tension as the Israelis are taken hostage. Negotiations with local politicians and police take place. A planned rescue by police is cancelled at the last minute.

Eventually the Palestinians are offered a plane and a rescue mission is planned at the airport. This is a disaster for all kinds of reasons and all the hostages are killed. The surviving Palestinians are arrested.

Even more chilling is the tacit admission by the Germans that the captured Palestinians were released deliberately by way of a "mock" hijack some months after the massacre.

An amazing piece of living history.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

Very well made but not for the fainthearted

Author: njmbo from Netherlands
20 September 2006

This documentary is simply one of the best I've ever seen. The build-up is brilliant, the interviews with relatives are gripping and often heartbreaking.

The laughing German general (Ulrich Wegener), who oversaw the worst terrorist rescue attempt in history, is just unreal. As was the entire operation. I knew something about the botched attempt but had no idea how bad it really was. If it happened like it did in a movie, you'd say it was rather far-fetched.

The music, especially Moby and the Chronos Quartett is quite haunting and just stays in your head. The soundtrack was actually the reason I bought it on DVD, after first seeing it on the BBC.

This piece of film is about One Day In September. Nothing more, nothing less. Yet obviously some people still don't get it. Blabbering on about the "social context of the Palestinian plight" or-what-have-you. Please go and watch Michael Moore's Waste o'Celluloid.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

Ethical relativism is a terrible thing. 10/10. SPOILERS!

Author: lizziebeth-1 from Sydney, Australia
24 September 2002

This piece of September terrorism refers to the kidnappings of Israeli athletes from the Munich Olympic village. 27yrs after the end of WWII, Munich in 1972 was the new face of German democracy trying hard to live down the country's shame over Hitler's propagandist 1936 Olympics. The documentary's prologue is a classic showcase of Olympic highlights, soundtracked by the Top Ten hit 'Joy' (by Apollo100 aka Tom Parker who 'remixed' Bach's 'Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring' into a really cool instrumental), which tugs at our heartstrings by really capturing the infectious optimism of the time.

Much of the story revolves around Israeli fencing athlete Anki Spitzer, whose widow voices her memories of him. Be warned, no punches are pulled, and the whole story is revealed in its infuriating, stupid, disgusting, rather corrupt reality, although it strikes ME as a very balanced view. Both 'sides' cop criticism. It's a terrific lesson in what NOT to do, because what happened was awful. Spitzer's widow, though, is amazingly even-handed; she takes solace in her warm, private memories of her dead husband.

As soon as the news of the 1972 terrorism broke on television, there was public world-wide outrage that the spirit of optimism of the Games should be so disgustingly undermined. There was also outrage at the unfeeling continuation of the Games during it. Remember the Macabia Games a few years ago in Israel? The same thing happened there, albeit with accidentally drowning athletes. WHAT IS IT with Games organisers having no heart? Apparently the main objective in 1972 was always to restart the Games; any rescue of the hostages was considered almost secondary! They are criticised in the doco for being so 'arrogant' to suppose they 'had nothing to do with' it.

The terrorists, handing a communique to police, wanted, in their obstinate rhetoric 'the release of >200 revolutionary prisoners' from jails all over the world!! The unrealistic nature of their demands is frustrating. (Demands couched in rhetoric are DESIGNED to be unfulfillable, because it's posturing, to give the terrorists the excuse to commit the violence they WENT THERE FOR. It's essentially a brainwashing & bullying technique. Look, the same scummy technique is used in prisons etc; and 'revolutionary acts' often get corrupted into nothing but male egotistical domination. Surprised? Well, we should all KNOW BETTER: ANYONE spouting rhetoric (ie highly calculated and DIRECTED party line), should immediately be anathema to everybody.

THAT'S the lesson.

The German negotiators obviously felt completely befuddled, shocked, and frustrated: they knew NOTHING about these obstinate, violent terrorists, who eventually turned out to be the very-extreme-left-wing Black September. The visage of the hooded terrorist stalking the balcony of the Olympic village, displayed on this video cover, haunts us still.

The group of Palestinian terrorists + Israeli hostages were supposed to be evacuated to Munich airport by helicopter from the Olympic village. The German police were planning an ambush at the airport for the supposed 4-5 terrorists, but as the group cautiously began to enter the 2 helicopters, it became clear that in fact there were 8 terrorists, with only 5 patently undertrained and undersupplied German policemen to counter them. The Germans had no communications equipment, no bulletproof vests, or even helmets! They did not coordinate their targets, and no-one advised them that there were MORE terrorists coming than expected. One of the police marksmen was ridiculously exposed, right in the line of fire between his colleagues and the terrorists, and he had no helmet! I think he never ever let off a single shot. Curious onlookers clogged the roads to the airport, so police reinforcements didn't arrive until an hour after the shooting began, by which time most of the firefight was over. When they did arrive, they mistook two of the police snipers for terrorists and opened fire on them! What a joke!

After almost 2 hrs of fighting, the terrorists decided to destroy the helicopters, full of hostages. Nine hostages were killed then and there. The doco powerfully reveals how offensive this massacre was (it's irrelevant to the ugliness what their nationality was). The music that accompanies the staccato montage of the police photos of the burnt-out bodies is very affecting. Later, the bodies of 5 dead terrorists were handed back to Libya. I suspect this is where Lybia's rep as a 'terrorist state' and the phrase 'Palestinian terrorist' comes from. The terrorists mainly seemed to want fame: '...they made their voice heard by the universe who had not been hearing before' (urgh, this is called 'posturing', so maybe Black September pi**ed off some of their own people). However, the 3 surviving terrorists were never to stand trial, because the Germans handed them back 7 weeks later. 'Acting with indecent haste and without consulting the Israeli government', Willy Brandt, the charismatic German head of government, colluded with the terrorists in order to 1) dispose of the embarrassing evidence of German tactical failures, and 2) to discourage further terrorist attacks on his country.

By 1999 secret Israeli assassination squads killed 2/3 surviving Palestinian terrorists, plus some 12 others suspected of having planned the terrorist act (presumably including Carlos 'The Jackal', who supposedly was one of them, but apparently(?) left his mates in Munich as soon as the 'kaka' started hitting the fan). The only still surviving Black September-ite, Jamal Al-Gashey, speaks of his 1972 actions here for the first time. He has survived many attempts on his life and lives in hiding with a wife and two daughters- compromising them still.

The documentary is necessarily sad and depressing with such realism, but at least everyone cops some criticism. Black September seem to have been more interested in their own self-aggrandisement, so I'm guessing that some of those assassinations should NOT BE SO QUICKLY attributed to Mossad. Mr Al-Gashey looked none-too-comfortable to me...

Sadly, people's tolerance for violence goes in cycles: what is 'acceptable' depends on whom you live near. ETHICAL RELATIVISM IS A TERRIBLE THING.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

One of the best documentaries *ever*

Author: Houmatt from Satellite of Love
20 May 2002

I stumbled upon this film while at work. (I work at a video store.) In a single five-day period, I watched it TWICE, then bought the companion book of the same title. As the 30th anniversary approaches, this compelling film should be re-released to theaters as a reminder to those who have forgotten, and a lesson to those born afterward as the OTHER dark day in human history that happened on a day in September.

Now, a warning: This film is rated R for a reason. They say no amount of words can convey what happened to someone or something without seeing it for yourself. This is demonstrated here, in a big way. If you are squeamish, or if seeing explicit photos may disturb you, DO NOT SEE THIS FILM.

Otherwise, find this puppy and rent it, and be prepared to be engrossed, frightened, and angered. No matter what the woefully ignorant may tell you.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

One day in September, 1972, Munich - not Manhattan, 2001

Author: greatwareagle from new york city
20 February 2002

This documentary was released in 1999. You have to wonder, how would it have been handled if it were made after 9-11-01?

No doubt the title would have been something else as the events of one day in September, 2001, have massively overshadowed those of one day in September, 1972.

I must say that as a young filmmaker just starting out, as I assume many of you may be as well, I truly hesitate to publicly critique the efforts of others. Many times I think we misunderstand the intentions of those we judge and rush to make our misinformed voices be heard. So I try to avoid dogmatism. TRY.

I bought ONE DAY by chance, just strolling through a video store. I never heard of the events (which I find sad) dropped $20 or so, took it home, and took it in.

For the majority, well done. Coherent, effective film rhetoric. Invigorating montage of athletes doing what they do best, set to uplifting score -"everything's peachy in Munich." - stark contrast of things to come. Airline hostage aftermath held interest as well.

I have to agree with what many are saying about the choices made when revealing the outcome, though - questionable tone of music here. Perhaps in the context of a drama based on a true story, this sequence might sit better. But as documentary...I dunno. I'm thinking DOG DAY AFTERNOON - very similar TRUE story, effectively dramatized. Except DOG DAY had no score. When it comes to documentaries, especially those dealing with sensitive crisis, loss of life, etc, if the filmmaker would take time out to imagine themself a relative to those affected, or perhaps a survivor themself, sitting in the audience, watching the film, how would they respond to the given cinematic depiction?

Was the above review useful to you?

3 out of 6 people found the following review useful:

On par with When We Were Kings - a resounding ten out of ten

Author: darrenlang-2 from southern highlands, Australia
30 October 2000

I watched this movie, in Sydney, the day before the opening ceremony of the Sydney Olympic Games. How quickly we forget events from our recent past. If the authorities response to the terrorist situation wasn't so tragic, it would be laughable. I thought the shooting of JFK was a monumental government debacle and cover up - well there is another to rate on a par with that. What a scoop for the makers of the documentary to snare the one surviving terrorist - it certainly added to the chilling effect of the documentary. I give it a rating of ten, and on par with the only other documentary I have given, a ten, When We Were Kings.

Was the above review useful to you?

7 out of 14 people found the following review useful:

Works as a thriller, fails as a documentary

Author: ShortestFrame ( from Washington, DC, USA
27 April 2005

I can only agree on what most of the user comments here have pointed out: Notwithstanding the thrilling and gripping style - great editing for instance - in which the events are presented, the film as a whole is fairly questionable because of its undeniable intention to bash the Germans and their police force for what happened while at the same time refusing to investigate into other directions. Furthermore, it gives us little more than a glimpse of the terrorists' motivations, feeding the impression that we're watching a piece of propaganda that is - without a doubt - well executed. The probably most unbelievable faux-pas is that at no time during all the interviews the name of the witnesses are shown. Very amateurish! 8/10 for film-making, 2/10 for subject treatment. See it, but be aware of its slanted view!

Was the above review useful to you?

12 out of 24 people found the following review useful:

dismissive of any pretense to objectivity

Author: cogs from (e.g. London, England)
4 September 2002

"One Day in September" is an interesting documentary exercise; favouring a thriller structure it seems dismissive of any pretense to objectivity (a quality that is incorrectly expected of the documentary form). I think the problem lies in just how unbalanced the representation is, and I think the film would have benefited from a more rounded view. The film is heavily weighted to a representation which condemns the German authorities and sanctifies the terrorists' victims. The hatchet job done on the Germans is pretty rough – given they were in a fairly untenable position, it's terribly unfair to condemn them in hindsight. This aspect of the film displays remarkable petulance. I have fewer reservations about how the Israelis and the Palestinians are each represented, I guess I don't expect it to be any other way. It's the kind of documentary that demands a responding documentary, but alas, I don't see one forthcoming. With all that said the dynamic structure of "One Day in September" is its most impressive aspect. With all the political implications surrounding the film the best moments are those sequences when the sportsmen and women are set to music. They're invigorating moments and perhaps overshadow the significance of the terrorist incident by contrasting man's evil doings to the eternal beauty of mankind in the pursuit of the limits of his physical capabilities.

Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:

Hard to Believe This Could Happen

Author: Michael_Elliott from Louisville, KY
10 May 2012

One Day in September (1999)

*** 1/2 (out of 4)

Very good, Oscar-winning documentary taking a look at the tragic 1972 events at the Munich Olympic games where eleven Israeli athletes were taken hostage by Palestinian terrorists. Through interviews and archival footage we hear about the planning of the event, the taking of the athletes, the negotiations to have them freed and then the tragic events that led to their deaths. Outside some questionable uses of music, this is a pretty strong documentary that features some great interviews with many of the people on the scene. We get interviews with some of the police negotiators, family members of victims and most shockingly is the last living terrorist who for the first time talks about the operation. There have been quite a few documentaries on this subject but this one here is without question one of the most interesting because of the people that were interviewed. It's was great getting to hear from the people who were involved in the negotiations and of course it was interesting to hear from the last remaining terrorist. With narration from Michael Douglas, the film does a very good job at mixing the interviews with the archival footage and it really gives you a great idea of the events and everything that was going on. This is especially true when you see some live TV broadcasts and learn that this hurt the police because the terrorist were inside watching and seeing that a raid was about to happen, which caused the first rescue mission to be canceled. The blunders of the German police are also on full display and it's really shocking to see how badly the entire thing was handled and especially the finale at the airport. Then, of course, there's the supposed hijacking, which led to the three surviving terrorists to get off without being punished (for the time).

Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:

Personal beauty, otherwise a mighty Wikipedia entry

Author: Niklas Pivic from Stockholm, Sweden
28 June 2011

The core power of this documentary is the intelligently and very touching story as told by Ankie Spitzer, the wife of one of the athletes involved in this.

Otherwise, this is a very straight-forward story of how the Olympic Games were hit by terrorists who took the Israeli squad hostage, making some quite incredible demands, and how the "rescue-mission" was completely botched by the German government, kind of shoot-aim-ready, in that order. I'm amazed by how it seems that very few people/governments were genuinely interested in helping out. Also, it felt very weird to me that the Olympics went on despite of the hostage-situation, which happened in the compound.

The soundtrack to this documentary is quite bewildering at times, except when slo-mo film is shown of athletes competing. Michael Douglas' drawling voice is - thankfully - not applied often throughout the documentary.

All in all: interesting, but if it weren't for Ankie Spitzer and a few other voices chiming in here, there wouldn't be much more than a cinematic equivalent of a Wikipedia entry to this.

Was the above review useful to you?

Page 3 of 7: [Prev][1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [Next]

Add another review

Related Links

Plot summary Ratings Awards
External reviews Parents Guide Official site
Plot keywords Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history