| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 19 reviews in total |
9 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
Mainly Forget, 12 June 2004
![]()
Author:
B24 from Arizona
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Although I rate the directing and acting high, this is ultimately a
detestable story, full of logical holes and homophobic animosity. To take a
heroic character of basically good intentions and essentially destroy him
because of flawed judgment is worthy only when the writer redeems the
character in some revelatory denouement. In this case, that never
comes.
(SPOILER ALERT)
First, we are treated to a guy who could be the envy of any woman's or man's
eye -- a decent, hard-working, fundamentally ethical young man who carries a
big secret behind the facade of machismo. That secret -- the tragic flaw,
if you will -- is that he is in love with his best buddy (or "mate" in the
parlance of the U.K.). Although he tries to find appropriate ways to deal
with his emotions, he falls into the trap of bending the truth more than
once in an effort to break up his buddy's relationship with an unstable but
attractive woman. The result is inevitable: he loses the friend and almost
loses his life. End of story. Crude homophobic jokes, gay stereotypes, and
fag bashing thrive.
What could have been a nice twist in this made-for-TV play involves the
cathartic "outing" of the main character, David (splendidly played by Steve
John Shepherd) on a TV talk show much like the old Jenny Jones show. This
is an obvious ripoff of the infamous case in the U.S. where a young man did
indeed lose his life a few years ago. Instead of allowing David to reveal
the complex entirety of his subterfuge, however, he is made out to be a
complete fool, which sets up in turn the ineffectual, gratuitous, and
needlessly violent ending.
How David's Greek God could fall for a heterosexual nebbish like Theo
(played well by John Simm) with almost no redeeming qualities really begs
the question. Theo's girlfriend is similarly two-dimensional, Only by some
ironic aspect that the audience is never made privy to can there be any
sense in this. Likewise, nearly all of the supporting cast consists of
stock characters and blatant stereotypes, like the angry Dad and the swishy
design consultant supervising David on the job.
But the directing and editing values are good for a TV production. My only
complaint is that it could have been so much better. Give this one a high
mark for technique and a pass at the same time.
10 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Looking for the Happiest Day of Your Life, 26 February 2006
![]()
Author:
gradyharp from United States
FORGIVE AND FORGET was originally written by Mark Burt and directed by
Aisling Walsh as a TV movie aimed at a straight audience in the UK.
That fact is important to remember as it makes this excellent film more
credible to the audience that is finding it negative. The world at
large remains homophobic as is evident not only in the US with all the
measures before the voting public about gay rights, but also with the
unrelenting gay bashing around the world in virtually every country.
FORGIVE AND FORGET attempts to defuse some of that irrational behavior,
yet sadly it only succeeds on some levels: some are still either
incredulous that this story could happen and end the way it does while
others quietly nod in recognition of a an atmosphere that remains
essentially unchanged with the apparent passage of time's
enlightenment.
Working class plasterer David (Steve John Shepherd) and perennial
student Theo (John Simm) have been best friends (mates) for fourteen
years, David the larger of the two being Theo's protector and defender.
They are devoted to each other in the best sense of the word. Theo
begins seeing artist Hannah (Laura Fraser) who is still recovering from
a broken relationship with an unfaithful guy. As the couple's
relationship intensifies, David sees his mate moving away from him
emotionally, a fact that is made more difficult due to the fact that
David is a closeted gay man, still living with his virulently
homophobic parents, and in truth is deeply in love with Theo. Theo
tries to bring David into his new life with Hannah, but David resists,
begins having meaningless sexual encounters in Soho, and gradually
finds ways to weaken Theo and Hannah's new relationship by playing on
Hannah's insecurities. David's attempts at finding time together with
Theo result in weakening Hannah's trust and she leaves Theo. As the
truths of David's desperate attempts to retain Theo to himself become
apparent, Theo questions David's motives. David, unable to talk with
anyone, opts for going on a popular UK confessional TV show ('Forgive
and Forget') where he admits he is gay and declares his love for Theo,
a public announcement that results not only in David's being disowned
by his parents but also in being beaten bloody by Theo, a sad
dénouement stopped only by Hannah's intrusion during the beating. The
only positive aspect of David's public confessional is that at last he
is free of the lie he has been living, and though he has seemingly lost
everything, he at last has some peace of mind - a tragically confessed
happiest day of his life.
The cast is homogenously excellent, but the quality of acting by the
exceedingly handsome and charismatic Steve John Shepherd and by John
Simm and Laura Fraser is exceptional. Whether the audience is deeply
disturbed by this film or closely aligns with its message, the film as
an artwork cannot be faulted. It is a brave little movie that dares to
hold a mirror up to the audience, hopefully enlightening at least a few
as to the perpetuated homophobia that maligns the lives of many
citizens. Recommended viewing. Grady Harp
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Playing hard to get, film makes you think., 17 October 2004
Author:
Remco van Schellen (vanschellen) from Vlissingen, the Netherlands
A person can do strange things when in love. David is a working class
boy. His friendship with 'mate' Theo seems to be indestructible. Until
Theo is starts living together with his girlfriend Hannah. Nobody knows
David is in love with Theo. And very jealous, as it turns out
David plays 'hard to get' by trying to break up Theo and Hannah's
relationship. He succeeds, but his lies are uncovered at the end.
Especially after the weekend in Brighton when Theo can only think of
Hannah who has left him, while David wants to make fun. When David,
still very deep in the closet, expresses his feelings for Theo in a
Jenny Jones-like program on television the shit really hits the fan.
David is kicked out of the house by his father and Theo's friendship
for David turns into pure hate.
Forgive and Forget is a film about friendship an jealousy. You can
really wonder why David doesn't come out of the closet earlier: his
life would have been easier. The end of the film is quite sudden and
the question pops up why there has to be a fight involving an iron bar.
Where did Hannah come from in the last scene? Even though: Forgive and
Forget is a nice and very well performed film that makes you think.
3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Why?!, 4 October 2007
![]()
Author:
yawnmower1 from New York City
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This is surely one of the nastiest, most misleading, films ever made.
The only redeeming factor is handsome John Shepherd who plays David, a
very closeted London construction worker. Secretly in love with his
life-long mate Theo, David's covert problems escalate when Theo
announces he is moving in with his girlfriend. Unable to share Theo's
time and attention, David will do anything to undermine the couple's
relationship.
David, with a misguided fantasy of 'sharing', gets the bright idea to
come out of the closet on a talk show. An unwitting Theo joins him and
is utterly embarrassed when he is told, in front of a national
audience, that David is in love with him.
That the plan backfires goes without saying, and the pretense of light
comedy ends abruptly. David's ghastly father pronounces him sick and
summarily tosses him out of the house. Theo hates him and, to show him
just how much, beats David senseless with a lead pipe. I kid you not.
It seems that Theo and his girlfriend are a perfect match after all:
they are equally smug and hateful. Looking back with pity and loathing
at the wretched, bleeding David, they walk off into the sunset
together. A perfect ending for a mean-spirited film that gay-friendly
TLA should be ashamed to have produced.
4 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
From the Sublime to the Ridiculous, 10 November 2003
![]()
Author:
Jed from Toronto (jed92ca@yahoo.com) from Toronto Ontario
I gave this movie an "8" when I voted for it. It has a tight script and it's extremely well-acted, especially by the closeted gay actor. The ending was thoroughly stupid. It is still worth watching, but be prepared for an ending that is more 1963 than 2003.
4 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
A promising start but let me rewrite the ending., 4 September 2001
![]()
Author:
Havan_IronOak from NYC/FL
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
(Caution contains spoilers)
This movie started with an interesting premise and had some brilliant
moments but then failed to live up to its promise.
David and Theo have been mates for 14 years. But, David, the handsome
self-assured alpha male has a secret. He's gay and is in love with Theo.
Now
Theo is moving in with his girlfriend and David is feeling left out. David
sabotages Theo's relationship by playing on the girl's insecurities and
then
consoles Theo on the break-up.
The crisis of the film comes after the breakup. David is consoling Theo
and
seems genuinely sad to see his friend in the pain that he knows he himself
has caused. When Theo is crying on David's shoulder as he asks, `How do
you
tell someone you Love them'. The look of recognition on David's face makes
the whole movie worthwhile. Theo is asking the very question that has
bothered David for so long.
The romantic in me started anticipating a noble, tear wrenching ending ..
David would sacrifice his own feelings for the man he loves. He would go
on
TV come out and confess to breaking up the couple. Even the jealous
girlfriend would have to believe such a public confession. Theo would get
his piece of happiness even if it meant that he may never Forgive David or
Forget. David would be sadder but wiser and see that there are other men
out
there other than his straight mate. And Theo would eventually recognize
David's sacrifice and the healing would begin.
Well forget it. David opts for another approach and much of the pathos of
the film escapes
5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Contrived, poorly written and directed soap-opera., 28 August 2005
![]()
Author:
ENRIQUE-3 from Ohio, USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
My first feeling was that I had already seen this kind of stuff too
many times already and much better (even in TV). Although the cast was
good (most of them deserve better), characters were so unconvincing and
the dialog so cheesy that it was impossible to feel any sympathy for
them. It is the typical script written with old recipes in the hands of
an inept, extremely heavy handed director. Every scene was irritably
predictable, except when towards the ending, the film goes overboard,
with a total misfired "tour de force." I am sure that this flick will
be very successful among family values audiences and the final bloody
and extremely severe beating that the gay character gets from his
'straight' friend would be a real treat for hate and neo-Nazis
audiences.
I am not giving a 1/10 rating out of respect for the actors (the only
reason that I saw this TV produce until the end): I feel sorry for some
of them.
6 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
This could have been a contender, 8 February 2005
![]()
Author:
cpto from New Jersey
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I enjoyed watching Steve John Sheppard and John Simm in the lead roles.
They handled their parts as competently as the script allowed.
The script, unfortunately, is the problem. It appears that homophobia
is alive and well in the UK, as is the convention that gay romances
must end in violence to show how unspeakably nasty the gay character
is.
Boy comes out. Admits to his best friend of 14 years that he loves him
(on a Jerry Springer type of show, no less). Father throws boy out of
house. Ex-best-friend assaults him with a pipe. End of movie.
This is formulaic to the point that reactions are not developed. The
scriptwriter assumes that the audience will use their own prejudices to
help advance the development of the story and, thus, things occur
without background exploration. They just happen, in a typical
homophobic way.
The mother makes a homophobic comment about an ex-schoolmate, but it's
she who supports her son when he comes out. The father--for no reason
we're given--throws the boy out of the house. The best friend of 14
years seems to have ignored the signals that must have come from a
close relationship of that length. If this is typical of UK television,
I'll stick with HBO and Cinemax, thank you.
Rent the movie if you must, but don't buy it. That will just encourage
more of this type of tripe being produced in the future.
11 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
Puts Gay Pride back about 50 years, 6 July 2005
![]()
Author:
guilfisher-1 from New York City
This 2000 made for TV film is a sham for gay people. It promotes gay
bashing, degrades coming out and gives homosexuals a dated persecuted
life style. I could have sworn when I saw this trite work, it must have
been done in 1960. For certainly gay issues deserve better than this
dribble. The fault lies in the writing and directing. Mark Burt writes
a trivial and lack-less script with absolutely no compassion for any of
the major characters. Aisling Walsh, a woman, directs with no
understanding of how to bring any hope to her leading players. She
certainly has no understanding of gay life. If she herself is gay, than
shame on her. If not, she needs to go to a gay bar or march in a gay
pride day parade and surround herself with today's gay people.
The actors do what they can to give believability to this nonsense.
Steve John Shepherd plays the young man tortured over his
homosexuality. Afraid to come out to his best friend and to his
parents. Why he chooses to do so in such a public way, beats me. But he
does. I'll say no more as to the outcome and let you see for yourself.
Believe me, you won't be surprised. John Simm, hardly, in my eyes,
worth all the suffering, is the attraction to Shepherd as his best
friend. Simm has his own demons to deal with. And again, you really
don't care. He earns his oats. As the unsympathetic and sometimes just
down right annoying girl-friend to Simm, Laura Fraser is a real
possessive bitch (can I say that word?) A control freak, she deserves
losing any guy who would put up with her antics and games. I was hoping
she'd lose the guy in the end. Again, see what happens yourself. Again,
no surprise.
Then there are the parents that contradict themselves all over the
place. An overbearing dad, played by Maurice Roeves, knows nothing but
anger and screams through most of the film. What's with this guy?
Sometimes overacting, he suddenly has all this tear jerking at the end?
And you don't believe it anyway. "Let him go", says he. I would have
been gone from this dad a long time ago. And the mother, played by Ger
Ryan, sits and bakes pies. Probes her son most of the time to see
what's wrong and when she discovers the truth, over public TV,
completely disowns him. She begs him to be honest and then slaps him in
the face. Give me a break.
I liked Shepherd's work in this and wish he could have had a decent
venue to work with. For he gave the most convincing performance. Simm
was one level, Fraser was just awful as were the parents.
I give this dated movie a 2 star for Shepherd's performance attempt.
4 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Compelling performances overcome some pitfalls, 1 December 2003
Author:
graham clarke (grahamclarke@earthling.net)
With the amount of gay writers, directors and actors (openly out or not),
it's remarkable that there exists something of a dearth of really high
quality gay themed movies. While it may be too much to expect Hollywood to
come to the fore, the independents too have been surprisingly poor in this
area. European cinema has dealt with gay issues in a far more successful
manner. Faced with this situation, gay movies are often over praised simply
because they've been made rather than for their intrinsic qualities. "Sunday
Bloody Sunday" made over 30 years still overshadows just about any other gay
themed movie made since then.
While "Forgive and Forget" certainly does have much going for it, it remains
not entirely successful. What it suffers from is a certain pandering
simplicity that has been so rampant in British movies for too long; the
worst of these (despite their commercial success being "Billy Elliot" and
"Full Monty"). "Forgive and Forget" has scenes which teeter on the brink of
this ultimately insulting approach of the depiction of complex emotional
states. (In all fairness I should mention the winning coming out drama "Get
Real" as an outstanding exception.)
What saves the film and really what makes it a worthwhile experience are the
two central performances by Steve John Sheppard and John Simm. Both give
fully convincing, committed portrayals, despite dialog which is at times
less than credible. The force of their acting compels one empathize with
predicament of these characters.
Despite the flaws, "Forgive and Forget" is a memorable movie , well worth
making the effort to seek out.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | External reviews |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |