(2000)

Critic Reviews

26

Metascore

Based on 14 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
50
Chicago Tribune
By making concessions for a possible sequel, Dracula 2000 wilts when compared in the light with other Dracula films.
50
Austin Chronicle
A middling film through and through, despite the occasional shocks it tries to earnestly to achieve.
50
Although it's not half bad -- which doesn't mean it's half good -- this horror cheapie comes equipped with a few ideas, a little atmosphere and a couple of serviceable scares.
50
Film.com
One way or the other, there really is something to be said for a movie which seems to revel in its own inherent comic-book silliness.
42
Entertainment Weekly
One of those desultory F/X and no script potboilers that seems to restart itself with every new scene.
40
In the end it's the same old blood pudding.
38
New York Daily News
There's a lot of scary stuff in Wes Craven Presents: Dracula 2000. There are eyeball-sucking leeches, decapitations, punctured necks... and appalling acting.
17
Mr. Showbiz
Dracula 2000 is a stake in the heart.
10
Rolling Stone
Dracula may stay undead in the new millennium, but there's not a sign of life - oh, that bloodless acting - in this sorry mess.
0
New York Post
Bloody awful movie.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Dracula 2000 (2000) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews | Message Board