15 user 7 critic

Dirty Pictures (2000)

R | | Drama | TV Movie 27 May 2000
A Cincinnati museum director goes on trial in 1990 for exhibiting sadomasochistic photographs taken by Robert Mapplethorpe.




On Disc

at Amazon

Won 1 Golden Globe. Another 3 wins & 6 nominations. See more awards »


Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Citizen Cohn (TV Movie 1992)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

As lawyer and power broker Roy Cohn lies dying of AIDS in a private hospital room, ghosts from his past visit him as he reflects on his life and loves.

Director: Frank Pierson
Stars: James Woods, Joe Don Baker, Joseph Bologna
Documentary | Biography
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

Alexander 'Sasha' Shulgin is the scientist behind more than 200 psychedelic compounds including MDMA, more commonly known as Esctasy. Considered to be one of the the greatest chemists of ... See full summary »

Director: Étienne Sauret
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

"Slice of life" take on life of international porn celebrity, Moon, and her musings on modern life, love and loss.

Director: Ash Baron-Cohen
Stars: Juliette Marquis, James Woods, Kip Pardue
Biography | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

Biographic movie of the witty, overachieving, hot-tempered Rudy Giuliani, spanning from his rising days as a New York City district attorney in the early 1980's to his marriage to part-time... See full summary »

Director: Robert Dornhelm
Stars: James Woods, Penelope Ann Miller, Michelle Nolden
Biography | Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

Carl Panzram is sent to Leavenworth Prison for burglary. While there, he is brutally beaten by a guard. Neophyte guard Henry Lesser feels sympathy for Panzram, befriends him, and gets him ... See full summary »

Director: Tim Metcalfe
Stars: James Woods, Robert Sean Leonard, Ellen Greene
Drama | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

Based on a real-life court case, the film finds members of the McMartin family on trial for alleged sexual molestation and abuse of children at their well-regarded preschool. ... See full summary »

Director: Mick Jackson
Stars: James Woods, Mercedes Ruehl, Lolita Davidovich
The Summer of Ben Tyler (TV Movie 1996)
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

A man who acts upon his conscience opens a Pandora's box of racism and intolerance. Temple Rayburn (James Woods) is an attorney who lives and works in a small Southern community in the ... See full summary »

Director: Arthur Allan Seidelman
Stars: James Woods, Elizabeth McGovern, Len Cariou
In Love and War (TV Movie 1987)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6/10 X  

This movie is an account of US Navy Commander James Stockdale's 8 year imprisonment in North Vietnam. During his confinement in such camps as the infamous "Hanoi Hilton", Stockdale, among ... See full summary »

Director: Paul Aaron
Stars: Jane Alexander, James Woods, Concetta Tomei
Comedy | Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3.7/10 X  

Redmond is a young guy who can't find what to do with his life. When his uncle Sam gives him the bag to deliver to some uptown connection he fails to do so and it gets them in trouble with ... See full summary »

Director: Matthew Harrison
Stars: Kevin Corrigan, Linda Fiorentino, Michael Rapaport
My Name Is Bill W. (TV Movie 1989)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

This film reconstructs the true story of stockbroker William Griffith Wilson, a World War I veteran whose small drinking problem becomes a serious addiction after he loses his fortune in ... See full summary »

Director: Daniel Petrie
Stars: James Woods, JoBeth Williams, James Garner
Next Door (TV Movie 1994)
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.7/10 X  

Matt and Karen have inconsiderate neighbors whose lawn sprinkler drowns their flowers. A feud erupts and a series of tit-for-tat actions develop and escalate.

Director: Tony Bill
Stars: James Woods, Randy Quaid, Kate Capshaw
Cop (1988)
Crime | Drama | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

An obsessive, insubordinate homicide cop is convinced a serial killer is loose in the Hollywood area and disobeys orders in order to catch him.

Director: James B. Harris
Stars: James Woods, Lesley Ann Warren, Charles Durning


Cast overview, first billed only:
Leon Pownall ...
Mr. Prouty
Matt North ...
Monty Lobb
H. Louis Sirkin
Mark Mizibov
Ann Bosworth
R.D. Reid ...
Judge Albanese
Michele Muzzi ...


Fact-based story about the court proceedings that followed Cincinnati art museum director Dennis Barrie after his decision to display a controversial art exhibit by photographer Robert Mapplethorpe. The proceedings start with an inflamed County Sheriff who is determined to put Barrie in jail. A grand jury established to determine whether the sexually explicit photographs were obscene found seven of the pictures to possibly be obscene. The seven pictures depicted nude children, a man ramming his fist up another man's anus, and man with his finger in his penis. Other pictures in the exhibit did depict explicit nudity and sexual connotation. An obviously biased judge made derisive decisions throughout the trial. The strain of the trial also placed Barrie's marriage under duress, which ultimately led to his wife divorcing him, and led to Barrie's children being derided and physically attacked by their classmates. Written by John Sacksteder <jsackste@bellsouth.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis



Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for nude and sexual images and for related dialogue | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:





Release Date:

27 May 2000 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

The Museum Project  »

Company Credits

Show more on  »

Technical Specs



Sound Mix:


See  »

Did You Know?


First Showtime production to win a Golden Globe. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Cherubims, body parts and experts
30 March 2006 | by See all my reviews

This movie missed a good occasion to make a substantial contribution in the discussion about censorship. It's about the law proceedings concerning a traveling exhibition with pictures of renowned photographer Robert Mapplethorpe in the year 1990. Some of the exhibits (they are presented in the movie) have a sexual content that a general public may deem shocking. In Washington State the exhibit was not allowed to be shown, in Cincinnati, Ohio, the sheriff started a lawsuit against the curator of the museum in which the exhibition was made accessible to the public in the said town.

The movie gives too much attention to the hysteria on both sides. The accusers are shown as dimwits who want to start a dictatorship, the defendants as ultra sensitive art experts who see themselves as martyrs for a noble cause. „I'm not Larry Flynt", whines the curator of the museum. Being compared with the publisher of pornographic magazines is apparently the worst that could happen to him. And exactly at this point I would have wanted an expose about what art is in our present days – but there is no response at all to that statement. Nobody tells the viewers how one should differ. After all there never was a society in which so many pictures are shoved in people's faces on a daily basis as ours. A picture in itself has ceased to be art a long time ago. All a good photographer has to do, basically, is excluding any unwanted chance elements in a picture. Once you release the shutter you'll get something.

Unfortunately the movie does not treat the art issue in a satisfying manner. It fails to deliver new food for thought. It does not make the acceptance of image content an issue. The curator argues that in old churches you find naked cherubims without anybody complaining – so why should the public be offended by Mapplethorpe taking a picture of a naked boy? I thought that was an extremely bad comparison that should have provoked protest. The presence of cherubims in a church has to do with a specific location. And it has a specific context (which has nothing to do with a democratic society, by the way). I think that's what is missing in displaying contemporary art, a perceptible context (star architects alone won't do the trick). Liberty in expression seems to me insufficient as a purpose for art, if you agree that art needs a public. And the question of censorship should not in every case be ridiculed (how to go about it, that is another story).

Dirty Pictures is a docudrama. It recounts real events from a predictable, uninspired perspective. Instead of including comments of intellectuals (thus strengthening the avantgarde expert angle) including, of all people, Salman Rushide (what on earth has he got to do with graphic art??) the movie should have focused more on the deliberations of the jury who decided in favor of the museum. The opinion of a section of ordinary people would have interested me more.

Let me finish with a short anecdote: Early this year the Kunsthaus of the town of Zurich showed a big retrospective of the Zurich born painter Henry Fuseli (1741-1825) who emigrated to England, became famous with his paintings of scenes from Shakespeare plays and his Gothic nightmare series. He also was at a time president of the Royal Academy in London. Unexpectedly I was confronted with a series of explicit pornographic etchings which were just part of the exhibition, without being specially marked or separated from the rest. I assume Fuseli made them „on private commissions" – not for artistic purposes but to earn a few extra bucks. I could accept their being included for historical reasons – the exhibition had the intention to show the time and life of the man. I didn't read or hear any comment concerning their presence in the much publicized exhibition.

3 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 15 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Watch the Latest Episode of "The IMDb Show"

Zach Braff tackles acting and directing on his new show "Alex, Inc.," and we take a look at the 15 most bingeable TV shows of all time.

Watch the show