MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 10,209 this week

Dirty Pictures (2000)

TV Movie  |  R  |   |  Drama  |  27 May 2000 (USA)
6.7
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.7/10 from 697 users  
Reviews: 15 user | 7 critic

A Cincinnati museum director goes on trial in 1990 for exhibiting sadomasochistic photographs taken by Robert Mapplethorpe.

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

On Disc

at Amazon

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 28 titles
created 29 Jul 2011
 
a list of 947 titles
created 22 Apr 2012
 
a list of 31 titles
created 20 Jun 2014
 
a list of 138 titles
created 9 months ago
 
a list of 27 titles
created 2 months ago
 

Related Items

Search for "Dirty Pictures" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Dirty Pictures (TV Movie 2000)

Dirty Pictures (TV Movie 2000) on IMDb 6.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Dirty Pictures.
Won 1 Golden Globe. Another 3 wins & 6 nominations. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Citizen Cohn (TV Movie 1992)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

As lawyer and power broker Roy Cohn lies dying of AIDS in a private hospital room, ghosts from his past visit him as he reflects on his life and loves.

Director: Frank Pierson
Stars: James Woods, Joe Don Baker, Joseph Bologna
Fast-Walking (1982)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

A corrupt prison guard becomes involved in a plot to murder a black revolutionary serving time in his prison.

Director: James B. Harris
Stars: James Woods, Tim McIntire, Kay Lenz
The Summer of Ben Tyler (TV Movie 1996)
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  
Director: Arthur Allan Seidelman
Stars: James Woods, Elizabeth McGovern, Len Cariou
Biography | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

Biographic movie of the witty, overachieving, hot-tempered Rudy Giuliani, spaning from his rising days as a New York district attorney in the early 1980's to his marriage to part-time ... See full summary »

Director: Robert Dornhelm
Stars: James Woods, Penelope Ann Miller, Michelle Nolden
In Love and War (TV Movie 1987)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

This movie is an account of US Navy Commander James Stockdale's 8 year imprisonment in North Vietnam. During his confinement in such camps as the infamous "Hanoi Hilton", Stockdale, among ... See full summary »

Director: Paul Aaron
Stars: Jane Alexander, James Woods, Concetta Tomei
Northfork (2003)
Drama | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

Set in 1955, the residents of a small Montana community are forced to move their homes to make way for a new dam.

Director: Michael Polish
Stars: Duel Farnes, Nick Nolte, Anthony Edwards
Biography | Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

Carl Panzram is sent to Leavenworth Prison for burglary. While there, he is brutally beaten by a guard. Neophyte guard Henry Lesser feels sympathy for Panzram, befriends him, and gets him ... See full summary »

Director: Tim Metcalfe
Stars: James Woods, Robert Sean Leonard, Ellen Greene
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.9/10 X  

17 year old Z.T., a brilliant mind and solid athlete, dreams of a great college and a future of invention and innovation. But he still grieves over his mother's recent death, a shoulder ... See full summary »

Director: Cleve Nettles
Stars: Ean Mering, Robert Loggia, Craig T. Nelson
Truman (TV Movie 1995)
Biography | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

Biographical account of America's President for the latter part of WWII. Shows Truman's rise from small-town nobody to leader of the USA, his decision to use the Atomic Bomb against Japan, ... See full summary »

Director: Frank Pierson
Stars: Gary Sinise, Diana Scarwid, Richard Dysart
Cop (1988)
Crime | Drama | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

An obsessive, insubordinate homicide cop is convinced a serial killer is loose in the Hollywood area and disobeys orders in order to catch him.

Director: James B. Harris
Stars: James Woods, Lesley Ann Warren, Charles Durning
Probable Cause (TV Movie 1994)
Action | Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.2/10 X  

A series of cop murders plagues the city. The remaining officers on the force are increasingly worried as the deaths increase with no leads. As the department's finest, Detective Gary ... See full summary »

Director: Paul Ziller
Stars: Kate Vernon, James Downing, David Neale
Drama | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

The McMartin family's lives are turned upside down when they are accused of serious child molestation. The family run a school for infants. An unqualified child cruilty "expert" videotapes ... See full summary »

Director: Mick Jackson
Stars: James Woods, Mercedes Ruehl, Lolita Davidovich
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
Dianne Barrie
Leon Pownall ...
Mr. Prouty
Matt North ...
Monty Lobb
David Huband ...
H. Louis Sirkin
...
Mark Mizibov
...
Ann Bosworth
...
Reising
R.D. Reid ...
Judge Albanese
...
Angela
Michele Muzzi ...
Brenda
Martin Roach ...
Ed
Tony De Santis ...
Floyd
...
Gil
Edit

Storyline

Fact-based story about the court proceedings that followed Cincinnati art museum director Dennis Barrie after his decision to display a controversial art exhibit by photographer Robert Mapplethorpe. The proceedings start with an inflamed County Sheriff who is determined to put Barrie in jail. A grand jury established to determine whether the sexually explicit photographs were obscene found seven of the pictures to possibly be obscene. The seven pictures depicted nude children, a man ramming his fist up another man's anus, and man with his finger in his penis. Other pictures in the exhibit did depict explicit nudity and sexual connotation. An obviously biased judge made derisive decisions throughout the trial. The strain of the trial also placed Barrie's marriage under duress, which ultimately led to his wife divorcing him, and led to Barrie's children being derided and physically attacked by their classmates. Written by John Sacksteder <jsackste@bellsouth.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for nude and sexual images and for related dialogue | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

27 May 2000 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Fotografías obscenas  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

|

Sound Mix:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

First Showtime production to win a Golden Globe. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Cherubims, body parts and experts
30 March 2006 | by (Zurich, Switzerland) – See all my reviews

This movie missed a good occasion to make a substantial contribution in the discussion about censorship. It's about the law proceedings concerning a traveling exhibition with pictures of renowned photographer Robert Mapplethorpe in the year 1990. Some of the exhibits (they are presented in the movie) have a sexual content that a general public may deem shocking. In Washington State the exhibit was not allowed to be shown, in Cincinnati, Ohio, the sheriff started a lawsuit against the curator of the museum in which the exhibition was made accessible to the public in the said town.

The movie gives too much attention to the hysteria on both sides. The accusers are shown as dimwits who want to start a dictatorship, the defendants as ultra sensitive art experts who see themselves as martyrs for a noble cause. „I'm not Larry Flynt", whines the curator of the museum. Being compared with the publisher of pornographic magazines is apparently the worst that could happen to him. And exactly at this point I would have wanted an expose about what art is in our present days – but there is no response at all to that statement. Nobody tells the viewers how one should differ. After all there never was a society in which so many pictures are shoved in people's faces on a daily basis as ours. A picture in itself has ceased to be art a long time ago. All a good photographer has to do, basically, is excluding any unwanted chance elements in a picture. Once you release the shutter you'll get something.

Unfortunately the movie does not treat the art issue in a satisfying manner. It fails to deliver new food for thought. It does not make the acceptance of image content an issue. The curator argues that in old churches you find naked cherubims without anybody complaining – so why should the public be offended by Mapplethorpe taking a picture of a naked boy? I thought that was an extremely bad comparison that should have provoked protest. The presence of cherubims in a church has to do with a specific location. And it has a specific context (which has nothing to do with a democratic society, by the way). I think that's what is missing in displaying contemporary art, a perceptible context (star architects alone won't do the trick). Liberty in expression seems to me insufficient as a purpose for art, if you agree that art needs a public. And the question of censorship should not in every case be ridiculed (how to go about it, that is another story).

Dirty Pictures is a docudrama. It recounts real events from a predictable, uninspired perspective. Instead of including comments of intellectuals (thus strengthening the avantgarde expert angle) including, of all people, Salman Rushide (what on earth has he got to do with graphic art??) the movie should have focused more on the deliberations of the jury who decided in favor of the museum. The opinion of a section of ordinary people would have interested me more.

Let me finish with a short anecdote: Early this year the Kunsthaus of the town of Zurich showed a big retrospective of the Zurich born painter Henry Fuseli (1741-1825) who emigrated to England, became famous with his paintings of scenes from Shakespeare plays and his Gothic nightmare series. He also was at a time president of the Royal Academy in London. Unexpectedly I was confronted with a series of explicit pornographic etchings which were just part of the exhibition, without being specially marked or separated from the rest. I assume Fuseli made them „on private commissions" – not for artistic purposes but to earn a few extra bucks. I could accept their being included for historical reasons – the exhibition had the intention to show the time and life of the man. I didn't read or hear any comment concerning their presence in the much publicized exhibition.


3 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Dirty Pictures (2000) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?