The elusive qualities of sex appeal are examined through the lens of science in this probing documentary, which reveals the evolution and function of every component of human attraction. In... See full summary »
"Gray's Anatomy" meets "Swingers" in this medical comedy as medical intern Ron Wilson plots to become Chief Resident with the help of Ivy League reject Steven Powell. As Dr. Wilson fights ... See full summary »
With a new book deal, a fabulous apartment and a stable relationship, psychologist turned sex expert Kate Langford is living her dream. But when her publisher pairs her up with the arrogant... See full summary »
Jimmy Boner, a 20-something slacker living with his parents, is given an ultimatum by his wicked stepmother to find a job and move out within 3 months after he accidentally walks in on her book club meeting wearing nothing but an iPod.
The story of infidelity: there are three couples, three different fates, three ways to overcome infidelity, three ways to spice up their relationship. Through their journey, these figures ... See full summary »
It is difficult to convey how frustrating this film was to watch. Although only 55 minutes duration, watching it felt like a lifetime and it was very tempting to hit the fast forward button or just switch off. The first bone of contention is the title; all the players seem to have made their careers in the adult film industry so one has to wonder if they are couples at all. As for the "Best Sex Ever" bit, this is a soft core film and so we never get to see any real sex, so was there any sex at all? The film comprises six segments, each segment starts with about two minutes of talking heads filmed in monochrome detailing each couple's fantasy sex scenario. There then follows the usual soft core practises of slow motion undressing, kissing and caressing which leaves very little time for the soft core sex.
The frustrating thing about the film was the execution of the filming. The writer/director, James Mvinner tries to be too arty with the camera, with too close up close-ups, jerky or unnecessary camera movements and generally not allowing the viewer to take in what is on screen before switching camera position. This is particularly noticeable in the Photography segment in which it seems, the cameraman cannot hold the camera steady for more than a couple of seconds at a time, even cutting off peoples heads while they are talking to camera. There are other faults but they would take too long to detail. All in all a very frustrating film to watch.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?