MOVIEmeter
Top 5000
Down 29 this week

Ken Park (2002)

Not Rated  |   |  Drama  |  3 April 2003 (Netherlands)
5.9
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.9/10 from 22,928 users  
Reviews: 157 user | 86 critic

Ken Park is about several Californian skateboarders' lives and relationships with and without their parents.

Directors:

, (as Ed Lachman)

Writers:

(screenplay), (based on stories and characters by)
0Check in
0Share...

IMDb Picks: May

Visit our IMDb Picks section to see our recommendations of movies and TV shows coming out in May, sponsored by COVERGIRL.

Visit the IMDb Picks section

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 36 titles
created 04 Apr 2011
 
a list of 48 titles
created 16 Sep 2011
 
a list of 31 titles
created 05 Jul 2013
 
list image
a list of 48 titles
created 29 Aug 2013
 
a list of 41 titles
created 26 Dec 2013
 

Related Items

Search for "Ken Park" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Ken Park (2002)

Ken Park (2002) on IMDb 5.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Ken Park.
2 nominations. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6/10 X  

Instead of adhering to the norms of their South Central neighborhood, a group of skater boys opt to bus into Hollywood and Beverly Hills, where they attract local rich girls - and plenty of... See full summary »

Director: Larry Clark
Stars: Jonathan Velasquez, Francisco Pedrasa, Milton Velasquez
Kids (1995)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

A day in the life of a group of teens as they travel around New York City skating, drinking, smoking, and deflowering virgins.

Director: Larry Clark
Stars: Leo Fitzpatrick, Justin Pierce, Chloë Sevigny
Bully (2001)
Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

A pack of naïve teenagers conspire to murder a mutual friend, whose aggressive demeanor has proved too much.

Director: Larry Clark
Stars: Brad Renfro, Nick Stahl, Bijou Phillips
Crime | Drama | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

In the hope of a big score, two junkie couples team up to commit various drug robberies which go disastrously wrong leading to dissent, violence and murder.

Director: Larry Clark
Stars: James Woods, Melanie Griffith, Vincent Kartheiser
Marfa Girl (2012)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

A story centered on a directionless 16-year-old living in Marfa, Texas and his relationships with his girlfriend, his neighbor, his teacher, a newly arrived local artist, and a local Border Patrol officer.

Director: Larry Clark
Stars: Adam Mediano, Drake Burnette, Jeremy St. James
Gummo (1997)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

Lonely residents of a tornado-stricken Ohio town wander the deserted landscape trying to fulfill their boring, nihilistic lives.

Director: Harmony Korine
Stars: Nick Sutton, Jacob Sewell, Lara Tosh
Teenage Caveman (TV Movie 2002)
Sci-Fi | Thriller | Horror
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3.3/10 X  

Teens encounter people, who, after being used as guinea pigs for the experimental testing of a virus can live forever in a post apocalyptic world.

Director: Larry Clark
Stars: Andrew Keegan, Tara Subkoff, Richard Hillman
Trash Humpers (2009)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5/10 X  

Follows the lives of a small group of sociopathic elderly people in Nashville, Tennessee.

Director: Harmony Korine
Stars: Rachel Korine, Brian Kotzur, Travis Nicholson
9 Songs (2004)
Drama | Music | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.9/10 X  

In London, England, love blooms between an American college student, named Lisa, and a British glaciologist, named Matt, where over the next few months in between attending rock concerts, the two lovers have intense sexual encounters.

Director: Michael Winterbottom
Stars: Kieran O'Brien, Margo Stilley, The Dandy Warhols
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

A portrait of the effects of schizophrenia on family life is the central focus.

Director: Harmony Korine
Stars: Ewen Bremner, Brian Fisk, Chloë Sevigny
Shortbus (2006)
Comedy | Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

A group of New Yorkers caught up in their romantic-sexual milieu converge at an underground salon infamous for its blend of art, music, politics, and carnality.

Director: John Cameron Mitchell
Stars: Sook-Yin Lee, Peter Stickles, PJ DeBoy
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.4/10 X  

A story centered around a group of self-destructive skateboarders in Paris.

Director: Larry Clark
Stars: Lukas Ionesco, Diane Rouxel, Théo Cholbi
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Adam Chubbuck ...
James Bullard ...
Seth Gray ...
...
Shawn's Mother
Zara McDowell ...
Zoe (as Zara Mcdowell)
...
Stephen Jasso ...
...
Claude's Father (as Wade Andrew Williams)
...
...
Peaches' Father (as Julio Oscar Mochoso)
...
Patricia Place ...
Tate's Grandmother
...
Claude's Mother
Mike Apaletegui ...
Curtis
Harrison Young ...
Tate's Grandfather
Edit

Storyline

Ken Park focuses on several teenagers and their tormented home lives. Shawn seems to be the most conventional. Tate is brimming with psychotic rage; Claude is habitually harassed by his brutish father and coddled, rather uncomfortably, by his enormously pregnant mother. Peaches looks after her devoutly religious father, but yearns for freedom. They're all rather tight, or so they claim. But they spend precious little time together and none of them seems to know much about one another's family lives. This bizarre dichotomy underscores their alienation # the result of suburban ennui, a teenager's inherent sense of melodrama, and the disturbing nature of their home environments. Written by Bubba

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

Who are you?

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

Not Rated | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

| |  »

Country:

| |

Language:

Release Date:

3 April 2003 (Netherlands)  »

Also Known As:

Ken Park - Quem és Tu?  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$10,135 (Hong Kong) (13 June 2003)

Gross:

$54,550 (Hong Kong) (11 July 2003)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema)

Sound Mix:

|

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Larry Clark shot Bully (2001), Teenage Caveman (2002) and Ken Park (2002) in a span of nine months. See more »

Quotes

Claude's father: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family.
See more »

Crazy Credits

The letter K is shown backwards in the credits, except in the first word of the film's title. See more »

Connections

References Diff'rent Strokes (1978) See more »

Soundtracks

Likwit
Written by E-Swift (as Brooks), King T (as McBride), J-Ro (as Robinson) and Tash (as Smith)
Performed by Tha Alkaholiks
Published by EMI
Courtesy of BMG
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Storm in a teacup
23 December 2003 | by (Belgium) – See all my reviews

Much has been made of this film's depiction of sex. Depending on who you ask, the scenes in question are "brutally honest" or simply "disgustingly pornographic". Both descriptions boil down to the same thing either way: you get to see erections. And ejaculate. A shiver goes through the audience, people shift in their seats - we are not used to seeing this in a non-pornographic movie, and it kind of throws us off-balance for a moment. But then, as it must, the film goes on and we are left to wonder what it was actually about. The reason I dislike this film, as I did both Kids and Bully (two movies that appear tame by comparison), is simply because once you take away the shocking aspects of it - the violence, the no-holds-barred sex scenes - it really isn't about anything much.

What Larry Clark is apparently trying to say here, is the same thing he tried to say with his earlier films: being a teenager stinks. Life sucks. It's the kind of wisdom that depressed adolescents spray-paint on walls. In the universe of Larry Clark, there are only two kinds of people: those who abuse, and those who are abused, and those two categories may (and probably will) shift in time. This film's defenders invariably use the same argument sooner or later: "This really happens". And it probably does, but it always happens for a reason. In Kids and Bully, there were no motivations given at all for the character's deplorable behaviour. Rather, they were walking, talking symptoms of an ill-defined social illness, and the movies were none too enlightening for it. Here, Clark (and his co-director Ed Lachmann), make a self-conscious effort at motivating the characters, by including their parents. They're the ones to blame, apparently, all of them negligent of their kids at best and downright (sexually) abusive at worst. Aah, but you see, they too are only looking for love and can't find it. They were neglected or abused by their parents as well, and are now continuing the cycle. Deep, isn't it? In stead of spray painting "Life Sucks", one could argue, that Ken Park as a movie might add the phrase: "And it does for my parents as well".

But there's no larger context given to any of this. We get to see the seediness of it (plenty of it), but there is no real insight offered into these characters. Why do these kids (and their parents) do what they do? The only answer the movie seems to be able to provide is: "because they don't get enough true love". Put this exact same message into any made-for-TV melodrama, and people will rightfully spit it out as unbelievably simplistic. We never really get to know any of these characters, much less care about them, because all of them are solely defined by the various ways in which their lives are messed up. We don't remember individuals, we just refer to: "That kid who ate out his girlfriend's mother. That guy who masturbated while choking himself. That girl who was into bondage." In a sense, it becomes a freak show. What they think (indeed, whether or not they think), what they feel, hope, want... It all remains rather vague, hinted at sometimes, but never fully explored, because the movie has ever more bizarre (and exploitative) sexual behaviour to get on with.

Two kinds of people will go see this movie: those who live in the same kind of circumstances, and those who don't. Those who don't, can go home with a more or less secure feeling, because everything they saw had been marginalized, put squarely within this box labelled: "The Lives And Times Of Freaky People We Don't Want Anything To Do With". And those who do... What will they take out of this? Nothing resembling even the slightest bit of hope, since no possibility of salvation seems to exist - the kids of Ken Park appear destined to become just as abusive as their parents, and the very last scene has two of them not-quite-saying they'd prefer to have been aborted. I read one reviewer who was apparently trying to earn a spot on the video cover with the quote: "This is a voice that just wants to be heard. Is that too much to ask?" No, of course not, but the voice doesn't have a lot to say, I'm afraid.

Movies like this, which contain what might be described as extreme amounts of either sex or violence, seem to have a built-in defence mechanism, whereby if you didn't like it, or object to it, you are automatically labelled a prude, who was enormously shocked by it and therefore stopped thinking. Or even worse: a censurer, who would take all "art" he doesn't like, throw it on a big pile and burn it. I assure you I'm neither. In fact, given the amount of discussion about this movie's sexual content, I'd expected it to be even more explicit than it was. And I would never want to ban anything just because I didn't like it. But I also don't believe in that knee-jerk reaction some people have of automatically praising everything that seems to shock others. This is the kind of film that tries to bully you into thinking it's actually about something. Five years from now, after all the fuss has died down, Ken Park will be remembered - if at all - as a storm in a teacup, one of those movies that come along every so often, that everyone has something to say about, but when looked on soberly, in retrospect, really wasn't worth the hassle. Pretty much the same has happened for Kids, after all.


85 of 97 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
What is your interpretation of Ken Park? Swzki
WAYYYYY TOO MUCH MALE NUDITY viper7xl
tThis movie glorifies promiscuous sex jerry4444
Australia Ban tyciol
Is anyone's life really like this? somehope
Claude Phone Scene Rick3y
Discuss Ken Park (2002) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?