Science documentaries about various topics.
Reviews

Watch Now

on Amazon Video

WATCH NOW
ON DISC

Episodes

Seasons


Years



45   44   43   42   41   40   … See all »
2017   2016   2015   2014   … See all »
Won 1 Primetime Emmy. Another 18 wins & 51 nominations. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Nova ScienceNow (TV Series 2005)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.5/10 X  
Stars: Neil deGrasse Tyson, Chad Cohen, Ziya Tong
Frontline (TV Series 1983)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.6/10 X  

Investigative journalist documentaries.

Stars: Will Lyman, Sarah Childress, Arun Rath
Secrets of the Dead (TV Series 2000)
Documentary | History | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  

Mysteries involving notable historical events, people and locations are scientifically examined.

Stars: Liev Schreiber, Jay O. Sanders, Salima Ikram
Horizon (TV Series 1964)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.7/10 X  

Horizon is BBC Two's flagship 50-minute science documentary series. In September 2004 it celebrated its 40th anniversary and it continues to enjoy outstanding critical acclaim. Recognised ... See full summary »

Stars: Paul Vaughan, Jack Fortune, Dilly Barlow
PBS NewsHour (TV Series 1975)
News
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

PBS newshour is an news show which shows news updates.

Stars: Judy Woodruff, Gwen Ifill, Jim Lehrer
American Experience (TV Series 1988)
Documentary | Biography | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.4/10 X  

A series showcasing documentaries on American history.

Stars: David McCullough, David Ogden Stiers, Michael Murphy
American Masters (TV Series 1985)
Documentary | Biography
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

Since its premiere in 1986, this Emmy-winning documentary series has presented hundreds of hours comprising profiles of outstanding American cultural artists. Past subjects have included ... See full summary »

Stars: Martin Scorsese, Tony Bennett, Peter Bogdanovich
The Universe (TV Series 2007)
Documentary | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.9/10 X  

This educational show explores many scientific questions and topics about the universe (Big Bang, the Sun, the planets, black holes, other galaxies, astrobiology etc.) through latest CGI, data and interviews with scientists.

Stars: Erik Thompson, Alex Filippenko, Laura Danly
Independent Lens (TV Series 1999)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  

Different celebrity host present a new independent documentary.

Stars: America Ferrera, Terrence Howard, Stanley Tucci
Edit

Cast

Series cast summary:
...
 Himself - Narrator / ... 59 episodes, 2007-2017
...
 Himself - Narrator / ... 29 episodes, 2010-2017
...
 Himself - Narrator / ... 25 episodes, 2004-2015
Edit

Storyline

A weekly documentary series, each episode providing an in-depth look at a different subject of scientific research. Subjects examined by this show have included the cutting edge of theoretical physics, a return to the Chernobyl nuclear reactor, the long-term effects of Amazon deforestation, and the development of life-saving medical techniques. Written by Jean-Marc Rocher <rocher@fiberbit.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Certificate:

TV-PG | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

3 March 1974 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Aux origines de l'humanité  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show more on  »

Technical Specs

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Referenced in Lake Placid (1999) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Pop Science
25 June 2010 | by See all my reviews

As a young person, Nova provided me with a means of easily understanding subjects of science which the average person found difficult to grasp. The program provided a nicely balanced version of popular science - not to difficult - not too easy. Each subject was carefully worked by the producers into a visually pleasing presentation that imparted a passable understanding. Then, I went to college again in mid-life to study engineering, science, and mathematics. As my understanding of the basics of physics and math began to grow, Nova began to reveal its weaknesses more and more. Rather than go into great detail about how this program is worked and simplified to ninth grade levels, I'll simply make a few observations. First it is science popularized and approved by an establishment that has in many respects perverted the very meaning of what science is supposed to represent. For a strong example of this problem, research the issue of fluoridation, and you will see how science can be manipulated by money and politics until a policy no longer services the best interests of the public it is supposed to protect. You'll find very limited or meaningless arguments and alternative explanations in a Nova presentation. Real science is not clean and simple like this program. It is complex and full of doubts and debate. You will never see any meaningful mathematical explanations either, but simple graphics repeated over and over in a beautiful pattern with a droning voice that teaches us very little. We are never challenged to think for ourselves. Controversial theories that could be presented by their most ardent proponents are very rare. Nothing brought this fact home to me more strongly than when Nova attempted to demonstrate the collapse theory of the World Trade Center from 9/11. The computer graphics were extremely simplified, and there was absolutely no doubt presented that the government's extremely flawed report had holes in it that were large enough to navigate a supernova through. Very little information was presented that made good, logical engineering sense when compared to the known facts. And, when I checked the source of the digital graphics from the program, the source turned out to be funded by an organization with an agenda that was far too closely attached to the Bush administration. This is not science. There was no mention of the alternative theory that the building exhibited every aspect known to occur when a structure is deliberately brought down by controlled demolition. Nothing was mentioned about the puzzling mystery of Building 7. I could present many other brazen examples of how Nova is edited into brutish simplicity by the selective hand of its editors and the National Science Foundation. But, I think you get the picture. So, before you give these programs a nine or ten rating, go do some deeper research concerning their subject matter, and make up your own theories concerning their cut and dried conclusions. Express doubt, consider the alternatives. Debate. This is what true science is about. Nova is good brain food for those who want everything explained to them with no doubts or challenge.

I'm proud to see that the majority who have read my review do not think it useful. Thank you for at least taking the time to read it. Now think about the science instead of your emotions. It's time to challenge NOVA to do a better job. And, I've noted of late that they seem to be doing a little better this year. Think. Challenge. Learn.


25 of 44 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?
Review this title | See all 5 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

What Is Katee Sackhoff Watching?

Katee Sackhoff shares her Watchlist and love for the CW drama "Reign" with "The IMDb Show." Plus, we take a look at the top 10 TV Shows of 2017.

Watch now