Nova (1974– )

TV Series  -  Documentary | Biography
8.4
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.4/10 from 846 users  
Reviews: 4 user | 7 critic

Science documentaries.

0Check in
0Share...

Watch Now

with Prime Instant Video + 1 more

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Exclusive Trailer

View the Foxcatcher Exclusive trailer with Steve Carell and Channing Tatum


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 35 titles
created 24 Apr 2012
 
a list of 48 titles
created 19 Dec 2012
 
a list of 23 titles
created 10 Apr 2013
 
list image
a list of 34 titles
created 5 months ago
 
a list of 39 titles
created 6 days ago
 

Related Items

Search for "Nova" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Nova (1974– )

Nova (1974– ) on IMDb 8.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Nova.

User Polls

Episodes

Next Episode


10 Sep 2014

Seasons


Years



Unknown   42   41   40   39   38   … See all »
Unknown   2014   2013   2012   … See all »
Won 1 Primetime Emmy. Another 8 wins & 27 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Nova ScienceNow (TV Series 2005)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.1/10 X  
Stars: Neil deGrasse Tyson, Ziya Tong, David Pogue
Frontline (TV Series 1983)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.4/10 X  

Investigative journalist documentaries.

Stars: Will Lyman, Arun Rath, Sarah Childress
Modern Marvels (TV Series 1994)
Documentary | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.3/10 X  

Fast-paced, fun and informative, Modern Marvels is The History Channel's signature series focusing on historical technology. The series has focused (among other things) on wonders of ... See full summary »

Stars: Lloyd Sherr, Harlan Saperstein, Franklin D. Roosevelt
The American Experience (TV Series 1988)
Documentary | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.1/10 X  

A series showcasing documentaries on American history.

Stars: David McCullough, David Ogden Stiers, Michael Murphy
The Fabric of the Cosmos (TV Series 2011)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.4/10 X  

Brian Greene takes us on a ride explaining the latest happenings in the world of Physics, and trying to explain What is Space, What is Time, The World of Quantum Physics and whether we live in Universe or a Multiverse.

Stars: David Albert, Raphael Bousso, Robert Cannon
Edit

Cast

Series cast summary:
...
 Himself - Narrator / ... (35 episodes, 2007-2014)
Lance Lewman ...
 Himself - Narrator / ... (24 episodes, 2004-2014)
...
 Narrator / ... (22 episodes, 2002-2008)
...
 Himself - Narrator (16 episodes, 1999-2009)
Edit

Storyline

A weekly documentary series, each episode providing an in-depth look at a different subject of scientific research. Subjects examined by this show have included the cutting edge of theoretical physics, a return to the Chernobyl nuclear reactor, the long-term effects of Amazon deforestation, and the development of life-saving medical techniques. Written by Jean-Marc Rocher <rocher@fiberbit.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

3 March 1974 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Aux origines de l'humanité  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Referenced in General Hospital: Episode #1.12655 (2012) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Pop Science
25 June 2010 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

As a young person, Nova provided me with a means of easily understanding subjects of science which the average person found difficult to grasp. The program provided a nicely balanced version of popular science - not to difficult - not too easy. Each subject was carefully worked by the producers into a visually pleasing presentation that imparted a passable understanding. Then, I went to college again in mid-life to study engineering, science, and mathematics. As my understanding of the basics of physics and math began to grow, Nova began to reveal its weaknesses more and more. Rather than go into great detail about how this program is worked and simplified to ninth grade levels, I'll simply make a few observations. First it is science popularized and approved by an establishment that has in many respects perverted the very meaning of what science is supposed to represent. For a strong example of this problem, research the issue of fluoridation, and you will see how science can be manipulated by money and politics until a policy no longer services the best interests of the public it is supposed to protect. You'll find very limited or meaningless arguments and alternative explanations in a Nova presentation. Real science is not clean and simple like this program. It is complex and full of doubts and debate. You will never see any meaningful mathematical explanations either, but simple graphics repeated over and over in a beautiful pattern with a droning voice that teaches us very little. We are never challenged to think for ourselves. Controversial theories that could be presented by their most ardent proponents are very rare. Nothing brought this fact home to me more strongly than when Nova attempted to demonstrate the collapse theory of the World Trade Center from 9/11. The computer graphics were extremely simplified, and there was absolutely no doubt presented that the government's extremely flawed report had holes in it that were large enough to navigate a supernova through. Very little information was presented that made good, logical engineering sense when compared to the known facts. And, when I checked the source of the digital graphics from the program, the source turned out to be funded by an organization with an agenda that was far too closely attached to the Bush administration. This is not science. There was no mention of the alternative theory that the building exhibited every aspect known to occur when a structure is deliberately brought down by controlled demolition. Nothing was mentioned about the puzzling mystery of Building 7. I could present many other brazen examples of how Nova is edited into brutish simplicity by the selective hand of its editors and the National Science Foundation. But, I think you get the picture. So, before you give these programs a nine or ten rating, go do some deeper research concerning their subject matter, and make up your own theories concerning their cut and dried conclusions. Express doubt, consider the alternatives. Debate. This is what true science is about. Nova is good brain food for those who want everything explained to them with no doubts or challenge.

I'm proud to see that the majority who have read my review do not think it useful. Thank you for at least taking the time to read it. Now think about the science instead of your emotions. It's time to challenge NOVA to do a better job. And, I've noted of late that they seem to be doing a little better this year. Think. Challenge. Learn.


15 of 24 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
DVD season boxed sets BARRON-5
B-29 episode? bellsauf
who used to narrate Nova? KubricksRube
NOVA Commercial superman1-3
NOVA LSD episode from 70s? eman6101
'Nova: What Darwin Never Knew' NukeLuke
Discuss Nova (1974) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?