| Index | 2 reviews in total |
0 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
What was the director and the movie studio thinking?, 23 April 2004
Author:
zzmale
The actual literal translation of the title of this movie is: Songs at
Midnight, the Sequel.
Well, the first and most important question one must ask is: What in the
world was the director and the movie studio thinking? Were they completely
out of their minds?
Giving the unsuccessful experience of the original, Songs at Midnight (Ye
Ban Ge Sheng) made four years earlier in 1937, anyone in their correct state
of mind would know that it would be extremely stupid to make sequel because
by 1941, the war was expanded and hence, much more horrible than when it was
in 1937, and not surprisingly, this movie resulted in the same fate like its
predecessor.
0 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
What was the director and the movie studio thinking?, 23 April 2004
Author:
zzmale
The actual literal translation of the title of this movie is: Songs at
Midnight, the Sequel.
Well, the first and most important question one must ask is: What in the
world was the director and the movie studio thinking? Were they completely
out of their minds?
Giving the unsuccessful experience of the original, Songs at Midnight (Ye
Ban Ge Sheng) made four years earlier in 1937, anyone in their correct state
of mind would know that it would be extremely stupid to make sequel because
by 1941, the war was expanded and hence, much more horrible than when it was
in 1937, and not surprisingly, this movie resulted in the same fate like its
predecessor.
| Ratings | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |