Covert Action (1988) Poster

(1988)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Covert Action is condemned to the lost video store shelf of history.
tarbosh2200012 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
When a senator who looks a lot like Jerry Seinfeld named Sen. Stumper (Stumper) begins the process of grilling Vietnam vet Frank White (Ingvordsen) in front of large audiences during a big congressional investigation, the heat is really on. Apparently, a Central American diplomat was shot by a sniper, and attention turned to White, even though a mysterious soldier/sniper named Rick Burns (Washburn) is heavily involved in a conspiracy that potentially could go all the way to the top. Through a series of flashbacks, we gradually get to the truth. But what will it all mean?

Even we're not sure why we keep watching these Ingvordsen-Washburn-Kaman movies. Perhaps it's because they were lesser-known contributions to video stores in the 80's and 90's, and there's something interesting about that. And some of them aren't that bad, like The Outfit (1993). So when we see one, we usually give it a try. Covert Action is a political drama with some action elements in the flashbacks. Some of the 'Nam battle scenes are okay, even though they don't have a lot of personality or pizazz, much like the rest of this outing. But still, there's the Prerequisite Torture of the hero. Who of course is shirtless. No one ever forgets that, unfortunately.

The action in this movie is indeed covert, as in, we couldn't really find it. But that didn't stop the filmmakers from recycling some footage into Cyber Vengeance (1997). Some of that footage even includes Senator Stumper, a guy whose real last name is Stumper. Apparently they couldn't let a name like that go to waste. (Even Rick Washburn plays "Rick Burns", apparently just taking out the wash and adding an S. Great.) But as previously noted, he looks alarmingly like Seinfeld, and you think at any moment you're going to hear some popping' bass and Stumper say "what's the deal with political corruption?"

So while the sniper subplot was mildly interesting, it can't really compare with higher-budget efforts like Sniper (1993) and Decoy (1995). Or, maybe it can. In all honesty, it could have competed, but characters weren't developed enough, which is surprising considering how talky the movie is overall. So despite some of the war-shooting and all that, Covert Action is ultimately old-fashioned, dry, and, sadly, boring. So if you want to see a political thriller/war movie on a low budget, by all means check it out. But its flaws are many. Some energy and character development would have worked wonders. But because those are largely not present, Covert Action is condemned to the lost video store shelf of history.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A routine recipe of familiar ingredients
dinky-411 March 2008
Movies that are twenty years old but have earned only one comment deserve more attention. In this case we have the usual "jungle commando adventure" wedded to the "corrupt Washington politics" plot. While testifying before a Congressional subcommittee, ex-Marine Lt. Frank White tells of a covert CIA operation designed to eliminate a drug ring operating in Central America. Scenes of White sparring with a venal and ambitious Congressman alternate with flashback scenes set in Central America -- scenes filled with gunfire and explosions. This arrangement is an efficient way to get the story across but action fans, at whom this movie seems to be aimed, may find the Washington scenes a bit tedious. Perhaps in recognition of this the movie ends with a chase-stalk-and-shootout sequence that is set in Washington rather than Central America but the sequence's degree of action and suspense don't justify its length. A continuing problem is that much of the plot hinges on the friendship between Frank White and sniper Rick Burns but this friendship is poorly developed and never very convincing. (White is played by J. Christian Ingvordsen who also directed and co-wrote the movie. He qualifies as an adequate leading man and he looks good with his shirt off.)

Remember those "macho" men's magazines with covers showing bound and bare-chested men being threatened by a beautiful Nazi babe wielding a whip? Fans of those magazines will enjoy this movie's Central American section wherein five American soldiers are captured and imprisoned by armed men working for the drug cartel. There are scenes of these prisoners, stripped to the waist and gleaming with sweat, being marched along hallways and down stairs, hands cupped behind heads. Occasionally they're tied up, arms stretched above their heads, and splashed with water. This culminates in a torture scene in which one bound man is punched in the gut, another one, seated in a chair, is given an electric shock, and a third is approached by a torturer carrying a hot iron. Before the hot iron can be applied to the prisoner's bare torso with an appropriate sizzling sound, however, the torturer is distracted -- and the audience is disappointed! For the record, the almost-scorched man is played by Spike Ryan.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Just Fun
MartinMaras14 October 2004
I have seen this movie maybe 12 or 13 years ago. It came back to my mind when I saw a TV documentary about snipers at the israelian army the other night. All I remember about this flick is: there is no emotion, no sympathy no nothing when you watch it. In Germany the title is "Hangmen 2" related to 1987's "Hangmen". Both titles are available on video only in Germany. You can imaging why. It's bad acting and you have to search the story by using enlarging glasses. But anyway: the atmosphere somehow is above the average of an ordinary low-budget action-flick. The music and the feeling of oppressiveness is something not many movies have. And: it's the best sniper-movie ever.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed