| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Index | 54 reviews in total |
21 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
A smart, funny comedy, 9 June 2005
![]()
Author:
hall895 from New Jersey
About Adam received new life after Kate Hudson became almost famous.
But while Hudson plays a key role this film is, quite literally, about
Adam, as played wonderfully by Stuart Townsend. The film begins with
young Irish singing waitress Lucy, as played by Hudson with an Irish
accent that comes and goes, meeting the mysterious Adam. She
immediately falls for him and their new romance proceeds happily along.
Lucy brings Adam home to meet the family and here things get turned on
their head. After seeing the story play out from Lucy's perspective we
go back and revisit the same time period from different points of view,
those of Lucy's two sisters and brother. It soon becomes apparent that
Adam is not quite what he seems and that he has become much closer to
Lucy's family than she would ever believe.
Frances O'Connor as the quiet, bookish Laura and Charlotte Bradley as
the unhappily married Alice will each strike up their own serious
relationship with Adam. As we see each of the sisters' stories unfold
it puts a new spin on all that we have seen before. Even Lucy's brother
finds himself oddly attracted to Adam while Lucy floats along
completely oblivious to all that is swirling around her. Each of the
key roles is performed well and enough time is given to allow us to
explore the motivations of each of these characters. If we didn't
really get to know these people and what drives them, everyone involved
could come off rather badly, especially Townsend's Adam. But the
director makes each character sympathetic enough and it all ties
together very well.
A clever script, mostly terrific acting, intriguing characters,
wonderful Irish scenery and a very smart plot device that adds a unique
twist to everything...About Adam has a lot going for it. It's a smart,
funny, enjoyable ride.
20 out of 26 people found the following review useful:
The Witches of Dun Laoghaire, 17 October 2000
![]()
Author:
hammy-3 from Cork, Ireland
In some ways this is an incredibly refreshing film. In it's acceptance
that
lust and promiscuity are normal facts of life and not something that lead
to
a lifetime of suffering and possibly eternal damnation, it's almost unique
in Irish cinematic history. Seeing a film so free from the historical and
religious baggage that shackles most Irish films can also be a bit
disconcerting, like seeing one of the nuns that taught you in school
wearing
a mini-skirt and fishnet tights.
Set far from the traditional Irish mise-en-scene in Dublin's trendy Temple
Bar area, it features Stuart Townsend as a benign Irish cousin to Jack
Nicholson in _The Witches of Eastwick_, who plays on the desires of three
beautiful sisters for his own ends. Far from being a scheming Casanova,
he's
a likeable character who does nothing more than tell a few tall tales to
aid
his seductive techniques, and who helps people come to terms with
themselves
rather than cosign them to a life of guilt by doing so.
This film is like Stembridges earlier film, Guiltrip, turned inside out.
It's bright, urban-based, modern, and shows signs that Ireland is finally
developing a mature attitude to Sexuality.
17 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
The truth about Adam..., 12 February 2001
![]()
Author:
Alice Liddel (-darragh@excite.com) from dublin, ireland
'About Adam' is a male counterpart to Gerry Stembridge's classic TV drama,
'the Truth about Clare', his innovative film about Ireland and abortion. In
that film, three characters tried to grope, through memories, prejudices,
egotism, blindness etc., the truth about the title character, a pregnant
woman who died following an abortion in England (it is still illegal in
Ireland); here, four characters try to capture the essence of the elusive
Adam, a jack of all relationships but mastered by none.
A knowledge of Stembridge's previous, more sober film gives this breezy
comedy a darker edge - its tale of a family being given everything they
sexually desire is an appropriate metaphor for a society like Ireland
currently going through an unheard-of economic boom, creating a culture of
extreme self-interest. The dangers of this self-interest are plain to see -
a few weeks ago another Stembridge TV satire was aired about Ireland's
racist treatment of refugees.
We have never had this much prosperity before, and we don't want anyone else
sharing it. Similarly, the last person this film is 'about' is Adam. Like
'Clare', the film is structured around the personal narratives of each
character involved with Adam - Lucy (Kate Hudson, and, I'm afraid, the hype
for once is spot-on - she IS adorable), the spontaneous, singing waitress
with a new boyfriend every week, who finally settles down to a 'great
passion'; Laura (Frances O'Conner - can there be any doubt now that she is
our finest actress?), the pretentious, uptight English post-grad doing a
thesis on repressed Victorian women writers who is 'loosened up' by Adam,
her assumptions revealed to be a lie; David, the brother, dating a prim
virgin, enlisting Adam's help and finding himself sexually attracted to him;
Alice, the elder sister, trapped in a prosperous marriage to a
pompous dullard, intrigued by Adam, but unwilling to lose control like her
siblings that easy.
Each narrative is tailored to each witness' personality (like 'Dracula', an
ironic allusion throughout), in the way each story is shaped; in the
stylistic devices employed; in tone; but, most importantly, in the
perception of Adam. 'Clare', for all its excellence, played to that age-old
myth, the mystery, inscrutability, unattainability, unknowability of woman.
'Adam', the first man, remorselessly documented throughout thousands of
years of masculine culture, is suddenly the mystery, the woman, the sphinx,
the passive black hole.
Adam (which may not even be his name) is the blank onto which the various
characters project their fantasies - he is literally what they want him to
be. Naturally, plot points overlap within the four stories, and our
interpretation of them changes with greater knowledge, but, paradoxically,
our knowledge of Adam diminishes, helped by the lies and stories he spins
about himself. Who is Adam? Besides the obvious pleasure of bedding three
beautiful women, why does he do it? In fact, forget that 'besides', that's
probably your answer.
As well as alluding to his own work, Stembridge cleverly remodels two other
classics of sexual amorphousness. Like Terence Stamp in Pasolini's
'Theorem', Adam is a stranger who enters a bourgeois household where
everyone has a stereotypical role they adhere to, and which Adam smashes,
forcing them to review their lives and the assumptions they live by. This
has a liberating effect, but also a joyful one - this is a remarkably
angst-free film. With his blank good looks, his white suit, and bleached
blonde crop, Stuart Townsend (hi Celia!) is a ringer for the young Stamp.
The other allusion is to 'Alfie', that freewheelingly amoral sexual cad,
lying his way through a score of beautiful women. Except Adam is the
anti-Alfie, he does not humiliate or diminish women, they're the ones who
develop; and he lacks the controlling power of narration; but he does limit
them, reducing them to 'mere' sexual urge.
Significantly, both these films were key artefacts of the 1960s, and there
is an optimism, a freshness, a vigour, a lightness to 'About Adam' that
resembles the swinging 60s, as if Ireland, belatedly, has entered its own
hedonistic decade. Both films, equally significantly, were warnings or
analyses of that decade's fatal complacency, and in the exhilerating shots
of Dublin that dot the film we cannot fail to notice the looming cranes, the
building activity that suggests this story isn't quite finished, this
culture hasn't quite reached maturity.
9 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Erin Go Bragh?, 5 July 2003
![]()
Author:
B24 from Arizona
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Whatever happened to the real Ireland we know so well from all those
Hollywood films of yore? Barry Fitzgerald, or at least his ghost, is
nowhere to be seen in this hip little tale. And not a sound from Bing
Crosby. Nor any nuns nor IRA types nor leprechauns nor prelates seducing
altar boys. I thought "Angela's Ashes" had brought us up to date on Irish
history, but, my goodness, just look how things have changed on the Emerald
Isle!
All facetiousness aside, some of the comments written here by Irish viewers
are impressively insightful and full of true reflections that could as well
have been made years ago about life in that tiny country. That this film
comes out of a modern and progressive (to some extent at least) culture is
obvious,and no Irishman need labor over an apologia to that effect. One
must remember that these same streets were known to James Joyce and Jonathan
Swift.
As to the film itself, only a fool could take it seriously. It is a
one-note "spoiler" from beginning to end, with no true center by way of an
intriguing plot. The shifts back and forth in time to suggest multiple
points of view have indeed been done before in much better films than this.
The characters are apt and comely, but with little depth. Romantic comedy
needs an edge, as well as some surprises, to make it go the distance.
Everything here is just too likeable.
Hmmm. I guess the same thing might be said of Barry Fitzgerald.
11 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Irish Urban Myths, 30 December 2003
![]()
Author:
James Hitchcock from Tunbridge Wells, England
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Possible Spoilers
Most films about Ireland are about either the Troubles, or the Catholic
Church, or a crowd of loveable, happy-go-lucky rustics, so it comes as
something of a surprise to find an Irish film set in middle-class Dublin
with very little mention of religion and none at all of sectarian
violence.
Indeed, there is so little specifically Irish about this film that with a
change of accent it could easily be relocated to London, New York or Los
Angeles.
The film is told in a number of episodes, each seen from the point of view
of a different character. The central character, Adam, is a handsome,
charming young man who is engaged to a waitress named Lucy but
nevertheless
seduces not only Lucy herself but also her two sisters Laura and Alice and
her brother's girlfriend Karen, and comes close to seducing the brother
himself.
A plot like this could easily be the stuff of tragedy, but here it is
treated strictly as a comedy. Unfortunately, it veers between two
different
comic genres, the romantic comedy and the sex comedy, with any humour
there
might be getting lost somewhere between the two. On the one hand, Adam is
a
promiscuous womaniser; on the other, he is the romantic gallant who wins
Lucy's hand. The director and scriptwriter try to get round this
contradiction by presenting Adam's behaviour not as exploitative but
rather
as liberating for the women concerned. The bookish academic Laura, the
unhappily married Alice and the prim, virginal Karen are all shown as
benefiting from their sexual experiences, nobody gets hurt, and all ends
happily with a big white wedding.
For all its modern urban setting, this film is about as realistic as one
of
Grimm's fairy tales. It is set in a fantasy world where everyone is
good-looking, where jealousy does not exist, where sex (especially
promiscuous sex) is an unqualified force for good, where a man can bed
every
woman he meets and still end up marrying the girl of his dreams, and where
a
woman's surest way to find happiness is to get laid (preferably by Adam).
And leprechauns exist and there really is a pot of gold at the end of
every
rainbow. If you like urban legends about knights on white chargers (or
pale
blue E-types) bringing sexual happiness to womankind, you will love this
film. I am afraid it did nothing for me. 4/10.
11 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Scenes from real life?, 16 August 2001
Author:
penseur from Wellington
On the face of it, it seems a little much that a no doubt sexy guy will attract females like a magnet including three sisters, one of their brother's girlfriend - and the brother - but it could well happen I guess. That in essence is roughly the plot, so if that appeals you'll probably like the film - it's reasonably well cast, adequately acted, nicely filmed and moves along at a fast pace. But if that plotline sounds too superficial, you can't stand seeing an E-type jaguar painted pale blue and aren't overly excited by Dublin as a setting, then you'll probably find it a bit ho hum. The promise of lots of appealing sex scenes will also be disappointing - certainly there is some action in that department but filmed very prudishly. However, Irish films are a rarity so that may be enough in itself to tempt a viewing.
10 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Impressive - Quality & Entertaining Show!, 20 January 2001
![]()
Author:
alenia from Cork, Ireland
I plodded toward the multiplex against my will, my girlfriend dragging me along as we went. '...but whyyy???' I moaned. 'Shut up with ya, we're going to see it, ya big ejit!' my girlfriend snapped. My reluctance to see 'About Adam' was based on previous experiences of experiencing Irish-made films, they were all the same - poor little, thatched cottage family living in repressed little ol' Ireland in the midst of poverty - boring! However, I actually really enjoyed 'About Adam' - with proper distribution and promotion - this could be a huge hit across Europe and the USA. 'About Adam', for a thankful change, shows Ireland how it really is - modern, stylish and prosperous. The people in the film aren't weeping throughout the entire film because their potato patch is unproductive, they are just like ordinary, modern Irish people - well, we don't all go sh**ging our fiance's entire family - but other than that it's real. The film is very witty and entertaining, if only a little slow at some parts. Kate Hudson has a surprisingly good Irish accent and Stuart Townsend is a well-cast star with a bright film throughout the film industry, here and abroad. 'About Adam' is a very positive and encouraging leap forward for the Irish film industry and is an example of how more Irish films should be made in the future - we're sick of dwelling in the past - it's the positive present and bright future people want to see. 'About Adam' bears more of a resemblance to 'American Pie' and 'Road Trip' than to 'The Field' and other such films. All in all, a good show. I encourage all, European, American, Australian etc, to see this film - not just because I'm Irish, but because it is a genuinely enjoyable, funny movie.
10 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Talk about a male fantasy!, 6 March 2005
![]()
Author:
Lauren-39 from New York
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Give me a break! In what world does this director/writer live in? If
anyone, after seeing this dribble, thinks it's a charming romantic
comedy, then try a little role reversal and see if you still think it
is. A woman, no matter how lovely her eyes may be, who sleeps with her
fiancé's two brothers (one just half an hour before her wedding) would
be deemed a whore and a slut. Not to mention that he's a pathological
liar, to boot! How did this film get made?
Maybe the backers thought an Irish film that wasn't about the Catholic
Church or about the Catholic Protestant "troubles", would be
refreshing, but please, this movie was hogwash from beginning to end.
Kate Hudson, Stuart Townsend, Frances O'Connor and Charlotte Bradley
made a valiant effort to make this screenplay work, but it was DOA..
Do yourself a favor, steer clear of this one. It' not worth anyone's
time. I just hope the actors got paid well.
4 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Better than I thought!!!!!!!, 21 March 2003
Author:
sherrie shaw from texas
The reason I say that is because I like the way they give different perspectives of several different scenes as seen by the different characters in the movie. I really like Stewart Townsend (he's one of those adorable people that are charismatic not to mention easy on the eyes). This is definitely NOT a cinematic masterpiece but I don't think it was meant to be either. It was entertaining and THAT's what I liked about it. Well, that and Stewart Townsend but I think I already mentioned that. Didn't sound like many people liked this one but I have to disagree. It's fun, sexy, flirtatious,and comedic all in one movie. Give it a chance and watch it again or for the first time, whichever the case may be.
7 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
a comedy that doesn't deliver, 3 April 2002
![]()
Author:
vivesi (vivesi@aol.com) from SC, USA
This film promised a bit more than it delivered. I never laughed out loud
and didn't find it particularly witty. The character, Adam, is intriguing,
but in the end, he remains a cipher, lacking any depth or even comedic
exploration of character. Perhaps I'm picky, but I also prefer movies that
employ actors from the character's country. For instance, hearing Kate
Hudson's unsuccessful accent attempts threw me right out of the movie
several times. The real jewel of this film is the all-too-brief performance
of Charlotte Bradley. That she portrayed nuances in character in this
otherwise fluff of a film is remarkable.
| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Plot summary | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| Awards | Newsgroup reviews | External reviews |
| Parents Guide | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |