| Index | 4 reviews in total |
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Good characters add to the enjoyment, 22 June 2001
![]()
Author:
Cylex from England
A monster is terrorising the city. Fievel and Nellie Brie, a brilliant
news
reporter, set out to discover the truth. Tiger and Tony lend a
paw.
I loved the villain, a psychotic poodle named Madame Mousey and also the
banter between Nellie and her boss, Reed. Tiger has good moments too. The
characterisation is what makes this sequel a success. The previous one,
Treasure of Manhattan, fell down on this.
I like the songs in this film. You can't hum them afterwards but that
doesn't mean they're necessarily bad.
Don't let the third film put you off. There's a lot of enjoyment to be had
here for young and old.
8/10
3 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Wholly disposable kid fodder., 24 August 2000
![]()
Author:
GazHack from Bolton, England
While this film is not as teeth gratingly bad as "The Treasure of Manhattan Island", this straight to video story hopefully marks the end of the Fieval franchise. Without the luxurious artwork or star vocals of the cinema films, the blandness of the regulars is all too obvious. There's a small respite for older viewers in the newspaper office scenes because they are based on films such as "His Girl Friday" but the wit isn't sharp enough to cut mozzorella. Oh yes, most of the characters are named after cheeses (ho ho!) As with all video sequels to cartoons, the songs are hopeless pastiches of the Disney formula and I was forgetting them mid-song. The mystery of the title manages to be sub Scooby Doo in its simplicity. In short, only watch this film if its a choice between this or its predecessor.
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Sorry I found it too simplistic to enjoy it, 8 June 2010
![]()
Author:
TheLittleSongbird from United Kingdom
So are there any redeeming qualities? The voice acting is pretty good
with what they have, the villainess Madame Mousey was an enjoyable
character(Cat R.Waul is my favourite American Tail villain though) and
the film moves quickly. However, An American Tail:The Mystery of the
Night Monster is not good at all for a sequel I feel, and I also feel
it is the worst of the American Tail franchise,the best of course being
the original. There are several reasons why I found this so.
One was the very simplistic story, that not only took a while to get
going but was very predictable as well. Secondly, the songs are
completely disposable, none of them memorable in any way. Thirdly, the
script is incredibly juvenile and make you grit your teeth in its sheer
banality. Fourthly, the animation is not good, at all, instead it is
very flat with choppy editing. Fifthly, the characters don't have their
likability any more, Fieval is now more annoying in alternative to
sweet, and Tiger is no longer funny despite the fact that the late Dom
DeLuise voices him. Sixthly, the ending is a real let-down, very rushed
I felt.
Overall, not absolutely awful, but forgettable and charmless. 3/10 for
the voice acting and villainess. Bethany Cox
1 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
another not a bad movie, 31 October 2003
![]()
Author:
ross robinson from england
An American Tail 4: The Mystery of the Night Monster: This movie was made in 2000, this is the 4th an american tail movie out of the series. So far there has not been anymore an american tail movies yet. But i hope there will be more after 3 years (2000 - 2003) I have loved an american tail just as much as the land before time. in it's 17 years an american tail has produced 4 movies and the land before time has produced 10 movies in it's 15th year and yet there is more to come for the land before time, but what will be in store for an american tail. We'll have to find that out in the future. I give An American Tail 4: The mystery of the Night Monster a good score 8 out 10.
| Amazon.com summary | Ratings | Awards |
| External reviews | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |