Inherit the Wind (TV 1999)Based on a real-life case in 1925, two great lawyers argue the case for and against a science teacher accused of the crime of teaching evolution. Director:Daniel Petrie |
|
| 0Share... |
Inherit the Wind (TV 1999)Based on a real-life case in 1925, two great lawyers argue the case for and against a science teacher accused of the crime of teaching evolution. Director:Daniel Petrie |
|
| 0Share... |
| Credited cast: | |||
| Jack Lemmon | ... | ||
| George C. Scott | ... | ||
| David Wells | ... | ||
| Beau Bridges | ... | ||
| Tom Everett Scott | ... | ||
| John Cullum | ... | ||
| Kathryn Morris | ... | ||
|
|
Lane Smith | ... | |
| Brad Greenquist | ... | ||
| Piper Laurie | ... | ||
| Peter Mackenzie | ... | ||
| Jim Meskimen | ... |
Sauber
|
|
| Rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
| Royce D. Applegate | ... | ||
| Twyla Banks | ... |
Girl in Parade /
Student
|
|
| Dirk Blocker | ... |
Sheriff Sam Gibson
|
|
This is another re-enactment of the play about the trial in 1925 of a school teacher who dared to teach Darwinian theory in his classroom. He did this as a consequence of one of his student's request to know... The student was a lad named 'Stebbins', and the trial (dubbed the 'Monkey Trial') pitted the great attorney of the day, Clarence Darrow, against the often running presidential candidate, and famous orator, William Jennings Bryan. Written by BOB STEBBINS <stebinsbob@aol.com>
The movie epitomizes what civilized debate can and should be. There are scintillating performances from Lemmon and Scott, and some very quotable lines as well. The courtroom atmosphere is well created and tension is never allowed to slack. Perhaps the most eloquent testimony paid on screen from a protagonist to his antagonist comes in the closing scenes. Although it is supposed to be based on the Scopes Monkey Trial, the closing credits state that the movie is a work of fiction. The movie raises many questions about the longstanding impasse between religion and science, between faith and reason. In a strange way, it does not conclusively resolve these issues but rather allows the viewer to decide for herself or himself. It will echo in your mind long after you have viewed it. Heartily recommended.